<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Kawai, Nobuyuki; Miyake, Keisuke; Yamamoto, Yuka; Nishiyama, Yoshihiro; Tamiya, Takashi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/247152

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Technical Advancement of Radiation Therapy

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 247152 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/247152

¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Nobuyuki Kawai,¹Keisuke Miyake,¹Yuka Yamamoto,²Yoshihiro Nishiyama,²and Takashi Tamiya¹

Academic Editor: Eng-Yen Huang

Received13 Mar 2013

Accepted02 Jun 2013

Published17 Jun 2013

Abstract

This paper summarizes the usefulness and limitation of positron emission tomography (PET) with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in typical PCNSL is about 2.5 times higher than that in the normal gray matter, and the tumor can usually be identified visually. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake pattern and value provide useful information for differentiating PCNSL from other enhancing malignant brain tumors especially glioblastoma (GB). The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in typical PCNSL is usually homogenous, and the uptake value is significantly higher than that in GB. However, ¹⁸F-FDG PET often fails to show the presence of tumor in the brain as ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is faint in atypical PCNSL such as disseminated or nonenhancing lesions. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also useful for evaluating the treatment response at a very early stage after the initial treatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment ¹⁸F-FDG uptake values may have a prognostic value in patients with PCNSL. In conclusion, ¹⁸F-FDG PET is very useful in the diagnosis of typical PCNSL and can differentiate PCNSL from other malignant brain tumors. However, the usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET is limited in the diagnosis of atypical PCNSL.

1. Introduction

Although primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare tumor accounting for only 3–5% of all primary brain tumors, the incidence of PCNSL in developed countries is about 5 patients per 1 million person/year [1–3]. Epidemiological data have shown a continuous increase over the past three decades in the immunocompetent population, whereas the incidence seems to be decreasing in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) since the development of highly active antiretroviral therapies [4]. PCNSL affects all age groups, with the peak incidence being in the fifth to seventh decades in non-AIDS patients. Therefore, the rising incidence of PCNSL may only represent the increasing age of the population. Recent studies have shown an encouraging improvement in the overall survival time when radiotherapy is combined with high-dose methotrexate- (MTX-) based chemotherapy [5, 6]. Young age and good Karnofsky performance score (KPS) at the time of diagnosis are reported to be associated with longer survival time [7]. Therefore, early diagnosis of PCNSL is essential to start early treatment before the patient’s performance status has declined. Clinical diagnosis of PCNSL is sometimes difficult and delayed because common initial symptoms such as focal signs, raised intracranial pressure, and behavioral and personality changes especially in elderly patients are nonspecific [8]. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images in patients with PCNSL show single or multiple uniformly well-enhancing lesions that are usually located in the periventricular lesions and the basal ganglia and often involve the corpus callosum [8, 9]. These radiological findings are not pathognomonic for PCNSL and cannot accurately differentiate PCNSL from other tumorous or nontumorous brain lesions. Moreover, atypical MR findings such as disseminated lesions or no lesions are more prevalent in a recent study than formally reported in immunocompetent patients with PCNSL [10].

Although CT and MR imaging are still the most important modalities in the diagnosis of PCNSL, modern metabolic imaging modalities other than conventional morphological imaging are increasingly used to improve accurate diagnosis of PCNSL. Positron emission tomography (PET) with glucose analogue ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) is one of the most attractive and widely used modalities for evaluating tumor metabolism noninvasively. Although PCNSL usually shows huge uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG, normally high uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and thalamus sometimes mask the presence of underlying PCNSL. Even in a rapid emerging clinical application, the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in PCNSL is not fully defined and reviewed systemically. This paper reviews the usefulness and limitation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL.

2. Molecular Mechanism of ¹⁸F-FDG Uptake

The glucose analog ¹⁸F-FDG is a surrogate biomarker for glucose metabolism in vivo and is the most commonly used clinical PET radiotracer. The clinical applications of ¹⁸F-FDG PET continue to increase, especially in the field of oncology as ¹⁸F-FDG can be delivered from a hub-cyclotron center because of the relatively long half-life of ¹⁸F (110 min). The molecular mechanisms of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the cells were investigated intensively in vitro and in vivo. ¹⁸F-FDG enters the cells by the same membrane glucose transporter (GLUT) as glucose. More than 10 GLUTs have been identified to date; only GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 need to be considered in the normal and tumorous brain [11]. After passing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via the GLUT, both ¹⁸F-FDG and glucose are phosphorylated by hexokinase. Unlike glucose-6-phosphate, ¹⁸F-FDG-6-phosphate is not a substrate of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase and does not undergo further metabolism in the glucose pathway and is trapped in the cells. As a result, the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is a good reflection of glucose transport and phosphorylation by cells in the tumor. Several mechanisms have been shown to cause increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in malignant tumors including high cellular density, overexpression of GLUT [12–14], and increased hexokinase activity [13, 14]. ¹⁸F-FDG PET for tumor imaging is typically performed 45 to 60 minutes after an intravenous administration of ¹⁸F-FDG. This interval allows the increase in tumor tracer activity due to intracellular trapping of ¹⁸F-FDG-6-phosphate and the concomitant decrease in blood pool radiotracer and overall background tracer activity to improve the tumor-to-background ratio.

The degree of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is measured to perform comparison within and between different patients and disease. The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a widely used method of measuring static ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesion. The SUV is a semiquantitative value if all of the injected tracer is distributed evenly throughout the body and is computed as follows: where FDG_region is the decay-corrected regional radiotracer concentration in becquerel (Bq) per milliliter, FDG_dose is the administered ¹⁸F-FDG dose in Bq, and WT is the body weight in kilograms. Alternatively, the tumor-to-normal brain tissue (T/N) ratio is used for evaluating ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesion. The T/N ratio is usually calculated by dividing the tumor SUV by the SUV value of the contralateral normal gray matter. The T/N ratio is not influenced by the injected radiotracer dose and the body weight, but the selection of normal brain tissue critically affects the calculated value.

3. ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of PCNSL

3.1. Primary Diagnosis and Differentiation from Nontumorous Lesions

PCNSL has a very high cellular density and increased glucose metabolism and usually shows strong uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the tumor [15–20] (Figure 1). The semiquantitative ¹⁸F-FDG uptake values measured by maximum SUV () are reported to be 14–22 in PCNSL [15–18], and this value is about 2.5 times higher than the average SUV in the normal gray matter [15–17] (Table 1). In patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesions can be used to distinguish between human-immunodeficiency-virus-(HIV)-related brain disease such as cerebral toxoplasmosis and PCNSL [21–23] (Figure 2). The use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of PCNSL is not a new concept. In 1992, Rosenfeld et al. reported a strong ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in a group of 10 patients with PCNSL [19]. They also reported a patient who showed dramatic disappearance of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the tumor with steroid therapy [19]. Hustinx et al. examined SUVs in primary brain tumors on ¹⁸F-FDG PET and concluded that SUV measurements were influenced by a variety of factors, such as plasma glucose level, steroid treatment, tumor size and heterogeneity, time after injection, and previous radiation therapy [24]. Steroids have a cytotoxic effect in lymphoma cells and reduce ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the tumor significantly causing false negative results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of PCNSL [15]. Moreover, nonspecific uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG has been reported in patients with nontumorous brain lesions such as intracerebral hematoma [25], brain abscess [26], and multiple sclerosis [27]. Animal studies have shown that inflammatory cells significantly contribute to ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in tumors. Kubota et al. reported that about 30% of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was related to the non-tumorous tissue in a malignant tumor model in mice [28]. The extent of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the non-tumorous lesions depends on the increased density of inflammatory cells as well as disruption of the BBB in the lesion.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

3.2. Differentiation from Other Malignant Brain Tumors

Recent studies have revealed that ¹⁸F-FDG PET can differentiate PCNSL from other malignant brain tumors such as glioblastoma (GB) and metastatic brain tumor [15, 18] (Figure 3). The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PCNSL is usually homogenous in contrast to inhomogeneous uptake in other malignant brain tumors. Kosaka et al. showed that metastatic brain tumors and GBs except for 1, case can be distinguished from PCNSL with ¹⁸F-FDG PET when the cutoff value was set at 15 of [15]. A recent study demonstrated the usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for differentiating between PCNSL and GB showing similar MR findings. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PCNSL ( of ) was significantly higher than that in GB ( of ; ) [18]. The accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for lesion differentiation was 0.86 when the cutoff value was set at 12 of with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.4% [18]. The overlying cortical gray matter sometimes shows glucose hypometabolism in PCNSL located in the deep white matter and the basal ganglia/thalamus. This finding is not a specific phenomenon in PCNSL and is reported in patients with gliomatosis cerebri due to disconnection of the cortical gray matter by tumor infiltration [29].

(a)

(b)

3.3. Diagnosis of Atypical PCNSL

PCNSL with typical radiological findings shows strong ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in almost all cases, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET provides valuable information in the primary diagnosis of PCNSL. However, PCNSL sometimes demonstrates atypical radiological findings such as disseminated or nonenhancing lesions (no lesions) in contrast-enhanced MR or CT images [9, 10]. Such atypical findings in non-AIDS patients with PCNSL were more prevalent in a recent study, showing that 13% of the patients had no lesions and 7% of the patients had disseminated lesions [10]. Ring-like enhancement occurs in more than 50% of the lesions in AIDS-related PCNSL, but also in 6–13% of the lesions in non-AIDS PCNSL [9, 10]. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PCNSL with atypical radiological findings is not increased sufficiently to detect the tumor visually because of normally high background uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the brain (Figure 4). Kawai et al. revealed that 3 of the 4 ¹⁸F-FDG PET failed to show the presence of PCNSL with atypical radiological findings visually [30]. Therefore, ¹⁸F-FDG PET is not a perfect tool, and caution is necessary especially in the diagnosis of atypical PCNSL. To date no imaging modality can definitively diagnose PCNSL, and early tumor biopsy is still recommended when PCNSL is suspected especially with atypical radiological findings [31].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR (upper) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET (lower) images in PCNSL patients with atypical MR findings. MR images show a ring-like enhanced lesion in the right frontal lobe (a), multiple faint enhanced lesions in the right cerebral cortex and the corpus callosum (b), multiple small enhanced lesions in the bilateral frontal white matter and the corpus callosum (c), and no enhancing lesion in the brain (d). PET images show no ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesions except for moderate ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the right frontal cortex (arrow) in case (b).

3.4. Detection of Occult Systemic Lymphoma

PCNSL is, by definition, a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma restricted to the CNS. Standard staging for PCNSL needs to examine contrast-enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and sometimes bone marrow biopsy to exclude systemic lymphoma [32]. Conventional body staging in patients initially diagnosed with PCNSL showed an occult systemic lymphoma in about 4% of the patients [33]. The clinical significance of identifying systemic disease is uncertain, but at least 5% of PCNSL relapse outside the CNS [34]. ¹⁸F-FDG PET may be more sensitive than conventional body staging and may disclose higher rates of concomitant systemic disease at initial PCNSL diagnosis. Mohile et al. demonstrated that 7% of patients initially diagnosed PCNSL were found to have systemic lymphoma by staging ¹⁸F-FDG whole body PET scan even when body CT scans and bone marrow biopsies were negative [35]. Detection of systemic lymphoma at the time of initial PCNSL diagnosis may play important roles regarding the origin of the disease and treatment strategies.

Summary(i)¹⁸F-FDG uptake value in PCNSL is about 2.5 times higher than that in the normal gray matter, and the tumor can usually be identified in the brain visually.(ii)Steroid treatment significantly reduces ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the tumor and can cause false negative results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of PCNSL.(iii)¹⁸F-FDG PET can differentiate PCNSL from other malignant brain tumors such as GB and metastatic brain tumor with high sensitivity.(iv)¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PCNSL with atypical radiological findings such as disseminated or nonenhancing lesions is not increased sufficiently to detect the tumor visually compared to the surrounding brain.(v)Conventional body scan with ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients initially diagnosed as PCNSL is occasionally useful to detect occult systemic lymphoma.

4. ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Treatment of PCNSL

4.1. Early Treatment Response

PCNSL is one of the most treatment-responsive malignant tumors in the brain. In recent years, high-dose MTX-based chemotherapy before radiotherapy has significantly extended the survival time compared to conventional chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)-based regimens given either before or after radiotherapy [5, 6]. However, it is reported that about 10–35% of tumors are refractory to the high dose MTX-based regimen, and up to 60% of complete responders show tumor recurrence during follow-up [36]. Early evaluation of the initial treatment response is very important because salvage treatment may improve the outcome and quality of life [37]. Although MR imaging is the standard method for evaluating the treatment response in PCNSL [32], few studies have addressed the question of whether early tumor response, according to MRI criteria, in patients still under therapy helps to predict the long-term outcome in PCNSL [38]. In systemic lymphoma patients, an early quantitative measurement of metabolic response with ¹⁸F-FDG PET was reported to provide more valuable prognostic information than conventional modalities [39]. Changes in metabolic imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET occur soon after the initiation of therapy. Palmedo et al. studied 8 PCNSL patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET after completion of chemotherapy or after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and the results were compared with the follow-up examinations [20]. They showed that ¹⁸F-FDG PET was able to predict complete remission or to diagnose tumor recurrence after chemotherapy in all patients [20]. Kawai et al. demonstrated that ¹⁸F-FDG PET examined within 3 weeks of the first chemotherapy showed a significant decrease of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the tumor compared with that before treatment [40]. The reduction of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake significantly correlated with the decrease of tumor size on the follow-up MR images [40]. These results indicate that metabolic imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET can be used to accurately evaluate treatment response at a very early stage, sometimes preceding changes on MRI (Figure 5). Early therapeutic monitoring might have an impact on deciding whether the treatment regimen should be maintained or changed. If patients with a poor early response were identified, then modification could be taken at an early stage, before many more cycles of ineffective therapy were delivered. Again, caution is necessary in interrupting ¹⁸F-FDG PET images especially after treatment because ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the tumor is not solely due to tumor cell metabolism but it also due to uptake in stromal and inflammatory cells [28].

(a)

(b)

Figure 5

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR (upper) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET (lower) images in a patient with PCNSL in the right frontal lobe before (a) and after (b) the first cycle of chemotherapy. MR images show a well-enhanced large mass lesion in the right frontal lobe, and PET images show a huge ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesion before treatment (a). After the first chemotherapy, MR images show a residual enhanced lesion in the right frontal lobe; however, PET images show no increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the lesion (b).

4.2. Prognostic Considerations

A recent study showed that pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG uptake may have a prognostic value in newly diagnosed PCNSL. The overall survival time of patients with low to moderate ¹⁸F-FDG uptake () was significantly longer than that of patients with high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake () [16]. PCNSL with high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake tended to exhibit poor treatment response compared to that with low to moderate ¹⁸F-FDG uptake [16]. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake value may represent tumor aggressiveness in PCNSL. Further clinical trials are needed to define the best way to utilize ¹⁸F-FDG PET information in designing true response-adapted therapies and to improve outcome in patients with PCNSL.

Summary(i)¹⁸F-FDG PET can be used to evaluate treatment response of PCNSL at a very early stage after treatment.(ii)¹⁸F-FDG PET is able to predict complete remission or to diagnose tumor recurrence of PCNSL after treatment.(iii)Pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG uptake may have a prognostic value in newly diagnosed PCNSL.

5. Conclusions

The application of ¹⁸F-FDG PET is currently increasing in clinical neurooncology. This review summarizes the usefulness and limitation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is very useful in the diagnosis of typical PCNSL, usually showing strong uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG in the tumor. The uptake value is about 2.5 times higher than that in the normal gray matter, and the tumors can be identified in the brain visually. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake pattern and value provide useful information to differentiate PCNSL from other enhancing malignant brain tumors especially GB. However, the usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET is limited in the diagnosis of PCNSL with atypical radiological findings. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also useful for evaluating the treatment response after initial chemotherapy and determining the strategy at a very early stage. Pretreatment and posttreatment ¹⁸F-FDG uptake values may have a prognostic value in patients with PCNSL. In a modern metabolic imaging era, ¹⁸F-FDG PET is useful when differential diagnosis of brain tumors is difficult, and PCNSL is considered as one of the differential diagnoses, but ¹⁸F-FDG PET is not a perfect tool, and early tumor biopsy is still necessary especially with atypical radiological findings.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests in this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (22390277) from the Ministry of Education, Sciences and Culture of Japan. The authors deeply appreciate the excellent technical support of the radiological technologist at their institution.

References

J. E. Olson, C. A. Janney, R. D. Rao et al., “The continuing increase in the incidence of primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis,” Cancer, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1504–1510, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Behin, K. Hoang-Xuan, A. F. Carpentier, and J.-Y. Delattre, “Primary brain tumours in adults,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9354, pp. 323–331, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ricard, A. Idbaih, F. Ducray, M. Lahutte, K. Hoang-Xuan, and J.-Y. Delattre, “Primary brain tumours in adults,” The Lancet, vol. 379, pp. 1984–1996, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Kadan-Lottick, M. C. Skluzacek, and J. G. Gurney, “Decreasing incidence rates of primary central nervous system lymphoma,” Cancer, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 193–202, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. O'Brien, D. E. Roos, G. Pratt et al., “Combined-modality therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: long-term data from a Phase II multicenter study (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group),” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 408–413, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. del Rio, A. Rousseau, C. Soussain, D. Ricard, and K. Hoang-Xuan, “Primary CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent patients,” Oncologist, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 526–539, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Abrey, L. Ben-Porat, K. S. Panageas et al., “Primary central nervous system lymphoma: the memorial sloan-kettering cancer center prognostic model,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 36, pp. 5711–5715, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bataille, V. Delwail, E. Menet et al., “Primary intracerebral malignant lymphoma: report of 248 cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Küker, T. Nägele, A. Korfel et al., “Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL): MRI features at presentation in 100 patients,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 169–177, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Haldorsen, J. Krakenes, B. K. Krossnes, O. Mella, and A. Espeland, “CT and MR imaging features of primary central nervous system lymphoma in Norway, 1989–2003,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 744–751, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Boado, K. L. Black, and W. M. Pardridge, “Gene expression of GLUT3 and GLUT1 glucose transporters in human brain tumors,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Reske, K. G. Grillenberger, G. Glatting et al., “Overexpression of glucose transporter 1 and increased FDG uptake in pancreatic carcinoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1344–4348, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
L.-C. Ong, Y. Jin, I.-C. Song, S. Yu, K. Zhang, and P. K. H. Chow, “2-[18F]-2-deoxy-D-Glucose (FDG) uptake in human tumor cells is related to the expression of GLUT-1 and hexokinase II,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1145–1153, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Paudyal, N. Oriuchi, P. Paudyal et al., “Clinicopathological presentation of varying 18F-FDG uptake and expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kosaka, T. Tsuchida, H. Uematsu, H. Kimura, H. Okazawa, and H. Itoh, “18F-FDG PET of common enhancing malignant brain tumors,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. W365–W369, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kawai, H.-N. Zhen, K. Miyake, Y. Yamamaoto, Y. Nishiyama, and T. Tamiya, “Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: SUV-based assessment,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 225–232, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kawase, Y. Yamamoto, R. Kameyama, N. Kawai, N. Kudomi, and Y. Nishiyama, “Comparison of 11C-methionine PET and 18F-FDG PET in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1284–1289, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Makino, T. Hirai, H. Nakamura et al., “Does adding FDG-PET to MRI improve the differentiation between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma? Observer performance study,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 432–438, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Rosenfeld, J. M. Hoffman, R. E. Coleman, M. J. Glantz, M. W. Hanson, and S. C. Schold, “Studies of primary central nervous system lymphoma with fluorine-18- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 532–536, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Palmedo, H. Urbach, H. Bender et al., “FDG-PET in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: correlation with MRI and clinical follow-up,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 164–168, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Hoffman, H. A. Waskin, T. Schifter et al., “FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 567–575, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Villringer, H. Jager, M. Dichgans et al., “Differential diagnosis of CNS lesions in AIDS patients by FDG-PET,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 532–536, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. O'Doherty, S. F. Barrington, M. Campbell, J. Lowe, and C. S. Bradbeer, “PET scanning and the human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1575–1583, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Hustinx, R. J. Smith, F. Benard, A. Bhatnagar, and A. Alavi, “Can the standardized uptake value characterize primary brain tumors on FDG-PET?” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1501–1509, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dethy, S. Goldman, S. Blecic, A. Luxen, M. Levivier, and J. Hildebrand, “Carbon-11-methionine and fluorine-18-FDG PET study in brain hematoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1162–1166, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Tsuyuguchi, I. Sunada, K. Ohata et al., “Evaluation of treatment effects in brain abscess with positron emission tomography: comparison of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and carbon-11-methionine,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Schiepers, P. van Hecke, R. Vandenberghe et al., “Positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and proton NMR spectroscopy of white matter in multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Kubota, S. Yamada, K. Kubota, K. Ishiwata, N. Tamahashi, and T. Ido, “Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: High accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1972–1980, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
P. N. Plowman, C. A. B. Saunders, and M. N. Maisey, “Gliomatosis cerebri: disconnection of the cortical grey matter, demonstrated on PET scan,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 240–244, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kawai, S. Okubo, K. Miyake et al., “Use of PET in the diagnosis of primary CNS lymphoma in patients with atypical MR findings,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 335–343, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Z. Tang, T. C. Booth, P. Bhogal, A. Malhotra, and T. Wilhelm, “Imaging of primary central nervous system lymphoma,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 768–777, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Abrey, T. T. Batchelor, A. J. M. Ferreri et al., “Report of an international workshop to standardize baseline evaluation and response criteria for primary CNS lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 5034–5043, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. O'Neill, R. P. Dinapoli, P. J. Kurtin, and T. M. Habermann, “Occult systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in patients initially diagnosed as primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL): how much staging is enough?” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Jahnke, E. Thiel, P. Martus et al., “Relapse of primary central nervous system lymphoma: clinical features, outcome and prognostic factors,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 159–165, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Mohile, L. M. Deangelis, and L. E. Abrey, “The utility of body FDG PET in staging primary central nervous system lymphoma,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 223–228, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Reni, A. J. M. Ferreri, and E. Villa, “Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 79, no. 3-4, pp. 530–534, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Yamanaka, “Management of refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 879–885, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Pels, A. Juergens, I. Schirgens et al., “Early complete response during chemotherapy predicts favorable outcome in patients with primary CNS lymphoma,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 720–724, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. G. Mikhaeel, M. Hutchings, P. A. Fields, M. J. O'Doherty, and A. R. Timothy, “FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1514–1523, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kawai, Y. Nishiyama, K. Miyake, T. Tamiya, and S. Nagao, “Evaluation of tumor FDG transport and metabolism in primary central nervous system lymphoma using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) kinetic analysis,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 685–690, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Nobuyuki Kawai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5442

Downloads

2191

Citations

BioMed Research International

Technical Advancement of Radiation Therapy

18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Molecular Mechanism of 18F-FDG Uptake

3. 18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of PCNSL

3.1. Primary Diagnosis and Differentiation from Nontumorous Lesions

3.2. Differentiation from Other Malignant Brain Tumors

3.3. Diagnosis of Atypical PCNSL

3.4. Detection of Occult Systemic Lymphoma

4. 18F-FDG PET in the Treatment of PCNSL

4.1. Early Treatment Response

4.2. Prognostic Considerations

5. Conclusions

Conflict of Interests

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

2. Molecular Mechanism of ¹⁸F-FDG Uptake

3. ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of PCNSL

4. ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the Treatment of PCNSL