Review Article

Targeting the Glutamatergic System to Treat Pathological Gambling: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Table 1

Clinical trials and case series using glutamatergic drugs to treat pathological gambling.

DrugDosage
(mg/day)
Study designDurationSample sizeMethodsCognitive outcomeGambling outcomeCommentsReferences

Acamprosate1,998Open-label8 + 2 weeks26 PG ptsPG-YBOCS, G-SAS, CGI, gambling episodesNA77% of participants completed. Improvement on all efficacy scales. 65% were responders.Improvement in ADHD Checklist scores.Black et al., 2011 [6]
999Open-label6 months8 PG ptsGambling relapse, VASNANone reached 6-month abstinence. No change in VAS scores to relapse.Dannon et al., 2011 [7]

Amantadine150Clinical case study8 weeksOne PG patientG-SAS, HDRS, YMRSNAReduction of 43–64% in gambling symptoms severity (G-SAS).Pettorruso et al., 2012 [8]
200Double-blind, placebo-controlled17 weeks17 PG pts with Parkinson’s diseaseG-SAS, PG-YBOCS, SOGSNAAbolished daily PG in 7 pts. 5 pts reduced daily expenditures and time spent gambling.Valuable option in Parkinson’s disease gambling behaviorsThomas et al., 2010 [9]

Baclofen30–50Open-label6 months9 PG ptsGambling relapse, VASNAOne patient reached 4-month abstinence. None reached 6-month abstinence. No change in VAS scores to relapse. Dannon et al., 2011 [7]

Gabapentin, pregabalin300–600Case series6 monthsGB: 4 PG pts
PGB: 6 PG pts
G-SAS, VASNAReduction of gambling craving and withdrawal Pettorruso et al., 2013 [10]

Memantine10–30Open-label10 weeks29 PG ptsPG-YBOCS, stop-signal task, IDED taskReduced cognitive inflexibility PG-YBOCS score and hours spent gambling decreased.Target both gambling and cognitive deficits in PGGrant et al., 2010 [11]
20Case report8 weeksOne OCD, BD, PG ptG-SASReduction of more than 50% in GSAS scores.Pavlovic, 2011 [12]

Modafinil200Double-blind, placebo-controlledSingle session20 nontreatment-seeking PG ptsEIQ, IGT, cognitive tasksIn H-I pts reduced disinhibition and risky decision-makingIn H-I pts decreased desire to gamble, salience, disinhibition, and risky decision-making. In L-I pts increased scores.Impulsivity could moderate medication response in PG Zack and Poulos, 2009 [13]

NAC1,200–1,800Open-label, double-blind discontinuation phase8 + 6 weeks27 PG ptsPG-YBOCS, G-SAS, CGINA59.3% were respondents. Difference with placebo in discontinuation phase.NAC targets craving in PG-addictive subtypeGrant et al., 2007 [14]
1,200–3,000RCT12 weeks28 PG, nicotine dependent, ptsSCI-PG, PG-YBOCS
Fagerström test for nicotine dependence
NA During the 3-month followup, NAC was superior to placebo on PG severity.NAC facilitates long-term behavioral therapyGrant et al., 2014 [15]

Topiramate200Randomized, blind-rater vs fluvoxamine12 weeks15 PG pts (topiramate), 16 PG pts (fluvoxamine)SOGS, PG-YBOCS, CGINA9/12 pts reported full remission and 3/12 partial remission. Significant CGI improvement.Dannon et al., 2005 [16]
300RCT14 weeks20 PG pts
22 placebo
PG-YBOCS, G-SAS, CGI-I, BIS-11Reduced impulsivity traitsNo significant effect on the primary measures.Small sample size. Study probably
underpowered
Berlin et al., 2013 [17]
200Clinical case study (add-on to lithium)2 monthsOne pt with BD and PG comorbiditiesNoneNAGambling behavior abated after 2 months of combined treatment. On long-term followup the patient remained asymptomatic.Valuable add-on treatment in BD-PG comorbidityNicolato et al., 2007 [18]

RCT: randomized-controlled trial; PG: pathological gambling; G-SAS: Gambling-Symptom Assessment Scale; PG-YBOCS: Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for pathological gambling; HDRS: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; YMRS: Young Mania Rating Scale; NA: not available; IDED task: intradimensional/extradimensional set shift task; SOSG: South Oaks Gambling Screen; EIQ: Eysenck Impulsiveness Questionnaire; IGT: Iowa gambling task; OCD: obsessive compulsive disorder; BD: bipolar disorder; H-I: high impulsivity; L-I: low impulsivity.