|
Study | No. of patients | Cell type | No. of cells | Outcome |
|
Strauer et al. (2002) [102] | 20 | ABMMNC | 2.8 × 107 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Chen et al. (2004) [135] | 69 | SMB | 6 × 1010 | Improvement in LVEF |
Strauer et al. (2005) [136] | 36 | ABMMNC | 9 × 107 | Improvement in LVEF |
Erbs et al. (2005) [137] | 26 | CPC | 7 × 107 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Bartunek et al. (2005) [138] | 35 | CD133 + BMC | 1.3 × 107 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Katritsis et al. (2005) [139] | 22 | MSC/EPC | 3 × 106 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Ruan et al. (2005) [140] | 20 | BMC | N/A | Improvement in LVEF |
Assmus et al. (2006) [141] | 51 | ABMMNC | 2 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF |
Meluzín et al. (2006) [142] | 66 | ABMMNC | 1 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF |
Schächinger et al. (2006) [143] | 204 | ABMMNC | 2.4 × 108 | Decreased mortality |
Ge et al. (2006) [144] | 20 | ABMMNC | 4 × 107 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Janssens et al. (2006) [145] | 67 | ABMMNC | 1.7 × 108 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Lunde et al. (2006) [146] | 100 | ABMMNC | 8.7 × 107 | Improvement in LVEF |
Meyer et al. (2006) [147] | 60 | ABMMNC | 2.5 × 109 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Assmus et al. (2006) [141] | 47 | CPC | 2 × 107 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Schächinger et al. (2006) [143] | 204 | ABMMNC | 2.4 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF |
Won et al. (2006) [126] | 82 | CPC | 1.4 × 109 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Li et al. (2007) [146] | 70 | CPC | 7.3 × 107 | Improvement in LVEF |
Chen et al. (2006) [148] | 48 | SMB | 5 × 106 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Meluzín et al. (2008) [149] | 60 | ABMMNC | 1 × 108 | Improvement in LVEF |
Tatsumi et al. (2007) [150] | 54 | CPC | 5 × 109 | Improvement in LVEF |
Choi et al. (2007) [151] | 73 | CPC | 2 × 109 | No significant LVEF improvement versus control |
Herbots et al. (2009) [152] | 33/34 | BMC | N/A | Better recovery of LV function |
Beitnes et al. (2009) [153] | 50/50 | BMC | 6.8 × 107 | Improvement in exercise tolerance |
Plewka et al. (2009) [154] | 40/20 | BMC | 1.44 × 108 | Improvement in LV function |
Tendera et al. (2009) [155] | 80/40 | BMC | 1.78 × 108 | Longer delay between symptoms and revascularization |
Strauer et al. (2010) [156] | 191/200 | BMC | 6.6 × 107 | Improvement in LV function |
Traverse et al. (2010) [157] | 30/10 | BMC | 1 × 108 | Favorable effect on LV modeling |
Quyyumi et al. (2011) [158] | 16/15 | CD34 + BMC | 5, 10, and 15 × 106 | Dose dependent LV function improvement |
|