BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Muscle Contractility and Cell Motility

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 685328 |

Chih-Yung Tang, Tsung-Yu Chen, "Physiology and Pathophysiology of CLC-1: Mechanisms of a Chloride Channel Disease, Myotonia", BioMed Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 685328, 10 pages, 2011.

Physiology and Pathophysiology of CLC-1: Mechanisms of a Chloride Channel Disease, Myotonia

Academic Editor: Lars Larsson
Received26 Apr 2011
Revised18 Jul 2011
Accepted10 Sep 2011
Published01 Dec 2011


The CLC-1 chloride channel, a member of the CLC-channel/transporter family, plays important roles for the physiological functions of skeletal muscles. The opening of this chloride channel is voltage dependent and is also regulated by protons and chloride ions. Mutations of the gene encoding CLC-1 result in a genetic disease, myotonia congenita, which can be inherited as an autosmal dominant (Thomsen type) or an autosomal recessive (Becker type) pattern. These mutations are scattered throughout the entire protein sequence, and no clear relationship exists between the inheritance pattern of the mutation and the location of the mutation in the channel protein. The inheritance pattern of some but not all myotonia mutants can be explained by a working hypothesis that these mutations may exert a “dominant negative” effect on the gating function of the channel. However, other mutations may be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms, such as the defect of protein trafficking to membranes. Thus, the underlying mechanisms of myotonia are likely to be quite diverse, and elucidating the pathophysiology of myotonia mutations will require the understanding of multiple molecular/cellular mechanisms of CLC-1 channels in skeletal muscles, including molecular operation, protein synthesis, and membrane trafficking mechanisms.

1. Introduction

Chloride ( ) channels are membrane proteins that consist of -permeation pores. Different types of human cells express channels in the cell membrane for various physiological purposes. In the last several decades, ion channels that conduct cations, such as sodium ( ), potassium ( ) or calcium ( ) channels, have been studied more extensively than anion channels. Nonetheless, channels are as abundant as cation channels, and they also participate in many important physiological tasks, including the maintainence of normal cellular excitability, the control of neurotransmitter release, and the transport of ions across epithelial cells, to name a few. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date overview of the mechanism and the consequence of the disruption of channel function. We will focus on the physiology and pathophysiology of a channel critical for the function of skeletal muscles, the CLC-1 channel.

is the most abundant anion in most organisms. In adult mammalian cells, the extracellular concentration of is significantly higher than its intracellular counterpart, resulting in a negative equilibrium potential (ECl) that is exquisitely determined by an intracellular concentration. Two secondary active transport systems contribute the most to the regulation of the cytoplasmic level. The - - cotransporter (NKCC) normally accumulates in the cell [1], whereas the - co-transporter (KCC) usually transports out of the cell [2]. Most epithelial cells express predominantly NKCC and display an ECl positive to the resting potential [3, 4]. In contrast, the majority of mature neurons have an enhanced expression of KCC, and therefore manifest a quite negative ECl—sometimes even more negative than the resting potential [3, 5]. In skeletal muscle, despite the presence of both NKCC and KCC, the contribution of secondary active transporters to ECl is rather small, mainly due to the presence of an extraordinarily high permeability that is virtually impossible to be counteracted by active transporters [69]. The ECl in skeletal muscle is thus mainly set by passive electrochemical equilibrium of according to the resting membrane potential which is primarily determined by equilibrium potential (EK). Recent evidence, however, supports the idea that the secondary active transporter NKCC may modulate the membrane potential of skeletal muscle via its import function [1012]. Indeed, the muscle resting potential is never the same as the value of EK while the ECl has been shown to be slightly more positive than the resting membrane potential [13]. Furthermore, the value of the intracellular activity has been shown to be slightly higher than would be expected for a passive distribution [13]. These observations underscore the contribution of the chloride conductance in determining the resting membrane potential of skeletal muscles.

2. Physiological Roles of CLC-1 Channels in Skeletal Muscles

Because of a large membrane conductance, up to 80% of the resting sarcolemmal conductance [1416], a relatively negative ECl explains the physiological role of channels in the cell membrane of skeletal muscles (sarcolemma). For example, activation of channels is essential for ensuring the electrical stability of skeletal muscle by resetting its membrane excitability to the resting state after firing an action potential. Furthermore, a significant conductance is also located in the transverse-tubule system [15, 1719], indicating that the presence of an effective homeostasis system is crucial for the generation and propagation of action potential in both the sarcolemmal and the transverse-tubule system. Finally, emerging evidence suggests that disruptions of the balance of ion channel functions in sarcolemma may contribute to skeletal muscle fatigue [1921]. During intensive firing of muscle action potentials, ions tend to accumulate in the extracellular space up to 10 mM as the extracellular volume of skeletal muscles is limited. The increase of extracellular concentration results in depolarization of membrane potential, and, consequently, a partial inactivation of voltage-gated channels. If the channels that remain active fail to generate a sufficient inward current to overcome the shunting currents mediated by the resting sarcolemmal conductance, the firing of action potential is not possible, thereby leading to muscle fatigue.

Although various types of channels are expressed in skeletal muscles, the most abundant channel in the sarcolemma is CLC-1 [4, 22], which is a member of the CLC-channel/transporter family. The mammalian CLC family consists of nine members: CLC-1, CLC-2, CLC-3, CLC-4, CLC-5, CLC-6, CLC-7, CLC-Ka, and CLC-Kb [2224]. Among these members, CLC-1, CLC-2, CLC-Ka, and CLC-Kb are channels, predominantly residing in the plasma membrane. The rest of the CLC members (CLC-3 to CLC-7) are thought to be transporters, mostly located in intracellular organelles. Like bacterial CLC proteins [25], these mammalian CLC transporters are thought to mediate the counter transport of and ; that is, they are / antiporters [26, 27].

Among the four plasma membrane CLC-channels, CLC-Ka and CLC-Kb channels are involved in transepithelial transport in the kidney and the inner ear [4, 28]. CLC-2 channels can be activated by hyperpolarization, cell swelling, and extracellular acidification [29, 30]. Northern analysis indicates that brain, kidney, and intestine express relatively high levels of CLC-2 channels, although these channel are broadly expressed in various tissues as well [31]. In contrast, CLC-1 channels are most abundantly expressed in the skeletal muscle [32]. A very low level of CLC-1 expression, however, has been reported in kidney, heart, smooth muscle, and, more recently, glial cells [32, 33]. Since the CLC-1 channel is the major sarcolemmal conductance, mutations of the gene encoding this channel lead to a significant muscle hyperexcitability in humans, mice, and other animals [3438], a situation known as “myotonia” [32, 39]. Myotonia is a muscle disease due to hyper-excitability of skeletal muscles. Therefore, this disease can be caused either by the gain of function of channels or a loss of function of channels in the sarcolemma of skeletal muscles. In the following sections we will focus on the defect of CLC-1, starting with the CLC-1’s molecular properties.

3. Molecular Biophysics of CLC-1 Channels

CLC-1 is a voltage-gated channel, and the open probability of CLC-1 channels increases with membrane depolarization. The functional study of CLC-1 at the single-channel level is challenging due to the small single-channel conductance of this channel. Therefore, many functional properties of CLC-1 are inferred from those found in its fish homologue, the Torpedo CLC-0 channel [23]. One unique functional feature in CLC-channels is that the channel opens to two current levels separated by equidistance in the single-channel recording trace (Figure 1). This feature has been identified as the consequence of a “double-barreled” channel opening, first found in CLC-0 in early 1980s [40, 41]. Later single-channel recordings confirmed that the opening of CLC-1 channels also fluctuates between three different conductance levels (Figure 1(a)), corresponding to the three functional states: two pores closed; one open and one closed; and, finally, both pores open [42]. These functional recordings of CLC-0 and CLC-1 channels foretold the recent structural findings from bacterial CLC proteins in which two identical -transport pathways were found in one CLC functional unit [43, 44].

The opening and closure of the two pores in CLC-0 and CLC-1 channels are controlled by two distinct gating mechanisms [23]. One of these gating mechanisms controls the opening and closure of two pores simultaneously, and is therefore called “common gate”. In addition, each pore is also controlled by a “fast gate” that operates independently from the partner fast-gate. Thus, the activation of the conducting pathway of CLC-1 channels requires the opening of both the common gate and the fast gate. The open-close transition of the fast gate operates at a time scale of milliseconds at negative membrane potentials. At the peak of the action potential, the opening kinetics of CLC-1 can be in the submillisecond range. Thus, the opening of CLC-1’s fast-gate can counteract the depolarization generated by the opening of channels during an action potential. This gating mechanism is thus important for CLC-1 channels to control the action potential in skeletal muscles. Mutations that reverse the voltage dependence of CLC-1 channels result in certain forms of myotonia (see below) because these mutant channels are unable to open after membrane depolarization. In addition to the control by membrane potentials, the fast-gating is also regulated by and [46, 47]. The regulation of CLC-1 and CLC-0 channels by and is thought to bear an evolutional relationship to the / counter transport function of their CLC transporter counterparts [48], although the exact link between the channel-gating mechanism and the / -antiporter mechanism is not known. Interestingly, a recent crystallographic study of a prokaryotic CLC protein provided a potential mechanism for the exchange stoichiometry of 2 for 1 [49].

The voltage dependence of the fast gating is similar to that found in voltage-gated cation channels; namely, the open probability ( ) is higher at more depolarized membrane potentials [40, 41, 45, 50, 51]. However, unlike voltage-gated cation channels with the “S4” transmembrane segment serving as the “voltage sensor” [52], there is no such structure in CLC-0 and CLC-1 channels. The voltage-dependent activation of the fast gate of CLC-0 and CLC-1 is likely to arise from the coupling of transport with the gating process [45, 46, 53]. This gating-permeation coupling mechanism was first proposed by Pusch and his colleague [53], who demonstrated that the - curve of the fast gating of CLC-0 channels was shifted toward a more depolarized membrane potential by reducing the extracellular concentration. At a constant voltage, therefore, reducing the extracellular concentration inhibits the opening of the fast gate. More detailed experiments at the single-channel level (Figure 1(b)) further showed that extracellular increases the open probability of the fast-gate by increasing the opening rate of the fast gate [45]. Later experiments also revealed the same dependent fast gating mechanism for CLC-1 channels [46]. To explain this gating effect, investigators have proposed a model in which the binding of to the channel pore opens the fast gate and the movement of across membrane electric field constitutes the fundamental mechanism for the observed voltage dependence [23]. This hypothesis was formulated before the crystal structure of CLC molecules became available. Later structural information from crystallographic studies of bacterial CLC proteins revealed that the transport pathway of CLC molecules appear to be obstructed by the negatively charged side chain of a glutamate residue, and in the pore may compete with this glutamate side chain [43, 44].

4. Structural/Functional Relationship of CLC-1 Channels

The gene of the human CLC-1 channel encodes a transmembrane protein consisting of 991 amino acids (AA). The protein can be roughly divided into two parts, the amino (N)-terminal transmembrane portion (up to  AA.) and the carboxyl (C)-terminal cytoplasmic portion (Figure 2). Although the molecular structure of CLC-1 has not been solved, recent breakthroughs in obtaining the crystal structure of bacteria CLC proteins [43, 44] and the crystal structures of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of several vertebrate CLC molecules, such as CLC-0 [54], CLC-5 [55] and CLC-K [56], have provided insightful structural information for other homologous CLC molecules. The CLC protein from E. coli (CLC-ec1) consists of only ~460  AA, which form a structure corresponding to the N-terminal transmembrane portion of CLC-1 [44] (Figure 2(a), upper panel). This part of the channel protein is composed of eighteen -helices (helices 1 to 18, or helices A to R), seventeen of which being membrane associated (helix A is not inserted into the membrane). Most of these helices are not perpendicular to the membrane, but severely tilted. Moreover, many of these helices do not span the entire width of the lipid membrane (Figure 2(a), upper panel). The most interesting feature of the transmembrane portion of CLC molecules is that a glutamate residue located at the beginning of helix N (helix 14) protrudes its negatively charged side chain into the -permeation pathway (Figure 2(a), red residues in the upper panel). With the glutamate side chain blocking the -permeation pore, permeation is not possible [44]. Mutation of this glutamate residue to a neutral amino acid in CLC-channels results in channels that appear to have a fully open pore. The side chain of this glutamate residue is therefore thought to be the gate that controls each individual protopore. It is also thought that the competition of with this glutamate side-chain may underlie the aforementioned gating permeation mechanism thoroughly characterized for CLC-0 and CLC-1 channels [23, 5759].

The C-terminal half of CLC-1 (from ~AA 591 to the C-terminus) is believed to be entirely located in the cytoplasmic side of the membrane (Figure 2(a), lower panel). This structure of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain was initially solved in several mammalian CLC molecules independent of the transmembrane domain. A most recent crystallographic study revealed the structure of CmCLC, a CLC protein from thermophilic alga that consists of a transmembrane region and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [49]. The transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the CmCLC structure are similar to those solved previously in other CLC proteins, including the extensive helical architecture in the transmembrane region and the characteristic cystathionine -synthase (CBS) domains in the cytoplasmic region (Figure 2(b)). Thus, it is very likely that the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of CLC-1, like those in other mammalian CLC molecules, also contains two tandem CBS domains that are folded into a potential ATP-binding site. It has been shown that cytoplasmic ATP can inhibit the current of CLC-1 channels in acidic pH conditions [6062], and the crystal structure of the C-terminal region of the CLC-5 protein revealed an ATP molecule bound to the predicted ATP-binding site formed by the two tandem CBS domains [55] (Figure 2(a), lower panel). The inhibition of CLC-1 channels by ATP is therefore thought to be due to a direct ATP binding to the C-terminus of protonated CLC-1 channels. Experimental evidence shows that the effect of intracellular ATP is to make the opening of the common gate more difficult [61]. The mechanism of common gating of CLC-channels is not clear, but it has been proposed that this gating mechanism may involve the relative motion of the two channel subunits, including the movement of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [63]. The inhibition of the common gating by cytoplasmic ATP is consistent with the structural feature that the ATP-binding site is located in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region of CLC-1 channels.

During vigorous muscle activities, ATP level in fast-twitch muscle fibers is significantly lowered [64], which in turn reduces ATP inhibition of CLC-1 channels. This enhanced activation of CLC-1 channels is expected to decrease muscle excitability, a potential cell protection mechanism during metabolic stress that may contribute to the development of muscle fatigue [65]. As discussed above, muscle fatigue may also be caused by partial channel inactivation as a result of the accumulation of extracellular ions after multiple action potentials. Moreover, intensive exercise leads to muscle acidosis [66, 67], which in the presence of ATP, may result in CLC-1 channel inhibition [60]. This down regulation of membrane Cl conductance will notably reduce the input conductance of sarcolemma and consequently increase the likelihood of spike induction for the Na+ channels that remain active, and may therefore serve as a physiological response to prevent the development of muscle fatigue.

5. Pathophysiology of Myotonia Congenita

In humans, mutations in the skeletal muscle CLC-1 gene (CLCN1) on chromosome 7 have been linked to a hereditary muscle disease, myotonia congenita [68]. Myotonia can be defined as a hyperexcitability of the plasma membrane of skeletal muscle fibers. Myotonia is due to an electrical instability of the muscle membrane itself, leading to repetitive action potentials with a single stimulus (“myotonic runs”). Myotonia congenita was one of the first human diseases proven to be caused by an ion-channel defect (channelopathy). This discovery was based on studies in goats with hereditary myotonia that closely resembled myotonia congenita in humans [6971]. Subsequent studies also demonstrated that there was indeed a reduced conductance in goat and human myotonic muscle fibers and that normal muscle fibers exhibited myotonic features when was replaced with an impermeant anion [14, 72]. This myotonia-like phenomenon induced by low concentrations of can be accounted for by the aforementioned -dependent gating mechanism for CLC-1 channels.

Human myotonia congenita can be inherited in an autosomal recessive (Becker type) or autosomal dominant (Thomsen type) manner [73]. By now, more than 100 different mutations in the CLCN1 gene have been identified in patients with myotonia congenita [7476]. Myotonia-causing mutations are scattered over the entire sequence of the channel protein, both in the transmembrane region and in the cytosolic N-terminal and C-terminal parts. They include nonsense, splice-site, and frameshift mutations that truncate the channel protein. Truncation mutations are always associated with recessive myotonia, except when they are very close to the C-terminus. Missense mutations can be associated with either recessive or dominant inheritance. Mutations with dominant inheritance are less frequent. With the exception of truncations very close to the C-terminus of CLC-1 channels, all dominant mutations are missense mutations. Recessive mutations are more diverse; they can be associated with truncations, insertions, splice defects, missense, or nonsense/stop errors. Therefore, it is not possible to predict on the basis of the mutation location or the mutation type whether the inheritance will be dominant or recessive.

For the autosomal dominant form of myotonia, patients are expected to carry the heterozygous CLCN1 genotype: one copy each of the wild-type and the mutant allele. Regarding the molecular mechanism of myotonia congenita, a loss-of-function phenotype of the mutant CLCN1 gene certainly supports haploinsufficiency as a reasonable mechanism causing the malfunction of muscles. For many other cases of disease-related mutations, however, a total loss of functional CLC-1 channels on only one allele does not lead to myotonia [32, 36]. It has been suggested that dominant myotonia is due to dominant-negative effects of the mutant subunit on the wild-type subunit coexpressed in the muscles of heterozygous patients. On the other hand, lots of CLCN1 gene mutations result in recessive myotonia, and the mutant proteins do not have dominant negative effects. A likely reason for a lack of dominant negative effects for these recessive mutants is the inability of truncated proteins to associate with the wild-type subunit [74].

Therefore, a current working hypothesis on the molecular basis for the inheritance of myotonia congenita is that the inheritance pattern of a mutation is predominantly determined by the functional consequence of the mutation on the gating of CLC-1 channels: those mutations that affect the common gate lead to an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern, whereas those affecting individual protopores only result in a recessive pattern [42, 77]. As described above, a functional CLC-1 channel is a homo-dimer. With the exception of truncations very close to the C-terminus of CLC-1 channels, all dominant mutations are missense mutations. Almost all these mutations shift the voltage-dependence of gating of the channel towards positive voltages so that the activity of the mutant channels is insufficient to cause membrane repolarization [53]. The dominant-negative effect of these mutations on the hetero-dimeric channel is due to the fact that the common-gate controlling both protopores is affected by the mutation in the mutant subunit [42]. Indeed, many, but not all, mutations in dominant myotonia are due to mutations of residues close to the subunit interface [74, 75, 78]. Consistent with this observation, site-directed mutagenesis of residues lining subunit interface affects the common gate of CLC-1 [79, 80]. On the other hand, as the ion-conducting pore of CLC-1 is entirely contained within each subunit of the dimer [43, 81], mutations affecting the function of one protopore are unlikely to affect the conductance of the second subunit in wild-type/mutant hetero dimeric channels and therefore will generally lack dominantnegative effects. For example, the equivalent residue of CLC-1’s M485 in bacterial CLC proteins is located in the ion-transport pathway. In heterologous expression systems, the mutation M485 V in CLC-1 drastically changed the single-channel conductance and the voltage-dependent gating of homodimeric mutant CLC-1 channels [82]. This mutation, however, displays a recessive inheritance pattern. As both alleles are mutated in patients with recessive myotonia, a total loss of CLC-1 channel function may ensue. In contrast, by assuming equal association affinity for both wild-type and mutant subunits in the dimeric channel architecture, at least 25% of wild-type currents will still remain in heterozygous patients carrying dominant-negative mutations. Accordingly, recessive myotonia is clinically more severe than the dominant Thomsen form.

In addition to faulty channel gating, other mechanisms may also contribute to the pathophysiology of myotonia congenita [83]. For example, several recessive CLCN1 mutations (e.g., Y150C, V165G, F167L, V236L, Y261C, V327I, and F413C) have been shown to yield functional CLC-1 channels with biophysical properties either only slightly different or virtually indistinguishable from those of wild-type channels [75]. Similarly, some dominant CLCN1 mutations (e.g., R338Q, F428S, and T550M) have been shown to display no detectable gating defects upon forming heterodimers with their wild-type counterparts [84, 85]. By no means can the foregoing dominant negative mechanism explain the inheritance patterns of these mutations. These examples clearly demonstrate that the effect of myotonia-related mutations cannot be simply attributed to the disruption of the gating of CLC-1 channels. Several novel mutations in the CLCN1 gene have recently been identified in Taiwanese patients suffering from myotonia congenita [86, 87]. Interestingly, one of the detected mutations, fs793X, was found in a Taiwanese family with dominant inheritance pattern [87]. However, the same mutation was previously found in an recessive Italian pedigree [88]. This is only one of the several examples showing that the same mutations are associated with recessive myotonia in some families, but with dominant myotonia in others [77, 89, 90]. This dual inheritance pattern again demonstrates the inadequacy of the gating hypothesis and further highlights the importance of other pathophysiological mechanisms of myotonia congenita. It is likely that some myotonia congenita-related mutations may (i) result in aberrant biogenesis and subunit assembly and/or (ii) lead to a defective membrane targeting subcellular localization patterns of CLC-1 channels. Indeed, three myotonia-related mutations in the distal C-terminus of CLC-1 channels have been shown to have a reduction of protein expression in the surface membrane [83]. Thus, the underlying mechanisms of myotonia due to CLC-1 channelopathy are likely to be quite diverse.

6. Clinical Correlation

Myotonia is characterized by the impaired relaxation of skeletal muscle following sudden voluntary contraction. As discussed above, CLC-1 conductance contributes up to 80% of the resting membrane conductance in normal skeletal muscle. Myotonia-causing mutations in the CLCN1 gene therefore lead to a significant reduction in resting membrane conductance, thereby increasing the input resistance of skeletal muscle [72, 91]. Consequently, a smaller membrane depolarization (threshold potential) will be sufficient to trigger an action potential, that is, muscle excitability will be enhanced. This scenario explains why a single nerve stimulus elicited a train of action potentials in muscle fibers from myotonic goats; in contrast, the same stimulus only induced a single action potential in normal muscle fibers [70].

Another important role of CLC-1 conductance in muscle is to counteract the depolarizing effect of tubular K+ accumulation during intensive firing of action potentials [70]. As the extracellular volume in the transverse-tubule system of skeletal muscles is limited, ions tend to accumulate in the extracellular space during intensive firing of muscle action potentials. This increase in extracellular normally has little effect on the membrane potential due to the presence of high CLC-1 conductance. In myotonic muscle, however, a small accumulation of tubular will result in a significant membrane depolarization. In the presence of rapid successions of action potentials, summation of these accumulation-induced membrane depolarization may trigger spontaneous muscle action potentials, thereby manifesting myotonia symptoms such as muscle stiffness after voluntary contraction. Hence, the medication of choice for myotonic patients usually involves drugs that suppress muscle excitability via inhibition of voltage-gated channels [92].

The muscle stiffness of myotonia can gradually be relieved by exercise (the so-called “warm-up” phenomenon) [93]. One plausible mechanism of the warm-up is the enhanced activity of the muscle / -ATPase induced by exercise, which facilitates the clearance of extracellular from transverse-tubules. A recent study in myotonic patients, however, failed to support this hypothesis [94], indicating that the precise mechanism of warm-up is still unclear.

Also elusive are the rationales for several other clinical manifestations of myotonia congenita. For example, the recessive myotonia is usually more common in men than in women, and for female patients of dominant myotonia, the symptoms become worse during pregnancy [75]. It has been suggested that the observed gender difference may arise from the modulation of CLC-1 channel function by sex hormones [95]. In addition, recessive but not dominant myotonia is often associated with transient muscle weakness on the initiation of movement [75, 96], a defect that is not predicted by enhanced muscle excitability. Obviously, a combination of biophysical and cell biological studies in both in vitro and in vivo models will be required for better understanding of the clinical symptoms of myotonia congenita.

7. Concluding Remarks

ClC-1 channels play a crucial role in setting membrane excitability in skeletal muscle. Despite of the numerous documentations of the association between CLCN1 mutations and myotonia congenita, elucidation of the mechanistic link between genetic defects and pathogenesis is still at the primitive stage. One major limitation to our better understanding of this issue lies in the fact that protein biosynthetic pathways as well as subcellular localization patterns of CLC-1 channels in situ remain obscure. For example, even though a significant conductance has been identified in the transverse-tubule system, it remains inconclusive whether CLC-1 channels are actually expressed in the transverse-tubule system. In the ADR (arrested development of righting response) mouse that has been used as a model for recessive myotonia [34, 69], immuonhistochemistry of muscle cryosection located CLC-1 channels primarily in the outer, sarcolemmal membrane, but not in the transverse-tubule of skeletal muscle [97]. A similar conclusion on sarcolemmal localization of CLC-1 channels was recently reported in flexor digitorum brevis muscle fibers of wild-type mice as well [98]. Biophysical and pharmacological studies in a skinned rat skeletal muscle, however, demonstrated that the transverse-tubule channel conductance was blocked by 9-AC, low intracellular pH, and protein kinase C activators [18, 19, 96], all of which are known to affect the properties of CLC-1 channels observed in the heterologous expression system [32, 60, 61, 99]. As has been previously proposed [19, 100], this apparent discrepancy may arise from the possibility that the transverse-tubule system expresses certain splice variants of CLC-1 channels that lack the epitope for the antibody used in the immunofluorescence study, or that the surrounding microenvironment in the transverse-tubule system prevents the antibody from properly recognizing the epitope in CLC-1 channels in situ. The field thus requires more extensive studies on not only the gating mechanisms but also the biosynthetic process and subcellular localization of CLC-1 channels.

Myotonia congenita, therefore, is still in lack of a standard, effective treatment. The field thus begs for further research efforts in multiple directions. At the molecular level, the mechanistic principles underlying the operation of CLC-1 need to be further examined. At the cellular level, the protein biosynthesis mechanisms of CLC-1 (protein biogenesis, membrane trafficking, as well as subcellular localization patterns in situ), although drawing much research attention recently, remain obscure and need more in-depth investigations. At the clinical level, many myotonia-associated symptoms require better understanding of their pathophysiological mechanisms. Through elucidations of the physiological roles of CLC-1 and the pathophysiological mechanisms of the CLC-1 channelopathy, the therapeutic strategies for myotonia congenita will eventually be illuminated.


The authors thank Dr. Tzyh-Chang Hwang for critical readings of the paper. The research in Dr. Chih-Yung Tang’s laboratory is supported by a Grant (NSC 96-2320-B-002-069-MY3) from National Science Council of Taiwan, while the work of Dr. Tsung-Yu Chen’s laboratory is supported by a Grant (R01GM065447) from National Institutes of Health of USA.


  1. J. M. Russell, “Sodium-potassium-chloride cotransport,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 211–276, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. C. Adragna, M. di Fulvio, and P. K. Lauf, “Regulation of K-Cl cotransport: from function to genes,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 109–137, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Gamba, “Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of electroneutral cation-chloride cotransporters,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 423–493, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. J. Jentsch, T. Maritzen, and A. A. Zdebik, “Chloride channel diseases resulting from impaired transepithelial transport or vesicular function,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 2039–2046, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. A. Payne, C. Rivera, J. Voipio, and K. Kaila, “Cation-chloride co-transporters in neuronal communication, development and trauma,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 199–206, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. L. Hodgkin and P. Horowicz, “The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 148, pp. 127–160, 1959. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. H. Adrian, “Potassium chloride movement and the membrane potential of frog muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 151, pp. 154–185, 1960. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. H. Adrian, “Internal chloride concentration and chloride efflux of frog muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 156, pp. 623–632, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. F. Dulhunty, “The dependence of membrane potential on extracellular chloride concentration in mammalian skeletal muscle fibres,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 276, pp. 67–82, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. J. G. Foppen, H. G. J. van Mil, and J. S. van Heukelom, “Effects of chloride transport on bistable behaviour of the membrane potential in mouse skeletal muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 542, no. 1, pp. 181–191, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. J. G. Foppen, “In skeletal muscle the relaxation of the resting membrane potential induced by K(+) permeability changes depends on Cl(-) transport,” Pflugers Archiv, vol. 447, no. 4, pp. 416–425, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Gallaher, M. Bier, and J. S. van Heukelom, “The role of chloride transport in the control of the membrane potential in skeletal muscle—theory and experiment,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 143, no. 1-2, pp. 18–25, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. C. Aickin, W. J. Betz, and G. L. Harris, “Intracellular chloride and the mechanism for its accumulation in rat lumbrical muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 411, pp. 437–455, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. H. Bryant and A. Morales-Aguilera, “Chloride conductance in normal and myotonic muscle fibres and the action of monocarboxylic aromatic acids,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 367–383, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. F. Dulhunty, “Distribution of potassium and chloride permeability over the surface and T-tubule membranes of mammalian skeletal muscle,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 293–310, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. H. Bretag, “Muscle chloride channels,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 618–724, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  17. P. T. Palade and R. L. Barchi, “Characteristics of the chloride conductance in muscle fibers of the rat diaphragm,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 325–342, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. R. Coonan and G. D. Lamb, “Effect of transverse-tubular chloride conductance on excitability in skinned skeletal muscle fibres of rat and toad,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 509, part 2, pp. 551–564, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. L. Dutka, R. M. Murphy, D. G. Stephenson, and G. D. Lamb, “Chloride conductance in the transverse tubular system of rat skeletal muscle fibres: importance in excitation-contraction coupling and fatigue,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, no. 3, pp. 875–887, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. H. Pedersen, O. B. Nielsen, G. D. Lamb, and D. G. Stephenson, “Intracellular acidosis enhances the excitability of working muscle,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5687, pp. 1144–1147, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. P. Cairns and M. I. Lindinger, “Do multiple ionic interactions contribute to skeletal muscle fatigue?” Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, no. 17, pp. 4039–4054, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. J. Jentsch, V. Stein, F. Weinreich, and A. A. Zdebik, “Molecular structure and physiological function of chloride channels,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 503–568, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. T. Y. Chen, “Structure and function of CLC channels,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 67, pp. 809–839, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. J. Jentsch, M. Poët, J. C. Fuhrmann, and A. A. Zdebik, “Physiological functions of CLC Cl- channels gleaned from human genetic disease and mouse models,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 67, pp. 779–807, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Accardi and C. Miller, “Secondary active transport mediated by a prokaryotic homologue of ClC Cl- channels,” Nature, vol. 427, no. 6977, pp. 803–807, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Picollo and M. Pusch, “Chloride/proton antiporter activity of mammalian CLC proteins ClC-4 and ClC-5,” Nature, vol. 436, no. 7049, pp. 420–423, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. O. Scheel, A. A. Zdebik, S. Lourdel, and T. J. Jentsch, “Voltage-dependent electrogenic chloride/proton exchange by endosomal CLC proteins,” Nature, vol. 436, no. 7049, pp. 424–427, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. O. Devuyst and W. B. Guggino, “Chloride channels in the kidney: lessons learned from knockout animals,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 283, no. 6, pp. F1176–F1191, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. Cuppoletti, K. P. Tewari, A. M. Sherry, and D. H. Malinowska, “Activation of human ClC-2 Cl- channels: implications for cystic fibrosis,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 896–900, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Strange, “Of mice and worms: novel insights into CIC-2 anion channel physiology,” News in Physiological Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. Thiemann, S. Grunder, M. Pusch, and T. J. Jentsch, “A chloride channel widely expressed in epithelial and non-epithelial cells,” Nature, vol. 356, no. 6364, pp. 57–60, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Steinmeyer, C. Ortland, and T. J. Jentsch, “Primary structure and functional expression of a developmentally regulated skeletal muscle chloride channel,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6351, pp. 301–304, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. D. Zhang, S. Morishima, Y. Ando-Akatsuka et al., “Expression of novel isoforms of the ClC-1 chloride channel, in astrocytic glial cells in vitro,” GLIA, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Steinmeyer, R. Klocke, C. Ortland et al., “Inactivation of muscle chloride channel by transposon insertion in myotonic mice,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6351, pp. 304–308, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. C. Koch, K. Steinmeyer, C. Lorenz et al., “The skeletal muscle chloride channel in dominant and recessive human myotonia,” Science, vol. 257, no. 5071, pp. 797–800, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. Gronemeier, A. Condie, J. Prosser, K. Steinmeyer, T. J. Jentsch, and H. Jockusch, “Nonsense and missense mutations in the muscular chloride channel gene Clc- 1 of myotonic mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 8, pp. 5963–5967, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  37. C. L. Beck, C. Fahlke, and A. L. George Jr., “Molecular basis for decreased muscle chloride conductance in the myotonic goat,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 11248–11252, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. H. Rhodes, C. H. Vite, U. Giger, D. F. Patterson, C. Fahlke, and A. L. George Jr., “A missense mutation in canine ClC-1 causes recessive myotonia congenita in the dog,” FEBS Letters, vol. 456, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Fahlke, R. Rüdel, N. Mitrovic, M. Zhou, and A. L. George Jr., “An aspartic acid residue important for voltage-dependent gating of human muscle chloride channels,” Neuron, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 463–472, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Miller, “Open-state substructure of single chloride channels from Torpedo electroplax,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, vol. 299, no. 1097, pp. 401–411, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  41. C. Miller and M. M. White, “Dimeric structure of single chloride channels from Torpedo electroplax,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 2772–2775, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  42. C. Saviane, F. Conti, and M. Pusch, “The muscle chloride channel ClC-1 has a double-barreled appearance that is differentially affected in dominant and recessive myotonia,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 457–468, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. Dutzler, E. B. Campbell, M. Cadene, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon, “X-ray structure of a CIC chloride channel at 3.0 Å reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6869, pp. 287–294, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. Dutzler, E. B. Campbell, and R. MacKinnon, “Gating the selectivity filter in ClC chloride channels,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5616, pp. 108–112, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Y. Chen and C. Miller, “Nonequilibrium gating and voltage dependence of the ClC-0 Cl- channel,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 237–250, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  46. G. Y. Rychkov, M. Pusch, D. S. J. Astill, M. L. Roberts, T. J. Jentsch, and A. H. Bretag, “Concentration and pH dependence of skeletal muscle chloride channel C1C-1,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 497, part 2, pp. 423–435, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. F. Chen and T. Y. Chen, “Different fast-gate regulation by external Cl(-) and H(+) of the muscle-type ClC chloride channels,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. Miller, “ClC chloride channels viewed through a transporter lens,” Nature, vol. 440, no. 7083, pp. 484–489, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Feng, E. B. Campbell, Y. Hsiung, and R. MacKinnon, “Structure of a eukaryotic CLC transporter defines an intermediate state in the transport cycle,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6004, pp. 635–641, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. Hanke and C. Miller, “Single chloride channels from Torpedo electroplax. Activation by protons,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 25–45, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  51. Y. W. Lin, C. W. Lin, and T. Y. Chen, “Elimination of the slow gating of C1C-0 chloride channel by a point mutation,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  52. B. Hille, Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2001.
  53. M. Pusch, K. Steinmeyer, M. C. Koch, and T. J. Jentsch, “Mutations in dominant human myotonia congenita drastically alter the voltage dependence of the CIC-1 chloride channel,” Neuron, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1455–1463, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Meyer and R. Dutzler, “Crystal structure of the cytoplasmic domain of the chloride channel ClC-0,” Structure, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 299–307, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Meyer, S. Savaresi, I. C. Forster, and R. Dutzler, “Nucleotide recognition by the cytoplasmic domain of the human chloride transporter ClC-5,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Markovic and R. Dutzler, “The structure of the cytoplasmic domain of the chloride channel ClC-Ka reveals a conserved interaction interface,” Structure, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 715–725, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Y. Chen, “Coupling gating with ion permeation in ClC channels,” Science's STKE, vol. 2003, no. 188, p. e23, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  58. R. Dutzler, “The structural basis of ClC chloride channel function,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 315–320, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. Dutzler, “Structural basis for ion conduction and gating in ClC chloride channels,” FEBS Letters, vol. 564, no. 3, pp. 229–233, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B. Bennetts, M. W. Parker, and B. A. Cromer, “Inhibition of skeletal muscle ClC-1 chloride channels by low intracellular pH and ATP,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 45, pp. 32780–32791, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Y. Tseng, B. Bennetts, and T. Y. Chen, “Cytoplasmic ATP inhibition of CLC-1 is enhanced by low pH,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. X. D. Zhang, P. Y. Tseng, and T. Y. Chen, “ATP inhibition of CLC-1 is controlled by oxidation and reduction,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 421–428, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. A. Bykova, X. D. Zhang, T. Y. Chen, and J. Zheng, “Large movement in the C terminus of CLC-0 chloride channel during slow gating,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1115–1119, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. Karatzaferi, A. de Haan, R. A. Ferguson, W. van Mechelen, and A. J. Sargeant, “Phosphocreatine and ATP content in human single muscle fibres before and after maximum dynamic exercise,” Pflugers Archiv, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 467–474, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Bennetts, G. Y. Rychkov, H. L. Ng et al., “Cytoplasmic ATP-sensing domains regulate gating of skeletal muscle ClC-1 chloride channels,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 37, pp. 32452–32458, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Roos and W. F. Boron, “Intracellular pH transients in rat diaphragm muscle measured with DMO,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 235, no. 1, pp. C49–C54, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  67. J. R. Wilson, K. K. McCully, D. M. Mancini, B. Boden, and B. Chance, “Relationship of muscular fatigue to pH and diprotonated P(i) in humans: a 31P-NMR study,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2333–2339, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  68. K. Jurkat-Rott, H. Lerche, and F. Lehmann-Horn, “Skeletal muscle channelopathies,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 249, no. 11, pp. 1493–1502, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. R. J. Lipicky and S. H. Bryant, “Sodium, potassium, and chloride fluxes in intercostal muscle from normal goats and goats with hereditary myotonia,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 89–111, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  70. R. H. Adrian and S. H. Bryant, “On the repetitive discharge in myotonic muscle fibres,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 505–515, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  71. R. H. Adrian and M. W. Marshall, “Action potentials reconstructed in normal and myotonic muscle fibres,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 125–143, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  72. R. J. Lipicky, S. H. Bryant, and J. H. Salmon, “Cable parameters, sodium, potassium, chloride, and water content, and potassium efflux in isolated external intercostal muscle of normal volunteers and patients with myotonia congenita,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2091–2103, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  73. L. J. Ptacek, K. J. Johnson, and R. C. Griggs, “Genetics and physiology of the myotonic muscle disorders,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 328, no. 7, pp. 482–489, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Pusch, “Myotonia caused by mutations in the muscle chloride channel gene CLCN1,” Human Mutation, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 423–434, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. E. Colding-Jørgensen, “Phenotypic variability in myotonia congenita,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. C. Lossin and A. L. George Jr., “Myotonia congenita,” Advances in Genetics, vol. 63, pp. 25–55, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. Kubisch, T. Schmidt-Rose, B. Fontaine, A. H. Bretag, and T. J. Jentsch, “CIC-1 chloride channel mutations in myotonia congenita: variable penetrance of mutations shifting the voltage dependence,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1753–1760, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. Fialho, S. Schorge, U. Pucovska et al., “Chloride channel myotonia: exon 8 hot-spot for dominant-negative interactions,” Brain, vol. 130, no. 12, pp. 3265–3274, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. Accardi, L. Ferrera, and M. Pusch, “Drastic reduction of the slow gate of human muscle chloride channel (CIC-1) by mutation C277S,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 534, no. 3, pp. 745–752, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. Duffield, G. Rychkov, A. Bretag, and M. Roberts, “Involvement of helices at the dimer interface in ClC-1 common gating,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. F. Weinreich and T. J. Jentsch, “Pores formed by single subunits in mixed dimers of different CLC chloride channels,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 4, pp. 2347–2353, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. B. Wollnik, C. Kubisch, K. Steinmeyer, and M. Pusch, “Identification of functionally important regions of the muscular chloride channel CIC-1 by analysis of recessive and dominant myotonic mutations,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 805–811, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  83. M. J. Macías, O. Teijido, G. Zifarelli et al., “Myotonia-related mutations in the distal C-terminus of ClC-1 and ClC-0 chloride channels affect the structure of a poly-proline helix,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 403, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. F. F. Wu, A. Ryan, J. Devaney et al., “Novel CLCN1 mutations with unique clinical and electrophysiological consequences,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 11, pp. 2392–2407, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  85. J. Zhang, S. Bendahhou, M. C. Sanguinetti, and L. J. Ptáček, “Functional consequences of chloride channel gene (CLCN1) mutations causing myotonia congenita,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 937–942, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  86. S. B. Jou, L. I. Chang, H. Pan, P. R. Chen, and K. M. Hsiao, “Novel CLCN1 mutations in Taiwanese patients with myotonia congenita,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 251, no. 6, pp. 666–670, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  87. H. C. Kuo, K. M. Hsiao, L. I. Chang, T. H. You, T. H. Yeh, and C. C. Huang, “Novel mutations at carboxyl terminus of CIC-1 channel in myotonia congenita,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 342–346, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. F. Sangiuolo, A. Botta, A. Mesoraca et al., “Identification of five new mutations and three novel polymorphisms in the muscle chloride channel gene (CLCN1) in 20 Italian patients with dominant and recessive myotonia congenita. Mutations in brief no. 118. Online,” Human Mutation, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 331, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  89. A. L. George Jr., K. Sloan-Brown, G. M. Fenichel, G. A. Mitchell, R. Spiegel, and R. M. Pascuzzi, “Nonsense and missense mutations of the muscle chloride channel gene in patients with myotonia congenita,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2071–2072, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  90. C. Meyer-Kleine, K. Steinmeyer, K. Ricker, T. J. Jentsch, and M. C. Koch, “Spectrum of mutations in the major human skeletal muscle chloride channel gene (CLCN1) leading to myotonia,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1325–1334, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  91. S. H. Bryant, “Cable properties of external intercostal muscle fibres from myotonic and nonmyotonic goats,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 539–550, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  92. G. Meola and V. Sansone, “Therapy in myotonic disorders and in muscle channelopathies,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. S953–S961, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  93. R. Rudel and F. Lehmann-Horn, “Membrane changes in cells from myotonia patients,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 310–356, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  94. M. C. P. van Beekvelt, G. Drost, G. Rongen, D. F. Stegeman, B. G. M. van Engelen, and M. J. Zwarts, “Na+-K+-ATPase is not involved in the warming-up phenomenon in generalized myotonia,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 514–523, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. D. Fialho, D. M. Kullmann, M. G. Hanna, and S. Schorge, “Non-genomic effects of sex hormones on CLC-1 may contribute to gender differences in myotonia congenita,” Neuromuscular Disorders, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 869–872, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. D. L. R. Rayan and M. G. Hanna, “Skeletal muscle channelopathies: nondystrophic myotonias and periodic paralysis,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 466–476, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. C. A. Gurnett, S. D. Kahl, R. D. Anderson, and K. P. Campbell, “Absence of the skeletal muscle sarcolemma chloride channel ClC-1 in myotonic mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 16, pp. 9035–9038, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. J. D. Lueck, A. E. Rossi, C. A. Thornton, K. P. Campbell, and R. T. Dirksen, “Sarcolemmal-restricted localization of functional ClC-1 channels in mouse skeletal muscle,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 597–613, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. Rosenbohm, R. Rüdel, and C. Fahlke, “Regulation of the human skeletal muscle chloride channel hClC-1 by protein kinase C,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 514, part 3, pp. 677–685, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. E. C. Aromataris and G. Y. Rychkov, “ClC-1 chloride channel: matching its properties to a role in skeletal muscle,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1118–1123, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Chih-Yung Tang and Tsung-Yu Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

10109 Views | 1943 Downloads | 15 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.