BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Recent Developments in Mycobacteriology: A Clinical and Diagnostic Perspective

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 161329 |

Michal Slany, Petr Jezek, Monika Bodnarova, "Fish Tank Granuloma Caused by Mycobacterium marinum in Two Aquarists: Two Case Reports", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 161329, 4 pages, 2013.

Fish Tank Granuloma Caused by Mycobacterium marinum in Two Aquarists: Two Case Reports

Academic Editor: Tomasz Jagielski
Received10 Oct 2013
Accepted19 Nov 2013
Published12 Dec 2013


Mycobacterium marinum, the cause of chronic systemic infections in fish, occasionally causes granulomatous skin and soft tissue lesions in humans. Cutaneous mycobacterial infection in two patients owing to unusual circumstances is presented in this report. The first patient was infected through improper hygienic behavior, while infection in the second patient was previously misdiagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis and treated with methylprednisolone for a period of three months, which resulted in a rare systemic spread of M. marinum into the bones of the hand, testis, and epididymis. Simultaneously, screening for possible sources of M. marinum infection in patients' aquaria revealed positive fish harboring VNTR profiles identical to those obtained for clinical isolates from patients.

1. Introduction

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous in the environment and are responsible for several diseases in animals and humans known as mycobacterioses [13]. A study published in 2013 has shown that M. fortuitum, M. gordonae, M. kansasii, and M. peregrinum are frequently present in the aquatic environment of surface waters in the Moravian region of the Czech Republic. In contrast, the most frequent NTM present in aquaria with ornamental fish were M. marinum [4].

Mycobacterium marinum is the cause of chronic systemic infections in fish and an occasional cause of granulomatous skin lesions in humans. Infections in humans result in skin and soft tissue infections characterized by their predilection for the upper extremities, often following minor trauma to hands with a history of typical exposure to aquarium tanks [5, 6]. Diagnosis is usually made after biopsy and culture of the lesion, but microbiologists should be alerted to the possibility of M. marinum if the injury originated from an aquarium or the water environment [7].

Here we report two cases of M. marinum infection in humans (Table 1). Previously described species-specific qPCR targeting the erp and IS2404 genes together with a conventional culture method was used for the detection of M. marinum in clinical specimens of two infected humans (Table 2). Simultaneously, epidemiology screening for possible sources in patients’ aquaria via VNTR fingerprinting of M. marinum isolates was carried out.

Patient no.Age/sexCase backgroundDrug therapy
Regimen CourseTreated

(1) 25/mHobby aquarist who cleaned injured knee with a brush usually used to clean the aquariumClarithromycin Infiltrate with visible crusts together with two subcutaneous resistances on the left knee
Extirpation of subcutaneous nodule because positivity for M. marinum in the sample of exploratorily excised cutaneous tissue was not detected
Treatment changed due to the insufficient clinical response in the area of subcutaneous resistance

(2) 60/m Patient with a professional interest in fish breeding reported finger injury during aquaria cleaningMethylprednisolone
Suspected rheumatoid arthritis due to swelling of the index finger joint
Immunosuppression contributed to the hematogenous spread of infection
Insufficient clinical response in the area of the right hand
Severe right-hand oligoarthritis
Osteomyelitis of the affected metacarpophalangeal joints
Orchiectomy due to inflammation and necrosis in the epididymis with continuous spreading to the testis
Surgical removal of the ring finger

Sampleerp/IS2404  qPCRZN microscopyCultivationIsolate identity

Patient 1
Subcutaneous noduleLeft knee AFB+M. marinum
Cutaneous tissueLeft knee

Patient 2
PunctureMetacarpal joint AFB+M. marinum
PusRing finger AFB+M. marinum
Subcutaneous noduleRight forearm +M. marinum
TissueEpididymis AFB
TissueTestis AFB

Quantification of M.  marinum is shown in genome equivalents per g of tissue or mL of liquid sample.
AFB: acid fast bacilli.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 49 samples were taken from two humans ( ), ornamental fish ( ), and the aquarium environment ( ; biofilms, water, and plants). Animal and environmental samples were examined within the framework of an epidemiological study carried out in the aquaria of infected aquarists.

2.2. Cultivation and Isolate Characterization

All fish and environmental samples were subjected to decontamination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine followed by cultivation at 25°C, 30°C, and 37°C for 8 weeks [8]. In case of clinical samples decontamination step was excluded. Mycobacterial isolates were grown on solid Löwenstein-Jensen and Ogawa media (Trios, Prague, Czech Republic) and in liquid Sula medium (Trios). Clinical specimens were subjected to microscopic examination after Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB).

Mycobacterial isolates were identified by their phenotypic properties (temperature preference, growth rate, and pigment production in the dark and upon exposure to light), microscopic examination after ZN staining, and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene [9]. Subsequently, VNTR analysis according to a previously published method was used to fingerprint isolates identified as M. marinum [10].

2.3. DNA Isolation and Molecular Detection of Mycobacterium marinum

DNA isolation from human, fish, and environmental samples was based on a protocol described previously [11]. The isolated DNA was analyzed according to a previously described erp/IS2404 qPCR assay, which enables species-specific detection of M. marinum [12].

3. Patient Clinical Presentation

3.1. Patient 1

A Twenty-five-year-old male reported cleaning his injured left knee with a brush usually used to clean the aquarium, which resulted in infiltration and subsequently visible crusts together with two subcutaneous resistances caused by M. marinum. The patient was initially treated with clarithromycin. Subcutaneous resistance did not lessen after nine weeks; therefore, treatment was continued with ethambutol for an additional nine weeks.

3.2. Patient 2

The second case involved cutaneous infection of a 60-year-old male with a professional interest in fish breeding. He reported injury to the tip of his index finger, which occurred during aquarium clearing. He was misdiagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and treated with methylprednisolone for a period of 3 months, which resulted in a rare systemic spread of M. marinum from the primary site into the joint and bones of the index and ring finger, forearm, testis, and epididymis. The patient was initially treated with a combination of clarithromycin and ethambutol. Because of the insufficient clinical response in the area of the right hand an eight-month-long treatment based on results of sensitivities to a combination of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, cycloserine, and pyrazinamide was administered. Due to the damage to the testis an orchiectomy was also carried out. Because of long-lasting pain and damage the distal part of the ring finger was surgically removed.

4. Results and Discussion

Generally, three main histopathological patterns of M. marinum infection are distinguished: granulomatous nodular or diffuse inflammation with mixed granulomas; abscesses with mild granulomatous reactions; and subcutaneous (patients 1) or deep dermal granulomatous inflammation [13]. Tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, bursitis, or osteomyelitis was also reported in the literature to follow from deep subcutaneous infection [14, 15]. M. marinum infection may have the potential for systemic dissemination in humans as has been reported earlier and was shown in the second patient [6].

Conventional microbiological methods used for M. marinum diagnostics are slow and rely solely on phenotypic characteristics, which can be very similar to different causative agents. Clinicians in general have to consider other causes besides M. marinum including deep fungal infection; therefore, a diagnostic ladder is needed in this kind of patients. Delayed diagnosis is the main cause of the patients’ serious side effect. Rapid and accurate molecular diagnosis methods are essential. Rapid detection of mycobacteria using conventional broad range PCR assay was previously described in the literature [16]. The advantage of this approach is the ability to detect multiple mycobacterial species. Generally, conventional PCR could show weakness such as proneness to contamination or lack of sensitivity when used for detection in clinical specimens where pathogen is present in limited amount [17]. Sensitive and specific method for the direct detection of M. marinum in clinical specimens suitable to overcome this limitation would be beneficial. So far, there have been very few reports on the detection of M. marinum directly from infected tissue without previous culturing [12, 18].

The molecular based approach used in this study represents a fast, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of M. marinum, in comparison to more time-consuming conventional methods. The protocol used here enabled us to complete the analysis of a sample, including controls, in approximately 6 hrs. The applied qPCR assay enabled the detection of M. marinum in clinical specimens collected from both the infected humans prior to successful cultivation (Table 2). Rare systemic spread of M. marinum in the second patient was proven by qPCR, microscopy, and cultivation. Furthermore, direct qPCR detection was successful in the case of three culture-negative samples.

Screening for the presence of M. marinum in the aquarium environment of both patients was carried out. The qPCR analysis of the patients’ ornamental fish and aquarium environment revealed positivity for M. marinum in eight fishes ( , patient 1; , patient 2). The number of viable cells in qPCR-positive samples was possibly lower due to the applied decontamination procedure because only one fish from each patient was later culture-positive for M. marinum. As reported earlier, microbiological stains give positive results in less than 25% of cases and do not correlate with the severity of M. marinum infection [14]. Although M. marinum is described to be present in the water environment, it was detected only in fish.

From the epidemiological aspect it has been proven that the M. marinum strain isolated from fish had the same VNTR profile as the clinical isolate originating from the fish owner and thus it can be concluded that the aquaria were the source of infection in the case of both aquarists (Table 3).

Isolate sourceVNTR locia
Locus 1Locus 6Locus 15Locus 16Locus 18MIRU2MIRU5VNTR2067VNTR3422

Patient 1
Subcutaneous nodule223322NA34

Patient 2
Subcutaneous nodule223422234

NA: no amplification. As Locus 9, Locus 14, and VNTR1132 failed in amplification from any isolates, they are not listed here.

5. Conclusion

With regard to health, it is important that many NTM species classified as potentially pathogenic survive not only in the water environment, but also in infected fish. Contact zoonosis may occur particularly in risk groups such as aquaculture and fishery professionals, fish processors, ornamental fish hobbyists, and also consumers. The diagnosis of infections is usually hampered by the unfamiliarity of clinicians with disease agents derived from aquatic species. Fish tank exposure is the source of most cases of cutaneous M. marinum infections. It should be considered as a possible threat to humans reporting close contact with this environment and may be prevented by the use of waterproof gloves by persons with acute or chronic open skin lesions.


This work was supported by Grant no. MZE0002716202 and Grant “AdmireVet” no. CZ 1.05/2.1.00/01.0006-ED0006/01/01 from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.


  1. J. O. Falkinham III, “Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 356–367, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. Y. Han, I. Dé, and K. L. Jacobson, “Rapidly growing mycobacteria: clinical and microbiologic studies of 115 cases,” The American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 612–621, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. J. Shitaye, V. Grymova, M. Grym et al., “Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis infection in a pet parrot,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 617–619, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Slany, J. Makovcova, P. Jezek, M. Bodnarova, and I. Pavlik, “Relative prevalence of Mycobacterium marinum in fish collected from aquaria and natural freshwaters in central Europe,” Journal of Fish Diseases, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. Palamaras, N. Pietropaolo, J. El-Jabbour et al., “Axonal sensory neuropathy in a patient treated with minocycline for fish-tank granuloma,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 765–766, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Ramos, M. F. García-Sepulcre, J. C. Rodríguez, S. Padilla, and F. Gutiérrez, “Mycobacterium marinum infection complicated by anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 617–621, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Slany, P. Jezek, V. Fiserova et al., “Mycobacterium marinum infections in humans and tracing of its possible environmental sources,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Matlova, L. Dvorska, J. Bartl et al., “Mycobacteria isolated from the environment of pig farms in the Czech Republic during the years 1996 to 2002,” Veterinarni Medicina, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 343–357, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. Harmsen, S. Dostal, A. Roth et al., “RIDOM: comprehensive and public sequence database for identification of Mycobacterium species,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 3, article 26, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Sun, C. Chen, J. Li et al., “Discriminatory potential of a novel set of variable number of tandem repeats for genotyping Mycobacterium marinum,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 1-2, pp. 200–204, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. Slana, M. Kaevska, P. Kralik, A. Horvathova, and I. Pavlik, “Distribution of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and M. a. hominissuis in artificially infected pigs studied by culture and IS901 and IS1245 quantitative real time PCR,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 437–443, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Slany, “A new cultivation-independent tool for fast and reliable detection of Mycobacterium marinum,” Journal of Fish Diseases, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Rodríguez, M. Ortegón, D. Camargo, and L. C. Orozco, “Iatrogenic Mycobacterium abscessus infection: histopathology of 71 patients,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 214–218, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. L. Hess, B. S. Wolock, and M. S. Murphy, “Mycobacterium marinum infections of the upper extremity,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 55–59, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H. N. Pang, J. Y. L. Lee, M. E. Puhaindran, S. H. Tan, A. B. H. Tan, and F. C. Yong, “Mycobacterium marinum as a cause of chronic granulomatous tenosynovitis in the hand,” Journal of Infection, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 584–588, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. H. Chia, T. L. Wu, L. H. Su, A. J. Kuo, and H. C. Lai, “Direct identification of mycobacteria from smear-positive sputum samples using an improved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 340–349, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Mancini, S. Carletti, N. Ghidoli, P. Cichero, R. Burioni, and M. Clementi, “The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 235–251, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Salati, M. Meloni, A. Fenza, G. Angelucci, A. Colorni, and G. Orrù, “A sensitive FRET probe assay for the selective detection of Mycobacterium marinum in fish,” Journal of Fish Diseases, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Michal Slany et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.