Review Article

The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis

Table 1

Prevalence of HPV at different anatomical sites for circumcised and uncircumcised men in various studies in different countries.
(a) CastellsaguΓ© et al. (2002) [45]: Spain, Columbia, Brazil, Thailand, Philippines; 26% were aged ≀37, 57% were 38–56, 25% were β‰₯57 years

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 3 7 0 )( 𝑛 = 1 5 4 3 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans, coronal sulcus
Any HPV5.5%19.6%0.37 (0.16–0.85)

(b) Svare et al. (2002) [54]: Copenhagen, Sweden, STI clinic

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 2 )( 𝑛 = 1 1 2 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans, coronal sulcus,
Shaft, scrotum
Any HPV9%21%0.20 (0.06–0.60)

(c) Baldwin et al. (2004) [44]: Tucson, Arizona, STI clinic, 42% white (non-Hispanic), 39% Hispanic, 19% indigenous, Pacific Islander or Asian, age 18–70, 90% heterosexual, 82% single, condom users had 79% lower high-risk HPV and 42% higher low-risk HPV

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 3 2 )( 𝑛 = 8 9 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans, coronal sulcus,
urethral meatus
Any HPV19.8%41.1%0.34 (0.20–0.57)
High-risk7.8%18.8%0.44 (0.22–0.90)
Low-risk12.1%22.3%0.44 (0.23–0.81)

(d) Weaver et al. (2004) [58]: Seattle, university students, aged 18–25, 81% white, 6% Asian, 3% African American, 2% Latino, 8% other, 97%  β-globin DNA-positive

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 3 3 )( 𝑛 = 8 4 )OR (95% CI)
GlansAny HPV17%32%Not shown
All sitesAny HPV31%29%0.95 (0.50–1.79; NS)

(e) Shin et al. (2004) [52]: South Korea, university students, 46% had β‰₯4 sex partners

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 9 6 )( 𝑛 = 4 0 )OR (95% CI)
Coronal sulcus, meatus,
shaft, scrotum
Any HPV7.0%8.9%1.8 (0.4–8.2; NS)

(f) Lajous et al. (2005) [48]: Mexico City, soldiers, age 16–40 (av. 23), average 3 sex partners. condom use with prostitutes did not affect HPV prevalence

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 9 5 )( 𝑛 = 8 3 0 )AOR (95% CI)
Coronal sulcus, meatus,
shaft, scrotum
Any HPV29.5%44.0%0.48 (0.30–0.77)

(g) Vaccarella et al. (2006) [57]: Mexico, 27 public vasectomy clinics in 14 states, average age 34 years, HPV was 60% less for condom users with regular partners and 90% less with sex workers, high-risk and low-risk HPV stated as similar within each of circumcised and uncircumcised

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 4 7 )( 𝑛 = 5 3 2 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans/coronal sulcus,
Meatus, shaft, scrotum
Any HPV2.4%11.7%0.20 (0.10–0.40)

(h) Partridge et al. (2007) [51]: Seattle, university students, age 18–20, white 85%, Asian/Pacific Islander 8.3%, other 7.1%, unmarried

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 1 8 4 )( 𝑛 = 5 6 )HR (95% CI)
Glans, shaft, scrotum1.2/100PY1.7/100PY1.1 (0.6–2.0; NS)

(i) Hernandez et al. (2008) [59]: Hawaii, university population, most white, single, average age 29, 77% heterosexual, 53% had had β‰₯6 female sex partners, 50% used condoms, all HIV-negative

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 9 9 )( 𝑛 = 8 0 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans/coronal sulcus
Any HPV29%46%0.51 (0.27–0.97)
High-risk16%31%0.40 (0.18–0.90)
Low-risk22%39%0.51 (0.25–1.08)
Multiple12%39%0.28 (0.12–0.67)
Shaft
Any HPV50%60%0.63 (0.42–1.22)
High-risk34%38%0.70 (0.32–1.52)
Low-risk45%56%0.59 (0.30–1.16)
Multiple30%36%0.57 (0.26–1.28)
Urine
Any HPV8%16%0.31 (0.08–1.16)
High-risk1%3%0.18 (0.004–7.69)
Low-risk7%16%0.28 (0.07–1.10)
Multiple1%0%β€”
Semen
Any HPV6%5%1.09 (0.17–7.14)
High-risk2%0%β€”
Low-risk6%5%0.86 (0.13–5.88)
Multiple1%0%β€”
Scrotum
Any HPV40%40%0.82 (0.43–25.0)
High-risk20%20%0.69 (0.33–2.38)
Low-risk33%35%0.69 (0.33–1.43)
Multiple14%19%0.53 (0.21–1.33)
External penis
Any HPV57%67%0.58 (0.30–1.14)
High-risk25%23%0.82 (0.28–2.38)
Low-risk30%36%0.61 (0.25–1.47)
Any20%23%0.52 (0.17–1.56)
Any site
Any HPV78%83%0.49 (0.19–1.28)
High-risk55%58%0.38 (0.11–1.28)
Low-risk61%67%0.42 (0.14–1.25)
Multiple39%41%0.35 (0.09–1.43)

(j) Nielson et al. (2009) [49]: Tucson and Tampa, aged 18–40, circumcised participants: white 76%, Indigenous 6%, black 1%, Asian/Pacific Islander 2%, other 4%; >6 sex partners 65%, condom use ≀ half = 56%, sex with partner with abnormal pap smear 26% for circumcised, 11% for uncircumcised

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 3 8 9 )( 𝑛 = 7 4 )AOR (95% CI)
Glans/coronal sulcus
Any HPV29.8%35.2%0.44 (0.23–0.82)
High-risk13.9%18.3%0.47 (0.22–0.99)
Low-risk15.8%16.9%0.62 (0.29–1.29)
Shaft
Any HPV40.2%40.9%0.53 (0.28–0.99)
High-risk21.2%25.4%0.50 (0.25–1.00)
Low-risk19.1%15.9%0.85 (0.40–1.80)
Scrotum
Any HPV25.9%24.3%0.73 (0.37–1.44)
High-risk12.9%12.9%0.68 (0.29–2.06)
Low-risk12.9%11.4%0.86 (0.36–2.06)
Urethra
Any HPV7.8%14.9%0.17 (0.05–0.56)
High-risk3.9%2.1%1.24 (0.14–10.8)
Low-risk3.9%12.8%0.04 (0.01–0.23)
Semen
Any HPV4.2%7.1%0.48 (0.12–1.96)
High-risk3.1%3.6%0.41 (0.10–2.78)
Low-risk1.1%3.6%0.41 (0.03–5.07)
Any site
Any HPV51.2%51.4%0.53 (0.28–0.99)
High-risk28.8%31.2%0.56 (0.30–1.06)
Low-risk22.4%20.3%0.84 (0.43–1.67)

(k) Giuliano et al. (2009) [46]: USA (34%), Mexico (32%), Brazil (35%); age 18–70 (av. 32), 66% had >1 sex partner in past 3 months, 9% had had sex with male, condom use: always 20%, sometimes 32%. The respective OR became 0.70 (0.52–0.94), 0.70 (0.50–0.97), and 0.63 (0.42–0.93) after multivariate analysis

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 5 9 0 )( 𝑛 = 3 9 8 )OR (95% CI)
Coronal sulcus, shaft, under foreskin, scrotum (all Ξ²-globin DNA-positive)
Any HPV54.8%62.2%0.97 (0.68–1.39)
High-risk41.8%49.2%0.93 (0.63–1.33)
Low-risk33.1%40.4%1.15 (0.74–1.79)

(l) Auvert et al. (2009) [43]: RCT, South Africa, Black, age 18–24, average 4 lifetime sex partners, consistent condom use 25%, 5% HIV-positive

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

(643)(621)PRR (95% CI)
Urethra
High-risk14.0%23.2%0.60 (0.46–0.79)
Multiple high-risk4.2%9.9%0.43 (0.28–0.66)

(m) Tobian et al. (2009) [55]: Rakai 1 RCT, Kenya; age 15–49 years; only Ξ²-globin positive samples

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 3 0 7 )( 𝑛 = 3 0 2 )RR (95% CI)
Glans/coronal sulcus
All HPV35.6%51.2%0.70 (0.53–0.91)
High-risk18.0%27.9%0.65 (0.46–0.90)
Low-risk26.2%39.4%0.66 (0.49–0.91)
Multiple4.3%12.2%0.35 (0.17–0.71)

(n) Gray et al. (2010) [47]: Rakai, Uganda; RCT; age 15–24 (22%), 25–35 (51%), >35 (26%); condom use (35%), >1 sex partners 42%; HPV at enrolment (39%); data for 24 months: after circumcision

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 4 4 1 )( 𝑛 = 3 9 9 )IRR (95% CI)
Glans/coronal sulcus
Any high-risk HPV19.7%29.4%0.67 (0.50–0.90)
Single new high-risk HPV12.9%15.6%0.89 (0.60–1.30)
Multiple new high-risk HPV 6.7%14.8%0.45 (0.28–0.73)
HPV163.6/100PYs4.8/100PYs0.75 (0.38–1.51)
HPV181.6/100PYs5.3/100PYs0.30 (0.12–0.75)
HPV311.6/100PYs2.2/100PYs0.74 (0.27–2.05)
HPV330.5/100PYs3.1/100PYs0.17 (0.04–0.76)
HPV351.9/100PYs3.7/100PYs0.50 (0.21–1.21)
(Condom use)22/100PYs32/100PYs0.68 (0.43–1.09)

(o) Tobian et al. (2011) [56]: Rakai, rural Uganda, RCT, age 15–49, consistent condom use 16%, HPV test at 12 months after circumcision, only Ξ²-globin DNA positive samples included, high-risk HPV significantly higher on coronal sulcus than on shaft

SiteHPVCircumcisedUncircumcised

( 𝑛 = 2 3 1 )( 𝑛 = 2 2 8 )APR (95% CI)
Coronal sulcus
Any high-risk HPV21.5%36.3%0.57 (0.39–0.84)
Multiple high-risk7.4%10.5%0.71 (0.33–1.52)
Shaft
Any high-risk HPV15.5%23.8%0.66 (0.39–1.12)
Multiple high-risk HPV1.7%3.8%0.45 (0.09–2.27)

OR: odds ratio; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; NS: not significant; RR: risk ratio; PPR: prevalence risk ratio; HR: hazard ratio, 100PY: 100 person years.