Ischemia Alters the Expression of Connexins in the Aged Human Brain

Nakase, Taizen; Maeda, Tetsuya; Yoshida, Yasuji; Nagata, Ken

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/147946

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 | Article ID 147946 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/147946

Ischemia Alters the Expression of Connexins in the Aged Human Brain

Taizen Nakase,¹Tetsuya Maeda,²Yasuji Yoshida,³and Ken Nagata²

Academic Editor: Thomas van Groen

Received06 Apr 2009

Revised08 Jun 2009

Accepted30 Jun 2009

Published23 Sept 2009

Abstract

Although the function of astrocytic gap junctions under ischemia is still under debate, increased expression of connexin 43 (Cx43) has been observed in ischemic brain lesions, suggesting that astrocytic gap junctions could provide neuronal protection against ischemic insult. Moreover, different connexin subtypes may play different roles in pathological conditions. We used immunohistochemical analysis to investigate alterations in the expression of connexin subtypes in human stroke brains. Seven samples, sectioned after brain embolic stroke, were used for the analysis. Data, evaluated semiquantitatively by computer-assisted densitometry, was compared between the intact hemisphere and ischemic lesions. The results showed that the coexpression of Cx32 and Cx45 with neuronal markers was significantly increased in ischemic lesions. Cx43 expression was significantly increased in the colocalization with astrocytes and relatively increased in the colocalization with neuronal marker in ischemic lesions. Therefore, Cx32, Cx43, and Cx45 may respond differently to ischemic insult in terms of neuroprotection.

1. Introduction

Astrocytes are a major cell type in the central nervous system and play an important role in regulating brain metabolism [1, 2]. Moreover, astrocytes compose the frame network and communicate through gap junctions. A gap junction hemichannel consists of six connexins, and the connexin 43 (Cx43) is a main subtype of astrocytic gap junctions [3, 4]. Previous studies showed that heterozygous Cx43 null mice exhibited significantly increased infarct volume [5] and enhanced apoptosis following ischemic brain insult [6]. Likewise, mice lacking Cx43 in astrocytes showed a significantly increased infarct volume and amplified inflammatory response in the penumbra compared to control littermates [7]. These results suggested that astrocytic gap junctions may play a critical role in controlling neuronal apoptosis and inflammatory response following brain ischemia. Moreover, in ischemic brain lesions of human samples, the expressed level of Cx43 was significantly increased in the penumbra compared to the intact area [8]. Therefore, astrocytic gap junctions may provide neuronal protection against ischemic insult not only in animal models but also in the human brain. However, the effects of astrocytic gap junctions on pathological conditions are still being debated [9, 10]. Recently, gap junctions composed of different types of connexins have been reported to have selective permeability for different biological molecules [11]. A few reports have also reported alterations of connexin expression under pathological conditions in the human brain [12, 13].

In this study, we used immunohistochemical analysis to examine the levels of Cx26, Cx32, Cx43, and Cx45 expression in neurons and astrocytes in ischemic lesions from the view point of human brain pathology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

We screened postmortem human brain samples with ischemic stroke () in our hospital. First, we carefully checked all clinical records and image examinations, such as CT, MRI, MRA, and ultrasound echo cardiography of all sample cases. Embolic infarction brains sectioned after stroke were recruited in this study. Because of restricting artifacts in the pathological analysis, we selected only those cases with atrial fibrillation (Af) as the embolic source. They were sectioned within one week after hospitalization. Then, 7 cases were well preserved and fit our criteria for pathological observation. Precise clinical data are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

The samples were fixed in phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde for one month and embedded in paraffin blocks. We observed whole brain sections with hematoxyline and eosin (H&E) staining under photomicroscope (Eclipse E800, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Then, smaller brain samples (approximately 3 cm 2 cm) were sectioned from the intact and ischemic cortex and included surrounding areas as shown in the representative picture (Figure 1). These brain sections (5 m in thickness) were mounted on glass slides and deparaffinized with xylene and graded ethanol solutions. Sections were then immersed in methanol with 0.3% H₂O₂ for 15 minutes to inactivate internal peroxidase. After the slides were treated with 0.1% trypsin for 5 minutes, they were irradiated with microwaves in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 5 minutes at 500 W, followed by 20 minutes cooling for antigen-retrieval. The samples were then blocked with Protein Block Serum-Free (X0909, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were incubated with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP: monoclonal, Dako), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2: monoclonal, Chemicon, Temecula, CA), connexin 26 (Cx26: polyclonal, Chemicon), Cx32 (polyclonal, ProteinTech Group Inc., Chicago, IL), Cx43 (polyclonal, Chemicon), and Cx45 (polyclonal, Alpha diagnostic Intl., San Antonio, TX) antibodies (dilution was , , , , , and , resp.) in 0.3% Tween20 in PBS overnight at C, then reacted with appropriate secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor, Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) in 0.3% Tween20 in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. As for the primary antibodies, GFAP was used for the detection of astrocytes, and MAP2 was used as the neuronal marker. The sections were observed under a luminescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse E600) and images captured with an attached digital camera (DXM1200C, Nikon).

2.3. Morphometry

Because we were not able to evaluate the exact amount of protein in tissue which was used in this study, we analyzed the amount of protein expression semiquantitatively. That is, the area of immunoreactive plaques was measured in four randomly selected regions (220 m 165 m square) and comparisons made between intact and ischemic peripheral areas. The analysis was performed with the aid of computer software (Scion Image Beta 4.0.2, Scion Image Co., Frederick, MD). Pixel counts were used for calculation. All measurements were repeated on two different slides for each patient. On the pictures of double immunohistochemical staining, yellow plaques represent the coexpression of connexin proteins and neuronal or astrocytic markers. These yellow plaques were extracted with the assistance of computer software (Adobe Photoshop CS2, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA), to assess the amount of colocalized connexins. All acquired images were standardized by subtracting background density; that is, particles with sizes smaller than 50 pixels or larger than 500 pixels were excluded from images in our samples, as they are staining debris confirmed by negative controls.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data is presented as mean SD values for each model. Mean values in each lesion were compared by an ANOVA posthoc test, Bonferroni/Dunn method using Stat View J 5.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Values of were considered as significant.

3. Results and Discussion

We observed the expression of different types of connexins in neurons and astrocytes to assess whether connexins play different roles under ischemic conditions. In this study, the expression of Cx26, Cx32, Cx43, and Cx45 was investigated because of previous reports in which critical roles for these connexins were suggested. Cx26 has been reported to form a major component of astrocytic gap junctions [14, 15], although its presence and function in the brain is still under debate [16, 17]. Hemichannels formed by Cx26 and Cx32 have been reported to pass cGMP more effectively than Cx32 homomeric hemichannels, suggesting that the effect of Cx26 is specific in cGMP transport [18]. Cx32 is expressed not only in gap junctions of Schwann cells [19] but also in neurons and oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system (CNS) [20, 21]. Cx32 was reported to participate in regulating the permeability of adenosine, a critical component of ATP [22]. Moreover, Cx32 knockout mice presented amplified neuronal loss following brain ischemia as compared to wild type mice [23]. Cx45 is reported to be expressed in neuronal and oligodendrocytic gap junctions [24, 25]. Electrical synapses composed of gap junctions, in which the main subtype of connexin is Cx45 [26], could disrupt chemical neurotransmission during development and regeneration [27]. However, it has also been reported that a Ca²⁺ influx has a critical impact on spreading cell damage from the core lesion to the penumbral area after ischemia [28, 29]. Therefore, the role of electrical synapses composed of gap junctions against ischemic insult is still controversial. Cx43 is a major component of astrocytic gap junctions [3, 4]. We have reported that the reduction of Cx43 expression extended neuronal apoptosis and amplified gliosis following ischemia [7, 30]. Moreover, gap junctions composed of Cx43 are reported to be involved in the distribution of ATP between attached cells [22].

The immunohistochemical staining revealed that the gross expression of Cx32 (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) was relatively increased in the ischemic area compared to the intact area (Figure 2(g): ). As seen in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), the expression of the yellow plaques representing Cx32 showed colocalization with MAP2. Expression was visualized along neuronal axons and was more abundant in the ischemic lesion than those in the intact area. According to calculations of the amount of the yellow plaques, Cx32 expression in MAP2 positive areas was significantly increased in the ischemic lesion compared to the intact area (Figure 2(g), ). On the contrary, the expression of Cx32 on GFAP positive cells was not changed in the ischemic lesion (Figures 2(e), 2(f), and 2(g)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 2

Cx32 immunofluorescent stainings indicate amplified expression in the ischemic lesion (b) compared to the intact area (a). Inset pictures of (c) and (d) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx32 (green) and MAP2 (red). Representative pictures in second row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (c) and ischemic area (d). The yellow region which stands for Cx32 immunopositive area colocalized with MAP2 shows increased expression in the ischemic periphery. Inset pictures of (e) and (f) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx32 (green) and GFAP (red). Representative pictures in third row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (e) and ischemic area (f). The yellow region which stands for Cx32 immunopositive area colocalized with GFAP seems similar level of the expression between normal and ischemic area. Black bars in graph (g) indicate the average counts of protein expressions. The Cx32 expression was relatively increased in the ischemic area compared to the intact area (†: ). The coexpression of Cx32 and MAP2 was significantly increased in the ischemic lesion as compared to the intact area (^**: ). However, there was no statistical difference in Cx32 and GFAP coexpression between intact and ischemic areas. Scale bar indicates 50 m.

The expression of Cx45 (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) was significantly increased in ischemic lesions compared to intact area (Figure 3(g), ). Cx45 expression colocalized in MAP2 positive area was observed in neuronal body and axons (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)) and was significantly increased in the ischemic lesion compared to the intact area (Figure 3(g), ). As shown in Figures 3(e) and 3(f), the expression of Cx45 in GFAP positive cells was not changed between ischemic and intact regions (Figure 3(g)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 3

Cx45 immunofluorescent stainings indicate amplified expression in the ischemic lesion (b) compared to the intact area (a). Inset pictures of (c) and (d) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx45 (green) and MAP2 (red). Representative pictures in second row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (c) and ischemic area (d). The yellow region which stands for Cx45 immunopositive area colocalized with MAP2 shows increased expression in the ischemic periphery. Inset pictures of (e) and (f) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx45 (green) and GFAP (red). Representative pictures in third row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (e) and ischemic area (f). The yellow region which stands for Cx45 immunopositive area colocalized with GFAP shows no difference of expression between intact and ischemic area. Black bars in graph (g) indicate the average counts of protein expressions. The Cx45 expression was significantly increased in the ischemic area compared to the intact area. The coexpression of Cx45 and MAP2 was significantly increased in the ischemic lesion as compared to the intact area. However, no statistical alteration was observed in the amount of coexpression of Cx45 and GFAP between intact and ischemic regions. Scale bar indicates 50 m. ^**: .

As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), the gross expression of Cx43 was significantly increased in ischemic lesions compared to intact tissue (Figure 4(g), ). The coexpression of Cx43 and MAP2 (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)) was visualized as punctate staining and relatively increased in the ischemic lesion compared to intact area (Figure 4(g), ). The coexpression of Cx43 and GFAP (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)) was significantly increased in ischemic lesions compared to intact area (Figure 4(g), ). The results supported previous reports in which showed increased Cx43 expression in the ischemic lesion [8, 31, 32].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 4

Cx43 immunofluorescent stainings indicate amplified expression in the ischemic lesion (b) compared to the intact area (a). Inset pictures of (c) and (d) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx43 (green) and MAP2 (red). Representative pictures in second row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (c) and ischemic area (d). The yellow region which stands for Cx43 immunopositive area colocalized with MAP2 shows amplified expression in the ischemic periphery. Inset pictures of (e) and (f) represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx43 (green) and GFAP (red). Representative pictures in third row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (e) and ischemic area (f). The yellow region which stands for Cx43 immunopositive area colocalized with GFAP also shows increased expression level in ischemic lesion as compared to intact area. Black bars in graph (g) indicate the average counts of protein expressions. The Cx43 expression alone and the amount of coexpression with Cx43 or GFAP were significantly increased in the ischemic lesion compared to the intact area. The coexpression of Cx43 and MAP2 was increased in ischemic lesion compared to intact area (†: ). Scale bar indicates 50 m. ^**: , *: .

Meanwhile, the gross expression of Cx26 was not changed between the intact area and ischemic lesion. The amount of Cx26 expression which colocalized with MAP2 or GFAP positive area revealed no significant difference between intact and ischemic regions (Figure 5). Since the role of Cx26 in astrocytic gap junctions is still controversial, our findings may support previous reports [17].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 5

Cx26 immunofluorescent stainings show similar finding between intact area (a) and ischemic lesion (b). Inset pictures represent double immunofluorescent staining with Cx26 (green) and MAP2 (red) in (c) and (d) and with Cx26 (green) and GFAP (red) in (e) and (f). Representative pictures in second row show the extracted area as yellow region of the double immunofluorescent staining from intact (c) and ischemic area (d). The yellow region which stands for Cx26 immunopositive area colocalized with MAP2 shows the same amount of expression. The yellow region which stands for Cx26 immunopositive area colocalized with GFAP shows no difference of expression between intact and ischemic area. Black bars in graph (g) indicate the average counts of protein expressions. The Cx26 expression was not changed in the ischemic lesion as compared to the intact area. No statistical alteration was observed in the amount of coexpression of Cx26 and MAP2 nor Cx26 and GFAP between intact and ischemic regions. Scale bar indicates 50 m.

In the ischemic lesion, neurons and astrocytes are perishing, and their cell bodies and processes will shrink. On the other hand, some astrocytes and microglia react by expanding their body and processes as an inflammatory response. As mentioned above, both Cx32 and Cx45 exist in neurons and/or oligodendrocytes, and Cx43 exists in astrocytes. In this study, a significant increase of Cx32 and Cx45 expression was mostly observed in neuronal axons in ischemic lesions. In the CNS, the neuronal axon is covered with a myelin sheath of oligodendrocytes, and therefore, the expression of Cx32 and Cx45 could be increased in either, or both, neuronal axons and oligodendrocytes after ischemic insult. The Cx43 expression was significantly increased in astrocytes within ischemic lesions and was slightly increased in the coexpression of Cx43 and MAP2 after ischemic insult, suggesting that Cx43 may participate in the composition of gap junctions between neurons and astrocytes activated by ischemic stress. Since Cx32 relates to adenosine transport and Cx43 participates in distributing ATP, both Cx32 and Cx43 may play an important role in maintaining energy support after ischemic insult. Cx45 has been reported to play a role in spreading chemical stress against neurons from the ischemic core to peripheral area. It would require further assessment to reveal the effect of increased Cx45 expression following ischemia.

We could not assess the expression of Cx36, one of the major components of neuronal gap junctions, because our samples, fixed in paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin blocks, were unable to be stained with any anti-Cx36 antibodies we had available. Cx30 is also a major connexin subtype in astrocytic gap junctions. However, the anti-Cx30 antibodies which were used in this study did not show reactivity against human brain samples. Since the evidence showing that Cx30 may compensate for the lack of Cx43 has been accumulating [6, 17], the alteration of Cx30 expression after ischemic stress should be explored. Moreover, we had not directly observed gap junctions between neurons and astrocytes. Alternatively, double immunohistochemical staining was used for investigating the expression of specific connexins in neurons and astrocytes. In the future, gap junctions between different cell types should be directly observed through an electron microscope. Gap junctions of oligodendrocytes or microglia need further investigation in order to confirm the role of gap junctional intercellular communication following ischemic insult.

In conclusion, this is the first report that has revealed amplified expressions of Cx32 and Cx45 in MAP2 positive areas within the ischemic lesion from the view point of human brain pathology. Furthermore, Cx32 and Cx43 may have a neuroprotective role under ischemic conditions in the human brain.

References

A. Araque, V. Parpura, R. P. Sanzgiri, and P. G. Haydon, “Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 208–215, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Dermietzel and D. C. Spray, “From neuro-glue (‘Nervenkitt’) to glia: a prologue,” Glia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Giaume, C. Fromaget, A. El Aoumari, J. Cordier, J. Glowinski, and D. Gros, “Gap junctions in cultured astrocytes: single-channel currents and characterization of channel-forming protein,” Neuron, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. G. Naus, J. F. Bechberger, S. Caveney, and J. X. Wilson, “Expression of gap junction genes in astrocytes and C6 glioma cells,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Siushansian, J. F. Bechberger, D. F. Cechetto, V. C. Hachinski, and C. C. G. Naus, “Connexin43 null mutation increases infarct size after stroke,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 440, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakase, S. Fushiki, G. Sohl, M. Theis, K. Willecke, and C. C. G. Naus, “Neuroprotective role of astrocytic gap junctions in ischemic stroke,” Cell Communication and Adhesion, vol. 10, no. 4–6, pp. 413–417, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Nakase, G. Sohl, M. Theis, K. Willecke, and C. C. G. Naus, “Increased apoptosis and inflammation after focal brain ischemia in mice lacking connexin43 in astrocytes,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 2067–2075, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Nakase, Y. Yoshida, and K. Nagata, “Enhanced connexin 43 immunoreactivity in penumbral areas in the human brain following ischemia,” Glia, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 369–375, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakase and C. C. G. Naus, “Gap junctions and neurological disorders of the central nervous system,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1662, no. 1-2, pp. 149–158, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Anderson, F. Blomstrand, C. Blomstrand, P. S. Eriksson, and M. Nilsson, “Astrocytes and stroke: networking for survival?” Neurochemical Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 293–305, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Goldberg, V. Valiunas, and P. R. Brink, “Selective permeability of gap junction channels,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1662, no. 1-2, pp. 96–101, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Nagy, W. Li, E. L. Hertzberg, and C. A. Marotta, “Elevated connexin43 immunoreactivity at sites of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 717, no. 1-2, pp. 173–178, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Vis, L. F. B. Nicholson, R. L. M. Faull, W. H. Evans, N. J. Severs, and C. R. Green, “Connexin expression in Huntington's diseased human brain,” Cell Biology International, vol. 22, no. 11-12, pp. 837–847, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Rash, T. Yasumura, K. G. V. Davidson, C. S. Furman, F. E. Dudek, and J. I. Nagy, “Identification of cells expressing Cx43, Cx30, Cx26, Cx32 and Cx36 in gap junctions of rat brain and spinal cord,” Cell Communication and Adhesion, vol. 8, no. 4–6, pp. 315–320, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. I. Nagy, X. Li, J. Rempel et al., “Connexin26 in adult rodent central nervous system: demonstration at astrocytic gap junctions and colocalization with connexin30 and connexin43,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 441, no. 4, pp. 302–323, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Filippov, S. G. Hormuzdi, E. C. Fuchs, and H. Monyer, “A reporter allele for investigating connexin 26 gene expression in the mouse brain,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 3183–3192, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wallraff, R. Kohling, U. Heinemann, M. Theis, K. Willecke, and C. Steinhauser, “The impact of astrocytic gap junctional coupling on potassium buffering in the hippocampus,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 5438–5447, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Bevans, M. Kordel, S. K. Rhee, and A. L. Harris, “Isoform composition of connexin channels determines selectivity among second messengers and uncharged molecules,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 5, pp. 2808–2816, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Spray and R. Dermietzel, “X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and other potential gap-junction diseases of the nervous system,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 256–262, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fushiki and C. Kinoshita, “Intercellular communication through gap junctions,” in Progress in Cell Research, Y. Kanno, K. Kataoka, Y. Shiba, Y. Shimazu, and T. Shimazu, Eds., vol. 4, pp. 239–243, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Dermietzel, O. Traub, T. K. Hwang et al., “Differential expression of three gap junction proteins in developing and mature brain tissues,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 24, pp. 10148–10152, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Goldberg, A. P. Moreno, and P. D. Lampe, “Gap junctions between cells expressing connexin 43 or 32 show inverse permselectivity to adenosine and ATP,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 39, pp. 36725–36730, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Oguro, T. Jover, H. Tanaka et al., “Global ischemia-induced increases in the gap junctional proteins connexin 32 (Cx32) and Cx36 in hippocampus and enhanced vulnerability of Cx32 knock-out mice,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 7534–7542, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Dermietzel, M. Farooq, J. A. Kessler, H. Althaus, E. L. Hertzberg, and D. C. Spray, “Oligodendrocytes express gap junction proteins connexin32 and connexin45,” Glia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–114, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Maxeiner, O. Kruger, K. Schilling, O. Traub, S. Urschel, and K. Willecke, “Spatiotemporal transcription of connexin45 during brain development results in neuronal expression in adult mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 689–700, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sohl, S. Maxeiner, and K. Willecke, “Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 191–200, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Neunuebel and M. J. Zoran, “Electrical synapse formation disrupts calcium-dependent exocytosis, but not vesicle mobilization,” Synapse, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 154–165, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Cotrina, J. H.-C. Lin, A. Alves-Rodrigues et al., “Connexins regulate calcium signaling by controlling ATP release,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 26, pp. 15735–15740, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H.-C. Lin, H. Weigel, M. L. Cotrina et al., “Gap-junction-mediated propagation and amplification of cell injury,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 494–500, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Nakase, S. Fushiki, and C. C. G. Naus, “Astrocytic gap junctions composed of connexin 43 reduce apoptotic neuronal damage in cerebral ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1987–1993, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Haupt, O. W. Witte, and C. Frahm, “Up-regulation of Connexin43 in the glial scar following photothrombotic ischemic injury,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Haupt, O. W. Witte, and C. Frahm, “Temporal profile of connexin 43 expression after photothrombotic lesion in rat brain,” Neuroscience, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 562–570, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2009 Taizen Nakase et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1310

Downloads

1028

Citations