Research Article  Open Access
Wei Meng, Fengxu Yu, Huaiqing Chen, Jianmin Zhang, Eryong Zhang, Ke Dian, Yingkang Shi, "Concentration Polarization of HighDensity Lipoprotein and Its Relation with Shear Stress in an In Vitro Model", BioMed Research International, vol. 2009, Article ID 695838, 8 pages, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/695838
Concentration Polarization of HighDensity Lipoprotein and Its Relation with Shear Stress in an In Vitro Model
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the concentration polarization of highdensity lipoprotein (HDL) at the surface of the carotid artery under conditions of steady flow and to establish its relationship with shear stress using an in vitro vascular simulation model of carotid bifurcation. Shear stress, HDL concentration at the surface, and the ratio of HDL concentration at the surface to concentration in bulk flow were measured at different locations within the model under highspeed (1.451 m/s) and lowspeed (0.559 m/s) flow. HDL showed concentration polarization at the surface of the carotid artery model, particularly in the internal carotid artery sinus. With decreasing flow velocity, the shear stress at the surface also decreased, and HDL concentration polarization increased. The concentration polarization of HDL was negatively and strongly correlated with shear stress at both low (, ) and highspeed flow (, ).
1. Introduction
Vascular events induced by atherosclerosis are the leading cause of death in developed countries. While the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis involves a series of events, the end result is the formation of an atherosclerotic plaque [1]. The preliminary stage of atherosclerosis is the presence of lipids in the vascular wall caused by subendothelial retention of lipoproteins [2]. High plasma concentrations of LDLc (lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol) and low plasma concentrations of HDLc (highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol) are each independent risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis [3, 4]. LDL has been shown to be the major carrier of cholesterol and the main atherogenic lipoprotein for atherosclerosis. Its oxidized form (OxLDL) binds to endothelial cells and leads to apoptosis [5]. HDL exerts a welldocumented antiatherogenic effect [6], and the mechanisms underlying the antiatherogenic effect of HDL include reverse cholesterol transport [7–9], antiLDL oxidation [10, 11], and the protection of endothelial cells [12–15].
However, low HDLc (highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol) plasma concentrations may directly promote atherogenesis, particularly when LDLc (lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol) is elevated. In areas with low shear stress, increase of NADPH oxidase expression and defect of oxygen transmission enhance the production of reactive oxygen species (, , etc.), accelerate the oxidation of LDL, and produce OxLDL [16, 17]. OxLDL can induce MCP1 expression and result in adhesion and migration of the monocyte [18]; it also can combine with its specific LOX1 receptor to decrease the expression of Bcl2 and cIAP1 and induce apoptosis [19]. Therefore, concentration polarization of LDL provides sufficient substrates for the pathogenic oxLDL, together with the deranged low shear stress environment, makes the endothelial cells in the area with low shear stress more vulnerable to the damage, and makes the occurrence of atherosclerosis easier.
In addition to concentrations of LDL and HDL in systemic circulation, some physical and fluid mechanical factors play an important role in the development of atherosclerotic plaques [20, 21]. Concentration of LDL and HDL at the surface of the vascular wall rather than in the circulation (bulk flow) plays an important role in the process of lipid infiltration and atherogenesis. The concentrations of LDL at the surface of the arteries are reportedly higher than LDL concentration in the bulk flow. This phenomenon is referred to as “lipid concentration polarization” [22]. Concentration polarization of lipoproteins is affected by three major factors: wall shear stress, filtration velocity of water at the vessel wall, and the distance from the entrance of the artery [21, 23]. Shear stress, the internal force per unit area of an artery that is formed to resist external factors [20, 21, 24], is low in vessels where flow is disturbed and/or slow. The surface concentration of LDL is locally elevated in regions of low flow and low shear stress, which provides a favorable condition for the formation of atherosclerotic plaques [22].
In the last 10 years, more and more researchers have been paying close attention to the effect of hemodynamics on material transfer and the interaction of blood constituents with the vessel wall. This interest has generated a theory that the retention time of this noxious substance and its deposition on the vessel wall are correlated with atherosclerosis and thrombosis. In addition, concentration polarization is thought to affect both the retention time of LDL and its deposition on the vessel wall [25].
To date, research on lipid concentration polarization has focused on LDL. But studies on concentration polarization of HDL are also essential for understanding the development and localization of atherosclerosis. Therefore, we studied the intraarterial localization of HDL during lowflow and highflow conditions, using a carotid bifurcation vascular model which designed to mimic the configuration of the human carotid artery. The purpose of this study was twofold: to determine if concentration polarization exists for HDL and to determine whether concentration polarization is related to shear stress. The results of such a study would provide additional information regarding the concentration polarization and polarization location of HDL that might be helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Model
Semipermeable poly tetra fluor ethylene (PTFE) was employed to create the carotid bifurcation model. The inner diameter of each region of a human carotid artery was measured by Doppler ultrasound and computerized tomography angiography. Because a previous model at 1:1 resulted in uneven endothelialization and other technical difficulties, these measurements were amplified at a rate of 1:1.5 (Table 1) experimentally to create a bifurcation model of the carotid artery that was subsequently coated with endothelial cells on the inner wall of the model to induce the endothelialization of the inner wall of the model as shown in Figure 1 [26].

As shown in Figure 2(a), the model included the common carotid artery (CCA), external carotid artery (ECA), internal carotid artery (ICA), and internal carotid artery sinus (ICAS). The low shear stress core region and its margins were marked on the model. The low shear stress core region was marked as point 5, and the anterior and posterior margins were marked as points 3 and 4 (Figure 2(b)). The measuring points of the inner diameter of the CCA and the inner diameter of the ICA were used as control points and marked as points 1 and 2 (Figure 2(b)). In addition, the final model is provided in the schematic diagram in Figure 3(a), and the schematic diagram of the experimental system was shown in Figure 3(b).
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
2.2. Numerical Simulation Methodology
If the circulating liquid is taken as an incompressible Newtonian fluid, then the flow is a steady flow. If the volume power, heat exchange, and other physical and chemical factors are not considered, then the equations provided in the footnote can be employed. The first formula is a continuity equation, and the second formula is an equation of motion where is the velocity of flow field, is the fluid pressure, is the fluid density, and is the fluid viscosity. Because the basic equations mentioned above are intensive nonlinear equations, the Finite Volume Method (FVM) was employed, because it is the most commonly used numerical method for resolving this type of mathematical problem at present [27]. The FLUENT software is hydrodynamic calculating software based on the FVM, and it is the CFD software application most widely utilized:
2.3. Hydrodynamic Parameters of Blood Flow
The parameters of the blood flow in the model were controlled by the particle image velocimetry (PIV) using a type PIV40010 (TSI Company, Shoreview, MN, USA). The average flow velocity of ICA was set at 0.559 m/s, which is the average flow velocity within the ICA measured in the human body at 150 mmHg blood pressure. PIV was also used to record the parameters of the blood flow in the core low shear stress region and at its margins.
A solution prepared with glycerol with a viscosity of 0.782 mPa.s and a density of kg/ (to prerun and stabilize the equipment) was measured by the Low Shear 30 (CONTRAVES LOW SHEAR 30 ISCOMETER, Swiss) and used in the PIV measurements as described previously [24]. This viscosity was chosen because it was the same viscosity as the M199 culture medium used for the endothelial cells. Blood flow parameters determined were flow rate (mL/s) and velocity of the circulation liquid through the model (flow velocity, m/s).
2.4. Separation of HDL and LDL
Human plasma lipoproteins were collected and separated using the onetime density gradient ultracentrifugation method described by Zhang and Liu [28]. HDL and LDL bands were collected from centrifuged samples using a long syringe needle and were dialyzed in a buffer containing and 0.01% Na at pH 7.6. Dialysis was performed at in the dark for 6 hours each time and completely repeated 4 times in order to remove sodium bromide. Collected lipoproteins were stored at following filtration (storage and dialysis were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere to avoid oxidation). Figure 4 shows the high purity of the isolated LDLs and HDLs. In total, 100 mL of circulation liquid was prepared for the experiments, including 80 mL of M199 medium and 20 mL of separated human plasma lipoproteins (i.e., 10 mL LDL and 10 mL HDL). Lipoprotein concentrations were determined with an OLYMPUS automatic biochemical analyzer (OLYMPUS automatic biochemical analyzer AU2700, Japan). The concentrations of LDL and HDL in the bulk () were 0.575 mmol/L and 0.242 mmol/L, respectively.
2.5. Experimental Procedure
HDL concentration polarization was measured under two different ICA flow velocities at 5 different locations in the model. The lowspeed group of measurements had an average ICA flow velocity of 0.559 m/s (the average flow velocity of ICA in human body under 150 mmHg blood pressure) while the highspeed measurement group had an average ICA flow velocity of 1.451 m/s (the peak flow velocity of ICA in human body under 90 mmHg blood pressure). Hydrodynamic parameters (i.e., blood flow in the low and highspeed groups) were measured and are summarized in Table 2.

After allowing the model to stabilize for 30 minutes, 50 L samples were sequentially collected from each of the 5 locations, and 5 samples were collected consecutively from each location. The samples were collected 15 minutes apart to ensure that samples were collected at a constant flow. The collected samples were individually placed in polyethylene tubes and stored protected from light in brown bottles at . Lipoprotein concentrations were measured within 4 hours of collection. The ratio of the concentration of HDL at the surface () to the concentration in bulk () was used as an index for concentration polarization of HDL. Polarization of HDL was considered to have occurred if the ratio was greater than 1.000.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Study variables were presented using descriptive statistics (mean, median, and range). Differences in variables between the five locations in the model were evaluated by KruskallWallis tests. The MannWhitney U test was used to calculate differences between locations at the same flow speed or between two speeds at the same location. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlation between shear stress and concentration polarization of HDL. All statistics analyses were performed in SAS software version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All tests were twosided and 0.05 was used as the significance level. For multiple comparisons, adjusted was defined as /number of comparisons.
3. Results
The shear stress was the highest at location 1 under highspeed flow (58.33 dyne/cm^{2}), and was the lowest at location 5 under lowspeed flow (0.69 dyne/cm^{2}) in this in vitro model of the carotid bifurcation. The shear stress, surface concentration of HDL (), and ratio at the two speeds of flow and five locations in experimental model are summarized in Table 3. At the lowspeed flow, the of HDL was the highest at location 5 and the lowest at location 2 (). Similarly, was also the highest at location 5 and the lowest at location 2 at the highspeed flow rate (). For locations 3, 4, and 5, HDL surface concentrations were significantly higher under lowspeed flow compared with highspeed flow (). A similar pattern was observed for the ratio of : it was the highest at location 5 and the lowest at location 1 for both low and highspeed flow ( and , resp.). At locations 3, 4, and 5 where shear stress was low, the ratio was significantly higher at lowspeed flow compared with highspeed flow ().
 
: concentration at the surface, : ratio of the concentration at the surface () to the concentration in the bulk circulation ().Continuous variables were presented as median (range) except for shear stress. Shear stress was constant. KruskallWallis test was used to test the differences among locations, P < .05 was the level of statistical significance, and MannWhitney U test with adjusted α was used to test the differences between each two locations (adjusted = 0.0083). MannWhitney U test was used to test the difference between speeds. P < .05 was the level of statistical significance. P < .0083 versus location 2. P < .0083 versus location 3. P < .0083 versus location 4. 
Concentration polarization of HDL (ratio of ) was present at all locations, except location 1 (control location of CCA) under lowspeed flow. The data indicate that a reverse association exists between shear stress and both and the ratio of in that the lower the shear stress, the higher the and ratio of (Figure 5). In the correlation analysis, the ratio of was negatively and strongly correlated with shear stress at both low and highspeed flow (correlation coefficient , , , resp.).
(a)
(b)
4. Discussion
In the present study, an in vitro carotid artery bifurcation model was created and employed to explore the concentration polarization of HDL to further elucidate the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The results revealed that HDL shows concentration polarization at the surface of the carotid artery, particularly in the internal carotid artery sinus, a low shear stress region. In addition, the concentration polarization of HDL was found to be negatively and strongly correlated with shear stress for both low and highspeed flow velocities.
Clinical studies and human autopsy reports indicate that atherosclerosis often occurs in the carotid artery, coronary artery, abdominal aorta, and peripheral arteries, that is, locations where the vascular geometric shape of the vessel changes sharply due to the formation of either vascular branches, abrupt changes in direction (bends), or vascular stenosis [29]. In our model, an obvious low shear stress region was identified at the surface of the internal carotid artery sinus. When the model’s flow velocity decreased from 1.451 m/s to 0.559 m/s, the absolute value of the shear stress of this low shear stress region decreased from 8.96 dyne/cm^{2} to 0.69 dyne/cm^{2}. Since the internal carotid artery sinus is an anatomic location with a high incidence of atherosclerosis, additional indepth studies are clearly warranted.
Fatouraee et al. [20], examined canine straight carotid arteries and found that under the conditions of steady and pulsatile flow, LDL concentrations at the surface were and higher than the bulk concentration, respectively. Our research group previously indicated that LDL showed concentration polarization at different flow velocities using an in vitro model [30]. In the present study, HDL concentrations at the surface at each sampling location (except control location 1 at low speed) were higher than those in the bulk flow, which indicates that HDL also has concentration polarization. In addition, it appears that at the same flow velocity, the extent of the low shear stress region at the surface of internal carotid artery sinus was relatively large with an obvious low shear stress core region. The degree of HDL concentration polarization at low shear stress region was much higher than that at the straight pipe part (control locations of CCA and ICA). At different flow velocities, the shear stress at the surface of internal carotid artery sinus had different degrees of changes, and the degree of HDL concentration polarization had a greater range of fluctuation. In fact, a negative correlation between shear stress and HDL concentration polarization was found, and the concentration polarization decreased with the increasing shear stress at both flow velocities.
The present study used a model of carotid artery bifurcation under steady flow as a platform that can simulate the internal carotid artery sinus and the mechanical characteristics of the local flow field. This model also included implanted endothelial cells in order to better mimic an in vivo artery and create a permeable model. In this model, when the flow velocity was low at 0.559 m/s, the low shear stress region at the surface of internal carotid artery sinus was larger, with an obvious low shear stress core region. More importantly, this model mimics the configuration of human carotid artery anatomy more faithfully than the previous carotid straight pipe model and straight pipe model with branches [31]. Thus, the model used in the present study can reflect the local hydrodynamic characteristics of internal carotid artery sinus more reliably in vitro.
The major limitation of this study was that it studied HDL only in normal concentration ranges. Further studies are needed to assess the concentration polarization character of HDL in abnormal concentration ranges as would be observed for most patients with atherosclerosis. Other limitations are that we did not measure the concentration polarizations of HDL and LDL in the same flow field, adjust the parameter of flow field (flow rate), and calculate the change of the difference between the concentration polarization of HDL and that of LDL in a same point along with the change of flow rate to further explain the interaction of the concentration polarization of HDL and that of LDL during the development of atherosclerosis. It is also noted that the present study is an in vitro experiment which cannot completely imitate the in vivo environment. The concentration polarization of HDL was proved under in vitro condition during the present study, and we hope in the future to construct an animal model in which the diameter of the common carotid artery will be changed by the surgical approach to produce various flow rates at the entrance for observing and verifying the concentration polarization of HDL in vivo.
Nonetheless, the present study has shown that concentration polarization exists in HDL and therefore is a potential risk factor in the process of atherosclerosis. In our future research, we plan to perform a comprehensive study of the degree of concentration polarization of both HDL and LDL under different flow velocities in the same or a similar model to explore the effect of concentration polarization of two different lipoproteins on the atherogenesis. This will also enable us to investigate potential ways to upregulate concentration polarization of HDL in order to prevent or slow atherogenesis.
5. Conclusion
In summary, at the two different flow velocities employed in this in vitro study, concentration polarization of HDL was identified at the surface at various points in the carotid bifurcation model. In particular, concentration was obvious in the internal carotid artery sinus, it was inversely related with shear stress and flow velocity. This observation is important as it communicates the inaugural finding of concentration polarization involving HDL in the internal carotid artery sinus, which is an anatomic location associated with a high incidence of atherosclerosis. The findings of this suggest that LDL and HDL both contribute, perhaps interactively, in the development of atherosclerosis in low shear stress regions of the carotid bifurcation. Further studies based on the present findings are warranted.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30273058) and the National Key Basic Research Program (2005CCA03600). The authors wish to thank Professor Yingkang Shi for technical direction.
References
 M. E. Mitchell and A. N. Sidawy, “The pathophysiology of atherosclerosis,” Seminars in Vascular Surgery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 134–141, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Badimon, J. MartinezGonzalez, V. LlorenteCortes, C. Rodriguez, and T. Padro, “Cell biology and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 439–456, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. M. Gotto Jr. and E. . Brinton, “Assessing low levels of highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol as a risk factor in coronary heart disease: a working group report and update,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 717–724, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. von Eckardstein and G. Assmann, “Prevention of coronary heart disease by raising highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol?” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 627–637, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Chen, J. L. Mehta, N. Haider, X. Zhang, J. Narula, and D. Li, “Role of caspases in oxldlinduced apoptotic cascade in human coronary artery endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 370–376, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.R. Nofer, M. Walter, and G. Assmann, “Current understanding of the role of highdensity lipoproteins in atherosclerosis and senescence,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1071–1086, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. J. Barter and K.A. Rye, “Molecular mechanisms of reverse cholesterol transport,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 82–87, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Hattori, T. Kujiraoka, T. Egashira et al., “Association of coronary heart disease with pre$\xdf$HDL concentrations in Japanese men,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 589–595, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. D. Curb, R. D. Abbott, B. L. Rodriguez et al., “A prospective study of HDL cholesterol and cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene mutations and the risk of coronary heart disease in the elderly,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 948–953, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Navab, S. Y. Hama, G. M. Anantharamaiah et al., “Normal high density lipoprotein inhibits three steps in the formation of mildly oxidized low density lipoprotein: steps 2 and 3,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1495–1508, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Boisfer, D. Stengel, D. Pastier et al., “Antioxidant properties of HDL in transgenic mice overexpressing human apolipoprotein AII,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 732–741, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Dimayuga, J. Zhu, S. Oguchi et al., “Reconstituted HDL containing human apolipoprotein A1 reduces VCAM1 expression and neointima formation following periadventitial cuffinduced carotid injury in apoE null mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 465–468, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.R. Nofer, B. Levkau, I. Wolinska et al., “Suppression of endothelial cell apoptosis by high density lipoproteins (HDL) and HDLassociated lysosphingolipids,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 37, pp. 34480–34485, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X.P. Li, S.P. Zhao, X.Y. Zhang, L. Liu, M. Gao, and Q.C. Zhou, “Protective effect of high density lipoprotein on endotheliumdependent vasodilatation,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 231–236, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. S. Yuhanna, Y. Zhu, B. E. Cox et al., “Highdensity lipoprotein binding to scavenger receptorBI activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 853–857, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Hwang, M. H. Ing, A. Salazar et al., “Pulsatile versus oscillatory stress regulates NADPH oxidase subunit expression,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1225–1232, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. W. Crawford, L. H. Back, and M. A. Cole, “In vivo oxygen transport in the normal rabbit femoral arterial wall,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1498–1508, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
 J. A. Berliner, M. C. Territo, A. Sevanian et al., “Minimally modified low density lipoprotein stimulates monocyte endothelial interactions,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1260–1266, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Chen, J. L. Mehta, N. Haider, X. Zhang, J. Narula, and D. Li, “Role of caspases in OxLDL induced apoptotic cascade in human coronary artery endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 370–376, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Fatouraee, X. Deng, A. De Champlain, and R. Guidoin, “Concentration polarization of low density lipoproteins (LDL) in the arterial system,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 858, pp. 137–146, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Wada and T. Karino, “Theoretical prediction of lowdensity lipoproteins concentration at the luminal surface of an artery with a multiple bend,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 778–791, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Wang, X. Deng, and R. Guidoin, “Concentration polarization of macromolecules in canine carotid arteries and its implication for the localization of atherogenesis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Wada and T. Karino, “Theoretical study on flowdependent concentration polarization of low density lipoproteins at the luminal surface of a straight artery,” Biorheology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 207–223, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Naiki and T. Karino, “Visualization of flowdependent concentration polarization of macromolecules at the surface of a cultured endothelial cell monolayer by means of fluorescence microscopy,” Biorheology, vol. 37, no. 56, pp. 371–384, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Kleinstreuer, S. Hyun, J. R. Buchanan Jr. et al., “Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–64, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Zilla, M. Deutsch, J. Meinhart et al., “Clinical in vitro endothelialization of femoropopliteal bypass grafts: an actuarial followup over three years,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 540–548, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Mohammed and J. F. Verhey, “A finite element method model to simulate laser interstitial thermo therapy in anatomical inhomogeneous regions,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 4, pp. 2–17, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. H. Zhang and B. W. Liu, “Isolation of human plasma lipoproteins by onetime density gradient untracentrifugation method,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 21, pp. 257–260, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
 M. E. DeBakey, G. M. Lawrie, and D. H. Glaeser, “Patterns of atherosclerosis and their surgical significance,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 115–131, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Yu, Y. Shi, W. Deng, H. Chen, Q. An, and Y. Guo, “Particle image velocimetry in measuring the flow fields distribution in carotid artery bifurcation model,” Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 104–109, 2007 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
 D. Lee and J. Chiu, “Intimal thickening under shear stress in a carotid bifurcationa numerical study,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 29, pp. 1–11, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Wei Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.