Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2010, Article ID 478732, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/478732
Review Article

Maternal-Zygotic Epistasis and the Evolution of Genetic Diseases

1Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
2Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA

Received 10 August 2009; Revised 25 November 2009; Accepted 19 February 2010

Academic Editor: Janet Sinsheimer

Copyright © 2010 Nicholas K. Priest and Michael J. Wade. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Hamosh, A. F. Scott, J. S. Amberger, C. A. Bocchini, and V. A. McKusick, “Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, pp. D514–D517, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. L. Hartl and R. B. Campbell, “Allele multiplicity in simple Mendelian disorders,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 866–873, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. E. Reich and E. S. Lander, “On the allelic spectrum of human disease,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 502–510, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. A. Thornton-Wells, J. H. Moore, and J. L. Haines, “Genetics, statistics and human disease: analytical retooling for complexity,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 640–647, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. R. Templeton, “Epistasis and complex traits,” in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III, and M. J. Wade, Eds., pp. 41–57, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. S. Lander and N. J. Schork, “Genetic dissection of complex traits,” Science, vol. 265, no. 5181, pp. 2037–2048, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. J. Wade, “The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects,” in Maternal Effects as Adaptations, T. A. Mousseau and C. W. Fox, Eds., pp. 5–12, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. B. Wolf, “Gene interactions from maternal effects,” Evolution, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1882–1898, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. S. Falconer, “Maternal effects and selection response,” in Genetics Today: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Genetics, vol. 3, pp. 763–774, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  10. D. E. Cowley, “Prenatal effects on mammalian growth: embryo transfer results,” in The Unity of Evolutionary Biology. Vol 2. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, E. C. Dudley, Ed., pp. 762–779, Dioscorides Press, Portland, Ore, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. E. Cowley, D. Pomp, W. R. Atchley, E. J. Eisen, and D. Hawkins-Brown, “The impact of maternal uterine genotype on postnatal growth and adult body size in mice,” Genetics, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 193–203, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Roach and R. D. Wulff, “Maternal effects in plants,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 18, pp. 209–235, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Mousseau and C. Fox, Eds., Maternal Effects as Adaptations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998.
  14. J. H. Nadeau, “Transgenerational genetic effects on phenotypic variation and disease risk,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 18, pp. R202–R210, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. B. Wolf, T. T. Vaughn, L. S. Pletscher, and J. M. Cheverud, “Contribution of maternal effect QTL to genetic architecture of early growth in mice,” Heredity, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 300–310, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. E. Comings and J. P. MacMurray, “Maternal age at the birth of the first child as an epistatic factor in polygenic disorders,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 141B, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Shen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, R. R. Recker, and H.-W. Deng, “Nonreplication in genetic studies of complex diseases—lessons learned from studies of osteoporosis and tentative remedies,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 365–376, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. F. Manly, “Reliability of statistical associations between genes and disease,” Immunogenetics, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 549–558, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. J. Sillanpää and K. Auranen, “Replication in genetic studies of complex traits,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 646–657, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Li, C. M. Coelho, T. Liu et al., “A statistical model for estimating maternal-zygotic interactions and parent-of-origin effects of QTLs for seed development,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 9, article e3131, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. T. A. Linksvayer and M. J. Wade, “The evolutionary origin and elaboration of sociality in the aculeate hymenoptera: maternal effects, sib-social effects, and heterochrony,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 317–336, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. J. Wilcox, C. R. Weinberg, and R. T. Lie, “Distinguishing the effects of maternal and offspring genes through studies of “case-parent triads”,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 148, no. 9, pp. 893–901, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Wheeler and H. J. Cordell, “Quantitative trait association in parent offspring trios: extension of case/pseudocontrol method and comparison of prospective and retrospective approaches,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 813–833, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. Sinsheimer, C. G. S. Palmer, and J. A. Woodward, “Detecting genotype combinations that increase risk for disease: the maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility test,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. L. Relton, C. S. Wilding, M. S. Pearce et al., “Gene-qene interaction in folate-related genes and risk of neural tube defects in a UK population,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 256–260, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. B. Robson, “Birth weight in cousins,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 262–268, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Le van Kim, I. Mouro, B. Cherif-Zahar et al., “Molecular cloning and primary structure of the human blood group RhD polypeptide,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10925–10929, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. A. Hobbs, S. L. Sherman, P. Yi et al., “Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism as maternal risk factors for Down syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 623–630, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. J. P. Barker, Ed., Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease: Papers, British Medical Journal, London, UK, 1992.
  30. K. L. Jones, D. W. Smith, C. N. Ulleland, and A. P. Streissguth, “Pattern of malformation in offspring of chronic alcoholic mothers,” Lancet, vol. 1, no. 7815, pp. 1267–1271, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. P. Misra, N. Astone, and C. D. Lynch, “Maternal smoking and birth weight: interaction with parity and mother's own in utero exposure to smoking,” Epidemiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 288–293, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. J. Wade, “The coevolutionary genetics of ecological communities,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 8, pp. 185–195, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. J. Wade, “Epistasis, complex traits, and mapping genes,” Genetica, vol. 112–113, pp. 59–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. S. Barker, J. P. Demuth, and M. J. Wade, “Maternal expression relaxes constraint on innovation of the anterior determinant, bicoid,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 1, no. 5, article e57, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. P. Demuth and M. J. Wade, “Maternal expression increases the rate of bicoid evolution by relaxing selective constraint,” Genetica, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. J. Wade, N. K. Priest, and T. Cruickshank, “A theoretical overview of maternal genetic effects: evolutionary predictions and empirical tests with mammalian data,” in Maternal Effects in Mammals, D. Maestripieri and J. Mateo, Eds., pp. 38–63, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. J. Wade, “A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection and speciation,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 337–346, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Wright, “Evolution in Mendelian populations,” Genetics, vol. 16, pp. 97–159, 1931. View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Wright, Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 2: Theory of Gene Frequencies, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1969.
  40. P. C. Phillips, “The language of gene interaction,” Genetics, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 1167–1171, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. C. Phillips, S. P. Otto, and M. C. Whitlock, “Beyond the average. The evolutionary important of gene interactions and variability of epistatic effects,” in Epistasis and the Volutionary Process, J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie, and M. J. Wade, Eds., pp. 20–38, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  42. C. C. Cockerham, “An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for anaylsis of covariance among relatives when epistasis is present,” Genetics, vol. 41, pp. 138–141, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  43. J. B. Wolf, “Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 4655–4660, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. C. Lewontin and K. Kojima, “The evolutionary dynamics of complex polymorphisms,” Evolution, vol. 14, pp. 450–472, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  45. J. F. Crow and M. Kimura, An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA, 1970.
  46. J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III, J. M. Cheverud, A. J. Moore, and M. J. Wade, “Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 64–69, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. A. Roff, “The detection and measurement of maternal effects,” in Maternal Effects as Adaptations, T. A. Mousseau and C. W. Fox, Eds., pp. 83–96, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  48. H. A. Oksh, T. M. Sutherland, and J. S. Williams, “Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice,” Genetics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Sidi, C. Goutel, N. Peyrieras, and F. M. Rosa, “Maternal induction of ventral fate by zebrafish radar,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 3315–3320, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. V. L. Jarrell, B. N. Day, and R. S. Prather, “The transition from maternal to zygotic control of development occurs during the 4-cell stage in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa: quantitative and qualitative aspects of protein synthesis,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. M. Schultz, “The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 323–331, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Vigneault, S. McGraw, L. Massicotte, and M.-A. Sirard, “Transcription factor expression patterns in bovine in vitro-derived embryos prior to maternal-zygotic transition,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1701–1709, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. A. Gavrilov and N. Gavrilova, “Human longevity and parental age at conception,” in Sex and Longevity: Sexuality, Reproduction, Parenthood, J.-M. Robine and T. B. L. Kirkwood, Eds., pp. 7–31, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  54. A. Kemkes-Grottenthaler, “Parental effects on offspring longevity—evidence from 17th to 19th century reproductive histories,” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 139–158, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Almond, “Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long-term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post-1940 U.S. population,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 672–712, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. Lander and L. Kruglyak, “Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results,” Nature Genetics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. R. Templeton, “A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping or DNA sequencing. V. Analysis of case/control sampling designs: Alzheimer's disease and the apoprotein E locus,” Genetics, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 403–409, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. Choudhry, N. E. Coyle, H. Tang et al., “Population stratification confounds genetic association studies among Latinos,” Human Genetics, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 652–664, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus