Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2008, Article ID 309760, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/309760
Review Article

Open Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Small Renal Masses

1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340 Izmir, Turkey
21st Urology Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, 06520 Ankara, Turkey

Received 14 February 2008; Accepted 23 April 2008

Academic Editor: J. Rubio

Copyright © 2008 Ziya Kirkali and A. Erdem Canda. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Jacqmin, H. van Poppel, Z. Kirkali, and G. Mickisch, “Renal cancer,” European Urology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 361–369, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Z. Kirkali and C. Öbek, “Clinical aspects of renal cell carcinoma,” EAU Update Series, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 189–196, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. Kirkali, E. Tuzel, and M. U. Mungan, “Recent advances in kidney cancer and metastatic disease,” BJU International, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 818–824, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Z. Kirkali and K. Yorukoglu, “Premalignant lesions in the kidney,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 1, pp. 855–867, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Pehlivan, M. Koyuncuoglu, M. Pehlivan et al., “Premalignant lesions of the kidney share the same genetics changes as conventional renal cell carcinoma,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 120–123, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Z. Kirkali and M. Lekili, “Renal cell carcinoma: new prognostic factors?” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 433–438, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. E. Canda, M. O. Sahin, E. Tuzel et al., “Significance of incidental renal cell carcinoma,” Turkish Journal of Ecopathology, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 105–109, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  8. Z. Kirkali, “The future of oncological urology in Europe: are we prepared?” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 11–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. B. C. Leibovich, M. L. Blute, J. C. Cheville, C. M. Lohse, A. L. Weaver, and H. Zincke, “Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1066–1070, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. J. Robson, “Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 89, pp. 37–42, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Russo, “Open partial nephrectomy: an essential operation with an expanding role,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 309–315, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. Z. Kirkali, “The motion: open partial nephrectomy is the standard of care for small resectable solid renal masses,” European Urology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 561–564, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. E. Canda and Z. Kirkali, “Current management of renal cell carcinoma and targeted therapy,” Urology Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Vander Eeckt, S. Joniau, and H. van Poppel, “Open surgery for localized RCC,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 7, pp. 742–752, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. E. Czerny, “Cited by Herczele: Ueber Nierenexstirpation,” Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora von China, vol. 6, pp. 484–486, 1890. View at Google Scholar
  16. V. Vermooten, “Indications for conservative surgery in certain renal tumors: a study based on the growth pattern of the cell carcinoma,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 64, pp. 200–208, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. L. Ramírez and C. P. Evans, “Current management of small renal masses,” The Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 14, supplement 1, pp. 39–47, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  18. J.-J. Patard, O. Shvarts, J. S. Lam et al., “Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 6, part 1, pp. 2181–2185, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. W. Herr, “A history of partial nephrectomy for renal tumors,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 705–708, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Guinan, L. H. Sobin, F. Algaba et al., “TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup No. 3,” Cancer, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 992–993, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. Z. Kirkali and H. van Poppel, “Developments in organ preserving treatments for renal cell cancer: open surgery,” European Urology Supplements, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 9–13, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. J. Stephenson, A. A. Hakimi, M. E. Snyder, and P. Russo, “Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 130–134, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. H. van Poppel, L. Da Pozzo, W. Albrecht et al., “A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma,” European Urology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1606–1615, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. McKiernan, R. Simmons, J. Katz, and P. Russo, “Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy,” Urology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 816–820, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. W. K. Lau, M. L. Blute, A. L. Weaver, V. E. Torres, and H. Zincke, “Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1236–1242, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  26. K. S. Hafez, A. F. Fergany, and A. C. Novick, “Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 1930–1933, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. C. T. Lee, J. Katz, W. Shi, H. T. Thaler, V. E. Reuter, and P. Russo, “Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. Or less in a contemporary cohort,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 730–736, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. B. C. Leibovich, M. L. Blute, J. C. Cheville et al., “Nephron sparing surgery for approximately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 an 7?cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1066–1070, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. F. Becker, S. Siemer, M. Hack, U. Humke, M. Ziegler, and M. Stöckle, “Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1058–1064, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. I. S. Gill, S. F. Matin, M. M. Desai et al., “Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 64–68, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. M. Crepel, J.-C. Bernhard, L. Bellec et al., “Comparison of open and laparoscopie partial nephrectomy : a French multicentre experience,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Häcker, A. Albadour, W. Jauker et al., “Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumours: acceleration and facilitation of the laparoscopic technique,” European Urology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 358–365, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. G.-P. Haber and I. S. Gill, “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 660–665, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. F. Fergany, K. S. Hafez, and A. C. Novick, “Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 442–445, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. H. van Poppel, B. Bamelis, R. Oyen, and L. Baert, “Partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma can achieve long-term tumor control,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 160, no. 3, part 1, pp. 674–678, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H. W. Herr, “Partial nephrectomy for unilateral renal carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney: 10-year followup,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 33–35, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. F. Fergany, I. R. Saad, L. Woo, and A. C. Novick, “Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 175, no. 5, pp. 1630–1633, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. F. Becker, S. Siemer, U. Humke, M. Hack, M. Ziegler, and M. Stöckle, “Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival data of 216 patients,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 308–313, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. C. Campbell and A. C. Novick, “Surgical technique and morbidity of elective partial nephrectomy,” Seminars in Urologic Oncology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 281–287, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  40. H. van Poppel and L. Baert, “Elective conservative surgery for renal cell carcinoma,” AUA Update Series, vol. 13, pp. 246–251, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. R. Licht, A. C. Novick, and M. Goormastic, “Nephron sparing surgery in incidental versus suspected renal cell carcinoma,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  42. P. Dal Cin, H. van Poppel, B. van Damme, L. Baert, and H. van den Berghe, “Cytogenetic investigation of synchronous bilateral renal tumors,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. H. van Poppel, F. Deroo, and S. Joniau, “Open surgical treatment of localized renal cell cancer,” EAU Update Series, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 220–225, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. F. Becker, S. Siemer, M. Hack, U. Humke, M. Ziegler, and M. Stöckle, “Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1058–1064, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. M. O. Sahin, A. E. Canda, M. U. Mungan, Z. Kirkali, and M. Sade, “Benign lesions underwent radical nephrectomy for renal cancer,” Turkish Journal of Urology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 405–409, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  46. B. R. Herts and M. E. Baker, “The current role of percutaneeous biopsy in the enucleation of renal mases,” Seminar Urologic Oncology, vol. 13, pp. 254–261, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  47. H. Goethuys, H. van Poppel, R. Oyen, and L. Baert, “The case against fine-needle aspiration cytology for small solid kidney tumors,” European Urology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 284–287, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  48. A. C. Novick, “Surgery of the kidney,” in Campbell's Urology, P. Walsh, A. L. Retik, E. D. Vaugman, and A. J. Wein, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 3571–3640, Saunders, New York, NY, USA, 8th edition, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  49. A. C. Novick, “Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 53, pp. 393–407, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. T. McHale, S. B. Malkowicz, J. E. Tomaszewski, and E. M. Genega, “Potential pitfalls in the frozen section evaluation of parenchymal margins in nephron-sparing surgery,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 903–910, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. H. van Poppel, “The optimal margins in nephron-sparing surgery,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 227–228, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. Q.-L. Li, H.-W. Guan, Q.-P. Zhang, L.-Z. Zhang, F.-P. Wang, and Y.-J. Liu, “Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less,” European Urology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 448–451, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. H. van Poppel, B. Bamelis, and L. Baert, “Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma,” EAU Update Series, vol. 6, pp. 8–12, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  54. N. Y. Piper, J. T. Bishoff, C. Magee et al., “Is a 1-cm margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma?” Urology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 849–852, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. C. B. Dechet, M. L. Blute, and H. Zincke, “Nephron-preserving surgery for unilateral renal cell carcinoma: which pathologic variables contribute to contralateral renal tumor recurrence?” The Journal of Urology, vol. 159, supplement, p. 169, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  56. A. H. Bani-Hani, B. C. Leibovich, C. M. Lohse, J. C. Cheville, H. Zincke, and M. L. Blute, “Associations with contralateral recurrence following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma using a cohort of 2,352 patients,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 391–394, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. M. E. Allaf, S. B. Bhayani, C. Rogers et al., “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 871–873, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. I. S. Gill, M. M. Desai, J. H. Kaouk et al., “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 167, no. 2, part 1, pp. 469–475, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. F. Steinbach, M. Stöckle, and R. Hohenfellner, “Current controversies in nephron-sparing surgery for renal-cell carcinoma,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 163–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. J. Rassweiler, C. Abbou, G. Janetschek, and K. Jeschke, “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy the European experience,” Urologic Clinics of North America, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 721–736, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. Moinzadeh, I. S. Gill, A. Finelli, J. Kaouk, and M. Desai, “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: 3-year followup,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 459–462, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. B. R. Lane and I. S. Gill, “5-year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 70–74, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. S. Siemer, S. Lahme, S. Altziebler et al., “Efficacy and safety of tachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumor resection: a randomised prospective study,” European Urology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1156–1163, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. A. H. Wille, M. Tüllmann, J. Roigas, S. A. Loening, and S. Deger, “Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in renal cell cancer—results and reproducibility by different surgeons in a high volume laparoscopic center,” European Urology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 337–342, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. E. Kouba, C. Tornehl, J. Lavelle, E. Wallen, and R. S. Pruthi, “Partial nephrectomy with fibrin glue repair: measurement of vascular and pelvicaliceal hydrodynamic bond integrity in a live and abbatoir porcine model,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 326–330, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. I. S. Gill, “Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery,” Urologic Clinics of North America, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 551–579, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. A. P. Ramani, M. M. Desai, A. P. Steinberg et al., “Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. A. Cicco, L. Salomon, H. Hoznek et al., “Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy,” European Urology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 606–612, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar