Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications

Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications / 2018 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1062562 | 18 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1062562

The Advancing of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications

Academic Editor: Francesco Paolo Fanizzi
Received04 Feb 2018
Revised13 May 2018
Accepted21 May 2018
Published05 Jul 2018

Abstract

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are used in an increasing number of industrial products such as rubber, paint, coating, and cosmetics. In the past two decades, ZnO NPs have become one of the most popular metal oxide nanoparticles in biological applications due to their excellent biocompatibility, economic, and low toxicity. ZnO NPs have emerged a promising potential in biomedicine, especially in the fields of anticancer and antibacterial fields, which are involved with their potent ability to trigger excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, release zinc ions, and induce cell apoptosis. In addition, zinc is well known to keep the structural integrity of insulin. So, ZnO NPs also have been effectively developed for antidiabetic treatment. Moreover, ZnO NPs show excellent luminescent properties and have turned them into one of the main candidates for bioimaging. Here, we summarize the synthesis and recent advances of ZnO NPs in the biomedical fields, which will be helpful for facilitating their future research progress and focusing on biomedical fields.

1. Introduction

Recently, biomedical nanomaterials have received more concerns because of their prominent biological characteristics and biomedical applications. With the development of nanomaterials, metal oxide nanoparticles show promising and far-ranging prospect for biomedical field, especially for antibacteria, anticancer drug/gene delivery, cell imaging, biosensing, and so on [1].

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), as one of the most important metal oxide nanoparticles, are popularly employed in various fields due to their peculiar physical and chemical properties [2, 3]. ZnO NPs are firstly applied in the rubber industry as they can provide wearproof of the rubber composite, improve performance of high polymer in their toughness and intensity and antiaging, and other functions [4, 5]. Because of the strong UV absorption properties of ZnO, they are increasingly used in personal care products, such as cosmetics and sunscreen [6]. In addition, ZnO NPs have superior antibacterial, antimicrobial, and excellent UV-blocking properties. Therefore, in the textile industry, the finished fabrics by adding ZnO NPs exhibited the attractive functions of ultraviolet and visible light resistance, antibacteria, and deodorant [7]. Apart from the applications mentioned above, zinc oxide can also be used in other branches of industry, including concrete production, photocatalysis, electronics, electrotechnology industries, and so on [4, 8].

It is generally known that zinc as an essential trace element extensively exists in all body tissues, including the brain, muscle, bone, skin, and so on. As the main component of various enzyme systems, zinc takes part in body’s metabolism and plays crucial roles in proteins and nucleic acid synthesis, hematopoiesis, and neurogenesis [25]. Nano-ZnO, with small particle size, makes zinc more easily to be absorbed by the body. Thus, nano-ZnO is commonly used as a food additive. Moreover, ZnO is graded as a “GRAS” (generally recognized as safe) substance by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [9]. With these properties, ZnO NPs have received more attention in biomedical applications. Compared with other metal oxide NPs, ZnO NPs with the comparatively inexpensive and relatively less toxic property exhibit excellent biomedical applications, such as anticancer, drug delivery, antibacterial, and diabetes treatment; anti-inflammation; wound healing; and bioimaging [1, 1012].

Herein, in this review, we will summarize the methods of synthesis and recent exciting progress on the use of ZnO NPs in the biomedical fields.

2. Synthesis of ZnO NPs

The biological activity of nanoparticles depends on factors including surface chemistry, size distribution, particle morphology, and particle reactivity in solution. Therefore, the development of nanoparticles with controlled structures that are uniform in size, morphology, and functionality is essential for various biomedical applications.

The ZnO NPs occurring in a very rich variety of size and shape will provide a wide range of properties. The methods for stable ZnO NPs preparation have been widely developed in recent years, which mainly include the chemical precipitation method, sol-gel method, solid-state pyrolytic method, solution-free mechanochemical method, and biosynthesis method.

2.1. Chemical Precipitation

The most popular method for ZnO NPs preparation is chemical precipitation, which usually involves two reaction reagents: a highly purified zinc forerunner such as zinc acetate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O), zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2), or zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and a solution of precipitator such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O) [13]. Typically, the precipitator is added dropwise to the dissolved zinc precursor until the pH level reached about 10. Then, completely mix these solutions to get a white intermediate of zinc hydroxide. Ultimately, the sample of zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)2) was converted to ZnO after sintering at high temperature.

Controlled parameters in this method mainly include the concentration of zinc forerunner and precipitator, the molar ratio of two reagents, and the reaction and calcination temperature.

Bisht et al. synthesized ZnO NPs using the chemical precipitation method using Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O and NaOH in a molar ratio of 1 : 5. Intermediate products were calcined at 200°C for 2 h in a muffle furnace to obtain white fine powder ZnO with the size of 18.67 ± 2.2 nm [14].

Bettini et al. introduced a simplified precipitation approach in ZnO NPs using ZnSO4 and NaOH solution with a molar ratio of 1 : 2, which was carried out under vigorous stirring for 12 h at room temperature. The obtained white precipitate was washed several times and separated by centrifugation [1517]. Finally, the precipitate (ZnO) was dried in an oven at 100°C for 6 h. The prepared ZnO NPs with a flake-like structure showed a size distribution about 100 nm.

The obtaining of ZnO NPs by the chemical precipitation method is not only simple and easily controlled but also easy industrialized. However, due to the surface effect of nanoparticles, the precursor of nanooxide prepared by the chemical precipitation method could form agglomerates easily.

2.2. Sol-Gel Method

A novel sol-gel synthesis of ZnO NPs was firstly presented by Spanhel and Anderson [18], which mainly involved three major steps:(1)Preparation of zinc precursor

A sample of Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O was dissolved in ethanol, placed into a distillation apparatus, and then refluxed for few hours at atmospheric pressure. The solution was boiled nearly at 80°C and stirred to obtain the condensate and hygroscopic reaction mixture.(2)Preparation of ZnO clusters

The hygroscopic mixture was diluted to ethanolic solution with the addition of LiOH·H2O powder. The suspension will become transparent with the help of an ultrasonic bath. This procedure could accelerate the release of OH ions, and the reaction at low temperature under air conditions could prevent rapid particle growth and get ZnO sols.(3)Crystal growth

Crystal growth is a self-induced procedure occurring at room temperature. But the amount of LiOH which could strongly affect the crystals growth rate, shape, and size should be well controlled. LiOH-induced ZnO growth can be briefly summarized as follows:

Some other alkalis can also be used for ZnO growth; for instance, Rani et al. synthesized ZnO NPs using NaOH instead of LiOH and successfully obtained ZnO NPs with the largest crystallite size of 14 nm at 9 pH value [19].

The sol-gel method is the subject of much interest, in view of the simplicity, low cost, and relatively mild conditions of synthesis, which could offer a simple route to quantum size ZnO particles.

2.3. Solid-State Pyrolytic Method

The solid-state pyrolytic method was first developed by Wang et al. with advantages of low cost and easy operation for the growth of high-quality ZnO nanoparticles [20].

The typical synthesis procedure is as follows: Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O and NaHCO3 are mixed at room temperature. The mixture is pyrolysed at the reaction temperature. Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O is converted into ZnO, while NaHCO3 is transformed into CH3COONa and can be eventually cleaned out with deionized water. Subsequently, white ZnO NPs can be obtained via the thermal decomposition process. The particle sizes can be regulated by selecting different pyrolytic temperatures. Using this method, Wang et al. obtained ZnO NPs of different sizes in the range of 8–35 nm.

2.4. Solution-Free Mechanochemical Method

Solution-free mechanochemical preparation of ZnO NPs is a two-step synthesis method. The first step is to grind Zn(CH3COO)2 and H2C2O4·2H2O powder mixtures for a certain time to form ZnC2O4·2H2O nanoparticles [21].

Zn(CH3COO)2 (solid, large particles) + H2C2O4·2H2O(solid, large particles) = ZnC2O4·2H2O (solid particles) + 2CH3COOH (liquid and gas) + H2C2O4·2H2O (solid particles).

The second step is the thermal decomposition of ZnC2O4·2H2O nanoparticles at a very high temperature to get ZnO NPs:

The advantages of this method are the low production costs and high homogeneity of the crystalline structure and morphology. But the morphology of the ZnO NPs strongly depends on the milling time of the reactant mixture, a longer time of milling led to a smaller particle size. The obtained ZnO NPs show an average size ranging from 24 to 40 nm.

Pardeshi and Patil synthesized ZnO NPs with different morphologies and crystallite sizes using this method by varying the calcination temperature from 400°C to 900°C. It was found that zinc oxide calcined from 400°C to 550°C exhibited the same crystallite growth rate (38–50 nm) [22].

2.5. Biological Methods

Physical and chemical methods for ZnO NPs preparations have widely developed. Nowadays, the development of green chemistry has attracted more and more attention because it is mostly environmentally friendly [23]. A broad variety of plant extract are used for the biosynthesis of ZnO NPs such as the leaf of Azadirachta indica (L.) [23], Cochlospermum religiosum (L.) [24], Plectranthus amboinicus [25], Andrographis paniculata [26], Aloe barbadensis [27, 28], the peel of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L) [29], the root extract of Polygala tenuifolia [30], the rhizome extract of Zingiber officinale [31], the flower extract of Trifolium pratense [32], Jacaranda mimosifolia [33], the seeds of Physalis alkekengi L [34], and so on. Biosynthetic and environment friendly technology for the synthesis of ZnO NPs are believed to be more ecofriendly, economical (low priced), nontoxic, and biocompatible than chemical and physical methods. ZnO NPs prepared by this method exhibited strong potential for biomedical applications such as its excellent anticancer and antibacterial activity.

3. Biomedical Applications of ZnO Nanoparticles

ZnO NPs, as a new type of the low-cost and low-toxicity nanomaterial, have attracted tremendous interest in various biomedical fields, including anticancer, antibacterial, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities, as well as for drug delivery and bioimaging applications [9, 12]. Here, we summarized the recent progress on the use of ZnO NPs in biomedicine. ZnO NPs less than 100 nm are considered to be relatively biocompatible, which support their biomedical applications and represent a powerful property in promoting the biomedical research.

3.1. Anticancer Activity

Cancer, a condition of uncontrolled malignant cell proliferation, is typically treated by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in the past several decades. Although all these therapies seem to be very effective for killing cancer cells in theory, these nonselective therapy methods also introduce a lot of serious side effects [35]. Recently, nanomaterial-based nanomedicine, with high biocompatibility, easily surface functionalization, cancer targeting, and drug delivery capacity, has demonstrated the potential to overcome these side effects. Zn2+ is an essential nutrient for adults, and ZnO nanomaterials are considered to be safe in vivo. Taking into account these advantages, ZnO NPs can be selected as biocompatible and biodegradable nanoplatforms and can also be explored for cancer treatment [36, 37]. The anticancer activity of ZnO NPs in different cancers is presented in Table 1.


Cancer typeEffect and mechanism

Colon cancerZnO NPs suppressed cell viability in Caco-2 cell line via increased ROS and induced IL-8 release [38]
ZnO NPs and fatty acids could induce lysosomal destabilization in Caco-2 cells [39]
ZnO NPs induced Caco-2 cells cytotoxicity associated with increased intracellular Zn ions [40]
ZnO NPs conjugated with peptides had a higher antiproliferation in HT-29 colon cancer cells than other Au NPs and Fe3O4 NPs [41]

HepatocarcinomaZnO NPs caused ROS generation and oxidative DNA damage and lead to mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in HepG2 cells [42]
ZnO NPs selectively induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells, which was also mediated by ROS via the p53 pathway [43]
Dox-ZnO nanocomplex can act as a drug delivery system to increase the internalization of the anticancer drug Dox in SMMC-7721 cells [44]

Breast cancerEcofriendly formulated ZnO NPs arrest the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and upregulated proapoptotic genes p53, p21, Bax, and JNK and downregulated antiapoptotic genes Bcl-2, AKT1, and ERK1/2 in a dose-dependent manner in MCF-7 cells [45]
A doxorubicin delivery system based on zinc oxide nanomaterials can bypass the P-gp increase in the drug accumulation in resistant MCF-7R and MCF-7S cells [46]
RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp)-targeted ZnO NPs can target integrin αvβ3 receptors to increase the toxicity of the ZnO NPs to MDA-MB-231 cells at lower doses [47]
ZnO-Fe3O4 magnetic composite nanoparticles site-specific have no significant toxicity towards noncancerous NIH 3T3 cells but show obvious toxicity at similar concentration to MDA-MB-231 cells [14]
FA-functionalized PTX-ZnO NPs released ∼75% of the paclitaxel payload within six hours in acidic pH, improved chemotherapy tolerance, and increased antitumor efficacy [48]

Lung cancerZnO NPs incorporated in liposomes not only rendered pH responsivity to the delivery carrier but also exhibited synergetic chemo-photodynamic anticancer action [49]
Human lung adenocarcinoma cells with an EGFR mutation are sensitive to ZnO NP20 and Al-ZnO NP20, which resulted in nonautophagic cell death [50]

Ovarian cancerZnO NPs are able to induce significant cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and autophagy in SKOV3 cells through reactive oxygen species generation and oxidative stress [51]

Cervical cancerDOX-ZnO/PEG nanocomposites exhibited better dose-dependent toxicity towards HeLa cell lines [52]
ZnO nanoparticles showed a dynamic cytotoxic effect in cervical carcinoma cells which induced the apoptosis through the increased intracellular ROS level and upregulated apoptotic gene p53 and caspase-3 expression [53]
Gastric cancerPMMA-AA/ZnO NPs and PMMA-PEG/ZnO were able to carry a large amount of the hydrophobic drug (curcumin) showing highly anti-gastric cancer activity [54, 55]

Human epidermal cancerZnO NPs induce cell death at high concentrations, and at lower concentrations, they induce cell cycle arrest in the S and G 2/M phase by intracellular ROS generation in A431 cells [56]

Acute promyelocytic leukemiaHA/ZnO nanocomposite caused G2/M cell cycle arrest and stimulated apoptosis-related increase in caspase-3 and −7 activities of the HL-60 cells [57]

3.1.1. Anticancer Activity by Inducing Cancer Cell Apoptosis

The mitochondrial electron transport chain is known to be associated with intracellular ROS generation, and anticancer agents entering into cancer cells could destroy the electron transport chain and release huge amounts of ROS [58, 59]. However, excessive ROS will lead to mitochondrial damage and result in the loss of protein activity balance that finally causes cell apoptosis [60]. ZnO NPs present certain cytotoxicity in cancer cells mainly by themselves based on a higher intracellular release of dissolved zinc ions, followed by increased ROS induction and induced cancer cell death via the apoptosis signaling pathway.

Sharma et al. explored the effects of ZnO NPs on human liver cancer HepG2 cells and its possible pharmacological mechanism [42]. ZnO NPs-exposed HepG2 cells presented higher cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, which were associated with cell apoptosis mediated by the ROS triggered mitochondrial pathway. The loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential could open outer membrane pores which would result in the release of some related apoptotic proteins including cytochrome c into the cytosol and activate the caspase. Mechanistic studies had proved that the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential-mediated HepG2 cell apoptosis was mainly due to the decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and Bcl-2/Bax ratios as well as accompanying with the activation of caspase-9. Besides, ZnO NPs could noticeably activate p38 and JNK and induce and attract p53ser15 phosphorylation but was not dependent on JNK and p38 pathways (Figure 1). These results afforded valuable insights into the mechanism of ZnO NPs-induced apoptosis in human liver HepG2 cells.

Moghaddam et al. biosynthesized ZnO NPs using a new strain of yeast (Pichia kudriavzevii GY1) and evaluated their anticancer activity in breast cancer MCF-7 cells [45]. ZnO NPs have been observed to show powerful cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells, which was associated with the occurrence of apoptosis, more than cell cycle arrest. The ZnO NPs-induced apoptosis was mainly through both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways, and some antiapoptotic genes of Bcl-2, AKT1, and JERK/2 were downregulated, while proapoptotic genes of p21, p53, JNK, and Bax were upregulated.

ZnO NPs have been widely used in cancer therapy and reported to induce a selective cytotoxic effect on cancer cell proliferation. Chandrasekaran and Pandurangan investigated the cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles against cocultured C2C12 myoblastoma cancer cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes, which showed that ZnO NPs could be more cytotoxic to C2C12 myoblastoma cancer cells than 3T3-L1 cells. Compared to 3T3-L1 cells, it appeared that ZnO NPs inhibited C2C12 cell proliferation and caused a marked apoptosis via a ROS-mediated mitochondrial intrinsic apoptotic pathway and p53, Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and caspase-3 pathways [61]. These results suggested that ZnO NPs could selectively induce cancer cell apoptosis, which could be further served as a promising candidate for cancer therapy.

3.1.2. Anticancer by Autophagy

Autophagy is a highly regulated catabolic process that activated in response to different kinds of stresses like damaged organelles, ROS, anticancer agents, and protein aggregation. Excessive cellular damage may lead to cell death by the extension of autophagy and cellular self-consumption and result in cancer cell apoptosis [62, 63]. Hence, autophagy not only promotes cell survival but also activates lethal mechanisms in cancer cells, thus be considered as an important event in nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity.

Bai et al. found that ZnO NPs with a crystal size of 20 nm resulted in a concentration-dependent loss of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cell viability [51]. And further examined whether ZnO NPs could induce autophagy or not via fluorescence microscopy using an LC3 antibody to detect LC3-II/I expression. Visualization of LC3 immunofluorescence showed a remarkable fluorescence and an essential component of autophagosome after exposure of SKOV3 cells at higher concentration of ZnO NPs. In addition, ZnO NPs-treated SKOV3 cells resulted in an upregulation of LC3-I/II and p53 expression, which further induced autophagic cell death.

Arakha et al. fabricated ZnO NPs using the chemical precipitation method and further evaluated their anticancer activity [64], which found that ZnO NPs with different sizes could obviously inhibit the proliferation of fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells. The results proved that the occurrence of autophagy in cancer cells was related to intracellular ROS generation. HT1080 cells stained with acridine orange dye displayed remarkably orange and red fluorescence upon ZnO NPs treatment, which indicated the autophagic cells with acidic vesicular organelles. Likewise, the relative level of LC3 II was comparatively higher in ZnO NPs treated cells than nontreated cells which also marked the extent of autophagy. Interaction ZnO NPs with HT1080 cell has relatively higher ROS generation. Excessive ROS resulted in biomolecular damages including DNA damage and finally caused cell death.

Previous studies have indicated that ROS and autophagy are involved in the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs, but the regulatory mechanisms between autophagy and ROS remain to be elucidated. Zhang et al. investigated the regulatory mechanism of autophagy and the link between autophagy and ROS in ZnO NPs-treated lung epithelial cells [65]. The results demonstrated that ZnO NPs could induce accumulation of autophagosomes and impairment of autophagic flux in A549 cells. This autophagy induction was positively correlated with the dissolution of ZnO NPs in lysosomes to release zinc ions, and zinc ions released from ZnO NPs were able to damage lysosomes, leading to impaired autophagic flux and mitochondria. Impaired autophagic flux resulted in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, which could generate excessive ROS to cause cell death. This research provided a novel insight into the regulation mechanisms of autophagy-lysosomes-mitochondria-ROS axis, which would contribute to a better understanding of the toxicity of nanomaterials.

3.1.3. Anticancer Drug Delivery

Using nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery provides exciting opportunities for much more safety and effective cancer treatment. By targeting the specific sites of cancer cells, nanoparticle-based drug delivery could reduce the overall amount of drugs used and thus minimize undesirable side effects [9, 66]. Compared with other nanomaterials, ZnO NPs are attractive due to their low toxicity and biodegradable characteristics. ZnO NPs have acquired tremendous interest in cancer drug delivery. Different types of drugs such as doxorubicin, paclitaxel, curcumin, and baicalin or DNA fragments could be loaded onto the ZnO NPs to show better solubility, higher toxicity compared with individual agents, and effective delivery into cancer cells [48, 6769].

Hariharan et al. used the coprecipitation technique to get PEG 600 solution-modified ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO/PEG NPs), following the loading of doxorubicin (DOX) to form DOX-ZnO/PEG nanocomposites [52]. DOX-ZnO/PEG nanocomposites not only enhanced the intracellular accumulation of DOX but also presented a concentration-dependent inhibition on cervical cancer HeLa cell proliferation. Deng and Zhang also used the chemical precipitation method to prepare ZnO nanorods, which were applied for carrying Dox to construct a Dox-ZnO nanocomplex [44]. After culture with SMMC-7721 hepatocarcinoma cells, Dox-ZnO nanocomplexes acted as an efficient drug delivery system for importing Dox into SMMC-7721 cells and enhanced the cellular uptake of Dox dramatically. Furthermore, coupled with ultraviolet (UV) illumination, Dox-ZnO nanocomplexes caused more cell death through photocatalytic properties and synergistically triggered caspase-dependent apoptosis.

Puvvada et al. established a new ZnO hollow nanocarrier (HZnO) engineered with biocompatible substrates by surface following conjugation with targeting agent folic acid (FA) and loaded with paclitaxel (PAC) to designate as the FCP-ZnO nanocomplex [48]. The FCP-ZnO nanocomplexes showed preferential bioaccumulation and cancer cell uptake in the folate receptors overexpressed breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Because of FA-mediated endocytosis and intracellular release within the acidic endolysosome, the FCP-ZnO nanocomplexes not only exhibited significantly higher cytotoxicity in vitro MDA-MB-231 cells but also reduced MDA-MB-231 xenograft tumours in nude mice.

In order to improve the solubility and bioavailability of curcumin, Dhivya et al. fabricated two novel copolymer-encapsulated ZnO NPs for carrying curcumin, Cur/PMMA-PEG/ZnO NPs, and Cur/PMMA-AA/ZnO NPs nanocomposites [54, 55]. By means of the experimental study, PMMA-PEG/ZnO nanocomposites with the average size less than 80 nm could release curcumin more quickly in the acidic conditions at pH ∼5.8. Compared to constituent nanomaterials (nanocurcumin, PMMA-PEG, ZnO NPs, and PMMA-PEG/ZnO), the Cur/PMMA-PEG/ZnO nanocomposite performed largest observable inhibition on human gastric cancer AGS cell viability (IC50 ∼0.01 μg/mL−1) and induced cell cycle arrest at the S phase. For another nanocomposite, PMMA-AA/ZnO NPs with a size of 42 ± 5 nm could carry a large amount of curcumin and also had obvious antiproliferation on AGS cancer cells.

3.1.4. Targeting Functionalization

Targeted nanoparticles (NPs) also provide more therapeutic benefits besides specificity and specific localization like high payload, multidrug conjugation, easy tuning of release kinetics, selective localization, and bypass of multidrug resistance mechanism [70]. In order to increase the targeting effects and selectivity against cancer cells, plenty of functionalization techniques have been reported for nanoparticle modification. Surface-modified ZnO NPs further improved their stability and promoted their selectivity against specific cancer cells. The central attention is on the functionalization of the ZnO NPs surface with different kinds of biological molecules comprising different types of proteins, peptides, nucleic acids, folic acid, hyaluronan, and so on [47, 57, 7173]. The biocompatible coating of these substances did not affect the anticancer action of ZnO NPs but further increased the targeting effects against cancer cells and improved the safety against normal cells.

For example, Chakraborti et al. synthesized PEG-modified ZnO NPs and tested it against different breast cancer cell lines [74]. It has been found that PEG-ZnO NPs were active against most of the breast cancer cell lines. The main mechanism by which PEG-ZnO kills a cancer cell is by generating ROS and triggering p53-dependent apoptosis leading to cell death.

Namvar et al. produced hyaluronan/ZnO nanocomposite (HA/ZnO) through green synthesis for the first time for cancer treatment [57]. The HA/ZnO nanocomposites caused morphological changes and inhibited proliferation of cancer cells (pancreatic adenocarcinoma PANC-1 cell, ovarian adenocarcinoma CaOV-3 cell, colonic adenocarcinoma COLO205 cell, and acute promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cell) in dose- and time-dependent manner. Encouraging, HA/ZnO nanocomposite treatment for 72 hours did not cause toxicity to the normal human lung fibroblast (MRC-5) cell line. Compared to bare ZnO NPs, RGD peptide modification also increased the targeting effects of ZnO NPs on integrin αvβ3 receptors overexpressed MDA-MB-231 cells [47]. It appeared to increase the toxicity of the ZnO NPs to breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells at lower doses.

In general, the anticancer activity of nanoscaled ZnO materials with prominent functionality may provide a new opportunity for exploiting ZnO NPs in treating cancer diseases. The theory analysis and experimental research proved that ZnO NPs with less side effect present greater selectivity among normal and cancerous cells. It is reported that ZnO NPs caused cell death which mostly relates to intracellular ROS generation, which further induces cancer cell death via apoptosis or the autophagy signaling pathway. But up to now, the advanced anticancer mechanism study of ZnO NPs is still lacked of, especially in cellular and molecular mechanism strengthening. Therefore, in subsequent research work, we should attach more importance to their molecular mechanism in vitro and vivo and overcome its limitations in cancer therapy.

3.2. Antibacterial Activity

ZnO NPs can be selected as an antibacterial material because of its superior properties, such as high specific surface area and high activity to block a wide scope of pathogenic agents. But recently, the antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs is still scarcely known. As shown in Figure 2, prior reports had suggested the main antibacterial toxicity mechanisms of ZnO NPs were based on their ability to induce excess ROS generation, such as superoxide anion, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide production [10]. The antibacterial activity may involve the accumulation of ZnO NPs in the outer membrane or cytoplasm of bacterial cells and trigger Zn2+ release, which would cause bacterial cell membrane disintegration, membrane protein damage, and genomic instability, resulting in the death of bacterial cells [7577].

Presently, Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) are mainly chosen as model bacteria to evaluate the antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs [77, 78]. Some other Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) [24, 79], Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris) [80], Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) [81] and other Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) [82] and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) [83] are also investigated. The antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs in different bacterial species is presented in Table 2.


MaterialSize (nm)Bacterial speciesAntibacterial mechanism

ZnO NPs30E. coliDestroy the membrane integrity and ROS production [76]
Ag-ZnO composite64S. aureus and GFP E. coliROS and the release of Ag+ and Zn2+ [84]
ZnO NPs∼80V. choleraDepolarization of the membrane structure, increased permeabilization and damage of DNA, and generation of ROS [85]
ZnO NPs∼20E. coli 11634Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [86]
ZnO NPsE. coli and S. aureusRelease of Zn2+ [78]
Phβ-GBP-coated ZnO NPs (Phβ-GBP-ZnO NPs)20∼50S. aureus and P. vulgarisAlter the bacterial cell membrane permeability and high level of ROS [87]
ZnO nanocatalyst∼18B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and S. typhimuriumH2O2, OH, and other ROS [88]
CdO-ZnO nanocomposite27E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, S. aureus, P. vulgaris, and Bacillus sppROS (OH, H2O2, and O22−) and the release of Zn2+ and Cd2+ [89]
ZnO quantum dots4E. coli MG1655, Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34The toxicity is mainly from Zn2+ [90]
ZnO/kaoline nanocompositesS. aureus, E. coli, E. faecalis, and P. aeruginosaZn2+ and consequent diffusion of these ions into the cytoplasm [91]
ZnO nanostructures (ZnO-NSs)70∼80S. aureus, S. typhimurium, P. vulgaris, and K. pneumoniaeROS damage to cell membranes [92]
ZnO NPs40Streptococcus mutans (MTCC497), S. pyogenes (MTCC1926), Vibrio cholerae (MTCC3906), Shigella flexneri (MTCC1457), and Salmonella typhi (MTCC1252)ROS and the release of Zn2+ [93]
ZnO NPs90∼100V. cholera and enterotoxic E. coli (ETEC)Inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity, and cAMP levels are decreased [94]
Ge-ZnO NPs20P. aeruginosa and E. faecalisPenetrated the cell and caused bacterial cell death [83]
SA/ZnO compositesE. coli and S. aureusROS production [95]
ZnO@GA NPs11.5 ± 4.4E. coli and S. aureusAttributed to the high affinity of GA for the bacterial cell membrane and the increased lipophilicity upon the addition of GA [96]

Jiang et al. reported the potential antibacterial mechanisms of ZnO NPs against E. coli [76]. It showed that ZnO NPs with an average size about 30 nm caused cell death by directly contacting with the phospholipid bilayer of the membrane, destroying the membrane integrity. The addition of radical scavengers such as mannitol, vitamin E, and glutathione could block the bactericidal action of ZnO NPs, potentially revealing that ROS production played a necessary function in the antibacterial properties of ZnO NPs. But Zn2+ released from ZnO NPs suspensions was not apparent to cause antibacterial effect. Reddy prepared ZnO NPs with sizes of ∼13 nm and examined their antibacterial (E. coli and S. aureus) activities [78]. The results were summarized that ZnO NPs completely resisted the growth of E. coli at concentrations of about 3.4 mM but inhibited growth of S. aureus at much lower concentrations (≥1 mM). Moreover, Ohira and Yamamoto also found the antibacterial (E. coli and S. aureus) activity of ZnO NPs with small crystallite sizes was stronger than those with large crystallite sizes [97]. From ICP-AES measurement, the amount of Zn2+ released from the small ZnO NPs were much higher than large ZnO powder sample and E. coli was more sensitive to Zn2+ than S. aureus. So we can believe that eluted Zn2+ from ZnO NPs also take a key role in antibacterial action.

Iswarya et al. extracted crustacean immune molecule β-1,3-glucan binding protein (Phβ-GBP) from the heamolymph of Paratelphusa hydrodromus and then successfully fabricated the Phβ-GBP-coated ZnO NPs. The Phβ-GBP-ZnO NPs were spherical in shape with a particle size of 20–50 nm and restrained the growth of S. aureus and P. vulgaris. It should be noted that S. aureus was more susceptible to Phβ-GBP-ZnO NPs than P. vulgaris. In addition, Phβ-GBP-ZnO NPs could alter cell membrane permeability and trigger high level of ROS formation both in S. aureus and P. vulgaris [87]. Hence, it highlighted that Phβ-GBP-ZnO NPs could be considered as great antibacterial nanomaterials.

Epidemic disease cholera, a serious diarrheal disease caused by the intestinal infection of Gram-negative bacterium V. cholera, mainly affects populations in the developing countries [81, 94]. Aiming at the development of nanomedicine against cholera, Sarwar et al. carried out a detailed study about ZnO NPs against Vibrio cholerae (two biotypes of cholera bacteria (classical and El Tor)). ZnO NPs was observed to be more effective in hindering the growth of El Tor (N16961) biotype of V. cholera, which was closely associated with ROS production. These results would damage bacterial membrane, increase permeabilization, and substantially modify their morphology [85]. They also detected the antibacterial activity of the ZnO NPs in cholera toxin (CT) mouse models. It was found that ZnO NPs could induce the CT secondary structure collapsed gradually and interact with CT by interrupting CT binding with the GM1 anglioside receptor [98].

Although ZnO in nanoparticle form is a promising antibacterial agent due to its wide activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, the exact antibacterial mechanism of ZnO NPs has not been well established. Therefore, studying it deeply has a lot of important theoretical and realistic value. In the future, we believe ZnO NPs can be explored as antibacterial agents, such as ointments, lotions, and mouthwashes. In addition, it can be coated on various substrates to prevent bacteria from adhering, spreading, and breeding in medical devices.

3.3. ZnO NPs for Diabetes Treatment

Diabetes mellitus is a serious public health problem, and the WHO has estimated that, in 2014, there were more than 400 million adults with diabetes all over the world [99]. Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease caused by the body’s incapacity to produce insulin or by the ineffective use of the insulin produced [100, 101]. Zinc is a trace element and abundantly found mineral in all human tissues and tissue fluids. Zinc is well known to keep the structural integrity of insulin and has an active role in the secretion of insulin from pancreatic cells. It also participates in insulin synthesis, storage, and secretion [102]. Therefore, ZnO NPs as a novel agent in order for zinc delivery have been developed and evaluated for their antidiabetic potential.

Kitture et al. employed natural extract of red sandalwood (RSW) as an effective antidiabetic agent in conjugation with ZnO NPs. The antidiabetic activity was assessed with the help of α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition assay with murine pancreatic and small intestinal extracts [103]. Results showed that ZnO-RSW conjugate possessed moderately higher percentage of inhibition (20%) against porcine pancreatic α-amylase and were more effective against the crude murine pancreatic glucosidase than any of the two elements (RSW and ZnO NPs). The conjugated ZnO-RSW displayed 61.93% of inhibition in glucosidase while the bare ZnO NPs and RSW showed 21.48% and 5.90%, respectively.

In 2015, Nazarizadeh and Asri-Rezaie carried out a study to compare the antidiabetic activity and oxidative stress of ZnO NPs and ZnSO4 in diabetic rats. It found that ZnO NPs with small dimensions at higher doses (3 and 10 mg/kg) had a much greater antidiabetic effect compared to ZnSO4 (30 mg/kg). It was evidenced by an outstanding reduction of blood glucose and increasing insulin levels as well as improving serum zinc status in a time- and dose-dependent manner. However, severely elicited oxidative stress particularly at higher doses was also observed by the altered erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities, increased in malondialdehyde (MDA) production, and marked reduction of serum total antioxidant capacity [100].

The hyperglycemia can directly enhance an inflammatory state by regulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokines, such as interleukins, which is involved in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Hussein et al. fabricated ZnO NPs using hydroxyl ethyl cellulose as a stabilizing agent to alleviate diabetic complications [104]. It reported that ZnO NPs could significantly decrease malondialdehyde (MDA) and fast blood sugar and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels. The inflammatory markers, interleukin-1 (IL-1α) and CRP, were also notably decreased after ZnO NPs treatment, concomitant with an increase in nitric oxide (NO) and serum antioxidant enzyme (PON-1) levels in diabetic rats.

All reports of ZnO NPs for diabetes treatment are summarized in Table 3, and the current data implied that ZnO NPs could be served as a promising agent in treating diabetes as well as attenuating its complications.


Type of NPsSizeDrug loaded/synergyEffects

ZnO NPs60–95 nm sphericalMitigated the diabetic complications [104]
ZnO NPs∼20 nm sphericalA significant decrease in fasting
blood glucose and increase in high-density lipoprotein levels [105]
ZnO NPs10–30 nmThiamineZnO NPs in combination with thiamine-improved diabetes therapy [106]
ZnO NPsZnO NPs effectively reversed diabetes-induced pancreatic injury [107]
ZnO-RSW NPs∼20 nmConjugated red sandalwood (RSW)ZnO-RSW NPs showed excellent activity against the crude murine pancreatic glucosidase as compared to the individual ZnO NPs and the RSW extract [103]
ZnO NPsZnO NPs acted as a potent antidiabetic agent evidenced by improved glucose disposal, insulin levels, and zinc status in diabetic rats [100]
ZnO NPs∼10 nmZnO NPs presented pleiotropic antidiabetic effects via improved insulin signaling, enhanced glucose uptake, decreased hepatic glucose output, decreased lipolysis, and enhanced pancreatic beta cell mass [108]
ZnO NPs, CeO2 NPs, Ag NPsZnO NPs: 55 nm, CeO2 NPs: 54 nm, Ag NPs: 22.5 nmZnO NPs and Ag NPs had more potent antihyperglycemic activity than CeO2 NPs [109]
ZnO NPsSpherical: 96–115 nm; hexagonal: 57 ± 0.3 nmZnO NPs displayed better antidiabetic potential (IC50: 66.78 μg/mL) than ZnNO3 (IC50: 91.33 μg/mL) in terms of the α-amylase inhibition activity [26]
ZnO NPsVildagliptinZnO NPs and vildagliptin have synergistic effects on the therapy of type-2 diabetes [110]
ZnO NPs10–15 nm sphericalZnO NPs could improve glucose tolerance and higher serum insulin and reduce blood glucose, nonesterified fatty acids, and triglycerides [101]

3.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation is part of the complex biological response of body tissues to harmful stimuli, such as pathogens, damaged cells, or irritants [111]. Since the advent of nanoparticles and considering these biological activities of zinc ions, the anti-inflammatory effects of ZnO NPs have also attracted much attention.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the impairment of the skin-barrier functions, which was involved with complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors [112, 113]. Textiles have the longest and most intense contact with the human skin. Wiegand explored the role of ZnO-functionalized textile fibers in the control of oxidative stress in AD in vitro and in vivo [114]. The study found that it is an obvious improvement of AD pruritus and subjective sleep quality when AD patients wore the ZnO textiles overnight on 3 consecutive days. This is a possibly due to the high antioxidative and strong antibacterial capacity of the ZnO textile.

Ilves et al. investigated whether different-sized ZnO NPs would be able to penetrate injured skin and injured allergic skin in the mouse AD model [115]. Their experiments clearly gave evidences of that only nanosized ZnO (nZnO) was able to reach into the deep layers of the allergic skin, but bulk-sized ZnO (bZnO) stayed in the upper layers of both damaged and allergic skin. Compared with bZnO, nZnO exerted higher anti-inflammatory properties by decreasing drastically on proinflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ, and Th2 cytokines) in the mouse model of AD. These results demonstrated that ZnO NPs with a small size had great effects on reducing skin inflammation in AD models.

The anti-inflammatory activity of ZnO NPs is not confined to atopic dermatitis treatment but has also shown to be very effective for other inflammatory diseases. Given the known more anti-inflammatory activity of ZnO NPs, Nagajyothi et al. described a straightforward, inexpensive, and ecofriendly ZnO NPs using the root extract of P. tenuifolia and the anti-inflammatory activities were investigated in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages [30]. ZnO NPs exposed remarkable anti-inflammatory activity by dose-dependently suppressing NO production as well as the related protein expressions of iNOS, COX-2, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Thatoi et al. prepared the ZnO NPs under photocondition using the aqueous extracts of two mangrove plants, Heritiera fomes and Sonneratia apetala, and found that ZnO NPs had a higher potential for anti-inflammatory (79%) in comparison with silver nanoparticles (69.1%) [116].

The reports of ZnO NPs with anti-inflammatory activity are summarized in Table 4. Hence, ZnO NPs also have the potential to be utilized for anti-inflammatory treatment.


Type of NPsSizeEffects

ZnO-functionalized textile fibersA rapid improvement of AD severity, pruritus, and subjective sleep quality when AD patients wore the ZnO textiles overnight on 3 consecutive days [114]
ZnO NPsZnO NPs exerted higher anti-inflammatory properties by decreasing drastically on proinflammatory cytokines in the mouse model of AD [115]
ZnO NPsSpherical: 33.03–73.48 nmZnO NPs relieved inflammation and displayed a dose-dependent effect in the suppression of related protein expressions [30]
ZnO NPsSpherical: 96–115 nm; hexagonal: 57 ± 0.3 nmZnO NPs exhibited excellent anti-inflammatory activity with 66.78 μg/mL IC50 value [26]
ZnO incorporated into TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs/ZnO)TNTs/ZnO had a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation and adhesion of macrophages [117]
ZnO NPs and Ag NPsZnO NPs had a higher potential for anti-inflammatory (79%) in comparison with Ag NPs (69.1%) [116]
ZnO NPs69.4 ± 13.0 nmThe anti-inflammatory abilities of ZnO NPs to suppress proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in the colitic mice and activate Nrf2 signaling [118]
ZnO NPsDietary supplementation with ZnO NPs was effective in inhibiting mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β, TNF-α, and NF-κB) in the ileum in weaned piglets [119]

3.5. ZnO NPs for Bioimaging

ZnO NPs exhibit efficient blue emissions and near-UV emissions, which have green or yellow luminescence related to oxygen vacancies, therefore further extending its application into bioimaging field [12, 36, 120].

Using a simple sol-gel method, Xiong et al. prepared stable aqueous ZnO@polymer core-shell nanoparticles (ZnO@poly(MAA-co-PEGMEMA))for the first time. The ZnO@polymer core-shell nanoparticles exhibited high quantum yield and very stable broad photoluminescence in aqueous solutions. As shown in Figure 3, within human hepatoma cells, ZnO-1 (derived from LiOH) with an average size of 3 nm showed green fluorescence, while ZnO-2 (derived from NaOH) with an average size of 4 nm appeared yellow. It was worth to note that these nanoparticles did not show any remarkable toxicity for human hepatoma cells when their concentrations were less than 0.2 mg/mL. Furthermore, the luminescence was very stable during cell culturing and the cells were alive at 45 min of exposure. So, as a type of safe and cheap luminescent labels, the ZnO@polymer core-shell nanoparticles can be used as fluorescent probes for cell imaging in vitro [121].

Jiang et al. constructed ZnO nanosheets for the imaging of cultured cells. They treated drug sensitive leukemia line K562 cells with ZnO nanosheets, and the yellow-orange light emission was clearly observed around or inside the cells under UV irradiation (365 nm) at room temperature [122]. ZnO nanostructures were successfully attached onto or penetrated into the cells, which suggested that ZnO nanosheets with visible yellow-orange emission could act as a feasible label for the bioimaging.

Tang et al. prepared ZnO NPs by using the chemical precipitation method. It exhibited emission colors of blue, green, yellow, and orange [123]. The emission color can be changed via adjusting the pH of the precipitation solutions. To stabilize ZnO NPs in water, they encapsulated the ZnO NPs with silica to form ZnO@silica core-shell nanostructures. The obtained ZnO@silica core-shell nanoparticles exhibited excellent water stability, and the visible emissions of ZnO were retained. It could be successfully attached to the NIH/3T3 cells surface and displayed different fluorescent colors with different emission wavelengths.

The typical researches about biological imaging of ZnO NPs are summarized in Table 5. Based on its advanced intrinsic fluorescence, ZnO nanomaterial can also be used as a promising candidate for cell imaging and pathological studies.


MaterialsSize and modelsBiological imaging

ZnO@MAA-co-PEGMEMAHuman hepatoma cellsWith tunable photoluminescence emission and high quantum yield, under UV light, ZnO-1 showed green fluorescence, while ZnO-2 appeared yellow [121]
ZnO@PMAA-co-PDMAEMASpherical: 4 nm/COS-7 cellsThe PDMAEMA-modified ZnO QDs emitted strong yellow luminescence under UV light [124]
ZnO-Au@PEG NPs<100 nm/B16F10 cellsZnO-Au@PEG NPs can penetrate into the living cells and exhibit bright yellow fluorescence [125]
ZnO nanosheets46.6 ± 8.5 nm/K562 cellsYellow-orange light emission was observed around or inside the cells under UV light [122]
ZnO@silica NPs2.7–4.4 nm/HeLa cellsMonodispersed ZnO@silica NPs with blue, green, and yellow emission through using VTES, TEOS, and APS as modification materials [126]
Fe3O4-ZnO NPs15.7 nm/dendritic cellsFe3O4-ZnO NPs emit green fluorescence under UV light irradiation [127].
ZnO@silica NPsNIH/3T3 cellsZnO@silica NPs exhibited emission colors of blue, green, yellow, and orange under 365 nm excitation via the adjustment of the pH of the precipitation solutions [123]
ZnO@silica NPs55 nm/nerve cells, Caco-2 cellsZnO@silica QD colloidal solution exhibited a significant blue emission [128]
ZnO nanowires20–50 nm/U87MG cells, MCF-7 cellsZnO nanowires exhibited green fluorescent. RGD peptide-conjugated green fluorescent ZnO NWs can be specifically targeted to cell surface receptors in vitro [129]

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

ZnO NPs have exhibited promising biomedical applications based on its anticancer, antibacterial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, drug delivery, as well as bioimaging activity. Due to inherent toxicity of ZnO NPs, they possess strong inhibition effects against cancerous cell and bacteria, by inducing intracellular ROS generation and activating apoptotic signaling pathway, which makes ZnO NPs a potential candidate as anticancer and antibacterial agents. In addition, ZnO NPs have also been well known to promote the bioavailability of therapeutic drugs or biomolecules when functioning as drug carriers to achieve enhanced therapy efficiency. Moreover, with the ability to decrease blood glucose and increase in insulin levels, ZnO NPs have shown the promising potential in treating diabetes and attenuating its complications, which can be further evaluated.

ZnO NPs are listed as a kind of safe substance by the FDA. However, some critical issues of ZnO NPs still need to be further explored, which include the following: (1) lack of comparative analysis of its biological advantages with other metal nanoparticles, (2) the limitations of ZnO NPs toxicity toward biological systems remain a controversial issue in recent researches, (3) lack of evidence-based randomized research specifically exploring therapeutic roles in improving anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activities, and (4) lack of insight into corresponding animals study about its anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activities. Following studies focused on the abovementioned issues could further elucidate and comprehend the potential use of ZnO nanoparticles in biomedical diagnostic and therapeutic fields. We believe that nanomaterials would dramatically promote the development of medicine, and ZnO nanoparticles are expected to make more exciting contributions in these fields.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Macau Science and Technology Development Fund (no. 028/2014/A1) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M631026).

References

  1. P. K. Mishra, H. Mishra, A. Ekielski, S. Talegaonkar, and B. Vaidya, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles: a promising nanomaterial for biomedical applications,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1825–1834, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. G. Smijs and S. Pavel, “Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness,” Nanotechnology, Science and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 95–112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. A. Ruszkiewicz, A. Pinkas, B. Ferrer, T. V. Peres, A. Tsatsakis, and M. Aschner, “Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review,” Toxicology Reports, vol. 4, pp. 245–259, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Kolodziejczak-Radzimska and T. Jesionowski, “Zinc oxide–from synthesis to application: a review,” Materials, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2833–2881, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Sahoo, M. Maiti, A. Ganguly, J. J. George, and A. K. Bhowmick, “Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles as cure activator on the properties of natural rubber and nitrile rubber,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 2407–2415, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. D. Newman, M. Stotland, and J. I. Ellis, “The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide- and zinc oxide-based sunscreens,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 685–692, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Hatamie, A. Khan, M. Golabi et al., “Zinc oxide nanostructure-modified textile and its application to biosensing, photocatalysis, and as antibacterial material,” Langmuir, vol. 31, no. 39, pp. 10913–10921, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. X. Xiao, S. F. Hung, H. B. Tao, J. Miao, H. B. Yang, and B. Liu, “Spatially branched hierarchical ZnO nanorod-TiO2 nanotube array heterostructures for versatile photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic applications: towards intimate integration of 1D-1D hybrid nanostructures,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 14950–14961, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. W. Rasmussen, E. Martinez, P. Louka, and D. G. Wingett, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles for selective destruction of tumor cells and potential for drug delivery applications,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1063–1077, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. Y. Zhang and H. M. Xiong, “Photoluminescent ZnO nanoparticles and their biological applications,” Materials, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3101–3127, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Kim, S. Y. Lee, and H. J. Cho, “Doxorubicin-wrapped zinc oxide nanoclusters for the therapy of colorectal adenocarcinoma,” Nanomaterials, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 354, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. M. Xiong, “ZnO nanoparticles applied to bioimaging and drug delivery,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 37, pp. 5329–5335, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. A. Majeed Khan, M. Wasi Khan, M. Alhoshan, M. S. AlSalhi, and A. S. Aldwayyan, “Influences of Co doping on the structural and optical properties of ZnO nanostructured,” Applied Physics A, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Bisht, S. Rayamajhi, B. Kc, S. N. Paudel, D. Karna, and B. G. Shrestha, “Synthesis, characterization, and study of in vitro cytotoxicity of ZnO-Fe3O4 magnetic composite nanoparticles in human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and mouse fibroblast (NIH 3T3),” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 537, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Bettini, R. Pagano, V. Bonfrate et al., “Promising piezoelectric properties of new ZnO@octadecylamine adduct,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 34, pp. 20143–20149, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Pagano, A. Quarta, S. Pal, A. Licciulli, L. Valli, and S. Bettini, “Enhanced solar-driven applications of ZnO@Ag patchy nanoparticles,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 121, no. 48, pp. 27199–27206, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Bettini, R. Pagano, L. Valli, and G. Giancane, “Enhancement of open circuit voltage of a ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cell by means of piezotronic effect,” Chemistry-An Asian Journal, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1240–1245, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Spanhel and M. A. Anderson, “Semiconductor clusters in the sol-gel process-quantized aggregation, gelation, and crystal-growth in concentrated ZnO colloids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 2826–2833, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Rani, P. Suri, P. Shishodia, and R. Mehra, “Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO powder via sol–gel route for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1639–1645, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Z. J. Wang, H. M. Zhang, L. G. Zhang, J. S. Yuan, S. G. Yan, and C. Y. Wang, “Low-temperature synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by solid-state pyrolytic reaction,” Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Shen, N. Bao, K. Yanagisawa, K. Domen, A. Gupta, and C. A. Grimes, “Direct synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by a solution-free mechanochemical reaction,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 5117–5123, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. K. Pardeshi and A. B. Patil, “Effect of morphology and crystallite size on solar photocatalytic activity of zinc oxide synthesized by solution free mechanochemical method,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 308, no. 1-2, pp. 32–40, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Elumalai and S. Velmurugan, “Green synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles from the leaf extract of Azadirachta indica (L.),” Applied Surface Science, vol. 345, pp. 329–336, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Mahendra, M. Murali, G. Manasa et al., “Antibacterial and antimitotic potential of bio-fabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles of Cochlospermum religiosum (L.),” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 110, pp. 620–629, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Fu and Z. X. Fu, “Plectranthus amboinicus leaf extract-assisted biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and their photocatalytic activity,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 2492–2496, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Rajakumar, M. Thiruvengadam, G. Mydhili, T. Gomathi, and I. M. Chung, “Green approach for synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from Andrographis paniculata leaf extract and evaluation of their antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities,” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. G. Qian, J. Yao, M. Russel, K. Chen, and X. Y. Wang, “Characterization of green synthesized nano-formulation (ZnO-A. vera) and their antibacterial activity against pathogens,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 736–746, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Ali, S. Dwivedi, A. Azam et al., “Aloe vera extract functionalized zinc oxide nanoparticles as nanoantibiotics against multi-drug resistant clinical bacterial isolates,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 472, pp. 145–156, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. Yuvakkumar, J. Suresh, A. J. Nathanael, M. Sundrarajan, and S. I. Hong, “Novel green synthetic strategy to prepare ZnO nanocrystals using rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L.) peel extract and its antibacterial applications,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 41, pp. 17–27, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. C. Nagajyothi, S. J. Cha, I. J. Yang, T. V. Sreekanth, K. J. Kim, and H. M. Shin, “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using Polygala tenuifolia root extract,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, Biology, vol. 146, pp. 10–17, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. C. Janaki, E. Sailatha, and S. Gunasekaran, “Synthesis, characteristics and antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 144, pp. 17–22, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Dobrucka and J. Dugaszewska, “Biosynthesis and antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles using Trifolium pratense flower extract,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 517–523, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Sharma, M. I. Sabela, S. Kanchi et al., “Biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Jacaranda mimosifolia flowers extract: synergistic antibacterial activity and molecular simulated facet specific adsorption studies,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 162, pp. 199–207, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Qu, X. Yuan, X. H. Wang, and P. Shao, “Zinc accumulation and synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Physalis alkekengi L,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 159, no. 7, pp. 1783–1788, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Sharma, K. Kumar, C. Choudhary, P. K. Mishra, and B. Vaidya, “Development and characterization of metal oxide nanoparticles for the delivery of anticancer drug,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 672–679, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Zhang, T. R. Nayak, H. Hong, and W. Cai, “Biomedical applications of zinc oxide nanomaterials,” Current molecular medicine, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1633–1645, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Martinez-Carmona, Y. Gun’ko, and M. Vallet-Regi, “ZnO nanostructures for drug delivery and theranostic applications,” Nanomaterials, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 268, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. I. De Angelis, F. Barone, A. Zijno et al., “Comparative study of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles: physicochemical characterisation and toxicological effects on human colon carcinoma cells,” Nanotoxicology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1361–1372, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Cao, M. Roursgaard, A. Kermanizadeh, S. Loft, and P. Moller, “Synergistic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and fatty acids on toxicity to Caco-2 cells,” International Journal of Toxicology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. Fang, L. Jiang, Y. Gong, J. Li, L. Liu, and Y. Cao, “The presence of oleate stabilized ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) and reduced the toxicity of aged NPs to Caco-2 and HepG2 cells,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 278, pp. 40–47, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Bai Aswathanarayan and R. Rai Vittal, “Muddegowda U: anticancer activity of metal nanoparticles and their peptide conjugates against human colon adenorectal carcinoma cells,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, pp. 1–8, 2017, In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. V. Sharma, D. Anderson, and A. Dhawan, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative DNA damage and ROS-triggered mitochondria mediated apoptosis in human liver cells (HepG2),” Apoptosis, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 852–870, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. J. Akhtar, M. Ahamed, S. Kumar, M. M. Khan, J. Ahmad, and S. A. Alrokayan, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles selectively induce apoptosis in human cancer cells through reactive oxygen species,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 7, pp. 845–857, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Deng and H. Zhang, “The synergistic effect and mechanism of doxorubicin-ZnO nanocomplexes as a multimodal agent integrating diverse anticancer therapeutics,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 8, pp. 1835–1841, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. B. Moghaddam, M. Moniri, S. Azizi et al., “Eco-friendly formulated zinc oxide nanoparticles: induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the MCF-7 cancer cell line,” Genes, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 281, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Liu, X. Ma, S. Jin et al., “Zinc oxide nanoparticles as adjuvant to facilitate doxorubicin intracellular accumulation and visualize pH-responsive release for overcoming drug resistance,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1723–1730, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. A. Othman, C. Greenwood, A. F. Abuelela et al., “Correlative light-electron microscopy shows RGD-targeted ZnO nanoparticles dissolve in the intracellular environment of triple negative breast cancer cells and cause apoptosis with intratumor heterogeneity,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1310–1325, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. N. Puvvada, S. Rajput, B. N. Kumar et al., “Novel ZnO hollow-nanocarriers containing paclitaxel targeting folate-receptors in a malignant pH-microenvironment for effective monitoring and promoting breast tumor regression,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID 11760, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Tripathy, R. Ahmad, H. A. Ko, G. Khang, and Y. B. Hahn, “Enhanced anticancer potency using an acid-responsive ZnO-incorporated liposomal drug-delivery system,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 4088–4096, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. J. Bai, K. J. Chuang, C. M. Ma, T. Y. Chang, and H. C. Chuang, “Human lung adenocarcinoma cells with an EGFR mutation are sensitive to non-autophagic cell death induced by zinc oxide and aluminium-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. P. Bai, X. F. Zhang, G. L. Zhang, Y. F. Huang, and S. Gurunathan, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis and autophagy in human ovarian cancer cells,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 12, pp. 6521–6535, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Hariharan, S. Senthilkumar, A. Suganthi, and M. Rajarajan, “Synthesis and characterization of doxorubicin modified ZnO/PEG nanomaterials and its photodynamic action,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 116, pp. 56–65, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Pandurangan, G. Enkhtaivan, and D. H. Kim, “Anticancer studies of synthesized ZnO nanoparticles against human cervical carcinoma cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 158, pp. 206–211, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. Dhivya, J. Ranjani, J. Rajendhran, J. Mayandi, and J. Annaraj, “Enhancing the anti-gastric cancer activity of curcumin with biocompatible and pH sensitive PMMA-AA/ZnO nanoparticles,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 82, pp. 182–189, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. Dhivya, J. Ranjani, P. K. Bowen, J. Rajendhran, J. Mayandi, and J. Annaraj, “Biocompatible curcumin loaded PMMA-PEG/ZnO nanocomposite induce apoptosis and cytotoxicity in human gastric cancer cells,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 80, pp. 59–68, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. Patel, K. Kansara, V. A. Senapati, R. Shanker, A. Dhawan, and A. Kumar, “Cell cycle dependent cellular uptake of zinc oxide nanoparticles in human epidermal cells,” Mutagenesis, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 481–490, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. Namvar, S. Azizi, H. S. Rahman et al., “Green synthesis, characterization, and anticancer activity of hyaluronan/zinc oxide nanocomposite,” OncoTargets and therapy, vol. 9, pp. 4549–4559, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. D. F. Stowe and A. K. S. Camara, “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in excitable cells: modulators of mitochondrial and cell function,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1373–1414, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. E. Moghimipour, M. Rezaei, Z. Ramezani et al., “Transferrin targeted liposomal 5-fluorouracil induced apoptosis via mitochondria signaling pathway in cancer cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 194, pp. 104–110, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. C. Y. Guo, L. Sun, X. P. Chen, and D. S. Zhang, “Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 2003–2014, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. Chandrasekaran and M. Pandurangan, “In vitro selective anti-proliferative effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles against co-cultured C2C12 myoblastoma cancer and 3T3-L1 normal cells,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 148–154, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. N. Yu, T. J. Yoon, A. Minai-Tehrani et al., “Zinc oxide nanoparticle induced autophagic cell death and mitochondrial damage via reactive oxygen species generation,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1187–1195, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Hackenberg, A. Scherzed, A. Gohla et al., “Nanoparticle-induced photocatalytic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell death is associated with autophagy,” Nanomedicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Arakha, J. Roy, P. S. Nayak, B. Mallick, and S. Jha, “Zinc oxide nanoparticle energy band gap reduction triggers the oxidative stress resulting into autophagy-mediated apoptotic cell death,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 110, pp. 42–53, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Zhang, X. Qin, B. Wang et al., “Zinc oxide nanoparticles harness autophagy to induce cell death in lung epithelial cells,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e2954, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Erathodiyil and J. Y. Ying, “Functionalization of inorganic nanoparticles for bioimaging applications,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 925–935, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Wang, J. S. Lee, D. Kim, and L. Zhu, “Exploration of zinc oxide nanoparticles as a multitarget and multifunctional anticancer nanomedicine,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 46, pp. 39971–39984, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. B. Ghaffari, M. H. Sarrafzadeh, Z. Fakhroueian, S. Shahriari, and M. R. Khorramizadeh, “Functionalization of ZnO nanoparticles by 3-mercaptopropionic acid for aqueous curcumin delivery: synthesis, characterization, and anticancer assessment,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 79, pp. 465–472, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. Li, C. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Gong, Y. Xie, and Y. Cao, “The effects of baicalein or baicalin on the colloidal stability of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) and toxicity of NPs to Caco-2 cells,” Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 167–176, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. N. Kamaly, Z. Xiao, P. M. Valencia, A. F. Radovic-Moreno, and O. C. Farokhzad, “Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 2971–3010, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Z. Han, X. Wang, C. Heng et al., “Synergistically enhanced photocatalytic and chemotherapeutic effects of aptamer-functionalized ZnO nanoparticles towards cancer cells,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 17, no. 33, pp. 21576–21582, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. C. Biplab, S. N. Paudel, S. Rayamajhi et al., “Enhanced preferential cytotoxicity through surface modification: synthesis, characterization and comparative in vitro evaluation of TritonX-100 modified and unmodified zinc oxide nanoparticles in human breast cancer cell (MDA-MB-231),” Chemistry Central Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. Y. Ma, H. Ding, and H. M. Xiong, “Folic acid functionalized ZnO quantum dots for targeted cancer cell imaging,” Nanotechnology, vol. 26, no. 30, Article ID 305702, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. S. Chakraborti, S. Chakraborty, S. Saha et al., “PEG-functionalized zinc oxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells through reactive oxygen species-dependent impairment of DNA damage repair enzyme NEIL2,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 103, pp. 35–47, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. E. Shi, Z. H. Li, W. Zheng, Y. F. Zhao, Y. F. Jin, and Z. X. Tang, “Synthesis, antibacterial activity, antibacterial mechanism and food applications of ZnO nanoparticles: a review,” Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 173–186, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. Y. Jiang, L. Zhang, D. Wen, and Y. Ding, “Role of physical and chemical interactions in the antibacterial behavior of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 69, pp. 1361–1366, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. R. K. Dutta, B. P. Nenavathu, M. K. Gangishetty, and A. V. Reddy, “Antibacterial effect of chronic exposure of low concentration ZnO nanoparticles on E. coli,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health: Part A, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 871–878, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. K. M. Reddy, K. Feris, J. Bell, D. G. Wingett, C. Hanley, and A. Punnoose, “Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 21, Article ID 213902, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. B. N. Singh, A. K. Rawat, W. Khan, A. H. Naqvi, and B. R. Singh, “Biosynthesis of stable antioxidant ZnO nanoparticles by Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipids,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 9, Article ID e106937, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Ishwarya, B. Vaseeharan, S. Kalyani et al., “Facile green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Ulva lactuca seaweed extract and evaluation of their photocatalytic, antibiofilm and insecticidal activity,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 178, pp. 249–258, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. T. Chatterjee, S. Chakraborti, P. Joshi, S. P. Singh, V. Gupta, and P. Chakrabarti, “The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the structure of the periplasmic domain of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR protein,” FEBS Journal, vol. 277, no. 20, pp. 4184–4194, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. H. Hsueh, W. J. Ke, C. T. Hsieh, K. S. Lin, D. Y. Tzou, and C. L. Chiang, “ZnO nanoparticles affect Bacillus subtilis cell growth and biofilm formation,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0128457, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. Divya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Abinaya et al., “Biopolymer gelatin-coated zinc oxide nanoparticles showed high antibacterial, antibiofilm and anti-angiogenic activity,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 178, pp. 211–218, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. I. Matai, A. Sachdev, P. Dubey, S. U. Kumar, B. Bhushan, and P. Gopinath, “Antibacterial activity and mechanism of Ag-ZnO nanocomposite on S. aureus and GFP-expressing antibiotic resistant E. coli,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 115, pp. 359–367, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Sarwar, S. Chakraborti, S. Bera, I. A. Sheikh, K. M. Hoque, and P. Chakrabarti, “The antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae: variation in response depends on biotype,” Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1499–1509, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. K. Ghule, A. V. Ghule, B. J. Chen, and Y. C. Ling, “Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study,” Green Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1034–1041, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. Iswarya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Anjugam et al., “Multipurpose efficacy of ZnO nanoparticles coated by the crustacean immune molecule beta-1,3-glucan binding protein: toxicity on HepG2 liver cancer cells and bacterial pathogens,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 158, pp. 257–269, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. M. Shaban, F. Mohamed, and S. Abdallah, “Production and characterization of superhydrophobic and antibacterial coated fabrics utilizing ZnO nanocatalyst,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3925, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. K. Karthik, S. Dhanuskodi, C. Gobinath, and S. Sivaramakrishnan, “Microwave-assisted synthesis of CdO-ZnO nanocomposite and its antibacterial activity against human pathogens,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 139, pp. 7–12, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. X. Bellanger, P. Billard, R. Schneider, L. Balan, and C. Merlin, “Stability and toxicity of ZnO quantum dots: Interplay between nanoparticles and bacteria,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 283, pp. 110–116, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. K. Dedkova, B. Janikova, K. Matejova et al., “Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties of ZnO/kaoline nanocomposites,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 148, pp. 113–117, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Ramani, S. Ponnusamy, C. Muthamizhchelvan, J. Cullen, S. Krishnamurthy, and E. Marsili, “Morphology-directed synthesis of ZnO nanostructures and their antibacterial activity,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 105, pp. 24–30, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. Soren, S. Kumar, S. Mishra, P. K. Jena, S. K. Verma, and P. Parhi, “Evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant potential of the zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by aqueous and polyol method,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 119, pp. 145–151, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. W. Salem, D. R. Leitner, F. G. Zingl et al., “Antibacterial activity of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. W. Wu, T. Liu, H. He et al., “Rheological and antibacterial performance of sodium alginate/zinc oxide composite coating for cellulosic paper,” Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 167, pp. 538–543, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. J. Lee, K. H. Choi, J. Min, H. J. Kim, J. P. Jee, and B. J. Park, “Functionalized ZnO nanoparticles with gallic acid for antioxidant and antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus,” Nanomaterials, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 365, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. T. Ohira and O. Yamamoto, “Correlation between antibacterial activity and crystallite size on ceramics,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 355–361, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Sarwar, A. Ali, M. Pal, and P. Chakrabarti, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles provide anti-cholera activity by disrupting the interaction of cholera toxin with the human GM1 receptor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 44, pp. 18303–18311, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. S. N. Seclen, M. E. Rosas, A. J. Arias, and C. A. Medina, “Elevated incidence rates of diabetes in Peru: report from PERUDIAB, a national urban population-based longitudinal study,” BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e000401, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. A. Nazarizadeh and S. Asri-Rezaie, “Comparative study of antidiabetic activity and oxidative stress induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles and zinc sulfate in diabetic rats,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 834–843, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. R. D. Umrani and K. M. Paknikar, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles show antidiabetic activity in streptozotocin-induced Type 1 and 2 diabetic rats,” Nanomedicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. R. Malizia, A. Scorsone, P. D’Angelo, C. Lo Pinto, L. Pitrolo, and C. Giordano, “Zinc deficiency and cell-mediated and humoral autoimmunity of insulin-dependent diabetes in thalassemic subjects,” Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism: JPEM, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 981–984, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  103. R. Kitture, K. Chordiya, S. Gaware et al., “ZnO nanoparticles-red sandalwood conjugate: a promising anti-diabetic agent,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4046–4051, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. J. Hussein, M. El-Banna, T. A. Razik, and M. E. El-Naggar, “Biocompatible zinc oxide nanocrystals stabilized via hydroxyethyl cellulose for mitigation of diabetic complications,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 107, pp. 748–754, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. A. Bayrami, S. Parvinroo, A. Habibi-Yangjeh, and S. Rahim Pouran, “Bio-extract-mediated ZnO nanoparticles: microwave-assisted synthesis, characterization and antidiabetic activity evaluation,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 730–739, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. A. Amiri, R. A. F. Dehkordi, M. S. Heidarnejad, and M. J. Dehkordi, “Effect of the zinc oxide nanoparticles and thiamine for the management of diabetes in alloxan-induced mice: a stereological and biochemical study,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 258–264, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. N. S. Wahba, S. F. Shaban, A. A. Kattaia, and S. A. Kandeel, “Efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in attenuating pancreatic damage in a rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes,” Ultrastructural Pathology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 358–373, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. S. C. Asani, R. D. Umrani, and K. M. Paknikar, “In vitro studies on the pleotropic antidiabetic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles,” Nanomedicine, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 1671–1687, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. K. Shanker, J. Naradala, G. K. Mohan, G. S. Kumar, and P. L. Pravallika, “A sub-acute oral toxicity analysis and comparative in vivo anti-diabetic activity of zinc oxide, cerium oxide, silver nanoparticles, and Momordica charantia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 59, pp. 37158–37167, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. R. M. El-Gharbawy, A. M. Emara, and S. E. Abu-Risha, “Zinc oxide nanoparticles and a standard antidiabetic drug restore the function and structure of beta cells in type-2 diabetes,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 84, pp. 810–820, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. L. Ferrero-Miliani, O. H. Nielsen, P. S. Andersen, and S. E. Girardin, “Chronic inflammation: importance of NOD2 and NALP3 in interleukin-1 beta generation,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 227–235, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. M. Boguniewicz and D. Y. Leung, “Atopic dermatitis: a disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 233–246, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. R. Jurakic Toncic and B. Marinovic, “The role of impaired epidermal barrier function in atopic dermatitis,” Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica: ADC, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 95–109, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  114. C. Wiegand, U. C. Hipler, S. Boldt, J. Strehle, and U. Wollina, “Skin-protective effects of a zinc oxide-functionalized textile and its relevance for atopic dermatitis,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, vol. 2013, pp. 115–121, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Ilves, J. Palomaki, M. Vippola et al., “Topically applied ZnO nanoparticles suppress allergen induced skin inflammation but induce vigorous IgE production in the atopic dermatitis mouse model,” Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. P. Thatoi, R. G. Kerry, S. Gouda et al., “Photo-mediated green synthesis of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles using aqueous extracts of two mangrove plant species, Heritiera fomes and Sonneratia apetala and investigation of their biomedical applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 163, pp. 311–318, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. S. Yao, X. Feng, J. Lu et al., “Antibacterial activity and inflammation inhibition of ZnO nanoparticles embedded TiO2 nanotubes,” Nanotechnology, vol. 29, no. 24, Article ID 244003, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. J. Q. Li, H. Q. Chen, B. Wang et al., “ZnO nanoparticles act as supportive therapy in DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in mice by maintaining gut homeostasis and activating Nrf2 signaling,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, Article ID 43126, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. T. Xia, W. Lai, M. Han, M. Han, X. Ma, and L. Zhang, “Dietary ZnO nanoparticles alters intestinal microbiota and inflammation response in weaned piglets,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 39, pp. 64878–64891, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. P. Zhu, Z. Weng, X. Li et al., “Biomedical applications of functionalized ZnO nanomaterials: from biosensors to bioimaging,” Advanced Materials Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID 1500494, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. H. M. Xiong, Y. Xu, Q. G. Ren, and Y. Y. Xia, “Stable aqueous ZnO@polymer core-shell nanoparticles with tunable photoluminescence and their application in cell imaging,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 24, pp. 7522-7523, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. H. Jiang, H. Wang, and X. Wang, “Facile and mild preparation of fluorescent ZnO nanosheets and their bioimaging applications,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 15, pp. 6991–6995, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. X. Tang, E. S. G. Choo, L. Li, J. Ding, and J. Xue, “Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with tunable emission colors and their cell labeling applications,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 3383–3388, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. P. Zhang and W. Liu, “ZnO QD@PMAA-co-PDMAEMA nonviral vector for plasmid DNA delivery and bioimaging,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 3087–3094, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. W. Wu, J. Shen, P. Banerjee, and S. Zhou, “A multifuntional nanoplatform based on responsive fluorescent plasmonic ZnO-Au@PEG hybrid nanogels,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 2830–2839, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. H. J. Zhang, H. M. Xiong, Q. G. Ren, Y. Y. Xia, and J. L. Kong, “ZnO@silica core-shell nanoparticles with remarkable luminescence and stability in cell imaging,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 26, pp. 13159–13165, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. N. H. Cho, T. C. Cheong, J. H. Min et al., “A multifunctional core–shell nanoparticle for dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 675–682, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. K. Matsuyama, N. Ihsan, K. Irie, K. Mishima, T. Okuyama, and H. Muto, “Bioimaging application of highly luminescent silica-coated ZnO-nanoparticle quantum dots with biotin,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 399, pp. 19–25, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. H. Hong, J. Shi, Y. Yang et al., “Cancer-targeted optical imaging with fluorescent zinc oxide nanowires,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 3744–3750, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Jinhuan Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

23632 Views | 5954 Downloads | 89 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder