Research Article
Efficient Haplotype Block Partitioning and Tag SNP Selection Algorithms under Various Constraints
Table 2
Analysis results based on numbers of tag SNPs required (using the chromosome 21 haplotype sample proposed by Patil).
| Tag SNPs used | Genome region covered (%) | Extra genome region increased (%) | 0-tagged blocks | Blocks with tags number >0 | Avg. length of non-0-tagged blocks |
| 0% (0) | 38.55 | 38.55 | 6136 | 0 | 1.51 (0-tagged blocks) | 10% (326) | 59.99 | 21.44 | 4991 | 192 | 35.52 | 20% (652) | 70.85 | 10.86 | 4145 | 367 | 29.37 | 30% (978) | 78.62 | 7.77 | 3387 | 516 | 26.79 | 40% (1304) | 84.61 | 5.99 | 2897 | 712 | 22.38 | 50% (1630) | 89.02 | 4.41 | 2250 | 844 | 21.29 | 60% (1956) | 92.59 | 3.57 | 1814 | 1002 | 19.41 | 70% (2282) | 95.30 | 2.71 | 1478 | 1159 | 17.79 | 80% (2608) | 97.29 | 1.99 | 1014 | 1289 | 16.90 | 90% (2934) | 98.64 | 1.35 | 719 | 1421 | 15.89 | 100% (3260) | 100.00 | 1.36 | 631 | 1635 | 14.10 |
|
|