Research Article | Open Access
Jing Liu, Wanqin Xie, Miles D. Lange, Sang Yong Hong, Kaihong Su, Zhixin Zhang, "Internalization of B Cell Receptors in Human EU12 μHC+ Immature B Cells Specifically Alters Downstream Signaling Events", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 807240, 9 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/807240
Internalization of B Cell Receptors in Human EU12 μHC+ Immature B Cells Specifically Alters Downstream Signaling Events
It has been recognized for a long time that engagement of B cell antigen receptors (BCRs) on immature B cells or mature B cells leads to completely opposite cell fate decisions. The underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that crosslinking of BCRs on human EU12 μHC+ immature B cells resulted in complete internalization of cell surface BCRs. After loss of cell surface BCRs, restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells showed impaired Ca2+ flux, delayed SYK phosphorylation, and decreased CD19 and FOXO1 phosphorylation, which differ from those in mature Daudi or Ramos B cells with partial internalization of BCRs. In contrast, sustained phosphorylation and reactivation of ERK upon restimulation were observed in the EU12 μHC+ cells after BCR internalization. Taken together, these results show that complete internalization of cell surface BCRs in EU12 μHC+ cells specifically alters the downstream signaling events, which may favor receptor editing versus cell activation.
The development of B lymphocytes from hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM) into mature, circulating B cells can be divided into distinct stages according to the expression of specific cell surface markers as well as the rearrangement status of the IgH and L chain gene loci [1, 2]. Immature B cells are the first to express the complete form of the B cell antigen receptors (BCRs), which can recognize specific antigens . The BCRs expressed on immature and mature B cells are all composed of membrane bound IgH/IgL peptides with noncovalently linked signaling components, the Igα/Igβ heterodimers [4, 5]. Although the BCRs expressed on the immature and the mature B cells share the same components, stimulation through BCRs results in totally opposite outcomes. In mature B cells, BCR stimulation induces cell activation and proliferation, antibody affinity maturation, and class-switch recombination during T cell-dependent responses and ultimately drives B cells differentiating into memory B cells or antibody-secreting plasma cells [5–7]. In contrast, stimulation of immature B cells via BCRs leads to receptor editing or clonal deletion [8–11].
Most of our current understandings of BCR-mediated signaling events are derived from analyses of mature B cells. One of the early signal events following BCR crosslinking is protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) Lyn and Syk-mediated phosphorylation of the tyrosine residues in the two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) in Igα and Igβ [5, 12, 13]. Lyn predominantly phosphorylates the first ITAM tyrosine, whereas Syk phosphorylates and binds to both ITAM tyrosine residues . The adaptor protein SH2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 65 kDa (BLNK) is then recruited to the BCR complex, where it is phosphorylated by Syk . Tyrosine phosphorylated BLNK serves as an adaptor to organize the signalosome by recruiting Btk, Vav, PLCγ2, Grab2, and Rac1 . Formation of this signalosome is important for full induction of Ca++ influx and activation of the downstream PI3K, MAPK, and NF-κB signaling pathways [17, 18].
Human EU12 μHC+ cells have features of BM immature B cells [19–21]. Our previous studies have shown that replacement occurs spontaneously in the EU12 μHC+ cells . Moreover, crosslinking of BCRs results in arrest of cell proliferation and induction of replacement [20, 21]. Thus, the EU12 μHC+ cells were used as an experimental model to dissect the BCR-mediated signaling events in immature B cells versus those in mature B cells. We noticed that treatment of EU12 μHC+ cells with F(ab′)2 anti-IgM antibodies resulted in complete internalization of cell surface BCRs, which is in sharp contrast to the partial internalization of BCRs observed in Daudi or Ramos mature B cells. Detailed analyses showed that complete BCR internalization specifically changed BCR-mediated downstream signaling events in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells with attenuated Ca++ influx and CD19 and FOXO1 phosphorylation, but with sustained ERK activation. Such changes may favor the induction of receptor editing rather than cell proliferation in these cells.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Lines and Treatments
The EU12 μHC+ cells are purified by flow cytometric sorting from the parental EU12 cells, which were established from an acute lymphocytic childhood leukemia patient [20, 21]. Ramos and Daudi are B cell lymphomas obtained by tissue culture adaptation of Burkitt’s lymphomas [22–24]. In all experiments, cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were maintained at 0.1 to 1 × 106 cells per mL. For direct stimulation, cells were stimulated with goat F(ab′)2 fragments of anti-human IgM antibodies (10 μg/mL) (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) at room temperature. For restimulation experiments, cells were pretreated with goat F(ab′)2 anti-human IgM antibody fragments at 2 μg/mL for 30 min; then, the cells are washed with fresh tissue culture medium to remove excessive anti-IgM antibodies, recovered in complete growth medium for 2 or 4 h, and then restimulated with 10 μg/mL goat F(ab′)2 anti-human IgM antibody or the monoclonal anti-human IgM antibody (BD Biosciences). Ca++ influx, Western blot, and immunofluorescence analyses were all performed under these two conditions.
2.2. Antibodies and Reagents
Immunofluorescence assays were performed using the following antibodies: Cy5-labeled AffiniPure donkey anti-human IgM F(ab′)2 fragment (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), goat anti-human IgM (μ chain specific, LE/AF) F(ab′)2 fragments (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL), goat anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), anti-phospho-SYK, phospho-ERK, and phospho-CD19 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).
2.3. Cell Surface Staining and Flow Cytometric Analysis
For cell surface staining, cells (1 × 106 cells) were blocked with PBS buffer with 2% FBS and stained with Cy5-labeled anti-human IgM F(ab′)2 antibodies, FITC-labeled anti-HLA antibodies, or APC-labeled anti-CD86 antibodies on ice for 30 min . After washing with PBS buffer with 2% FBS, samples were analyzed on an Accuri cytometric analyzer. Dead cells were excluded by PI staining. The results were then analyzed using the CFlow Plus software (Accuri Cytometers Inc., MI).
2.4. Ca2+ Influx Assays
Intracellular Ca2+ levels were monitored by flow cytometric analyses using the Fluo-3AM fluorescence dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) . Briefly, EU12 μHC+ cells (106 cells/mL) were preloaded with 1 μM Fluo-3AM with pluronic-F127 at 1 : 1 ratio for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. Cells were washed and resuspended in RPMI media containing 1% FBS. Cells were maintained in the dark at room temperature before use. Samples were analyzed on an Accuri cell analyzer. Unstimulated cells were used to establish the baseline of fluorescence. Different stimuli were added at 30 sec after running the samples on the Accuri cell analyzer and continued for 4 min. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using the CFlow Plus software (Accuri Cytometers Inc., MI).
2.5. Anti-IgM Antibody-Mediated BCR Internalization
Human EU12 μHC+, Daudi, and Ramos cells or murine 70Z/3 cells were used in these experiments. Approximately 1 × 106 cells were incubated with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (2 μg/mL) for different human cell lines or goat anti-mouse IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (5 μg/mL) (Southern Biotech, AL) at 37°C. Cells were collected at different time points and cell surface BCR levels were analyzed by flow cytometry.
2.6. Immunofluorescence Analysis
Different cells were directly stimulated or restimulated as described above. After treatment, cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min in the dark, followed by incubation with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min on ice. Untreated cells were used for both negative and secondary antibody staining controls. Cells were washed twice with 1 x PBS and blocked with PBS + 1% goat serum at room temperature for an hour. Anti-phospho-SYK or anti-phospho-ERK antibodies (1 : 200 dilution in PBS + 2% BSA) were added to the samples and incubated at room temperature for 1 h in the dark. After extensive washing, bound antibodies were detected with goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alxa488 secondary antibody (1 : 1000 dilution) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and visualized under an Olympus X81 fluorescence microscope. Images were captured with 60X lens under oil and analyzed using the Slidebook 5 software.
2.7. Western Blot Analysis
For analysis of global protein tyrosine phosphorylation, EU12 μHC+, Daudi, and Ramos cells (10 × 106/mL) were either directly stimulated with anti-human IgM F(ab′)2 antibody fragments (10 μg/mL) for 3 min or pretreated with goat anti-human IgM F(ab′)2 antibody fragments (2 μg/mL) for 30 min, washed, recovered in complete RPMI medium for 4 h, and then restimulated with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (10 μg/mL) for 3 min. Cells were washed once with 1 x PBS; whole cell lysates were prepared using 1% TNT buffer [21, 25]. Samples were separated onto 10% SDS-PAGE. The phosphorylation status of the BCR signaling molecules CD19, LYN, SYK, BLNK, ERK, AKT, and FOXO1 was then analyzed by Western blot with phosphospecific antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).
3.1. Crosslinking BCRs Induces Different Levels of BCR Internalization in Human Immature versus Mature B Cells
Our previous studies showed that treatment of EU12 μHC+ cells with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments resulted in complete internalization of surface BCRs . Here, we compared anti-IgM antibody-mediated BCR internalization in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cell, versus those in Daudi and Ramos mature B cells. In the EU12 μHC+ cells, crosslinking BCRs with anti-IgM antibodies resulted in quick BCR internalization, which can be seen as soon as 1 min (Figure 1(a)). After 30 min, almost all the immature cells lost their cell surface BCRs (Figure 1(a)). In contrast, treatment of Daudi and Ramos cells with the same amount of anti-IgM antibodies only resulted in partial internalization of BCRs (Figure 1(a)). After 4 h, about 96% of Daudi cells and 78% of Ramos cells still expressed their cell surface BCRs (Figure 1(a)).
To determine if complete internalization of cell surface BCRs is a general mechanism for early B lineage cells, we analyzed a panel of murine early B lineage cells and found that crosslinking cell surface BCRs also induced complete internalization of cell surface BCRs in 70Z/3 cells (Figure 1(b)).
To further verify these findings, the three lines of cells were treated with or without Cy5 labeled F(ab′)2 anti-human IgM antibody fragments (2 μg/mL) at 37°C for 30 min, and cell surface BCR expression was visualized under immunofluorescence microscopy. In untreated cells, the labeled BCRs were distributed on the cell surface. After treatment, all the Cy5 labeled anti-IgM antibodies were internalized into the EU12 μHC+ cells. For Daudi and Ramos cells, a large fraction of Cy5 labeled anti-IgM antibodies still remained on the cell surface under the same treatment (Figure 1(c)). These results show that the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells are highly sensitive to BCR crosslinking and completely internalize their cell surface BCRs, which are different from that in the mature B cells.
Moreover, after treatment of EU12 μHC+ cells or Daudi cells with anti-IgM antibodies (2 μg) for 24 hours, we analyzed cell surface HLA and CD86 expression as indicators for B cell activation. Upon anti-IgM antibody treatment, Daudi cells have elevated HLA and CD86 expression. In contrast, the expression levels of HLA and CD86 are not changed in EU12 μHC+ cells upon anti-IgM antibody treatment (Figure 1(d)). These results indicated that crosslinking cell surface BCRs activated different signaling in the EU12 μHC+ cells or in Daudi cells.
3.2. Complete Internalization of BCRs in the EU12 μHC+ Cells Reduces Ca2+ Influx upon Restimulation
To determine the effects of complete BCR internalization on subsequent BCR-mediated signaling events, we compared EU12 μHC+, Daudi, and Ramos cells for their capabilities to evoke calcium influx upon BCR stimulation before and after BCR internalization. Direct stimulation of the three lines of cells with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (10 μg/mL or 20 μg/mL) induced Ca2+ influx in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2(b)). During the restimulation experiments, EU12 μHC+ cells showed dramatically reduced Ca2+ influx compared to that during direct stimulation or those in restimulated Daudi and Ramos cells (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). These results revealed that complete internalization of BCRs on the EU12 μHC+ cells reduced Ca2+ influx during BCR restimulation.
3.3. Complete BCR Internalization in the EU12 μHC+ Cells Specifically Changes BCR-Mediated Downstream Signaling Events
To further determine if BCR internalization affects BCR-mediated downstream signaling events, we performed Western blot analyses to determine the phosphorylation status of different BCR signaling molecules. As described before, the three lines of cells were either directly stimulated with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (10 μg/mL) or pretreated with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (2 μg/mL) at 37°C for 30 min to first internalize cell surface BCRs and then rechallenge them at 2 h or 4 h with goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (10 μg/mL). With direct stimulation, EU12 μHC+ immature B cells exhibited similar activation of downstream signaling molecules, including CD19, SYK, ERK, AKT, and FOXO1, compared to those in mature Daudi and Ramos cells. However, BCR signaling induced BLNK phosphorylation was almost undetectable in the EU12 μHC+ cells (Figure 3(b)). Restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells induced no apparent changes of global protein Tyrosine phosphorylation at 2 h or 4 h time points. Interestingly, restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells did not induce SYK and FOXO1 phosphorylation at 3 min but still induced similar levels of ERK phosphorylation. Taken together, complete internalization of BCRs in the EU12 μHC+ cells not only attenuates BCR-mediated signaling events, but also specifically changes the downstream signaling events with reduced SYK activation but with sustained ERK activation.
3.4. Delayed SYK Activation and Sustained ERK Phosphorylation after BCR Internalization
In mature B cells, engagement of surface BCRs activates SYK. Activated SYK phosphorylates BLNK, thereby leading to the formation of BCR signalosome to fully activate the downstream PI3K, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and NF-κB pathways . In our study, however, after complete internalization of BCRs in EU12 μHC+ cells, restimulation with anti-IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (10 μg/mL) did not activate SYK at 3 min. To further determine the activation status of SYK in the EU12 μHC+ cells during restimulation process, we analyzed SYK phosphorylation at different time points after either direct stimulation or restimulation. During direct stimulation, SYK phosphorylation can be detected as soon as 1 min after BCR crosslinking. It reached the peak level of phosphorylation at 3 min and then diminished after 10 min. In contrast, in restimulated EU12 μHC+ cells, SYK phosphorylation was barely detectable at 1 or 3 min, increased at 10 and 15 min, and lasted till 30 min (Figure 4). The level of CD19 phosphorylation was also reduced during restimulation. Surprisingly, ERK phosphorylation was sustained after 30 min even after all the cells lost their cell surface BCRs during the direct stimulation (Figure 4, lane 6). The level of ERK phosphorylation was further enhanced during restimulation after 2 h (Figure 4, lanes 8 and 9). Similar results were obtained using either goat F(ab′)2 anti-IgM antibody fragments or monoclonal anti-human IgM antibodies. These results support that complete internalization of BCRs in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells altered the downstream signaling pathways.
3.5. Distribution of Phosphorylated SYK and ERK in Stimulated EU12 μHC+ Cells
Next, we performed immunofluorescence staining to visualize phosphorylated SYK and ERK proteins in these three lines of cells upon direct stimulation or restimulation. In directly stimulated EU12 μHC+, Daudi, or Ramos cells, crosslinking BCR with Cy5 labeled F(ab′)2 anti-IgM antibodies (10 μg/mL) induced SYK and ERK phosphorylation (Figures 5(a) and 5(b), left panels). In restimulated EU12 μHC+ cells, SYK phosphorylation was almost undetectable. Interestingly, phosphorylated ERK could be detected inside of the EU12 μHC+ cells even 4 h after the first stimulation and was further enhanced by restimulation with anti-IgM antibodies (Figures 5(a) and 5(b), right panels). These results are consistent with the Western blot results, which indicate that complete internalization of BCRs in the EU12 μHC+ cells specifically changes BCR-mediated downstream signaling with sustained ERK activation.
BCRs expressed on immature B cells and mature B cells have the same components; however, upon stimulation, they transduce different signals, which result in different outcomes . For immature B cells, engagement of BCR induces receptor editing, clonal deletion, or anergy; for mature B cells, stimulation of BCR induces cell activation and proliferation. Understanding how the same BCRs can generate different signals is a long standing question in the immunology research field.
We are currently using the EU12 μHC+ cells as an experimental model system to study the molecular regulation of replacement. The EU12 μHC+ cells phenotypically resemble human bone marrow immature B cells . We notice that the EU12 μHC+ cells are highly sensitive to BCR crosslinking that internalizes their cell surface BCRs . Treatment of EU12 μHC+ cells with low concentration of goat anti-human IgM antibody F(ab′)2 fragments (2 μg/mL) resulted in quick internalization of cell surface BCRs, which could be seen as soon as 1 min after adding the antibodies. After 30 min, almost all the EU12 μHC+ cells lost their cell surface BCRs. The complete BCR internalization observed with the EU12 μHC+ cells was different from the partial BCR internalization that occurred in mature B lineage Daudi or Ramos cells. Under the same stimulations, the majority of the Daudi and Ramos cells still have their cell surface BCRs, although the levels of cell surface BCRs are slightly reduced. Complete internalization of cell surface BCRs upon BCR crosslinking seems to be a general phenomenon for early B linage cells, because upon anti-IgM antibody treatment, murine 70Z/3 cells also completely internalize cell surface BCRs. Currently, it is not clear why EU12 μHC+ cells and 70Z/3 cells quickly and completely internalize their cell surface BCRs upon anti-IgM treatment. It has been shown that another murine B lineage cell line, WEHI231, which represents murine immature B cells, did not internalize cell surface BCRs upon anti-IgM antibody treatment . It will be very interesting to further compare and contrast BCR signaling mediated events in these early B lineage cell lines to identify the responsive factors that control BCR internalization.
Treatment of EU12 μHC+ cells or Daudi cells with the same concentration of anti-IgM antibodies resulted in different activation of HLA and CD86. We speculate that internalization of cell surface BCRs will impact the downstream signaling events. Detailed analysis showed that restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells after complete internalization of cell surface BCRs showed dramatic reduction of BCR induced Ca++ influx. Furthermore, after BCR internalization, restimulated EU12 μHC+ cells failed to induce global protein tyrosine phosphorylation even with higher concentration of the stimulating anti-IgM antibodies at 2 h or 4 h. Under the same treatment, Ca++ influx in Daudi or Ramos cells was also attenuated, but restimulation still induced strong protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Such results can be easily explained as that reducing the cell surface BCR expression levels attenuates BCR-mediated signaling events.
More specifically, after complete internalization of BCRs, restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells resulted in a delayed SYK phosphorylation and reduced CD19 and FOXO1 phosphorylation. Such changes are consistent with the low level of BCR expression on the EU12 cell surface. However, anti-IgM antibody-mediated activation of ERK in the EU12 μHC+ cells was not affected by complete internalization of BCRs. on the contrary, sustained ERK phosphorylation was detected in the EU12 μHC+ cells even after they lost cell surface BCRs. Restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells induced a similar wave of ERK activation. These results show that internalization of BCR in the EU12 μHC+ cells specifically changed BCR-mediated downstream signaling events with sustained ERK activation but reduced SYK, CD19, and FOXO1 phosphorylation. Such changes may be due to the differential activation thresholds of individual signaling factors. For ERK, the activation threshold may be very low. With minimal levels of cell surface BCR stimulation, ERK can be phosphorylated to activate the downstream signaling events. On the other hand, the sustained ERK activation after BCR internalization suggested that the internalized BCRs within the endosomes might still be able to activate ERK. Such low threshold of ERK activation and sustained ERK activation might be critical for immature B cells for induction of receptor editing and negative selection with even low affinity self-antigens. However, after internalization of the majority of the cell surface BCRs, SYK can no longer be quickly and fully activated in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells after restimulation. Given the important roles of SYK in BCR-mediated early signaling events in mature B cells, delayed and attenuated SYK activation might affect the formation of the signalosome to fully activate Ca++ influx and the downstream PI3K and NF-κB pathways. Indeed, we observed reduced Ca++ influx and reduced CD19 and FOXO1 phosphorylation upon restimulation of EU12 μHC+ cells. Recent studies have shown that ERK activation is involved in light chain receptor editing process . Correlating with the sustained activation of ERK in the EU12 μHC+ cells, we suspect that ERK activation is important for induction of replacement in human immature B cells.
Among the different BCR-mediated downstream signaling pathways, induction of Ca++ influx, activation of the PI3K, and NF-κB pathways are always considered to be important for B cell activation and proliferation. Here, our results show that complete internalization of BCRs in the EU12 μHC+ cells specifically alters the BCR downstream signaling events with sustained activation of ERK but attenuated Ca++ influx and CD19 and FOXO1 phosphorylation, which are different from that in mature B cells. We speculate that such changes in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells may prevent B cell activation and proliferation from favoring the induction of replacement.
Crosslinking BCRs on EU12 μHC+ immature B cells completely internalizes cell surface BCRs and specifically alters the BCR downstream signaling events with sustained activation of ERK but reduced Ca++ influx and SYK, CD19, and FOXO1 phosphorylation. Such changes may favor the induction of replacement rather than cell activation and proliferation in the EU12 μHC+ immature B cells.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
The authors would like to thank Drs. Louis Justement, Hiromi Kubagawa, and John Kearney for scientific discussions and Drs. Larry Gartland, Marion Spell (UAB), and Charles Kuszynski, Megan Michalak, and Victoria Smith (UNMC) for help with cell sorting and flow cytometric analysis. This work was supported in part by NIH Grants AI074948, AI076475, and AI073174 to Zhixin Zhang and AR059351 to Kaihong Su.
- P. D. Burrows and M. D. Cooper, “Regulated expression of cell surface antigens during B cell development,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 189–195, 1990.
- L. B. King and J. G. Monroe, “Immunobiology of the immature B cell: plasticity in the B-cell antigen receptor-induced response fine tunes negative selection,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 176, pp. 86–104, 2000.
- L. E. Tze, B. R. Schram, K.-P. Lam et al., “Basal immunoglobulin signaling actively maintains developmental stage in immature B cells,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 3, article e82, 2005.
- K. S. Campbell and J. C. Cambier, “B lymphocte antigen receptors (mlg) are non-covalently associated with a disulfide linked, inducibly phosphorylated glycoprotein complex,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 441–448, 1990.
- M. Reth, “B cell antigen receptors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 6, pp. 3–8, 1994.
- K. Rajewsky, “Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6585, pp. 751–758, 1996.
- L. J. McHeyzer-Williams and M. G. McHeyzer-Williams, “Antigen-specific memory B cell development,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 487–513, 2005.
- M. Hertz and D. Nemazee, “BCR ligation induces receptor editing in IgM+IgD- bone marrow B cells in vitro,” Immunity, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 429–436, 1997.
- M. Hertz, V. Kouskoff, T. Nakamura, and D. Nemazee, “V(D)J recombinase induction in splenic B lymphocytes is inhibited by antigen-receptor signalling,” Nature, vol. 394, no. 6690, pp. 292–295, 1998.
- M. Hertz and D. Nemazee, “Receptor editing and commitment in B lymphocytes,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 208–213, 1998.
- A. Norvell, L. Mandik, and J. G. Monroe, “Engagement of the antigen-receptor on immature murine B lymphocytes results in death by apoptosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 9, pp. 4404–4413, 1995.
- S. J. Beavitt, K. W. Harder, J. M. Kemp et al., “Lyn-deficient mice develop severe, persistent asthma: lyn is a critical negative regulator of Th2 immunity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 1867–1875, 2005.
- K. Sada, T. Takano, S. Yanagi, and H. Yamamura, “Structure and function of Syk protein-tyrosine kinase,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2001.
- Y. Kulathu, E. Hobeika, G. Turchinovich, and M. Reth, “The kinase Syk as an adaptor controlling sustained calcium signalling and B-cell development,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1333–1344, 2008.
- C. Fu, C. W. Turck, T. Kurosaki, and A. C. Chan, “BLNK: a central linker protein in B cell activation,” Immunity, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 1998.
- T. Kurosaki and S. Tsukada, “BLNK: connecting Syk and Btk to calcium signals,” Immunity, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2000.
- T. Kurosaki, S. A. Johnson, L. Pao, K. Sada, H. Yamamura, and J. C. Cambier, “Role of the Syk autophosphorylation site and SH2 domains in B cell antigen receptor signaling,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 1815–1823, 1995.
- S. Yanagi, R. Inatome, T. Takano, and H. Yamamura, “Syk expression and novel function in a wide variety of tissues,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. 495–498, 2001.
- Y. H. Wang, Z. Zhang, P. D. Burrows et al., “V(D)J recombinatorial repertoire diversification during intraclonal pro-B to B-cell differentiation,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1030–1037, 2003.
- Z. Zhang, M. Zemlin, Y.-H. Wang et al., “Contribution of gene replacement to the primary B cell repertoire,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2003.
- J. Liu, M. D. Lange, S. Y. Hong et al., “Regulation of replacement by B cell receptor-mediated signaling in human immature B cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 11, pp. 5559–5566, 2013.
- G. Klein, B. Giovanella, and A. Westman, “An EBV-genome-negative cell line established from an American Burkitt lymphoma; receptor characteristics. EBV infectibility and permanent conversion into EBV-positive sublines by in vitro infection,” Intervirology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 319–334, 1975.
- E. Klein, G. Klein, J. S. Nadkarni, J. J. Nadkarni, H. Wigzell, and P. Clifford, “Surface IgM-kappa specificity on a Burkitt lymphoma cell in vivo and in derived culture lines,” Cancer Research, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1300–1310, 1968.
- W. G. Kerr, L. M. Hendershot, and P. D. Burrows, “Regulation of IgM and IgD expression in human B-lineage cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 146, no. 10, pp. 3314–3321, 1991.
- J. E. Stadanlick, M. Kaileh, F. G. Karnell et al., “Tonic B cell antigen receptor signals supply an NF-κB substrate for prosurvival BLyS signaling,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1379–1387, 2008.
- V. Rolli, M. Gallwitz, T. Wossning et al., “Amplification of B cell antigen receptor signaling by a Syk/ITAM positive feedback loop,” Molecular Cell, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1057–1069, 2002.
- A. Norvell, L. Mandik, and J. G. Monroe, “Engagement of the antigen-receptor on immature murine B lymphocytes results in death by apoptosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 9, pp. 4404–4413, 1995.
- T. W. Sproul, S. Malapati, J. Kim, and S. K. Pierce, “Cutting edge: B cell antigen receptor signaling occurs outside lipid rafts in immature B cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 11, pp. 6020–6023, 2000.
- L. Mazari, M. Ouarzane, and M. Zouali, “Subversion of B lymphocyte tolerance by hydralazine, a potential mechanism for drug-induced lupus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 15, pp. 6317–6322, 2007.
Copyright © 2013 Jing Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.