BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

Next-Generation Sequencing

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 134232 |

S. S. Hasson, R. A. Mothana, T. A. Sallam, M. S. Al-balushi, M. T. Rahman, A. A. Al-Jabri, "Serine Protease Variants Encoded by Echis ocellatus Venom Gland cDNA: Cloning and Sequencing Analysis", BioMed Research International, vol. 2010, Article ID 134232, 12 pages, 2010.

Serine Protease Variants Encoded by Echis ocellatus Venom Gland cDNA: Cloning and Sequencing Analysis

Academic Editor: Fuli Yu
Received28 May 2010
Accepted20 Jul 2010
Published29 Sep 2010


Envenoming by Echis saw-scaled viper is the leading cause of death and morbidity in Africa due to snake bite. Despite its medical importance, there have been few investigations into the toxin composition of the venom of this viper. Here, we report the cloning of cDNA sequences encoding four groups or isoforms of the haemostasis-disruptive Serine protease proteins (SPs) from the venom glands of Echis ocellatus. All these SP sequences encoded the cysteine residues scaffold that form the 6-disulphide bonds responsible for the characteristic tertiary structure of venom serine proteases. All the Echis ocellatus EoSP groups showed varying degrees of sequence similarity to published viper venom SPs. However, these groups also showed marked intercluster sequence conservation across them which were significantly different from that of previously published viper SPs. Because viper venom SPs exhibit a high degree of sequence similarity and yet exert profoundly different effects on the mammalian haemostatic system, no attempt was made to assign functionality to the new Echis ocellatus EoSPs on the basis of sequence alone. The extraordinary level of interspecific and intergeneric sequence conservation exhibited by the Echis ocellatus EoSPs and analogous serine proteases from other viper species leads us to speculate that antibodies to representative molecules should neutralise (that we will exploit, by epidermal DNA immunization) the biological function of this important group of venom toxins in vipers that are distributed throughout Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent.

1. Introduction

Envenoming resulting from snake bites is an important public health hazard in many regions, particularly in tropical and subtropical countries [1, 2]. The saw-scaled viper Echis ocellatus is the most abundant [3] and medically important viper species in West Africa [4].Envenoming by saw-scaled viper (Viperidae: Echis) species is thought to be responsible for more snakebite deaths worldwide than any other snake genus [5]. In northern Nigeria, E. ocellatus is responsible for 95% of all envenoming by snakes [6], causing several hundred deaths annually [7]. The precise incidence of snakebite is difficult to determine and is often grossly underestimated, but in some areas of the Nigerian savannas, victims of E. ocellatus envenoming may occupy more than 10% of hospital beds [8]. In the Benue valley of Nigeria, for example, the estimated incidence is 497 per 100 000 population per year with 10%–20% untreated mortality [9]. Local effects of Echis viper envenoming include pain, swelling, blistering, and haemorrhage which, in severe cases, can lead to necrosis, permanent disfigurement, and even amputation of the affected limb [10]. Systemic effects include potentially lethal consumption coagulopathy, haemorrhage and hypovolaemic shock [10].

Snake venoms contain a great variety of toxic proteases [11, 12]. Many of these components are proteases, for example, metalloproteases [13], serine proteases [14], phospholipases A2 [15] and C-type lectins [16] and mediate their toxicity by either stimulating or inhibiting the haemostatic system of human victims or experimental animals, resulting in clinical complications of blood clotting or uncontrolled haemorrhage [12, 1719]. Several of these proteinases cleave plasma proteins of the victims in a specific manner with varying degrees of substrate specificity. Thus, while some serine proteases have both fibrinogenolytic and fibrinolytic activities, others have only fibrinogenolytic activity and are called “thrombin-like” proteases [1925]. Approximately 100 snake venom toxins have been identified as “thrombin-like” enzymes activating the blood coagulation factor [26]. These “thrombin-like” proteases hydrolyze fibrinogen specifically and release either fibrinopeptide A or B or both [27] resulting in the disruption of the blood coagulation system by producing abnormal fibrin clots composed of short polymers that are rapidly dispersed and no longer cross-linked by activated factor XIII [28].

Another group of serine proteases of Batroxobin, Crotalase, and Ancrod venoms affect other substrates, for example, plasminogen [27] by cleaving fibrinogen in manner distinct from that of thrombin. Other venom serine proteases function like mammalian kallikrein (or kininogenase) releasing bradykinin from kininogen [2931] and are called “kallikrein-like” proteases [29], an example of this is halystase [32], a kallikrein-like serine protease isolated from A. halys blomhoffii venom, which cleaves the β chain at Arg42 and slowly degrades the α chain of fibrinogen to generate a product that is no longer converted to normal fibrin clots by thrombin; this results in both reduction of blood pressure as well as inhibiting fibrinogen clotting in the victims. Another kallikrein-like serine protease with potent biological activity but with different physicochemical properties from those of halystase has been isolated from the venoms of  A. caliginosus, C. atrox, C. viridis, and Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus [29, 30, 3234]. The latter showed both a strong -fibrinogenolytic and kallikrein-like activities, cleaving -chain of fibrinogen molecules specifically and releasing bradykinin from kininogen, respectively. Moreover, the purified enzymes indicated that they have specificities different from thrombin and thrombin-like proteases of snake venom reported previously by decreasing fibrinogen levels in plasma and prolonging bleeding without formation of fibrin clots. They also exhibit amidase activity against N-benzoyl-Pro-Phe-Arg-p-nitroanilide, which is a specific synthetic substrate for kallikrein-like proteases.

In addition, there have been a few reports on venom serine proteases with a unique activity, such as ACC-C, a protein C activator isolated from the A. contortrix venom [35] (which inhibits blood coagulation by inactivating the activated forms of factor V and VIII), a plasminogen activator such as TSV-PA isolated from the T. stejnegeri venom [36, 37], PA-BJ, a platelet aggregating enzyme isolated from the B. jararaca and Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus venoms [38], and RVV-V, a factor V-activating enzyme isolated from the V. russelli venom [39].

These data indicate that snake venom serine proteases comprise an enzyme superfamily with multifunctional activities that may have diverged or have undergone gene duplication resulting in alteration of their biological properties during the process of evolution thus acquiring special functions [40, 41]. Although a considerable amount of data is now available, no standardised grouping of these venom serine proteases has yet been documented. However, in 2001 Wang et al. [27] compared sequences of 40 serine proteinases isolated from different snake venoms, using a constructed phylogram in which such sequences were clustered into three groups designated as coagulating enzymes, kininogenases, and plasminogen activators.

No Serine proteinases have yet been purified from venom of the West African saw-scaled viper Echis ocellatus, in particular or for members of the Echis genus in general. However, the fact that the serine protease superfamily was important in the venom of the Viperidae suggested that such enzymes should be present in the venom of E. ocellatus and that serine protease-specific antibodies are likely to be an important factor in E. ocellatus envenoming. We therefore screened the E. ocellatus cDNA library in order to isolate and characterise different isoforms or variants of this enzyme superfamily.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Adult E. ocellatus (Nigeria) carpet viper used in this study was maintained in the herpetarium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

2.2. Extraction of Total Venom Gland RNA and Construction of cDNA Libraries

Venom glands were dissected from three Echis ocellatus snakes. The vipers were sacrificed 3 days after venom extraction when toxin gene transcription rates are at a peak. Glands were homogenized under liquid Nitrogen and total RNA extracted using guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform as described previously [15]. Lambda phage cDNA libraries for E. ocellatus were constructed by RT-PCR using the SMART cDNA library construction kit (Clontech, California, USA). The lambda phage of the E. ocellatus was packaged using Gigapack III Gold Packaging Extract (Stratagene) and boiled for 5 min prior to being used as targets of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

2.3. Isolation and Analysis of cDNA Sequences

A PCR strategy [42] was used to isolate sequences encoding serine proteinases from the cDNA libraries. A sense primer (5V-GGA-TCC-ATG-GTG-CTG-ATC-AGA-GTG-CTA-ATC-GCA-3V) and an antisense primer (5V-CTC-GAG-TGG-GGG-GCA-AGT-CGC-AGT-TGT-ATT-TCC-3V) complimentary to highly conserved amino-terminal signal peptide (M-V-L-I-R-V) and to the less conserved carboxy-terminal (T-T-A-T-C-P-P) domains of published serine proteinases DNA sequences of related viper species were synthesized commercially (Sigma-Genosys, UK). A TAG stop codon was inserted in the primer and BamH1 and Xho1 restriction endonuclease sites (bold) were included in the   and   primers, respectively, to facilitate future subcloning into mammalian expression plasmids. PCR was performed using an initial denaturation ( C—6 minutes) and annealing ( C—1 minute) step, followed by 35 cycles (1 minute each) of extension ( C), denaturation ( C), and annealing ( C), and a terminal extension step (7 minutes) at C in a thermal cycler (Gene Cycler, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The inclusion of water-only controls with each PCR reaction allowed us to monitor and prevent cross-over contamination. The amplicons were subcloned into the TA cloning vector, pCR 2.1-TOPO, (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) and used to transform chemically competent E. coli cells (TOP10F’, Invitrogen) under ampicillin selection. Plasmid DNA was extracted (Mini-spin prep kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and digested with BamH1 and Xho1 at C to select plasmids containing inserts of the predicted size for DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing was carried out by the dideoxy-nucleotide chain-termination method in a Beckman Coulter CEQk 2000 XL DNA Analysis System. To confirm that the cDNA sequences encoded CTLs, the predicted amino acid sequences were subjected to BLAST searches of the GenBank, PDB, SwissProt, PIR, and PRF databases. All the cDNAs exhibited significant sequence homology to Serine protienases of related vipers. The CLUSTALW program [43] with PAM 250 residue weight matrix was used to align deduced amino acid sequences representing each E. ocellatus Serine protienases isoforms with analogues in venoms from related Viperidae species as illustrated in Table 1. Serine proteinase (CAB62591) from V. lebetina [44], Serine protease 1 (AAR24534) from B. gabonica [45], Thrombin-like enzyme pre. (AAK12273) from D. acutus [46], Venom serine protease 5 (AAN52350) from T. stejnegeri [47], Serine proteinase 3 pre. (O13063) from gramineus [48], Serine proteinase A Precursor (Q9PTU8) from B. jararaca [46, 49], Serine proteinase 2A pre. (O13060) from T. gramineus [45, 48], Serine protease (AAP42416) from B. jararacussu [50], KN-BJ2 (BAA20283) from B. jararaca [51], Serine proteinase 1 pre. (AAG10788) from T. jerdonii [52], Thrombin-like serine protease (AAL68708) from G. ussuriensis [53], and, finally, Serine protease catroxase I pre. (AAL77226) from C. atrox [54]. The phylogenetic trees constructed from the above alignments were generated by a neighbour-joining [55] algorithm in Lasergene software (DNASTAR, USA). The predicted antigenic profile [56] of the published and new Echis ocellatus serine protease (EoSer) isoforms analysed here was determined using Protean Software (DNASTAR).

SpeciesAccession no.ReferencesSerine proteaseEoSP-1EoSP-3EoSP-7EoSP-17

V. lebetinaCAB62591Siigur et al. [44]Serine proteinase65668064
B. gabonicaAAR24534Francischetti et al. [45]Serine protease 162638265
D. acutusAAK12273Liang et al. [46]Thrombin-like enzyme pre.67677170
T. stejnegeriAAN52350Lee and Zhang [47]Venom serine protease 566666569
T. gramineusO13063Deshimaru et al. [48]Serine proteinase 3 pre.71716176
B. jararacaQ9PTU8Murayama, [49]Serine proteinase A pre.66686674
T. gramineusO13060Deshimaru et al. [48]Serine proteinase 2A pre.65657370
B. jararacussuAAP42416Kashima et al. [50]Serine protease63637268
B. jararacaBAA20283Serrano et al. [51]KN-BJ269686269
T. jerdoniiAAG10788Lu et al. [52]Serine proteinase 1 pre.65657170
G. ussuriensisAAL68708Zhao et al. [53]Thrombin-like serine protease67677271
C. atroxAAL77226Tsai et al. [54]Serine protease catroxase I pre.66656365

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of cDNAs Encoding E. Ocellatus Serine Protease

PCR screening of the Echis ocellatus venom gland cDNA libraries resulted in a total of 14 E. ocellatus (Eo) cDNAs whose sequences matched (BLAST searches) those of published Serine proteases. The cDNAs consisted of 822 nucleotides (Figures 1 and 2(a)) and were predicted to encode an open reading frame proteins of 264 amino acids (28.5 kDa) (Figure 2(b)). Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences of the 14 specific cDNAs encoding the EoSP proteins (Figure 2(b)) revealed sequence variations. The sequence similarity between the EoSP variants proteins was less than 60% for the mature protein-coding region but over 90% for regions coding both the signal peptide and the carboxyl-terminal end. Where two or more identical sequences were obtained from any one of these libraries, a single representative cDNA was used for subsequent analysis. Structural properties analysis (Emin algorithm-DNASTAR, USA) (Figure 3) was used to categorise the 14 Serine protease sequences into four distinct groups, based solely on sequence alignment.

3.2. BLAST Search of the Predicted Amino Acid Sequence

Accession numbers assigned to the new Echis ocellatus Serine protease sequences are as follows: “group 1” EoSer-1 (GU562413), “group 2” EoSer-3 (GU592440), “group 3” EoSer-17 (GU592441), and “group 4” EoSer-7 (GU592439). The predicted amino acid sequences of the EoSP-01, EoSP-03, EoSP-07, and EoSP-17 were submitted to BLAST searches of the genetic data bases and their similarity to published viper serine protease (Table 1) confirmed that the EoSP cDNAs encoded serine proteases.

3.3. Comparison of E. Ocellatus cDNAs with Analogous Serine Proteases from Other Viper Species

All the EoSer-variants contained the serine protease-consensus 24 amino acid signal peptide sequence (Figure 4, arrows), including the six-amino acids-activated motif. The signal peptide residues were followed by a protease domain of 236 residues. The deduced primary structures of all EoSP cDNA clones include the requisite, highly conserved, 12 cysteine residues that form the 6-disulphide bonds responsible for the characteristic tertiary structure of venom serine proteases. The complete amino acid sequences of the EoSP variants were aligned with those of other venom serine proteases (Figure 4). Viper venom SP sequences in the genetic databases were compared with the E. o groups (Table 2 and Figure 4) by BLAST. Groups 1–4 represent novel, highly similar, SP isomers with less than 65% sequence similarity to analogues in related viper species. Group 4 showed the greatest sequence similarity (80% and 82%) to the Serine protease of the African V. lebetina and B. gabonica vipers, respectively. Of all the EoSP clusters seemed to represent a SP sequence which showed the highest sequence similarity range between 62% to 70% to the SP of the vipers. None of the clusters showed more than 72% sequence similarity to the partial peptide sequences for the Thrombin-like serine protease isolated from the venom of the G. ussuriensis viper [52]. Similarly, the Serine protease catroxase I pre. of C. atrox venom showed no greater than 65% sequence similarity to any of the EoSP sequences.

Amino acidTSV-PABatroxobinAncrodEoSP-1EoSP-17EoSP-3EoSP-7References

H/RH57H57H57H67H67H67R67 Braud et al. [57]

FF193G193S193G206G206G206A206 Guinto et al. [58]

PP219P219P219P228V228P228P228Braud et al. [57]

DD96N96R96Y106Y106Y106Y106 Lee and Zhang [47]

HDS: Catalytic Traid; H/F: substrate specificity; D & P: Architecture of water channel; P: Evolutionary region to kallikrein; DDE: substrate specificity to plasminogen.
3.4. Predicted Antigenic Profile Analysis of E. ocellatus Serine Proteases with Analogous Molecules

Since the main focus of our research is to develop toxin neutralising antibodies by immunisation with DNA encoding specific toxins in venoms of the most medically important African vipers [15, 59, 60], we next compared the algorithm-predicted immunogenicity of the E. ocellatus serine protease cluster cDNA sequences with those of all the published SPs from vipers of African origin (Figure 5). The predicted antigenic profiles of the published and new E. ocellatus serine proteases were analysed as shown in Figure 5 using Protean Software (DNASTAR, USA) [53]. The deduced signal peptide domains of the EoSP variants are separated by a vertical dotted line, as these would normally be cleaved from the native proteins during posttranslational. The thin vertical boxes depict the residues comprising the catalytic traid, H/R/N, D/G/N, and S/P/N/T (67, 110, and 208), that show the greatest immunogenic domains conservation common to all the new and published African viper venom SPs sequences as demonstrated in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

Serine proteases are a major component of viper venoms and are thought to disrupt several distinct elements of the blood coagulation system of envenomed victims. A detailed understanding of the functions of these enzymes is important for both acquiring a full understanding of the pathology of envenoming and because these venom proteins have shown a vital role in treating blood coagulation disorders.

In general, serine proteinases including fibrinogenolytic enzymes are very abundant in Viperidae venoms in which they may account for 20% of their total protein content [61].The unique specificity of snake venom proteinases makes them potentially useful in research of fibrinogen-depletion and limited proteolysis [62, 63]. This may be due to the existence of multiple forms of serine proteases in the venom of a single viper species which is likely to contribute to the diverse biological effects exerted by the whole venom. Therefore, screening the E. ocellatus cDNA library to isolate different isoforms or variants of serine proteases was the aim of this research work. The results obtained in this work provide the first molecular sequence data for E. ocellatus serine proteases they also reveal that the serine protease composition of E. ocellatus is as complex as that of the better characterised Viperidae species. The utilization of PCR amplification of E. ocellatus venom gland cDNA with the new viper serine protease-specific primers was successful and produced fourteen cDNAs sequences that were identified (BLAST) as belonging to the serine protease enzyme family. All EoSP cDNAs were of similar total length (approximately 0.80 kb, Figure 1) and encoded 260 amino acids (Figure 2(b)) with a predicted molecular weight of 28.5 kDa. To differentiate between the isolated EoSP clones a surface probability algorithm was used to assign the 14 E. ocellatus serine protease cDNAs into four main groups (Figure 3). A single representative clone from each group was chosen for further analyses as described earlier. The sequence similarity between the EoSP variants proteins was less than 60% for the mature protein-coding region but over 90% for regions coding both the signal peptide and the carboxyl-terminal end. Thus the latter two regions are highly conserved, which explains why the PCR experiment to amplify the cDNAs-encoding EoSP clones was successful.

The EoSP cDNA sequences were confirmed by BLAST searches as encoding serine proteases (Figure 4). The greatest sequence similarity was between EoSer-7 and B. gabonica and V. labetina (80% and 85%) with the remaining EoSP cDNAs showing 60%–76% sequence similarity with other snake venom serine proteinases as illustrated in Table 1. From the proteins with known biological activity, sequence similarities of the EoSP variants (i.e., EoSer-01, EoSer-03, EoSer-07 and EoSer-17) were 62%–69% with the kinin-releasing and fibrinogen-clotting serine protease (KN-BJ) from venom of B. jararaca [51] (Table 1). The putative 18 amino acid signal-peptide of the EoSP variants was as conserved (over 90% sequence similarity) as that in the serine proteases of other viper species (Figure 4, arrows). Following the signal peptide all the EoSP variants contained the predicted six-amino acid cleavage (activation) site Q-K/T/M/E-S-S-E-L/P (Figure 4 in green) as proposed for batroxobin [64]; thus cleavage generates a hydrophilic zymogen peptide, based on the processing site of pre-peptides of mammalian serine proteinases [6567]. Comparison of the EoSP variants with analogous members of the serine protease family revealed that all EoSP variants encoded the presumed catalytic triad, which is common to venom serine proteases H67, D110 and S208 as shown in Figure 4. Such residues were highly conserved in groups 1–3, except proteins of group 4 (Figures 2(b) and 4) which contain R instead of H at the same position (Figure 4). Furthermore, comparison of the EoSP amino acid sequence alignment with analogous venom serine proteases (Figure 4) revealed a conserved consensus active site of L-T/S-A-A-H/R/N-C corresponding to position 63–68, as previously determined [68]. Most SVSPs are likely to be glycoproteins showing a variable number of N- or O-glycosylation sites in sequence positions that differ from one SVSP to the other [69]. Using the primary structure of EoSP variants (Figure 4) the putative N-linked glycosylation sites, Asn-X-Thr/Ser [45], were found and are located at two different positions. EoSer-01, EoSer-03, and EoSer-17 [N44-X45-S46  and N257-X258-T259] and EoSer-07 [N124-R125-T126  and N257-T258-T258]. Although such motifs are thought to be needed for protein stabilization rather than for the catalytic function of the venom enzymes [30], confirmation of the roles of such motifs in venom proteases remain to be investigated. All serine proteases have a common pattern of 6-disulfide bridges [69, 70]. They contain twelve cysteine residues, ten of which form five disulfide bonds, based on the homology with trypsin [64]; the remaining two cysteines form a unique and conserved bridge among SVSPs, involving Cys245e (chymotrypsinogen numbering), found in the C-terminal extension [35].

From the results obtained this was found in all EoSP clones (Figure 2(b)) that encoded the common 12 cysteine residues in which are strongly conserved forming putative disulphide bridges which are located at Cys31 Cys52, C68, C100, C145, C165, C176, C204, C214, C229, and C260 (Figure 4). This suggests that the EoSP proteins possess a similar tertiary structure to that of other serine proteases which are well characterized.

Despite such sequence and structural conservation, viper venom serine proteases show very divergent effects on haemostasis as previously stated. In some cases certain amino acid sequences have been shown to be responsible for such effects as demonstrated in Table 2. Although such table gives a preliminary prediction of the functional characterization of the EoSP cDNAs in comparison with well-known characterized venom serine proteases, it cannot be considered as a functional confirmation or even a categorization strategy to differentiate between the four EoSP cDNAs. However, from Figure 4 and Table 2 it can be generally concluded that such comparison demonstrates that the enzymes encoded by the four EoSP cDNAs confer multiple haemostasis-disruptive activities to E. ocellatus venom. Furthermore, the sequence and predicted structural similarities of these four EoSP groups suggest that an antibody generated to one group may be capable of neutralizing the other group of EoSPs. To examine this permeability the sequences of EoSP groups were subjected to a more specific algorithm that predicted amino acid motifs of high immunogenicity. A protein structure-predicting algorithm [56] has been used (i) to identify domains of strong antigenic potential in the toxin gene product and (ii) to determine whether these domains are conserved in analogous venom toxin gene products of related vipers. The signal peptide was separated from the mature protein by dotted line as would be cleaved posttranslationally. The peaks shown by the EoSPs profile indicate the numerous domains predicted to have a surface location and potential for antibody induction. Although the antigenic peaks of the catalytic traid of the EoSPs showed less similarity with that of the analogous venom SPs particularly those at residues 67 and 110, many antigenic residue similarities of EoSPs are shared with other SVSPs of related vipers. Therefore, it is likely that antibodies raised by EoSP DNA immunisation are likely to possess considerable cross-reactivity and might competitively inhibit the function of these domains in the similar venom toxins of related vipers. However, binding of antibodies specific to conserved antigenic domains without a known function are equally as likely to disrupt protein function by virtue of steric hindrance. The veracity of these speculations need to be confirmed experimentally and thus is a focus of our current research.

In conclusion, the predicted Jameson-Wolf antigenic profiles (DNASTAR, USA) of the EoSP variants aligned with very low identity to their (BLAST) analogous serine proteases. This observation strongly suggests that an antibody raised by immunisation with group one EoSP DNA is likely to be less effective against the gene products of groups 2, 3, or 4. Therefore additional antibodies generated against antigenic index that showed less conservation will be required.


Funding for this project was provided by the Wellcome Trust (RAH, Grant no. 061325), the University of Science and Technology, Yemen, and the Gunter Trust (S. Hasson). The authors would like to thank Dr. R. A. Harrison, Prof. R. D. G. Theakston, and Mr. Paul Rowley for their assistance during extraction of the venom glands from snakes and Dr. A. Nasidi, Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria, for obtaining the snakes.


  1. J. M. Gutiérrez, R. D. G. Theakston, and D. A. Warrell, “Confronting the neglected problem of snake bite envenoming: the need for a global partnership,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 6, article e150, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. WHO, Rabies and Envenomings: A Neglected Public Health Issue, Report of a consultative meeting, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  3. J. F. Trape, G. Pison, E. Guyavarch, and Y. Mane, “High mortality from snakebite in south-eastern Senegal,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 420–423, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. C. Wagstaff and R. A. Harrison, “Venom gland EST analysis of the saw-scaled viper, Echis ocellatus, reveals novel α9β1 integrin-binding motifs in venom metalloproteinases and a new group of putative toxins, renin-like aspartic proteases,” Gene, vol. 377, no. 1-2, pp. 21–32, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. R. Casewell, R. A. Harrison, W. Wüster, and S. C. Wagstaff, “Comparative venom gland transcriptome surveys of the saw-scaled vipers (Viperidae: Echis) reveal substantial intra-family gene diversity and novel venom transcripts,” BMC Genomics, vol. 10, article 564, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. S. Hasson, A. A. Al-Jabri, T. A. Sallam, M. S. Al-Balushi, and R. A. A. Mothana, “Antisnake venom activity of Hibiscus aethiopicus L. against Echis ocellatus and Naja n. nigricollis,” Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2010, Article ID 837864, 8 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. P. Chippaux, “The treatment of snake bites: analysis of requirements and assessment of therapeutic efficacy in tropical Africa,” in Perspectives in Molecular Toxinology, A. Menez, Ed., pp. 457–472, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. Revault, “Ecology of Echis ocellatus and peri-urban bites in Ouagadougou,” Toxicon, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 144, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. G. Habib, S. B. Abubakar, I. S. Abubakar et al., “Envenoming after carpet viper (Echis ocellatus) bite during pregnancy: timely use of effective antivenom improves maternal and foetal outcomes,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1172–1175, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. A. Warrell, N. McD. Davidson, and B. M. Greenwood, “Poisoning by bites of the saw scaled or carpet viper (Echis carinatus) in Nigeria,” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, vol. 46, no. 181, pp. 33–62, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. L. D. Weinberg, L. F. Felicori, C. A. Bello et al., “Biochemical properties of a bushmaster snake venom serine proteinase (LV-Ka), and its kinin releasing activity evaluated in rat mesenteric arterial rings,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 333–342, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. B. Sallau and M. A. Ibrahim, “Characterization of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) from Echis ocellatus venom,” African Journal of Biochemistry Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 98–101, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J.-M. Howes, R. D. G. Theakston, and G. D. Laing, “Antigenic relationships and relative immunogenicities of isolated metalloproteinases from Echis ocellatus venom,” Toxicon, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 677–680, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Liu, M.-Z. Sun, C. Sun, B. Zhao, F. T. Greenaway, and Q. Zheng, “A novel serine protease from the snake venom of Agkistrodon blomhoffii ussurensis,” Toxicon, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 760–768, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Bharati, S. S. Hasson, J. Oliver, G. D. Laing, R. D. G. Theakston, and R. A. Harrison, “Molecular cloning of phospholipases A2 from venom glands of Echis carpet vipers,” Toxicon, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 941–947, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Q. Lu, A. Navdaev, J. M. Clemetson, and K. J. Clemetson, “Snake venom C-type lectins interacting with platelet receptors. Structure-function relationships and effects on haemostasis,” Toxicon, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1089–1098, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Stocker, “Snake venom proteins affecting hemostasis and brinolysis,” in Medical Use of Snake Venom Proteins, K. F. Stocker, Ed., pp. 97–160, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T. Matsui, Y. Fujimura, and K. Titani, “Snake venom proteases affecting hemostasis and thrombosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1477, no. 1-2, pp. 146–156, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. S. Markland Jr., “Preface: snake venoms and hemostasis,” Toxin Reviews, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 319–321, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. S. Markland Jr., “Inventory of α- and β-fibrinogenases from snake venoms. For the Subcommittee on Nomenclature of Exogenous Hemostatic Factors of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 438–443, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  21. H. Pirkle, “Thrombin-like enzymes from snake venoms: an updated inventory,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 675–683, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  22. H. Pirkle and K. Stocker, “Thrombin-like enzymes from snake venoms: an inventory. For the Subcommittee on Nomenclature of Exogenous Hemostatic Factors of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 444–450, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. Pirkle and I. Theodor, “Thrombin-like venom enzymes: structure and function,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 281, pp. 165–176, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  24. A. V. Pérez, A. Rucavado, L. Sanz, J. J. Calvete, and J. M. Gutiérrez, “Isolation and characterization of a serine proteinase with thrombin-like activity from the venom of the snake Bothrops asper,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. C. Castro, R. B. Zingali, M. G. Albuquerque, M. Pujol-Luz, and C. R. Rodrigues, “Snake venom thrombin-like enzymes: from reptilase to now,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 61, no. 7-8, pp. 843–856, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. I. Panfoli, D. Calzia, S. Ravera, and A. Morelli, “Inhibition of hemorragic snake venom components: old and new approaches,” Toxins, vol. 2, pp. 417–427, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. Y.-M. Wang, S.-R. Wang, and I.-H. Tsai, “Serine protease isoforms of Deinagkistrodon acutus venom: cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 354, no. 1, pp. 161–168, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. A. Hutton and D. A. Warrell, “Action of snake venom components on the haemostatic system,” Blood Reviews, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 176–189, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. B. Bjarnason, A. Barish, and G. S. Direnzo, “Kallikrein-like enzymes from Crotalus atrox venom,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 258, no. 20, pp. 12566–12573, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  30. Y. Komori, T. Nikai, and H. Sugihara, “Comparison of the lethal components in Vipera aspis aspis and Vipera aspis zinnikeri venom,” Journal of Natural Toxins, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. L. F. Felicori, C. T. Souza, D. T. Velarde et al., “Kallikrein-like proteinase from bushmaster snake venom,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Matsui, Y. Sakurai, Y. Fujimura et al., “Purification and amino acid sequence of halystase from snake venom of Agkistrodon halys blomhoffii, a serine protease that cleaves specifically fibrinogen and kininogen,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 252, no. 3, pp. 569–575, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  33. S. Iwanaga, G. Oshima, and T. Suzuki, “Proteinases from the venom of Agkistrodon halys blomhoffi,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 45, pp. 459–468, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C.-C. Hung and S.-H. Chiou, “Fibrinogenolytic proteases isolated from the snake venom of Taiwan Habu: serine proteases with kallikrein-like and angiotensin-degrading activities,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 281, no. 4, pp. 1012–1018, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. A. A. Parry, U. Jacob, R. Huber, A. Wisner, C. Bon, and W. Bode, “The crystal structure of the novel snake venom plasminogen activator TSV-PA: a prototype structure for snake venom serine proteinases,” Structure, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1195–1206, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  36. Y. Zhang, A. Wisner, Y. Xiong, and C. Bon, “A novel plasminogen activator from snake venom: purification, characterization, and molecular cloning,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 17, pp. 10246–10255, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. Zhang, A. Wisner, R. C. Maroun, V. Choumet, Y. Xiong, and C. Bon, “Trimeresurus stejnegeri snake venom plasminogen activator: site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 33, pp. 20531–20537, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. M. T. Serrano, R. Mentele, C. A. M. Sampaio, and E. Fink, “Purification, characterization, and amino acid sequence of a serine proteinase, PA-BJ, with platelet-aggregating activity from the venom of Bothrops jararaca,” Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 7186–7193, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. F. Tokunaga, F. Nagasawa, S. Tamura, T. Miyata, S. Iwanaga, and W. Kisiel, “The factor V-activating enzyme (RVV-V) from Russell's viper venom. Identification of isoproteins RVV-V(α), -Vβ, and -Vγ and their complete amino acid sequences,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 263, no. 33, pp. 17471–17481, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. J. Calvete, C. Marcinkiewicz, D. Monleón et al., “Snake venom disintegrins: evolution of structure and function,” Toxicon, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1063–1074, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Sanz, A. Bazaa, N. Marrakchi et al., “Molecular cloning of disintegrins from Cerastes vipera and Macrovipera lebetina transmediterranea venom gland cDNA libraries: insight into the evolution of the snake venom integrin-inhibition system,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 395, no. 2, pp. 385–392, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. Israel, “A PCR-based method for high stringency screening of DNA libraries,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2627–2631, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson, “CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 4673–4680, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  44. E. Siigur, A. Aaspõllu, and J. Siigur, “Sequence diversity of Vipera lebetina snake venom gland serine proteinase homologs—result of alternative-splicing or genome alteration,” Gene, vol. 263, no. 1-2, pp. 199–203, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. I. M.B. Francischetti, V. My-Pham, J. Harrison, M. K. Garfield, and J. M.C. Ribeiro, “Bitis gabonica (Gaboon viper) snake venom gland: toward a catalog for the full-length transcripts (cDNA) and proteins,” Gene, vol. 337, supplement, pp. 55–69, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. S. Liang, T. T. Liu, H. P. He, Y. A. Xie, Z. Q. Meng, and A. M. Liang, “Cloning and sequence analysis of the new cDNA of thrombin-like enzyme from Deinagkistrodon acutus,” Guangxi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  47. W. H. Lee and Y. Zhang, “Molecular cloning and sequence comparison of serine proteases from the venom of Trimeresurus stejnegeri,” Unpublished, Direct Submission, BLAST Search, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  48. M. Deshimaru, T. Ogawa, K.-I. Nakashima et al., “Accelerated evolution of crotalinae snake venom gland serine proteases,” FEBS Letters, vol. 397, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Murayama, “Thrombin-like snake venom serine protease,” Direct Submission, Unpublished, BLAST Search, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  50. S. Kashima, P. G. Roberto, A. M. Soares et al., “Analysis of Bothrops jararacussu venomous gland transcriptome focusing on structural and functional aspects: I-gene expression profile of highly expressed phospholipases A2,” Biochimie, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. M. T. Serrano, Y. Hagiwara, N. Murayama et al., “Purification and characterization of a kinin-releasing and fibrinogen-clotting serine proteinase (KN-BJ) from the venom of Bothrops jararaca, and molecular cloning and sequence analysis of its cDNA,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 251, no. 3, pp. 845–853, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  52. Q.-M. Lu, Y. Jin, D.-S. Li, W.-Y. Wang, and Y.-L. Xiong, “Characterization of a thrombin-like enzyme from the venom of Trimeresurus jerdonii,” Toxicon, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1225–1236, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. Zhao, K. Fang, and K. Sun, “cDNA for thrombin-like serine protease from venom gland of Agkistrodon ussuriensis,” Unpublished, Direct Submission, BLAST Search, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  54. I. H. Tsai, J. C. Hsu, and Y. M. Wang, “Catroxase I and II, the serine proteases of Crotalus Atrox venom: cloning, complete sequencing and functional characterization,” Unpublished, Direct Submission, BLAST Search, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  55. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  56. B. A. Jameson and H. Wolf, “The antigenic index: a novel algorithm for predicting antigenic determinants,” Computer Applications in the Biosciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 181–186, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  57. S. Braud, M. A. Parry, R. Maroun, C. Bon, and A. Wisner, “The contribution of residues 192 and 193 to the specificity of snake venom serine proteinases,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, pp. 1823–1828, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  58. E. R. Cuinto, S. Caccia, T. Rose, K. Futterer, G. Waksman, and E. Di Cera, “Unexpected crucial rule of residue 225 in serine proteases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, pp. 1852–1857, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. S. Hasson, R. D. G. Theakston, and R. A. Harrison, “Cloning of a prothrombin activator-like metalloproteinase from the West African saw-scaled viper, Echis ocellatus,” Toxicon, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 629–634, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. R. A. Harrison, J. Oliver, S. S. Hasson, K. Bharati, and R. D. G. Theakston, “Novel sequences encoding venom C-type lectins are conserved in phylogenetically and geographically distinct Echis and Bitis viper species,” Gene, vol. 315, no. 1-2, pp. 95–102, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Wisner, S. Braud, and C. Bon, “Snake venom proteinases as tools in hemostasis studies: structure-function relationship of a plasminogen activator purified from Trimeresurus stejnegeri venom,” Haemostasis, vol. 31, no. 3–6, pp. 133–140, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  62. D. C. I. Koh, A. Armugam, and K. Jeyaseelan, “Snake venom components and their applications in biomedicine,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 63, no. 24, pp. 3030–3041, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. E. Gardiner and R. K. Andrews, “The cut of the clot(h): snake venom fibrinogenases as therapeutic agents,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1360–1362, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. N. Itoh, N. Tanaka, S. Mihashi, and I. Yamashina, “Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for batroxobin, a thrombin-like snake venom enzyme,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 7, pp. 3132–3135, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  65. G. H. Swift, J. C. Dagorn, P. L. Ashley, S. W. Cummings, and R. J. MacDonald, “Rat pancreatic kallikrein mRNA: nucleotide sequence and amino acid sequence of the encoded preproenzyme,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 23, pp. 7263–7267, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  66. R. J. MacDonald, S. J. Stary, and G. H. Swift, “Two similar but nonallelic rat pancreatic trypsinogens. Nucleotide sequences of the cloned cDNAs,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 16, pp. 9724–9732, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  67. R. J. MacDonald, G. H. Swift, C. Quinto et al., “Primary structure of two distinct rat pancreatic preproelastases determined by sequence analysis of the complete cloned messenger ribonucleic acid sequences,” Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1453–1463, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  68. S. Brenner, “The molecular evolution of genes and proteins: a tale of two serines,” Nature, vol. 334, no. 6182, pp. 528–529, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  69. S. M. T. Serrano and R. C. Maroun, “Snake venom serine proteinases: sequence homology vs. substrate specificity, a paradox to be solved,” Toxicon, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1115–1132, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. T. Nikai, A. Ohara, Y. Komori, J. W. Fox, and H. Sugihara, “Primary structure of a coagulant enzyme, bilineobin, from Agkistrodon bilineatus venom,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 S. S. Hasson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.