Review Article

Sexual (Dys)function after Urethroplasty

Table 4

Posterior urethra, erectile dysfunction.

Authors, yearStudy type Questionnaire Follow-up (years)Age (median)Results

Anger et al., 2009 [47]26 R IIEF 4,4 40,2 54% ED
31% severe ED

Corriere, 2001 [48]60 R ? 27,3 35 33% “complete” ED

Shenfeld et al., 2003 [49]25 D <3 28,6 72% preoperative ED

Koraitim, 2005 [10]155 R 1–22 21 34% “definitive” ED
2% after surgery

Mundy, 1996 [9]82 R ? >5 ? 7% “permanent” ED

Yin et al., 2011 [50]76R42,534,595% remained potent
5% de novo ED
59% recovered potency

Lumen et al., 2009 [51]61R5,583432,8% ED previous to surgery
2 cases spontaneous recovery

Onen et al., 2005 [52]49RNVQ122018,4% ED at last follow-up

Mouraviev et al., 2005 [53]96R8,8?34% after realignment
42% after delayed repair

Tunç et al., 2000 [54]58R3,924,216,2% de novo ED

Aboutaieb et al., 2000 [55]35R?2518,3% ED early repair
5,3% ED delayed repair

Morey and Mcaninch, 1997 [56]82R>1?54% ED previous to repair
38% ED after repair

Corriere et al., 1994 [57]50R>1?48% ED previous to repair
32% ED after repair

IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; NVQ: nonvalidated questionnaire; ED: erectile dysfunction; P: prospective; R: retrospective; D: descriptive.