A Comparison of Epithelial Cells, Fibroblasts, and Osteoblasts in Dental Implant Titanium Topographies

Table 1

One-way ANOVA statistical analysis of the control group (0 sec) and test groups using 30 sec of acid etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec of sandblasting for samples from bone E1, fibroblast 3T3, and an epidermal cell XB-2 cells after 1 and 24 h (𝑛=5).

(a)

Statistical analysis*	Variations	Time of sandblasting (sec)
		0^b		10		30		60
Groups	Cells	𝑃 value	Group comparisons^a	𝑃 value	Group comparisons	𝑃 value	Group comparisons	𝑃 value	Group comparisons
1 h cell adhesion	3T3/E1/XB-2	0.0161	XB-2 > E1	0.0077	3T3 > E1; XB-2 > E1	0.0013	XB-2 > E1 XB-2 > 3T3	<0.0001	3T3 > E1; 3T3 > XB-2; XB-2 > E1
24 h cell proliferation	3T3/E1/XB-2	0.0705	none	0.0026	3T3 > E1; XB-2 > E1	0.0231	XB-2 > E1	<0.0001	3T3 > E1; 3T3 > XB-2; XB-2 > E1

(b)

Statistical analysis*	Variations	E1 bone cell		3T3 fibroblast cell		XB-2 epidermal cell
Groups	0 sec^b and through 30 sec etching after 10, 30, and 60 sec blasting	𝑃 value	Group comparisons^a	𝑃 value	Group comparisons^a	𝑃 value	Group comparisons^a
1 h cell adhesion	0/10/30/60	0.0025	30 > 0, 10, 60	0.0026	10 > 30; 60 > 10	0.0005	0 > 10, 30, 60; 10 > 60
24 h cell proliferation	0/10/30/60	0.0510	none	0.0791	none	0.2788	none

*Groups significantly differ at 𝑃<0.05; ^a“none” indicates the group comparisons are not significantly different at 𝑃>0.05; ^b“0 sec” indicates the control group without the blasting/etching treatment.