Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2013, Article ID 269347, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/269347
Research Article

Characterization of Sera with Discordant Results from Reverse Sequence Screening for Syphilis

Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea

Received 16 October 2012; Revised 30 November 2012; Accepted 30 November 2012

Academic Editor: Antonio La Gioia

Copyright © 2013 Kyunghoon Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. A. Larsen, B. M. Steiner, and A. H. Rudolph, “Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. A. Workowski and S. Berman, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1–113, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. French, M. Gomberg, M. Janier et al., “IUSTI: 2008 European guidelines on the management of Syphilis,” International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Disease and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 300–309, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Kingston, P. French, B. Goh et al., “UK national guidelines on the management of Syphilis 2008,” International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Disease and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 729–740, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Peterman, J. Schillinger, S. Blank et al., “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening -four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 57, no. 32, pp. 872–875, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Discordant results from reverse sequence Syphilis screening-five laboratories, United States, 2006–2010,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 133–137, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. J. Cole, K. R. Perry, and J. V. Parry, “Comparative evaluation of 15 serological assays for the detection of syphilis infection,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 705–713, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. J. Binnicker, “Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?” Current Opinion in Infectious Disease, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. J. Binnicker, D. J. Jespersen, and L. O. Rollins, “Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1313–1317, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. A. C. Maple, D. Ratcliffe, and E. Smit, “Characterization of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay-negative sera following screening by treponemal total antibody enzyme immunoassays,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1718–1722, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Young, J. Pryde, L. Duncan, and J. Dave, “The Architect Syphilis assay for antibodies to Treponema pallidum: an automated screening assay with high sensitivity in primary syphilis,” Sexually Transmitted Infections, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Kim, W. H. Kim, C. Cho et al., “Evaluation of automated Architect Syphilis TP as a Diagnostic Laboratory Screening Test for Syphilis,” Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 475–482, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Lipinsky, L. Schreiber, V. Kopel et al., “Validation of reverse sequence screening for syphilis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 1501, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Owusu-Edusei Jr., T. A. Peterman, and R. C. Ballard, “Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. M. Contreras, C. M. Tornero-Romo, J. G. Toribio et al., “Very low hepatitis C antibody levels predict false-positive results and avoid supplemental testing,” Transfusion, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2540–2548, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. K. Y. Lai, M. Jin, S. Yuan, M. F. Larson, J. A. Dominitz, and D. D. Bankson, “Improved reflexive testing algorithm for hepatitis C infection using signal-to-cutoff ratios of a hepatitis C virus antibody assay,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1050–1056, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. J. Alter, W. L. Kuhnert, and L. Finelli, “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for laboratory testing and result reporting of antibody to hepatitis C virus,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus