BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Combating Kidney Fibrosis

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 124902 | 14 pages |

Effect of Angiotensin II and Small GTPase Ras Signaling Pathway Inhibition on Early Renal Changes in a Murine Model of Obstructive Nephropathy

Academic Editor: Akito Maeshima
Received27 Feb 2014
Revised12 May 2014
Accepted06 Jun 2014
Published03 Jul 2014


Tubulointerstitial fibrosis is a major feature of chronic kidney disease. Unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) in rodents leads to the development of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis consistent with histopathological changes observed in advanced chronic kidney disease in humans. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of inhibiting angiotensin II receptors or Ras activation on early renal fibrotic changes induced by UUO. Animals either received angiotensin II or underwent UUO. UUO animals received either losartan, atorvastatin, and farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) L-744,832, or chaetomellic acid A (ChA). Levels of activated Ras, phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-Akt, fibronectin, and α-smooth muscle actin were subsequently quantified in renal tissue by ELISA, Western blot, and/or immunohistochemistry. Our results demonstrate that administration of angiotensin II induces activation of the small GTPase Ras/Erk/Akt signaling system, suggesting an involvement of angiotensin II in the early obstruction-induced activation of renal Ras. Furthermore, upstream inhibition of Ras signalling by blocking either angiotensin AT1 type receptor or by inhibiting Ras prenylation (atorvastatin, FTI o ChA) reduced the activation of the Ras/Erk/Akt signaling system and decreased the early fibrotic response in the obstructed kidney. This study points out that pharmacological inhibition of Ras activation may hold promise as a future strategy in the prevention of renal fibrosis.

1. Introduction

Renal interstitial fibrosis is a common histopathological endpoint in all forms of progressive renal diseases independently of their etiology. Unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) is a well-established experimental model in mice leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the ligated kidney [1, 2]. Increased synthesis of angiotensin II (Ang II) has been implicated as playing a causative role in progression of kidney damage in obstructive nephropathy [35]. Ang II is directly profibrotic but also acts as a proinflammatory cytokine in the kidney through the activation of the nuclear factor-κB family of transcription factors, which in turn, induces an autocrine response enhancing both Ang II and tumor necrosis factor alpha production [6]. By promoting tubulointerstitial infiltration of inflammatory cells, Ang II also contributes to the onset and progression of renal damage in UUO [6]. However, studies examining the effect of directly targeting Ang II in UUO-induced renal damage have yielded contradictory results. Thus, whereas it has been reported that Ang II receptor blockade or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition abrogates fibrosis deposition and myofibroblast proliferation in some studies of obstructive nephropathy [79], in other studies these interventions have been shown to aggravate renal damage after UUO [1012]. These differences may be due to whether obstruction was partial or complete but they also suggest that optimal strategies may be better targeted downstream of the Ang II receptor complex, focused on those pathways that are implicated in the proinflammatory and profibrotic responses to Ang II.

Actions of Ang II are mediated via the Ang II type I (AT1) and type II G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR), as well as the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK)s [13, 14]. Specific profibrotic actions of Ang II are implicated in the appearance of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive fibroblasts or myofibroblasts and fibronectin accumulation which are considered prominent features of fibrosis development in the obstructed kidney [15, 16].

Ras monomeric GTPases play a major role in the control of proliferation, differentiation, and cell death, connecting activated RTKs and GPCRs to the effector pathways Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3 K)-Akt [17]. Many growth factors are known to activate intracellular signaling pathways that converge on Ras activation, including Ang II which has been reported to stimulate renal Ras/MAPK pathway in vivo and in vitro [18, 19]. Thus, Muthalif et al. [18] have demonstrated that Ang II infusion for 6 days induces hypertension and renal Ras activation, and both phenomena are reversed by administration of a farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI). However, the effects of acute Ang II administration on Ras activation have not been assessed.

Activation of Ras and its effectors ERK1/2 and PI3 K/Akt has been reported as mediators in progressive renal damage [20, 21]. Activation of Ras signaling pathway occurs after early UUO [22, 23], demonstrating a contribution of Ras downstream effectors to renal injury with a main involvement of ERK1/2 in apoptotic events and Akt in proliferative and fibrotic response [23]. There are several Ras isoforms (H-, N- and K-Ras) with different functional properties in fibrotic processes and in fibroblast biology [2426]. Thus, we have observed that H-Ras knock-out (KO) mice show lower fibrosis after UUO [27], whereas in embryonic fibroblasts obtained from H-Ras or N-Ras KO mice, fibronectin and collagen synthesis were higher and proliferation and migration were lower than in wild type fibroblasts [24, 25]. Moreover, K-Ras knock-down decreases stimulated proliferation in renal fibroblasts [28] and inhibits fibrosis in a rat experimental model [29]. It is known that activation of Ras requires several posttranslational modifications that include prenylation, the addition of either the 15-carbon isoprenoid farnesy1 or the 20-carbon isoprenoid geranylgeranyl to cysteine residue(s) at or near the C-termini of Ras proteins, allowing their anchorage to the cell membrane and subsequent activation [30]. Some evidence exists to demonstrate that inhibition of prenylation reduces extracellular matrix production by fibroblasts “in vitro” [31]. Thus, we aimed to interrogate the effects of decreasing prenylation on early UUO-induced Ras pathway activation and associated fibrotic responses in the mouse kidney. We used multiple strategies to address the question: (1) by inhibiting the synthesis of farnesyl groups using atorvastatin, an inhibitor of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase-involved in the synthesis of isoprenoid groups required for Ras prenylation [32, 33], (2) by directly inhibiting Ras farnesylation using a farnesyl transferase inhibitor [34], and (3) by treating with chaetomellic acid A, which selectively blocks H-Ras farnesylation [35] with reduced off-target toxicity relative to FTIs [36].

2. Methods

2.1. Animals and Disease Model

C57BL/6J male mice were kept in a germ-free facility, under controlled environmental conditions (Unidad de Experimentación Animal, University of Salamanca, Spain). Mice were reared on standard chow (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) and provided with water ad libitum. Surgical techniques to produce UUO were performed as previously described on animals at 2 months of age [23]. All procedures were approved by the Committee for Animal Care and Use of the University of Salamanca and complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of National Research Council.

2.2. Pharmacological Groups and Drug Administration

Angiotensin (Ang II) Group. A group of mice was treated with a single intraperitoneal dose of Ang II (0.8 mg/kg; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA; per time point) or saline vehicle (NaCl 0.9%; ). No surgery was performed in this group of animals and kidneys were removed either 30 minutes, 4, or 12 hours after Ang II administration.

Losartan Group. A group of animals received a daily intraperitoneal injection of losartan (40 mg/kg; Du Pont, Wilmington, DE, USA; ), whereas the corresponding control group received the vehicle isotonic saline (NaCl 0.9%; ), for 4 days. UUO was carried out on the second day of treatment.

Atorvastatin Group. A group of mice were treated with atorvastatin calcium (70 mg/kg/day; Pfizer, Madrid, Spain; ) by oral gavage, and the corresponding control mice group were treated with carboxymethylcellulose vehicle (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA; ), once daily for 6 days. UUO was performed at the fourth day after initiating the treatment.

Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor (FTI) Group. A group of mice received a subcutaneous injection of L-744,832 (40 mg/kg; Biomol Inc, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA; ) while a control group received the vehicle solution (17 mM sodium citrate, 94 mM sodium chloride; pH 5.4; ), daily for 6 days. UUO was performed on the fourth day of treatment.

Chaetomellic Acid A Group. A group of mice received subcutaneously injected chaetomellic acid A (3 mg/kg/day; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA; ) during 6 days, whereas a control group received the vehicle solution (17 mM sodium citrate, 94 mM sodium chloride; pH 5.4; ). UUO was performed on the fourth day of treatment.

2.3. Preparation of Kidney Tissue and Protein Analysis

At endpoint in each group, kidneys were removed under terminal anaesthesia. Methods used for protein analysis, including affinity precipitation of Ras-GTP or ELISA Ras activation Kit (Upstate Biotechnology, MA, USA) and immunodetection of proteins by Western blot and immunohistochemistry, have been already described [23, 25, 27]. As we have previously reported, the amount of loading controls for WB such as tubulin or GAPDH change after UUO [23], and thus we have decided to control strictly the amount of protein loaded instead to perform WB for these proteins.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for statistical analysis (NCSS 2000 program, Utah, USA). Bonferroni’s or Kruskal-Wallis multiple-comparison tests were, respectively, employed for analysis of data with or without normal distribution. Data were expressed as mean ± Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). or were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Renal Activation of Ras Signaling Pathway after Short-Term Ang II Infusion

Renal Ras activation, measured by ELISA, was higher both at 4 and 12 hours after single dose Ang II administration than in saline-treated control group (Ctrl; Figure 1).

Western blot analysis also detected an Ang II-induced increase in renal activation of Ras signaling effectors, ERK1/2 and Akt, as demonstrated by measuring the ratio phosphorylated (p)/total protein at 4 hours after Ang II administration (Figures 1(b) and 1(c), resp.).

3.2. Effect of AT1 Receptor Antagonist on Ras Activation and Renal Changes after UUO

We aimed to determine the effect of AT1 receptor antagonist losartan on the activation of Ras/ERK/Akt signaling pathway and the expression of fibronectin and α-SMA in kidneys submitted to 3 days of UUO. Western blot analyses showed that levels of Ras-GTP, pERK, pAkt, total Akt, fibronectin, and α-SMA were significantly higher in obstructed (O) kidneys than in nonobstructed (NO) kidneys of vehicle-treated animals (Figures 2(a)2(f)). The increase observed in total Akt levels in kidneys submitted to ureteral obstruction (Figure 2(d)) has been previously described [23]. After receiving losartan treatment, no significant differences were found for levels of activated RAS, fibronectin, and α-SMA in O kidneys compared with NO kidneys (Figures 2(a), 2(e) and 2(f), resp.), and a similar pattern was observed for pERK1/2 and pAkt (Figures 2(b) and 2(c), resp.). No differences between NO groups of treated and untreated groups were observed for any of the analyzed proteins.

3.3. Effect of Ras Activation Inhibitors on ERK1/2 and Akt Activation and Fibrotic Markers after UUO

Our next objective was to assess whether inhibition of Ras activation after UUO could modulate activation of its downstream effectors, ERK1/2, and Akt, as well as expression of fibronectin and α-SMA in ligated kidneys. For this purpose we treated the animals with either the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin or the farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) L-744,832 or chaetomellic acid A.

Western blot analysis revealed that whereas O kidneys of vehicle-treated mice showed higher levels of Ras-GTP, pERK1/2, pAkt, and total Akt proteins than NO kidneys, the differences between O and NO kidneys for Ras-GTP, pERK1/2, pAkt, and total Akt abundance were not significant (Figures 5(a)5(d)) in atorvastatin-treated animals (Figures 5(a)5(d)). Similar results were obtained for fibronectin and α-SMA, with lower amounts for both proteins detected in the O kidneys of animals treated with atorvastatin than in O kidneys of vehicle-treated mice (Figures 5(e) and 5(f), resp.). In agreement with these results, immunohistochemistry studies revealed reduced amount of fibronectin (Figures 3(a), 3(b), 3(e) and 3(f)) and interstitial α-SMA (Figures 4(a), 4(b), 4(e) and 4(f)) in the O kidneys of atorvastatin-treated mice than in the O kidneys of vehicle-treated animals.

Pull-down and Western blot analysis showed that O kidneys of FTI-treated mice presented significantly lower Ras activation than kidneys of vehicle-treated animals (Figure 6(a)). Administration of FTI significantly blunted the obstruction-induced increase in pERK1/2 when compared to control vehicle group, with lower levels of activated protein also found in NO kidneys of FTI (Figure 6(b)). A slight, nonsignificant decrease in the expression of pAkt and total Akt was observed in O kidneys from FTI-treated animals (Figures 6(c) and 6(d), resp.). We observed a marked and significant reduction in fibronectin levels of O kidneys after FTI treatment when compared with kidneys of animals receiving vehicle administration (Figure 6(e)). In agreement with these results, immunohistochemical analysis revealed lower fibronectin staining in the renal cortical interstitium of O kidneys from FTI-treated mice compared with mice receiving the vehicle (Figures 3(a), 3(b), 3(g) and 3(h)). Compared with untreated mice, O kidneys of FTI group showed a mild although nonsignificant reduction in α-SMA levels (Figure 6(f)), which correlates with the interstitial amount detected by Figures 4(a), 4(b), 4(g) and 4(h).

Western blot analysis showed significantly lower pERK1/2 and pAkt levels in O kidneys from mice that received chaetomellic acid A with respect to O kidneys of control mice (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). As measured by Western blotting, the expression of α-SMA, but not that of fibronectin was significantly lower in O kidneys of mice treated with chaetomellic acid compared with O kidneys of mice treated with vehicle (Figures 7(c) and 7(d), resp.). Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that in the animals receiving chaetomellic acid, O kidneys showed lower staining for α-SMA but not for fibronectin than O kidneys from animals receiving the vehicle alone (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Increased levels of Ang II have been suggested to play a major role in the progression of renal disease induced by experimental UUO [3]. Previous studies have demonstrated that both mRNA and protein levels are increased for renin, angiotensin converting enzyme activity, and Ang II content in the obstructed kidney 1 day after UUO [4]. Additionally, in vivo studies have shown renal Ras activation induced by infusion of Ang II for 6 days [18].

Having previously demonstrated that Ras signaling pathway is activated in obstructed kidneys after 3 days of UUO [22, 23, 37], we now demonstrate that systemic Ang II administration in normal mice results in a marked increase of the renal Ras signaling pathway as early as 30 minutes, with larger increases observed 4 hours after administration. Thus, our data demonstrates a rapid activation of the Ras pathway induced by UUO or Ang II administration. Furthermore, by blocking the AT1 receptor by losartan administration, levels of activated Ras in obstructed kidneys were markedly reduced. Taken together, these results suggest that Ang II leads to AT1 receptor dependent stimulation of Ras in early renal injury post-UUO.

Fibronectin is a major component of the pathological extracellular matrix (ECM) in tubulointerstitial fibrosis that serves as a fibroblast chemoattractant and scaffold protein for the deposition of other ECM proteins [38]. Furthermore, the fibronectin scaffold has been demonstrated to be involved in the differentiation of fibroblasts to the α-SMA positive myofibroblasts [39], a key step in UUO-induced renal fibrosis [16]. Since inhibition of UUO-induced Ras activation by losartan treatment attenuates increases in fibronectin and α-SMA expression in the obstructed kidney, a potential role for Ras beyond mere association could be suggested in relation to the early stages of Ang II-mediated renal fibrosis.

Considering all this data, it could be suggested that in the early stages of UUO the profibrotic effects of AT1 receptor-mediated Ang II are regulated, at least in part, via a Ras-dependent pathway.

Both downstream effectors of Ras, ERK1/2, and Akt have been implicated in renal damage response in obstructive nephropathy. We have previously reported that activation of Ras and ERK1/2 is significantly higher in the obstructed (O) kidneys than in nonobstructed (NO) kidneys 3 days after UUO. The same pattern was observed in UUO-induced expression of p-Akt and total Akt, as demonstrated by Western and Northern blot analysis [22, 23]. Activation of ERK1/2 has been related to interstitial apoptosis and proliferation of tubular cells [23, 40, 41], whereas a role for activated Akt has been reported in early tubulointerstitial cell proliferation and profibrotic events in UUO [23]. Results presented in this study have also shown that inhibition of Ras activation by blocking either the farnesyl transferase or HMG-CoA reductase enzymes is able to reduce UUO-induced MAPK-ERK1/2 signaling pathway in the obstructed kidney. Additionally, administration of atorvastatin or chaetomellic acid A also induced a marked downregulation of PI3 K/Akt pathway. Thus, blockade of Ras activation can provide a new strategy to reduce the renal damage events elicited by activation of ERK1/2 and Akt signaling pathways.

Moreover, our data demonstrate that inhibition of Ras activation by atorvastatin or FTI administration reduces UUO-induced accumulation of fibronectin in the mouse kidney. Atorvastatin data are in agreement with previous studies reporting protective effect of statins in UUO-induced renal fibrosis [4246].

In addition, atorvastatin, and chaetomellic acid A reduced the increased amount of the marker for myofibroblasts, α-SMA, after UUO. At least a part of myofibroblast present in the kidney after UUO may derive from epithelial cells by a process called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [16] and there are enough evidences that Ras activation participates in EMT [47, 48]. These results suggest that Ras participates in the initiating molecular events are involved in renal interstitial fibrogenesis induced by ureteral obstruction in mice. We have already reported that H-Ras isoform is able to modulate renal fibrosis and myofibroblast activation following ureteral obstruction in mice [24, 27]. Notably Ras activation has been shown to be involved in EMT of tubular cells to myofibroblasts [49], and specifically H-Ras is involved in TGF-β1-induced EMT [50]. In the kidney, chaetomellic acid A selectively inhibits the membrane-bound of H-Ras without affecting the membrane-bound of Ki-Ras or other prenylated intracellular proteins like Rab [51]. Since H-Ras isoform only can be farnesylated, we have used chaetomellic acid A specifically to inhibit the activation of H-Ras isoform. Our results have demonstrated that chaetomellic acid A administration decreased Ras downstream signaling pathway as well as α-SMA accumulation in UUO kidneys. Previous studies of our group have shown that H-Ras KO mice show reduced numbers of myofibroblasts in the kidney following UUO [27]. It has been reported that in acute renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats the inhibition of the Ras pathway by chaetomellic acid A resulted in a beneficial effect, preserving both renal function and structure [51]. Furthermore, in an experimental murine model of ischemic stroke, chaetomellic acid A administration increased the intracellular concentration of inactive H-Ras, leading to a marked decrease of both superoxide anion production and volume of cerebral necrotic tissue, with the subsequent improved survival of hypoxic neuronal cells [35]. Thus, inhibition of H-Ras isoform specifically by chaetomellic acid A could be used as a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce fibrosis development.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our results suggest that increased Ang II production in the obstructed kidney could play a role in Ras/ERK/Akt pathway activation, which in turn, can be involved in early renal fibrosis induced by UUO. Our data also offer evidence of the pharmacological potential of Ras pathway inhibition in preventing the progression of renal tubulo-interstitial fibrosis. Chaetomellic acid A is of particular interest in this regard in relation to the arrest or reversal of renal fibrosis as it acts more specifically than statins and is less toxic than synthetic FTIs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare not to have any conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Ana B. Rodríguez-Peña and Isabel Fuentes-Calvo contributed equally to this paper.


The authors thank Mrs. Angustias Pérez for histological assistance. This study was supported by grants from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Grant SAF2010-15881 and Red de Investigación Cooperativa en Enfermedades Renales REDINREN RD12/0021/0032), Junta de Castilla y Leon (Grant SA 001/C05 and Excellence Group GR100), and REDINREN which is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III of Spain supported by FEDER funds. When performing the present study, Ana B. Rodríguez-Peña was a fellow of the Fundación Renal “Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo” and Neil G. Docherty was a fellow of The Marie Curie Programme, EU.


  1. A. C. Ucero, A. Benito-Martin, M. C. Izquierdo et al., “Unilateral ureteral obstruction: beyond obstruction,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 765–776, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Bascands and J. P. Schanstra, “Obstructive nephropathy: insights from genetically engineered animals,” Kidney International, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 925–937, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Klahr, S. Ishidoya, and J. Morrissey, “Role of angiotensin II in the tubulointerstitial fibrosis of obstructive nephropathy,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 141–146, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. L. Pimentel Jr., A. Montero, S. Wang, I. Yosipiv, S. El-Dahr, and M. Martinez-Maldonado, “Sequential changes in renal expression of renin-angiotensin system genes in acute unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Kidney International, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1247–1253, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. L. Pimentel Jr., C. L. Sundell, S. Wang, J. B. Kopp, Á. Montero, and M. Martínez-Maldonado, “Role of angiotensin II in the expression and regulation of transforming growth factor-β in obstructive nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1233–1246, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. Esteban, O. Lorenzo, M. Rupérez et al., “Angiotensin II, via AT1 and AT2 receptors and NF-κB pathway, regulates the inflammatory response in unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1514–1529, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. El Chaar, J. Chen, S. V. Seshan et al., “Effect of combination therapy with enalapril and the TGF-β antagonist 1D11 in unilateral ureteral obstruction,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 292, no. 4, pp. F1291–F1301, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Kellner, J. Chen, I. Richardson et al., “Angiotensin receptor blockade decreases fibrosis and fibroblast expression in a rat model of unilateral ureteral obstruction,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 806–812, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Klahr and J. Morrissey, “Comparative effects of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in the prevention of renal damage,” Kidney International, Supplements, vol. 62, no. 82, pp. S23–S26, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. C. O. Chen, M. H. Park, M. S. Forbes et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition aggravates renal interstitial injury resulting from partial unilateral ureteral obstruction in the neonatal rat,” American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, vol. 292, no. 3, pp. F946–F955, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. M. Coleman, J. J. Minor, L. E. Burt, B. A. Thornhill, M. S. Forbes, and R. L. Chevalier, “Angiotensin AT1-receptor inhibition exacerbates renal injury resulting from partial unilateral ureteral obstruction in the neonatal rat,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. F262–F268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. J. Stoneking, T. E. Hunley, H. Nishimura et al., “Renal angiotensin converting enzyme promotes renal damage during ureteral obstruction,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 1070–1074, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Aplin, G. L. Christensen, and J. L. Hansen, “Pharmacologic perspectives of functional selectivity by the angiotensin II type 1 receptor,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 305–312, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Yin, C. Yan, and B. C. Berk, “Angiotensin II signaling pathways mediated by tyrosine kinases,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 780–783, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. L. Chevalier, M. S. Forbes, and B. A. Thornhill, “Ureteral obstruction as a model of renal interstitial fibrosis and obstructive nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1145–1152, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. T. Grande and J. M. López-Novoa, “Fibroblast activation and myofibroblast generation in obstructive nephropathy,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 319–328, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. M. Rojas and E. Santos, “Ras genes and human cancer: different implications and different roles,” Current Genomics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 295–311, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. M. Muthalif, N. A. Karzoun, L. Gaber et al., “Angiotensin II-induced hypertension contribution of Ras GTPase/mitogen-activated protein kinase and cytochrome P450 metabolites,” Hypertension, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 604–609, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Schieffer, W. G. Paxton, Q. Chai, M. B. Marrero, and K. E. Bernstein, “Angiotensin II controls p21ras activity via pp60c-src,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 17, pp. 10329–10333, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. T. Grande and J. M. López-Novoa, “Therapeutical relevance of MAP-kinase inhibitors in renal diseases: current knowledge and future clinical perspectives,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 2054–2070, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Martínez-Salgado, A. B. Rodríguez-Peña, and J. M. López-Novoa, “Involvement of small Ras GTPases and their effectors in chronic renal disease,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 477–492, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. T. Grande, M. Arévalo, A. Núñez, J. B. Cannata-Andía, E. Santos, and J. M. López-Novoa, “Targeted genomic disruption of H-ras and N-ras has no effect on early renal changes after unilateral ureteral ligation,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 787–797, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. B. Rodríguez-Peña, M. T. Grande, N. Eleno et al., “Activation of Erk1/2 and Akt following unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Kidney International, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 196–209, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. Fuentes-Calvo, A. M. Blázquez-Medela, N. Eleno, E. Santos, J. M. López-Novoa, and C. Martínez-Salgado, “H-Ras isoform modulates extracellular matrix synthesis, proliferation, and migration in fibroblasts,” American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, vol. 302, no. 4, pp. C686–C697, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. I. Fuentes-Calvo, P. Crespo, E. Santos, J. M. López-Novoa, and C. Martínez-Salgado, “The small GTPase N-Ras regulates extracellular matrix synthesis, proliferation and migration in fibroblasts,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1833, no. 12, pp. 2734–2744, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Martínez-Salgado, I. Fuentes-Calvo, B. García-Cenador, E. Santos, and J. M. López-Novoa, “Involvement of H-and N-Ras isoforms in transforming growth factor-β1-induced proliferation and in collagen and fibronectin synthesis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 312, no. 11, pp. 2093–2106, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. T. Grande, I. Fuentes-Calvo, M. Arevalo et al., “Deletion of H-Ras decreases renal fibrosis and myofibroblast activation following ureteral obstruction in mice,” Kidney International, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 509–518, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. C. Sharpe, M. E. C. Dockrell, R. Scott et al., “Evidence of a role for Ki-RAS in the stimulated proliferation of renal fibroblasts,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1186–1192, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. Wang, L. J. Newbury, A. S. Knisely, B. Monia, B. M. Hendry, and C. C. Sharpe, “Antisense knockdown of Kras inhibits fibrosis in a rat model of unilateral ureteric obstruction,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. F. Hancock and R. G. Parton, “Ras plasma membrane signalling platforms,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Masterson, K. Kelynack, T. Hewitson, and G. Becker, “Effect of inhibition of farnesylation and geranylgeranylation on renal fibrogenesis in vitro,” Nephron—Experimental Nephrology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. e19–e29, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Buemi, M. Senatore, F. Corica et al., “Statins and progressive renal disease,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 76–84, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Jakobisiak and J. Golab, “Potential antitumor effects of statins (Review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1055–1069, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Crul, G. J. De Klerk, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H. M. S. Schellens, “Ras biochemistry and farnesyl transferase inhibitors: a literature survey,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 163–184, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Ruocco, M. Santillo, M. Cicale et al., “Farnesyl transferase inhibitors induce neuroprotection by inhibiting Ha-Ras signalling pathway,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3261–3266, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Qian, S. M. Sebti, and A. D. Hamilton, “Farnesyltransferase as a target for anticancer drug design,” Biopolymers, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. B. Rodríguez-Peña, E. Santos, M. Arévalo, and J. M. López-Novoa, “Activation of small GTPase Ras and renal fibrosis,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 341–349, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Gharaee-Kermani, R. Wiggins, F. Wolber, M. Goyal, and S. H. Phan, “Fibronectin is the major fibroblast chemoattractant in rabbit anti-glomerular basement membrane disease,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 961–967, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  39. G. Serini, M. Bochaton-Piallat, P. Ropraz et al., “The fibronectin domain ED-A is crucial for myofibroblastic phenotype induction by transforming growth factor-β1,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 873–881, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Masaki, R. Foti, P. A. Hill, Y. Ikezumi, R. C. Atkins, and D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, “Activation of the ERK pathway precedes tubular proliferation in the obstructed rat kidney,” Kidney International, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1256–1264, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. B. Pat, T. Yang, C. Kong, D. Watters, D. W. Johnson, and G. Gobe, “Activation of ERK in renal fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction: modulation by antioxidants,” Kidney International, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 931–943, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Moriyama, N. Kawada, K. Nagatoya et al., “Fluvastatin suppresses oxidative stress and fibrosis in the interstitium of mouse kidneys with unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2095–2103, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Y. Mizuguchi, A. Miyajima, T. Kosaka, T. Asano, and M. Hayakawa, “Atorvastatin ameliorates renal tissue damage in unilateral ureteral obstruction,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 6 I, pp. 2456–2459, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. M. Vieira Jr., E. Mantovani, L. Tavares Rodrigues et al., “Simvastatin attenuates renal inflammation, tubular transdifferentiation and interstitial fibrosis in rats with unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation—European Renal Association, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1582–1591, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Kamdar, S. Y. Chou, U. M. M. Mooppan, H. Kim, and F. A. Gulmi, “Atorvastatin protects renal function in the rat with acute unilateral ureteral obstruction,” Urology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 853–857, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. J. Mazzei, I. M. García, L. Altamirano, N. G. Docherty, and W. Manucha, “Rosuvastatin preserves renal structure following unilateral ureteric obstruction in the neonatal rat,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 103–113, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. F. Safina, A. E. Varga, A. Bianchi et al., “Ras alters epithelial-mesenchymal transition in response to TGFβ by reducing actin fibers and cell-matrix adhesion,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 284–298, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Jordà, A. Vinyals, A. Marazuela et al., “Id-1 is induced in MDCK epithelial cells by activated Erk/MAPK pathway in response to expression of the Snail and E47 transcription factors,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 313, no. 11, pp. 2389–2403, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Wei, X. Wang, Y. Xia et al., “Kindlin-2 regulates renal tubular cell plasticity by activation of Ras and its downstream signaling,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. F271–F278, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  50. H. Peinado, M. Quintanilla, and A. Cano, “Transforming growth factor β-1 induces Snail transcription factor in epithelial cell lines. Mechanisms for epithelial mesenchymal transitions,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 23, pp. 21113–21123, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Sabbatini, M. Santillo, A. Pisani et al., “Inhibition of Ras/ERK1/2 signaling protects against postischemic renal injury,” The American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, vol. 290, no. 6, pp. F1408–F1415, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Ana B. Rodríguez-Peña et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1215 Views | 452 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.