Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy

<div>Forrest plot assessing standardized mean difference (SMD) for the number of pad/day (a) and ICIQ-SF score (b) recovery after device placement according to the five groups of invasive treatments for UI after RP, implemented within the studies included for analysis. (<i>A</i> = bulking agents, <i>B</i> = fixed slings, <i>C</i> = adjustable slings, <i>D</i> = circumferential compressor device, and <i>E</i> = noncircumferential compressor devices; SD = standard deviation; CI = confidence interval).</div>

Advances in Urology

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy 