|
| Study | Pts
(No.) | Mean/med
f/u (mo) | Pre-op continence
(mean/med) | Success def | Success
(%) | Improved (%) | No improvement
(%) | Complications
(%) | Notes |
|
| Romano et al. [45] | 48 | 45 | | 0 ppd | 31 (66) | 6 (13) | 10 (21) | Infection 3 (6), erosion 6 (13), removal 9 (19), pain 2 (4) | Argus sling; adjustment required in 5 (10) |
|
*Tuygun et al. [46] | 8 | 10 | 6.8 ppd | 0 ppd | 1 (13) | 1 (13) | 6 (75) | Pain 3 (38) | Argus sling; pts w/prior AUS erosion; study compares AUS to sling as salvage option |
| Bochove-Overgaauw and Schrier [47] | 95 | 27 | See notes | ≤1 ppd | 51 (54) | 17 (18) | 27 (28) | Infection 6 (6), erosion 3 (3), removal 11 (12), total 55 (58) | Argus sling; Pre-op continence: 1-2 ppd in 13/100, 3–5 ppd in 46/100, and 6–10 ppd in 41/100 |
| Dalpiaz et al. [48] | 29 | 35 | 5 ppd | | 5 (17) | | | Infection 2 (7), erosion 3 (10), bladder perforation 3 (10), retention 10 (35), removal 10 (35), significant pain 8 (27) | Argus sling; Dissatisfied with clinical outcome 21 (72) |
| Hübner et al. [49] | 101 | 25 | | ≤1 g 20-min pad test | 80 (79) | | | Bladder perforation 5 (5), infection 5 (5), erosion 13 (13), removal 16 (16), pain <3 wks 15 (15) | Argus sling; adjustment required in 39 (39) |
| Sousa-Escandón et al. [50] | 51 | 32 | | ≤1 ppd | 33 (65) | 10 (20) | 8 (16) | Infection 3 (6), removal 1 (2), bladder perforation 5 (10), majority with perineal pain | Remeex sling; multicenter study; adjustment required in 51 (100) |
| Verdejo et al. [51] | 5 | 15 | 5–8 ppd | ≤1 ppd | 5 (100) | | | | Remeex sling |
| Parra et al. [52] | 15 | 19 | | | 5/12 (42) | 4/12 (33) | 3/12 (25) | Removal 3 (21), readjustment 12 (86), bladder perforation 4 (29), retention 5 (36) | Remeex sling |
|
