BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes and Vaccine Development

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 234540 |

David Laurin, Virna Marin, Ettore Biagi, Irene Pizzitola, Valentina Agostoni, Géraldine Gallot, Henri Vié, Marie Christine Jacob, Laurence Chaperot, Caroline Aspord, Joël Plumas, "Exploration of the Lysis Mechanisms of Leukaemic Blasts by Chimaeric T-Cells", BioMed Research International, vol. 2010, Article ID 234540, 9 pages, 2010.

Exploration of the Lysis Mechanisms of Leukaemic Blasts by Chimaeric T-Cells

Academic Editor: Hanchun Yang
Received03 Dec 2009
Accepted18 Mar 2010
Published13 Jun 2010


Adoptive transfer of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and Cytokine Induced Killer Cells (CIK) following genetic engineering of T-cell receptor zeta hold promising perspective in immunotherapy. In the present work we focused on the mechanisms of anti-tumor action of effectors transduced with an anti-CD19 chimaeric receptor in the context of B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Primary B-ALL blasts were efficiently killed by both z-CD19 CTL and z-CD19 CIK effectors. The use of death receptor mediated apoptosis of target cells was excluded since agonists molecules of Fas and TRAIL-receptors failed to induce cell death. Perforin/granzyme pathway was found to be the mechanism of chimaeric effectors mediated killing. Indeed, cytolytic effector molecules perforin as well as granzymes were highly expressed by CTL and CIK. CD19 specific stimulation of transduced effectors was associated with degranulation as attested by CD107 membrane expression and high IFN- and TNF- release. Moreover inhibitors of the perforin-based cytotoxic pathway, Ca2+-chelating agent EGTA and Concanamycin A, almost completely abrogated B-ALL blast killing. In conclusion we show that the cytolysis response of z-CD19 chimaeric effectors is predominantly mediated via perforin/granzyme pathway and is independent of death receptors signaling in primary B-ALL.

1. Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation constitutes the main curative treatment of hematological malignancies and disorders. The potency of the graft versus-leukemia effect varies widely depending on the type of leukemia. For B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the graft versus-leukemia effect is modest and consequently disease relapse after transplantation is a major contributor to treatment failure [1].

Adoptive cellular therapy such as donor lymphocyte infusions achieves poor remission rates in patients with B-ALL and is associated with a high incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease morbidity and mortality [2]. Adoptive immunotherapy targeting chosen antigens selectively expressed by leukaemic targets should separate graft-versus-leukemia and graft-versus-host disease.

Ex vivo genetic engineering of T cells and Cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK) using gene-transfer technology should overcome these barriers and allow the production of large numbers of leukaemia-specific effector cells. Chimaeric receptors are generated by joining the heavy and light chain variable regions of a monoclonal antibody, expressed as a single-chain Fv molecule, to the cytoplasmic T-cell receptor zeta [3].

Chimaeric immunoreceptors that use antibody-derived single-chain variable domains bypass the requirement for antigen processing and presentation by HLA molecules. Modified effectors exhibit specific lysis and cytokine secretion upon exposure to tumor cells expressing the respective target antigen [4] and shown protection in murine tumor models [5].

CD19-specific chimaeric Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) [68], z-CD19 natural killer cells (NK) [9], or z-CD19 CIK [10] effectors specifically recognize and kill CD19+ leukemia/lymphoma cells and primary B-ALL blasts. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of this lysis has never been studied.

Two main pathways of CTL-mediated cytotoxicity, that is, granule exocytosis mediated by perforin/granzymes and the death receptor-mediated Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) system, have been identified [11]. More recently, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) was found to induce apoptosis in a variety of tumor cells and leukemia [12]. Mechanisms that trigger apoptosis in target cells are shared by CTL and NK cells.

Death receptors are members of the tumor-necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily and include a subfamily that is characterized by an intracellular domain—the death domain [13]. Decoy receptors are closely related to the death receptors but lack a functional death domain. Death receptors are activated by their natural ligands from the TNF family. Ligands bind to their respective death receptors—such as CD95, TRAIL-R1 (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-R1 or Death Receptor 4), and TRAIL-R2 (DR5), then the death domains attract the intracellular adaptor protein FADD (Fas-associated death domain protein, also known as MORT1), which, in turn, recruits the inactive proforms of certain members of the caspase protease family. In contrast to the DR4 and DR5 receptors, two other cell-surface TRAIL-receptors, DcR1 (Decoy Receptor 1 or TRAIL-R3) and DcR2 (TRAIL-R4), lack a functional death domain and cannot transduce a proapoptotic signal. These “decoy receptors” compete with DR4 and DR5 for TRAIL binding.

Apoptosis of target cells is also induced by the granule exocytosis pathway. Upon binding of an effector to a target cell (by CTL-receptor and antigen on the target cell), the content of the granules is released. These cytolytic granules contain a number of proteins: perforin, a pore forming protein, and granzymes A and B, serine proteases, which are the main effector molecules of the granule-mediated cell death.

In the present work we show that tumor killing by CTL and CIK cells transduced with zeta-CD19 receptor (z-CD19) is predominantly mediated via the perforin/granzyme pathway and is independent of death receptors signaling in primary B-ALL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Primary Lymphoma Cells

Cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (LGC Standards, Molsheim, France). We used SupB15 (ALL-B) and Raji (Burkitt's lymphoma) CD19+ leukemia cell lines and the CD19- Jurkat (ALL-T). They were maintained in RPMI-1640 Glutamax (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, supplemented with sodium pyruvate, gentamycin, and nonessential amino acids.

Bone marrow cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from patients with B-ALL at diagnosis who signed informed consent forms. Flow cytometry analysis showed that, in all tested cases, blast infiltration was 80% and 100% of the blasts which expressed the CD19 antigen. All leukemia samples were cryopreserved and subsequently thawed to be used in the experiments.

2.2. Plasmids and Retrovirus Production

The variable domains of monoclonal antibody anti-CD19 fmc63 were cloned as single-chain Fv (scFv) molecules in frame with CH2-CH3-CD28tm-zeta in the SFG-retroviral construct by Martin Pule, UCL, London, UK. The retroviral supernatant was produced by FuGENE 6 (Roche Diagnostic S.p.A., Italy)—mediated cotransfection of 293-T cells with the MoMLV gag-pol expression plasmid pEQ-PAM3(-E) (kindly provided by Martin Pule), the RD114 env expression plasmid pRDF (kindly provided by Dr Yasu Takeuchi) and the SFG-anti-CD19 CR vector. Supernatants containing retrovirus were harvested 48 hours and 72 hours after transfection, immediately frozen in dry ice, and stored at 80 C until use. 293T cells were used to titrate virus concentration.

2.3. Generation of Effectors and Retroviral Transduction

EBV-Specific CTLs and CIKs Cells were prepared from PBMC obtained after centrifugation of fresh blood on a density gradient using Ficoll-Hypaque (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France).

EBV-specific CTLs were produced as previously reported [14] PBMCs ( ) were cocultured with gamma-irradiated (40 Gy) autologous EBV lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) per well in a 24-well plate. Starting on day 10, the responder cells were restimulated weekly with irradiated LCLs at a responder-to-stimulator ratio of 4 : 1. From day 14, 40 IU/mL recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2) (Proleukine, Chiron) was added twice a week. Twenty-four hours to three days after the third stimulation, the CTLs were transferred to a 24-well nontissue culture plates (BD) precoated with 3.7  g/cm2 of the recombinant fibronectin fragment FN CH-296 (RetroNectin; TaKaRa BioEurope, Gennevilliers, France). Transduction was performed in culture medium supplemented with 40 UI/mL IL-2 and incubation for 48 hours at 37 C and 5% CO2. Then, the viral supernatant was replaced by fresh medium and a fourth stimulation was performed on day 24.

CIK cells were prepared as described previously [10] Briefly, PBMC were resuspended in medium completed with 1000 U/mL recombinant human IFN-g (Sigma). The next day, IL-2 and anti-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3, Janssen-Cilag) were added at 500 IU/mL and at 50 ng/mL, respectively. Cells were cultured at the concentration of  cells/mL. Fresh medium and 300 IU/mL IL-2 were added weekly during culture. The transduction process was analogous to the one used for CTLs, except for IL-2, that was used at 600 IU/mL.

2.4. Flow Cytometric Analysis

The following affinity-purified mouse monoclonal fluorescent conjugated antibodies were used: anti-CD3, anti-CD45, antigranzyme A, antigranzyme B and isotypic controls (BD Biosciences, le Pont de Claix, France), anti-CD95 and anti-CD19 (Beckman Coulter), and antiperforine (Diaclone). Unconjugated anti-DR4 (HS101), DR5 (HS201), DcR1 (HS301), and DcR2 (HS402) were from Alexis (Lausen, Switzerland). Their indirect staining was performed with a goat antimouse-PE conjugated polyclonal F(ab )2 antibody (Beckman Coulter).

Granzymes and perforin intracellular staining was perform following permeabilization using 10 min. incubation with BD-Fixation/Permeabilization solution from BD-Cytofix/Cytoperm kit and incubation in PermWash buffer.

Detection of the genetically modified zeta-transfectant was performed by the goat antihuman (GAH) IgG (H+L) F(ab )2 fragment polyclonal antibodies (Beckman Coulter).

Down expression of CD45 was used to gate leukemia blasts from nonleukaemic cells. B cell origin of leukaemic gated cells was confirmed by CD19 expression.

All labeling was performed in the dark at room temperature. Analyses were performed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer and Diva software (BD Biosciences).

2.5. Assay for Determining Sensitivity to Death Receptor-Induced Apoptosis and Cytotoxicity

Target cells were labeled with 50  Ci chromium 51 for 1 hours at 37 C and 5% CO2. After 3 washes, labeled targets were plated in 96 wells plates at 105 cells/well for apoptosis assay and  cells/well for cytotoxic assay.

The sensitivity of cells to Fas- and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis was investigated using 500 ng/mL agonistic anti-CD95 (IgM clone CH11; Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) and 500 ng/mL recombinant human soluble TRAIL (KillerTRAIL; Alexis Biochemicals). Isotype IgM antibody was used as control (500 ng/mL, Beckman Coulter). Apoptosis was assayed following 4 and 18 hours of incubation at 37 C and 5% CO2.

For cytotoxicity, effector cells were added at various effector to target ratios. Final volumes were 200  L and were incubated for 4 hours at 37 C and 5% CO2.

Subsequently, 35  L supernatant was removed from each well and counted by the Top Count NXT (Perkin Elmer) scintillation counter to determine experimental chromium 51 release. Spontaneous release was obtained from wells receiving target cells and medium only, and total release was obtained from wells receiving 1 mg/mL Saponine (Sigma).

Percentage-specific apoptosis was calculated by the following formula: % apoptosis = 100 (experimental release spontaneous release)/(total release spontaneous release).

Percentage-specific cytotoxicity was calculated by the following formula: % cytotoxicity = 100 (experimental release spontaneous release)/(total release spontaneous release).

2.6. Determination of Degranulation and Intracellular Cytokine Staining

Chimaeric effectors cells were stimulated with SupB15 cell line (1 : 3 ratio) for 5h30. Anti-CD107a and CD107b FITC antibodies (BD Biosciences) were added in the medium at the beginning of the stimulation in the presence of 0.7  L/mL GolgiStop (BD Biosciences) and 1  L/mL GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences). Cells were then labeled with anti-CD3 and goat antihuman (GAH) IgG (H+L) F(ab )2 antibodies. Then permeabilization of the cells was performed using Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences). IFN-γ and TNF-α intracellular staining was then performed (BD Biosciences). Degranulation and cytokine production was analyzed on CD3+ GAH- or CD3+ GAH+ T cells.

3. Results

3.1. Primary B ALL Blast Are Sensitive to z-CD19 CTL and CIK-Mediated Cytolysis

CTL anti-EBV and CIK cells transduced with zeta-CD19 receptor were controlled and were similar to our previous publications (see supplementary data). The zeta-CD19 receptor transduced effectors were used to assay primary B-ALL blasts lysis. A strong cytotoxic activity was observed against all blasts assayed (Figure 1).

Thus, primary B-ALL blasts are sensitive to the killing by anti-CD19-z CTL and anti-CD19-z CIK effectors.

3.2. Poor Expression of Death Receptors and Ligand Sensibility by B ALL Blasts

Since death receptor expression is a prerequisite for susceptibility of target cells to receive the apoptosis signal by death ligands expressed by effector cells, we investigated Blast cell surface expression by flow cytometry.

Expression of Fas was observed on 100% of Jurkat and Raji cell lines and 60% of SupB15 (Figure 2(a)). In contrast, all primary B-ALL blasts studied were almost negative for Fas expression, with a frequency range of 1.5% to 7.5% (Figure 2(b)).

TRAIL death inducing receptors DR4 and DR5 were expressed by Jurkat and Raji with more than 49% and 65% DR4+ cells, respectively and 100% DR5+ for both cell lines. More than 60% of SupB15 expressed DR5 but no expression of DR4 was observed. Primary B-ALL blasts expressed heterogeneously DR4 and DR5. DR4 was expressed by 1.9% to 14.5% of cells. DR5 was more strongly expressed by leukaemic cells with a range of 3.3% to 40.8% of blasts expressing this molecule. TRAIL decoy receptors DcR1 (TRAIL-R3) and DcR2 (TRAIL-R4) were not expressed by Jurkat and SupB15, whereas 40% of Raji expressed DcR1. Very interestingly, B-ALL blasts expressed DcR1 and DcR2 proportionally to death receptors, the leukemia expressed the most DR4, and DR5 expressed the highest levels of decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2.

The absence of Fas expressed by blasts should result in the resistance of blast cells to apoptosis triggered by FasL expressed by effectors. The proportional coexpression of TRAIL-death receptors with decoy receptors could lead to the absence of TRAIL-mediated apoptosis susceptibility by B-ALL cells.

In order to confirm the resistance of B-ALL blast to cytolysis induced by death receptors, we used the agonist antibody anti-Fas clone CH11 and soluble recombinant human TRAIL (killerTRAIL) molecule on these cells (Figure 3). Apoptosis of Jurkat positive control was induced after treatment by anti-Fas and TRAIL-receptors apoptosis agonists. SupB15 was weakly sensitive to TRAIL, but not to Fas. Raji was weakly sensitive to Fas but not to TRAIL. As anticipated from phenotyping study, blasts were not sensitive to apoptosis induced by Fas and very weakly or not to TRAIL-Receptors Death induction.

We concluded that primary B-ALL blasts were not sensitive to death receptor-induced killing or very weakly. These results showed that effector cells cannot use Fas/FasL and TRAIL/TRAIL-R pathways to kill primary B-ALL leukaemic targets.

3.3. z-CD19 CTL and CIK-Express Mediators of Cytotoxicity and Express Membrane CD107 Granule Exocytosis-Associated Molecule upon B Cell Stimulation

To go further into the elucidation of effector mechanisms, we then analyzed the expression of perforin, granzyme-A, and granzyme-B by the effectors. We also compared the expression of these cytotoxicity-associated molecules from the transduced positive populations versus not transduced CTL and CIK. As shown in Figure 4(a), CTL and CIK expressed high amounts of granzymes and perforin. Retroviral transduced cells showed no alteration in the expression of perforin and granzyme-A and -B (Figure 4(a)).

We concluded that chimaeric effectors express molecules implicated in the perforin/granzyme pathway and that the transduction do not affect the expression of these molecules.

We next directly examined the degranulation of anti-CD19-z chimaeric effectors by the CD107 degranulation assay. This functional assay was coupled to the cytokine release assay for IFN-γ and TNF-α. In order to analyze only the specific response linked to the CD19 molecule expressed by target cells, effectors were stimulated by EBV negative B cell line SupB15 but also by primary B-ALL blasts. Nontransduced CTL and CIK were not stimulated by target cells so that the response analyzed is only the transfectant-specific stimulation.

The coculture of anti-EBV-z-CD19-CTL and z-CD19-CIK effectors with CD19+ targets was associated to a high increase in CD107 surface expression as compared to nontransduced effectors (Figure 4(b)), showing granules exocytosis. CD19-specific stimulation of transduced effectors induced high secretion of both IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines. As expected nontransduced anti-EBV and CIK revealed only a small background of cytokine production.

Altogether, results from perforin and granzymes expression with the CD107 degranulation assay highly support the hypothesis of perforin/granzyme pathway used by effectors. Moreover, intracellular cytokine staining confirmed transduced CTL and CIK functionality associated with B-ALL blasts target recognition and killing by effectors.

3.4. Inhibition of Perforin/Granzyme Pathway Block z-CD19 Chimaeric Effectors Cytolysis

In order to confirm the involvement of perforin/granzyme pathway, we used specific inhibitors. The exocytosis of lytic granules is Ca2+-dependent. We used EGTA chelating agent of divalent cations including Ca2+ to block granzymes exocytosis in the presence of Mg2+ (used to allow adherence between effectors and targets). Inhibition of perforin/granzyme pathway were also performed by Concanamycin A who degrades perforin by increasing the pH of lytic granules and inhibits perforin-based cytotoxic activity.

Anti-EBV-z-CD19-CTL and z-CD19-CIK efficiently killed SupB15 and Raji (Figure 5) but were inhibited by the presence of EGTA/MgCl2 or Concanamycin A, confirming the use of perforin/granzyme pathway by effectors to kill their targets. More interestingly, primary B-ALL blasts were efficiently killed by transduced CTL and CIK effectors but the killing was abrogated in the presence of inhibitors of degranulation or of perforin.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that chimaeric CTL and CIK effectors killed B-ALL primary blasts via the perforin/granzyme pathway.

4. Discussion

Our data demonstrate that redirecting the specificity of anti-EBV CTL and CIK via a CD19-specific chimaeric immunoreceptor efficiently kills CD19+ leukaemic and lymphoma lines, as well as primary B-ALL cells. Targeting CD19 with genetically modified effectors is a strategy that has shown its potent killing efficacy on primary B-ALL. The effectors used were T cells activated by the CD3-specific antibody OKT3 [8], anti-virus specific CTL [6, 7], Natural Killer cells [9], or CIK [10]. In the present study we used EBV-specific CTL and CIK. Both effectors efficiently lyse tumors but the mechanisms by which chimaeric effector cells mediate killing of B-ALL blasts have not been studied until now. Tumor cell sensibility and effector-mediated lysis mechanisms are important to evaluate in order to improve the immunomonitoring of T cells and NK cells responses following immunotherapy. The lysis of tumor targets is mediated by cell death induced by distinct pathways [13, 14]. Tumor escape may in part be associated to defective signaling allowing evasion to effectors functionality. The mechanisms of effector-mediated lysis are therefore also important to elucidate tumor escape strategies.

The Fas-FasL pathway is a classic effector mechanism that CTL and NK cells use to lyse target cells [15]. More recently, TRAIL was found to induce apoptosis in a variety of tumor cells and leukemia [12] upon binding with its death-inducing receptors, DR4 and DR5. At the cell surface, TRAIL binding reflects a competition between death receptors (DR4 and DR5) and so-called ‘decoy receptors’ (DcR1 and DcR2), that are receptor homologs but cannot signal to FADD. So we first analyzed death receptors expressed by B-ALL blasts and the apoptosis susceptibility of primary leukemia following exposition to Fas and TRAIL-receptor agonists. Our data indicate that primary B-ALL blasts poorly express Fas and are not susceptible to Fas agonist-induced apoptosis. The resistance of leukaemic cells towards Fas-mediated apoptosis found in this study is in line with previous data describing leukemia cell resistance to Fas ligation [16, 17]. Resistance to Fas ligation can be associated to different mechanisms in leukemia such as over expression of proto oncogenes or secretion of soluble Fas. In the present work, it seems that lack of Fas expression on the membrane of B-ALL blasts could explain the resistance to Fas pathway. Cell surface expression analysis of TRAIL receptors showed that primary B-ALL cells express the death-inducing receptors DR4 and/or DR5 but also the decoy receptors DcR1 and/or DcR2, potentially leading to a competition associated with an absence of death signaling. In line with this hypothesis, the use of human recombinant TRAIL on B-ALL cells failed to induce blasts apoptosis. Data from primary precursor B-cell ALL showing that TRAIL was only modestly effective in this tumor type was previously reported [18]. In contrast to our findings, authors reported that the poor TRAIL activity reflected a poor expression of death receptors as well as decoy receptors. This could be explained by the use of western blot analysis instead of more sensitive flow cytometry used in the present study and availability of more specific (monoclonal) antibodies for TRAIL-receptors expression analysis. Taken together, expression analysis of death-inducing receptors and agonists susceptibility demonstrates that primary B-ALL blasts are almost not sensitive to Fas and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. As a consequence, specific chimaeric effectors lysis of B-ALL blasts cannot use the FasL/Fas or TRAIL/TRAIL-receptors pathways.

In order to investigate the perforin/granzyme pathway, we first analyzed the expression of the cytolytic effector molecules. Anti-EBV CTL and CIK effector cells highly expressed perforin as well as granzyme A and B. Comparison of z-CD19 transduced effectors to nontransduced cells demonstrates that receptor modifications of both anti-EBV CTL and CIK are not associated to an alteration in the expression of cytolytic effector molecules. High expression of cytolytic effector molecules argues in favor of perforin/granzyme pathway all the more since some experiments showed that granzymes and perforin expression correlates with cytolytic activity [19]. We then analyzed transduced effectors functionality via the chimaeric immunoreceptor z-CD19 following stimulation by SupB15 cell line but also by primary B-ALL blasts. Degranulation is a necessary prerequisite to perforin-granzyme-mediated killing. Upon effectors activation, preformed cytotoxic granules move toward the outer membrane of the cell in a polarized fashion toward the site of antigen presentation. After reaching the plasma membrane, the membrane of the granule and the plasma membrane merge, releasing the contents of the granule into the extracellular space. At this time, the CD107a and CD107b proteins from the granule membrane are accessible at the cell surface for specific antibody binding [20]. Our data indicate that both genetically modified effectors anti-EBV CTL and CIK highly increased CD107 surface expression following CD19 specific stimulation. The upregulation of surface CD107 attests the degranulation of z-CD19 chimaeric effectors. This functional assay was completed by the analysis of IFN-γ and TNF-α release. The production of these proinflammatory cytokines is associated with the effectors function and killing. CD19-specific stimulation of anti-EBV CTL and CIK transduced effectors induced high secretion of both IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines showing high functionality of genetic modified responding cells.

Then we show that cytotoxicity mediated by CD19-specific human chimaeric anti-EBV CTL as well as CIK are Ca2+-dependent, since addition of the Ca2+-chelating agent EGTA to the assay medium resulted in complete abrogation of cytotoxicity.

The exocytosis of lytic granules is Ca2+ dependent but the up-regulation of FasL on the cell surface of effectors requires also extracellular Ca2+ [21]. Since in the present work we have demonstrated that primary B-ALL are not susceptible to the death induced by Fas pathway, we could conclude that the cytotoxicity mediated by the z-CD19 effectors is perforin/granzyme-dependent. Moreover, the cytotoxicity mediated by z-CD19 anti-EBV CTL and CIK was almost completely inhibited by treatment with a potent inhibitor of the perforin-based cytotoxic pathway, Concanamycin A.

In conclusion the findings reported in the present work show that the cytolysis response of z-CD19 chimaeric effectors is predominantly mediated via perforin/granzyme pathway and is independent of death receptors signaling in primary B-ALL. This has important implications since in mouse models of allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation, it was shown that donor T cells mediate graft versus host disease primarily through the FasL effector pathway, whereas the graft-versus-leukaemia activity was mediated through the perforin pathway [22]. The present work has important implications on the monitoring of z-CD19 engineered effector cells therapy against B leukemia.


CTL:Cytotoxic T lymphocytes
CIK:Cytokine Induced Killer Cells
B-ALL:B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Funding for this work was provided by the European Union Sixth Framework Programme and AIRC 2007 (4069) Ministero della Salute—Direzione Generale della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica. The use of chimeric T-cell receptors (ChTCRs) for the therapy of haematological high-risk diseases" and “Progetto Integrato Oncologia 2006”, Ministero della Salute—Direzione Generale della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica.


  1. C. H. Pui, M. Schrappe, R. C. Ribeiro, and C. M. Niemeyer, “Childhood and adolescent lymphoid and myeloid leukemia,” Hematology, pp. 118–145, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. W. Loren and D. L. Porter, “Donor leukocyte infusions for the treatment of relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 483–493, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. Biagi, V. Marin, G. M. P. G. Attianese, E. Dander, G. D'Amico, and A. Biondi, “Chimeric T-cell receptors: new challenges for targeted immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies,” Haematologica, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Pule, K. C. Straathof, G. Dotti, H. E. Heslop, C. M. Rooney, and M. K. Brenner, “A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 933–941, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. J. Brentjens, E. Santos, Y. Nikhamin et al., “Genetically targeted T cells eradicate systemic acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenografts,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 5426–5435, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Roessig, S. P. Scherer, A. Baer et al., “Targeting CD19 with genetically modified EBV-specific human T lymphocytes,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 81, supplement 2, pp. S42–S43, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. J. N. Cooper, Z. Al-Kadhimi, L. M. Serrano et al., “Enhanced antilymphoma efficacy of CD19-redirected influenza MP1-specific CTLs by cotransfer of T cells modified to present influenza MP1,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1622–1631, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. J. N. Cooper, M. S. Topp, L. M. Serrano et al., “T-cell clones can be rendered specific for CD19: toward the selective augmentation of the graft-versus-B-lineage leukemia effect,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1637–1644, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Imai, S. Iwamoto, and D. Campana, “Genetic modification of primary natural killer cells overcomes inhibitory signals and induces specific killing of leukemic cells,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 376–383, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. Marin, E. Dander, E. Biagi et al., “Characterization of in vitro migratory properties of anti-CD19 chimeric receptor-redirected CIK cells for their potential use in B-ALL immunotherapy,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1219–1229, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Barry and R. C. Bleackley, “Cytotoxic T lymphocytes: all roads lead to death,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 401–409, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. H. Kaufmann and D. P. Steensma, “On the TRAIL of a new therapy for leukemia,” Leukemia, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2195–2202, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. H. Igney and P. H. Krammer, “Death and anti-death: tumour resistance to apoptosis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 277–288, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. Chowdhury and J. Lieberman, “Death by a thousand cuts: granzyme pathways of programmed cell death,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, pp. 389–420, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Kagi, B. Ledermann, K. Burki et al., “Cytotoxicity mediated by T cells and natural killer cells is greatly impaired in perforin-deficient mice,” Nature, vol. 369, no. 6475, pp. 31–37, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. G. Otten, W. G. J. van Ginkel, A. Hagenbeek, and E. J. Petersen, “Prevalence and clinical significance of resistance to perforin- and FAS-mediated cell death in leukemia,” Leukemia, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1401–1405, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Uno, T. Inukai, N. Kayagaki et al., “TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) frequently induces apoptosis in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia cells,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 3658–3667, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Clodi, D. Wimmer, Y. Li et al., “Expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors and sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in primary B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 580–586, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Hombach, H. Kohler, G. Rappl, and H. Abken, “Human CD4+ T cells lyse target cells via granzyme/perforin upon circumvention of MHC class II restriction by an antibody-like immunoreceptor,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 8, pp. 5668–5675, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. R. Betts, J. M. Brenchley, D. A. Price et al., “Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 281, no. 1-2, pp. 65–78, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Lowin, C. Mattman, M. Hahne, and J. Tschopp, “Comparison of Fas(Apo-1/CD95)- and perforin-mediated cytotoxicity in primary T lymphocytes,” International Immunology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Schmaltz, O. Alpdogan, K. J. Horndasch et al., “Differential use of Fas ligand and perforin cytotoxic pathways by donor T cells in graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia effect,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2886–2895, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 David Laurin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.