Preliminary Efficacy of Adapted Responsive Teaching for Infants at Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Community Sample
Table 4
Estimated difference in growth between treatment and control from two difference model specifications.
Outcome
Linear growth model1
Multiphase growth model1
Model fit comparison: AIC3
Linear
Multiphase
MBRS Directive Scale Score
−0.701 (0.54)
−1.419 (0.45)*
1.053 (0.561)+
130.1
123.2
MBRS Responsive Scale Score
0.925 (0.536)
0.647 (0.541)
0.13 (0.677)
125.5
126.9
CSBS-Behavior Sample Total Standard Score2
0.896 (0.623)
NA
NA
83.7
NA
CSBS-Caregiver Question. Total Standard Score2
1.228 (0.447)*
NA
NA
69.7
NA
MSEL Expressive Language score
0.187 (0.716)
0.211 (0.404)
−0.252 (0.454)
116.2
115.1
MSEL Receptive Language score
0.928 (0.403)*
0.76 (0.485)
−0.029 (0.589)
123.4
123.2
SEQ: Hyperresponsive Scale Mean Score
1.38 (0.533)*
0.452 (0.373)
0.696 (0.419)
114.3
117.3
SEQ: Hyporesponsive Scale Mean Score
−1.023 (0.628)
−1.541 (0.478)*
0.738 (0.534)
131.6
127.6
SPA: Hyperresponsive Scale Mean Score
0.525 (0.58)
0.794 (0.519)
−0.447 (0.598)
129.0
127.4
SPA: Hyporesponsive Scale Mean Score
−0.31 (0.517)
−0.701 (0.53)
0.555 (0.679)
131.0
130.6
Vineland Expressive Communication -scale score
0.614 (0.575)
0.79 (0.328)*
−0.474 (0.356)
108.8
106.9
Vineland Receptive Communication -scale score
0.874 (0.594)
1.34 (0.356)*
−0.765 (0.393)+
120.4
113.0
Vineland Socialization Standard Score
1.299 (0.734)+
1.178 (0.431)*
−0.092 (0.51)
117.1
115.3
Standard errors in parentheses; 2outcome was only measured on two occasions; 3lower AIC statistics indicate better fit between linear and multiphase models (indicated in bold font between last two columns). ; .
