Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications / 2012 / Article / Tab 1

Research Article

A Comparison of Epithelial Cells, Fibroblasts, and Osteoblasts in Dental Implant Titanium Topographies

Table 1

One-way ANOVA statistical analysis of the control group (0 sec) and test groups using 30 sec of acid etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec of sandblasting for samples from bone E1, fibroblast 3T3, and an epidermal cell XB-2 cells after 1 and 24 h ( ).
(a)

Statistical analysis*VariationsTime of sandblasting (sec)
0b1030 60

GroupsCells valueGroup comparisonsa valueGroup comparisons valueGroup comparisons valueGroup comparisons
1 h cell adhesion3T3/E1/XB-20.0161XB-2 > E10.00773T3 > E1
XB-2 > E1
0.0013XB-2 > E1 XB-2 > 3T3<0.00013T3 > E1
3T3 > XB-2
XB-2 > E1
24 h cell proliferation3T3/E1/XB-20.0705none0.00263T3 > E1
XB-2 > E1
0.0231XB-2 > E1<0.00013T3 > E1
3T3 > XB-2
XB-2 > E1

(b)

Statistical analysis*VariationsE1 bone cell3T3 fibroblast cellXB-2 epidermal cell

Groups0 secb and through 30 sec etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec blasting valueGroup comparisonsa valueGroup comparisonsa valueGroup comparisonsa
1 h cell adhesion0/10/30/600.002530 > 0, 10, 600.002610 > 30
60 > 10
0.00050 > 10, 30, 60
10 > 60
24 h cell proliferation0/10/30/600.0510none0.0791none0.2788none

*Groups significantly differ at ; a“none” indicates the group comparisons are not significantly different at ; b“0 sec” indicates the control group without the blasting/etching treatment.