Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Urology
Volume 2016, Article ID 3140372, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3140372
Review Article

From Inflammation to Prostate Cancer: The Role of Inflammasomes

Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

Received 23 March 2016; Revised 17 May 2016; Accepted 9 June 2016

Academic Editor: Mohammad H. Ather

Copyright © 2016 Dev Karan and Seema Dubey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Inflammation-associated studies entice specific attention due to inflammation’s role in multiple stages of prostate cancer development. However, mechanistic regulation of inflammation inciting prostate cancer remains largely uncharacterized. A focused class of inflammatory regulators known as inflammasomes has recently gained attention in cancer development. Inflammasomes are a multiprotein complex that drives a cascade of proinflammatory cytokines regulating various cellular activities. Inflammasomes activation is linked with infection, stress, or danger signals, which are common events within the prostate gland. In this study, we review the potential of inflammasomes in understanding the role of inflammation in prostate cancer.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States [1]. The initiation of tumor in the prostate has been linked with multiple factors including age, race, diet, heredity, and environment [2]. Additionally, inflammation also remains an integral component in prostatic diseases and may contribute to tipping the balance towards tumor cell growth. Over the years, there has been a surge in understanding the role of inflammation in prostate cancer. Based on the presence of infiltrating lymphocytes in the prostate biopsy, it is suggested that the quantity of immune cells infiltration may help to predict the outcome of prostate cancer. However, several other studies are not in consensus with such correlative outcome. In the context of inflammation, the studies remain minimal on the role of inflammatory cytokines, which are potentially regulated via the inflammasome complex [3, 4]. Therefore, we discuss the prospective of inflammasome complex regulating inflammation in the context with prostate cancer.

2. Prostate and Inflammation

The common disorders of the prostate include benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis (chronic inflammation), and prostate cancer. As the prostate gland is compartmentalized into three distinct zones (a central zone (CZ), a transitional zone (TZ), and a peripheral zone (PZ)), it is a general consensus that the BPH develops in the site of TZ whereas prostatitis and cancer mainly occur in the PZ. The CZ of the prostate is rarely involved with carcinoma [5]. The dominant pathological symptoms of BPH and prostate cancer are characterized by extensive proliferation of the prostate glandular cells, while prostatitis is mainly an inflammation-associated disease. The disorders in the prostate primarily progress with the advancement of age, which further increases the susceptibility of the prostate tissue to injury or infection leading to inflammatory response [68]. Inflammation has been associated with various cancer types with an estimated 20% of cancer deaths linked to chronic infections and persistence inflammation [911]. Inflammation may incite carcinogenesis by causing DNA damage (genetic and epigenetic modulations), promoting cellular proliferation as well as angiogenesis [1214].

The role of inflammation in prostate cancer has been appreciated for a long time. Classically, inflammation is described based on the physical presence of immune infiltrating cells as a natural response at the site of tissue injury or infection. Although infiltrating immune cells are detected in prostate cancer specimen, the significance of immune cells infiltration (coexistence with prostate tumor) and correlative association (protective or tumor promoting) remains contradictory. Based on histopathologic analysis of prostate tumor biopsy, several studies revealed an inverse association of inflammatory infiltrates with prostate cancer. Retrospective analysis of the prostate biopsies from the REDUCE (Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events) study demonstrated that inflammation in the negative biopsy for prostate cancer lowers the subsequent prostate cancer detection and reduced risk of prostate cancer in association with baseline inflammation [15, 16]. In a Finnish prostate cancer screening trial, histologic inflammation in prostate biopsy among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was not linked to increased risk of prostate cancer [17]. Additionally, histological inflammatory finding at the initial prostate biopsy was negatively associated with prostate cancer detection in repeat biopsy [18]. When we consider the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among different ethnicities, African American (AA) men are at a higher risk and carry an aggressive load of disease. However, clinical prostatitis indicated an inverse association with prostate cancer in AA men, and histologic inflammation was not related to prostate cancer disparity [19, 20]. On the contrary, chronic inflammation in the areas of benign prostatic tissue is linked with high-grade prostate cancer. Histologic analysis of prostate biopsy from PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) showed an association of the high-grade disease with inflammation [21]. Overall, the diagnosis of prostate cancer using sampling biopsies collected via transrectal ultrasound guidance seems apprehensive with peril as 25% or more of men with “negative” biopsies show prostate cancer on a subsequent biopsy within months to a year. A recent review summarizes the infiltration of T cells (CD4+, CD8+, and Th17), B cells, macrophages, mast cells, immunosuppressive cells (T regulatory cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells), and neutrophils in association with prostate cancer studies [22]. The infiltration of macrophages and immune suppressor cells was found to be positively associated with prostate cancer progression; however, the coexistence of other cell types with prostate tumors remains inconclusive. Thus, the physical presence of the type and the amount of immune infiltrating cells within the prostate tissue may vary significantly. Indeed, impact of inflammation may be of influence at the individual level such as personal lifestyle including eating habits (diet). Inflammatory infiltrates may also depend on the severity of the injured/damaged tissue. Nonetheless, these infiltrating lymphocytes along with the host tissue secrete a plethora of cytokines/chemokines, which recruit such immune infiltrates and can easily dictate cellular activities towards neoplasm. The legacy of cytokines/chemokines these infiltrating lymphocytes leave behind remains enigmatic.

Some studies suggest that the incidences of tissue inflammation among BPH and prostate biopsy (cancerous or noncancerous) are high and are associated with proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA), prostatitis, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN, low or high grade), and prostate cancer. Recently, it has been suggested that PIA occurs in association with inflammation and is considered as a precursor to prostate cancer via PIN. However, investigation of the morphological level of 1367 prostate biopsies revealed that low-grade PIN in over 90% of cases arises from normal, nonatrophic glands and is more frequently found in biopsy cores with absent or mild inflammatory burden. This concludes an inverse relationship between the prevalence of low-grade PIN and the extent of PIA lesions per patient and does not support the development of PIN from the PIA [23]. However, the diagnosis of low-grade PIN is highly subjective, and many high-grade PIN are now thought to reflect ductal spreading of otherwise invasive cancer. In fact, the majority of the published studies do not follow any specific region of the prostate or prostate lesion longitudinally, a logic that was used to indict cervical cancer intraepithelial neoplasia as a cervical cancer precursor. Another study determined the incidence of PIA in 30% of the prostate biopsies; however, the association with prostate cancer remains low and insignificant [24]. As it may be inconclusive to support PIA as a precursor of prostate cancer, the immune infiltrates and proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines eventually help the developing neoplastic cells to undergo immunoediting leading to cancer development. Therefore, the histologic inflammation alone measured by the presence of infiltrating lymphocytes in the prostate biopsy may not help to predict the risk of prostate cancer development. Even the healthy prostate tissue is found to contain immune cells infiltration [25]. The impact of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines is equally important in facilitating tumor microenvironment contributing to prostate tumor development.

3. Inflammasomes as Potential Target of Prostate Inflammation

In the process of inflammation and prostate cancer development, the role of NFκB has been appreciated. The nuclear factor NFκB is associated with the upregulation of tumor promoting cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α [26, 27]. However, NFκB is a ubiquitous transcription factor and poses a challenge as a potential target to control inflammation-associated tumor growth studies. To determine a potential target of inflammation, a number of studies have proposed the role of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in prostate cancer [2831]. Clinically, the measurement of IL-1β, IL-18, IL-6, and MIC-1/GDF-15 correlates with the risk of carcinoma and the prognosis of established cancer. While the role of IL-6 in prostate cancer is well documented, studies on serum IL-18 for its diagnostic utility in cancer are limited. Study on a cohort of 149 patients demonstrated that serum IL-18 level was significantly higher in locally advanced prostate cancer as compared to healthy control and BPH [32]. Expression of IL-18 binding protein (IL-18 BP) was significantly upregulated in patients with large volume disease, and a high serum level of IL-18 BP was correlated with Gleason score [33]. Similarly, MIC-1/GDF15 is regulated by the inflammatory cytokines and clinical evidence supports the notion that serum MIC-1/GDF-15, in combination with PSA, might improve the specificity for prostate cancer detection [34, 35]. It has been suggested that IL-1β and IL-18 exert immunosuppressive effects and support tumor promoting microenvironment [36, 37]. Thus, identifying the regulators of inflammation-associated cytokine/chemokines as a molecular target of cancer progression may provide an opportunity to further understand the role of inflammation in prostate cancer.

Recently, an emerging class of inflammasomes is considered as master regulators of inflammation. Inflammasomes are a group of multimeric proteins that consist of NLR protein, an apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a carboxyterminal CARD (ASC), and procaspase-1 [38, 39]. Assembly of inflammasomes complex activates caspase-1 leading to the secretion and the maturation of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, which causes a wide variety of biological effects associated with infection, inflammation, and other disease processes [4042]. Additionally, cancer cells at the advanced stage spontaneously secrete IL-1β where it can intrinsically activate pro-IL-1β and catalytic function of caspase-1 [43]. Based on caspase-1 activation, four inflammasomes including NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4, and the DNA sensor AIM2 (absent in melanoma) have been described [4, 38]. NLRP3 is one of the most studied inflammasomes and senses pathogens and danger signals in response to injury or infection [44, 45]. As known, various stimuli such as urine reflux, uric acid crystals, bacteria, or fungi are common elements causing injury or infection within the prostate. Therefore, such stimuli may lead to activation of inflammasome-medicated proinflammatory cytokines in the prostate driving tumor development. Linked with the prostatic inflammation in a rat model, an increased association of inflammasome proteins suggests that the activation of inflammasome complex may yield inflammatory state similar to BPH in human [46, 47]. This study showed that chemically induced chronic inflammation using carrageenan suspension leads to increase in IL-1β and caspase-1 proteins in association with increased NRLP1 in the prostate. Following treatment with chlorogenic acid (Chinese herbal product), there was a significant decrease both in NLRP1 and in IL-1β protein suggesting inflammasome mediated regulation of inflammation. It is also reported that AIM2 inflammasome plays a fundamental role in the development of human prostatic diseases [48]. AIM2 is an interferon (IFN) inducible protein, which is constitutively downregulated in prostate cancer. IFNs treated prostate cancer cell lines showed increased AIM2 activating inflammasome complex leading to production of IL-1β and IL-18. Also, IL-1β supports the skeletal colonization and metastatic progression of prostate cancer cells [49, 50]. Indeed, IL-1 is a key regulator of inflammation, and targeting IL-1 has been a major goal to modulate pathophysiology of various diseases related to autoimmunity and autoinflammatory symptoms. There are three main agents targeting IL-1: anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept; however, anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, which blocks the activity of both IL-1α and IL-1β, is the most widely used agent in clinics [51]. In addition to IL-1 targeting, anakinra reduces the level of IL-6, one of the most common cytokines associated with the progression and metastasis of prostate cancer. For specific targeting of IL-1α, a monoclonal antibody MABp1 has been tested in several phase I and II clinical studies. MABp1 targets and binds to IL-1α, preventing IL-1α-mediated tumor growth, metastasis, and invasiveness. In an open label, dose escalation phase I study, MABp1 in patients with metastatic disease of different tumor types showed no-dose limiting toxicities and was well tolerated with observed disease control [52]. Antibody MABp1 demonstrated positive results for patients with advanced symptomatic colorectal cancer in a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [53]. Since cleavage of mature IL-1β is facilitated by the active caspase-1, it is very likely that, by targeting inflammasome complex, the role of inflammation-associated events can be manipulated in the prostate tumor microenvironment.

Although the role of inflammasomes in anticancer activity is not fully understood, it is suggested that the mice lacking NLRP3 have a low tumor burden and suppression of tumor metastasis [54]. NLRP3 deficiency induces NK cell infiltration and is associated with increased production of CCL5 and CXCL9 chemokines. Mice fed with high oxalate diet exhibit renal failure due to increased NLRP3-mediated inflammation [55]. However, studies in chemically induced colitis model showed that the mice lacking NLRP3 are highly susceptible to tumor formation with severe inflammation [56]. The importance of inflammasomes has been reviewed in reference to various diseases including carcinogenesis and antitumor activities with conflicting observations [5761]. As we are progressing in this area of inflammasome research with respect to cancer studies, it is likely that the role of inflammasomes may be disease-specific. Therefore, to examine the contribution of inflammasomes to regulating prostate inflammation, it is necessary to characterize and identify the role of inflammasomes complex for appropriate targeting to modulate prostate tumor microenvironment.

4. Perspective

Inflammasome-associated studies in prostate cancer remain uncharacterized and are at the beginning stage. Regardless of their divergent roles in tumor growth studies, it is evident that the inflammasomes regulate inflammatory cytokines, thereby modulating the course of inflammation. Since the proinflammatory cytokines may serve as fuel for the developing neoplastic cells in the prostate, the tumor promoting effect of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines may be reduced significantly by understanding the mechanistic regulation of inflammasomes. Keeping in view the importance of inflammation in prostate cancer, investigating the role of inflammasomes may open a new direction for therapy to target the intricacies of inflammatory pathways.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (R21CA169453; R21CA179733-01A1 to Dev Karan) and COBRE Center Grant P20 GM103641.

References

  1. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2016,” CA—A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Karan, J. B. Thrasher, and D. Lubaroff, “Prostate cancer: genes, environment, immunity and the use of immunotherapy,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 230–236, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Martinon and J. Tschopp, “Inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes: master switches of inflammation,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10–22, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. K. Davis, H. Wen, and J. P.-Y. Ting, “The Inflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflammation, and associated diseases,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 29, pp. 707–735, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. J. Cohen, B. A. Shannon, M. Phillips, R. E. Moorin, T. M. Wheeler, and K. L. Garrett, “Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 1762–1767, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. De Marzo, E. A. Platz, S. Sutcliffe et al., “Inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 256–269, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Sciarra, G. Mariotti, S. Salciccia et al., “Prostate growth and inflammation,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 108, no. 3–5, pp. 254–260, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Vasto, G. Carruba, G. Candore, E. Italiano, D. Di Bona, and C. Caruso, “Inflammation and prostate cancer,” Future Oncology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 637–645, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. M. Coussens and Z. Werb, “Inflammation and cancer,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 860–867, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. G. Nelson, A. M. De Marzo, T. L. DeWeese et al., “The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer,” Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 5, pp. S6–S12, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Kuper, H.-O. Adami, and D. Trichopoulos, “Infections as a major preventable cause of human cancer,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 171–183, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. G. DeNardo, M. Johansson, and L. M. Coussens, “Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasis,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. B. Swann, M. D. Vesely, A. Silva et al., “Demonstration of inflammation-induced cancer and cancer immunoediting during primary tumorigenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 652–656, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. M. Moreira, D. G. Bostwick, G. L. Andriole et al., “Baseline prostate atrophy is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 194, no. 5, pp. 1241–1246, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. M. Moreira, J. C. Nickel, G. L. Andriole, R. Castro-Santamaria, and S. J. Freedland, “Chronic baseline prostate inflammation is associated with lower tumor volume in men with prostate cancer on repeat biopsy: results from the REDUCE study,” The Prostate, vol. 75, no. 13, pp. 1492–1498, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. H. Yli-Hemminki, M. Laurila, A. Auvinen et al., “Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial,” BJU International, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 735–741, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. H. Yun, E. C. Hwang, H. S. Yu et al., “Is histological prostate inflammation in an initial prostate biopsy a predictor of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy?” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1251–1257, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Zhang, I. A. Sesterhenn, R. R. Connelly, F. K. Mostofi, and J. W. Moul, “Inflammatory infiltrate (prostatitis) in whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens from black and white patients is not an etiology for racial difference in prostate specific antigen,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. A. Rybicki, O. N. Kryvenko, Y. Wang et al., “Racial differences in the relationship between clinical prostatitis, presence of inflammation in benign prostate and subsequent risk of prostate cancer,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 19, pp. 145–150, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Gurel, M. S. Lucia, I. M. Thompson Jr. et al., “Chronic inflammation in benign prostate tissue is associated with high-grade prostate cancer in the placebo arm of the prostate cancer prevention trial,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 847–856, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Strasner and M. Karin, “Immune infiltration and prostate cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 5, article 128, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Vral, V. Magri, E. Montanari et al., “Topographic and quantitative relationship between prostate inflammation, proliferative inflammatory atrophy and low-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia: a biopsy study in chronic prostatitis patients,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1950–1958, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Celma, P. Servián, J. Planas et al., “Clinical significance of proliferative inflammatory atrophy in prostate biopsy,” Actas Urologicas Espanolas, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 122–126, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Fujita, M. Hosomi, G. Tanigawa, M. Okumi, H. Fushimi, and S. Yamaguchi, “Prostatic inflammation detected in initial biopsy specimens and urinary Pyuria are predictors of negative repeat prostate biopsy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1722–1727, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. P. Nguyen, J. Li, S. S. Yadav, and A. K. Tewari, “Recent insights into NF-κB signalling pathways and the link between inflammation and prostate cancer,” BJU International, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 168–176, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Hoesel and J. A. Schmid, “The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 12, no. 1, article 86, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Salazar, M. Castellan, S. S. Shirodkar, and B. L. Lokeshwar, “Chemokines and chemokine receptors as promoters of prostate cancer growth and progression,” Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. J. J. Waugh, C. Wilson, A. Seaton, and P. J. Maxwell, “Multi-faceted roles for CXC-chemokines in prostate cancer progression,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 4595–4604, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. I. Heidegger, J. Höfer, M. Luger et al., “Is Eotaxin-1 a serum and urinary biomarker for prostate cancer detection and recurrence?” The Prostate, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 1904–1909, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. B. Holliday, N. F. Dieckmann, T. L. McDonald, A. Y. Hung, C. R. Thomas Jr., and L. J. Wood, “Relationship between fatigue, sleep quality and inflammatory cytokines during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a prospective study,” Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Dwivedi, A. Goel, S. M. Natu, A. Mandhani, S. Khattri, and K. K. Pant, “Diagnostic and prognostic significance of prostate specific antigen and serum interleukin 18 and 10 in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: A Prospective Study,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1843–1848, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Fujita, C. M. Ewing, W. B. Isaacs, and C. P. Pavlovich, “Immunomodulatory IL-18 binding protein is produced by prostate cancer cells and its levels in urine and serum correlate with tumor status,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 424–432, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. R. Bauskin, D. A. Brown, T. Kuffner et al., “Role of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in tumorigenesis and diagnosis of cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4983–4986, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. S. Selander, D. A. Brown, G. B. Sequeiros et al., “Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 concentrations correlate with the presence of prostate cancer bone metastases,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 532–537, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Tu, G. Bhagat, G. Cui et al., “Overexpression of interleukin-1β induces gastric inflammation and cancer and mobilizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice,” Cancer Cell, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 408–419, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Terme, E. Ullrich, L. Aymeric et al., “IL-18 induces PD-1-dependent immunosuppression in cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 16, pp. 5393–5399, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. Schroder and J. Tschopp, “The Inflammasomes,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 821–832, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Y. Chen and G. Núñez, “Inflammasomes in intestinal inflammation and cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 141, no. 6, pp. 1986–1999, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Fabbi, G. Carbotti, and S. Ferrini, “Context-dependent role of IL-18 in cancer biology and counter-regulation by IL-18BP,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 665–675, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. A. C. Deans, S. J. Wigmore, H. Gilmour, S. Paterson-Brown, J. A. Ross, and K. C. H. Fearon, “Elevated tumour interleukin-1β is associated with systemic inflammation: a marker of reduced survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 1568–1575, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. A. Dinarello, “Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 519–550, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Okamoto, W. Liu, Y. Luo et al., “Constitutively active inflammasome in human melanoma cells mediating autoinflammation via caspase-1 processing and secretion of interleukin-1β,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 9, pp. 6477–6488, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Dostert, G. Guarda, J. F. Romero et al., “Malarial hemozoin is a Nalp3 inflammasome activating danger signal,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 8, Article ID e6510, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. Hornung, F. Bauernfeind, A. Halle et al., “Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 847–856, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C.-S. Chen, P.-J. Chang, W.-Y. Lin, Y.-C. Huang, and D.-R. Ho, “Evidences of the inflammasome pathway in chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome in an animal model,” The Prostate, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 391–397, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Kashyap, S. Pore, Z. Wang, J. Gingrich, N. Yoshimura, and P. Tyagi, “Inflammasomes are important mediators of prostatic inflammation associated with BPH,” Journal of Inflammation, vol. 12, article 37, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. Ponomareva, H. Liu, X. Duan et al., “AIM2, an IFN-inducible cytosolic DNA sensor, in the development of benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1193–1202, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Q. Liu, M. R. Russell, K. Shahriari et al., “Interleukin-1β promotes skeletal colonization and progression of metastatic prostate cancer cells with neuroendocrine features,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 3297–3305, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Schulze, K. Weber, A. Baranowsky et al., “P65-Dependent production of interleukin-1β by osteolytic prostate cancer cells causes an induction of chemokine expression in osteoblasts,” Cancer Letters, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. 106–113, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C. A. Dinarello, A. Simon, and J. W. M. Van Der Meer, “Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in a broad spectrum of diseases,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 633–652, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. S. Hong, D. Hui, E. Bruera et al., “MABp1, a first-in-class true human antibody targeting interleukin-1α in refractory cancers: An open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 656–666, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. “A phase 3 study to evaluate Xilonix as an anticancer therapy in patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer,” https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02138422.
  54. M. T. Chow, J. Sceneay, C. Paget et al., “NLRP3 suppresses NK cell-mediated responses to carcinogen-induced tumors and metastases,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 22, pp. 5721–5732, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. F. Knauf, J. R. Asplin, I. Granja et al., “NALP3-mediated inflammation is a principal cause of progressive renal failure in oxalate nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 895–901, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. I. C. Allen, E. M. Tekippe, R.-M. T. Woodford et al., “The NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis-associated cancer,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 5, pp. 1045–1056, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. Kolb, G.-H. Liu, A. M. Janowski, F. S. Sutterwala, and W. Zhang, “Inflammasomes in cancer: a double-edged sword,” Protein and Cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Terlizzi, V. Casolaro, A. Pinto, and R. Sorrentino, “Inflammasome: cancer's friend or foe?” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. K. Drexler and A. S. Yazdi, “Complex roles of inflammasomes in carcinogenesis,” Cancer Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 468–472, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. Guo, J. B. Callaway, and J. P.-Y. Ting, “Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 677–687, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L. Zitvogel, O. Kepp, L. Galluzzi, and G. Kroemer, “Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 343–351, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus