BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 126038 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/126038

Interactions between E-Cadherin and MicroRNA Deregulation in Head and Neck Cancers: The Potential Interplay

Academic Editor: Valli De Re
Received28 Feb 2014
Revised07 Jul 2014
Accepted11 Jul 2014
Published04 Aug 2014

Abstract

E-cadherin expression in the head and neck epithelium is essential for the morphogenesis and homeostasis of epithelial tissues. The cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts are required for the anchorage-dependent growth of epithelial cells. Further, survival and proliferation require physical tethering created by proper cell-cell adhesion. Otherwise, the squamous epithelial cells will undergo programmed cell death. Head and neck cancers can escape from anoikis and enter into the epithelial-mesenchymal transition stages via the modulation of E-cadherin expression with epigenetic mechanisms. At epigenetic level, gene expression control is not dependent on the DNA sequence. In the context of E-cadherin regulation in head and neck cancers, 2 major mechanisms including de novo promoter hypermethylation and microRNA dysregulation are most extensively studied. Both of them control E-cadherin expression at transcription level and subsequently hinder the overall E-cadherin protein level in the head and neck cancer cells. Increasing evidence suggested that microRNA mediated E-cadherin expression in the head and neck cancers by directly/indirectly targeting the transcription suppressors of E-cadherin, ZEB1 and ZEB2.

1. Introduction

Head and neck cancers could be developed from multiple sites in the head and neck regions including nasopharynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and pharynx. It is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and is the fourth most common cancer in the male population in Europe [1]. Head and neck cancer is a multifactorial disease. Well-known risk factors include tobacco and alcohol consumption [2]. Epidemiology data suggested that there is a significant increase in the risk for cancer development in the group of smokers and drinkers, especially in young adults [3]. In particular geographic regions, the cancers from the oral cavity and oropharyngeal regions are linked with the chewing of tobacco or betel nut [4, 5]. Head and neck regions are subjected to “field cancerization.” Early genetic changes could possibly be reverted if the risk factors are removed in the early stages [6, 7]. Patients with precancerous lesions such as leukoplakia and erythroplakia have a high probability to progress to carcinoma without early diagnosis. Histologically, squamous cell carcinoma is the major clinical presentation of head and neck cancers. The prognosis of head and neck cancer is poor especially when regional migration to cervical lymph nodes and metastasis to distant organs are presented. The migration and invasion of the head and neck cancer are sequential processes. In oral tongue cancer, the risk for lymphatic metastasis increased with the tumor volume [8]. It is evidenced that the tumor depth is a predictive factor for cervical metastasis [9]. Further, the relevance between regional lymph node migration of head and neck cancers and poor prognosis is documented in hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients in which patients with high positive lymph nodes ratio closely tend to have poorer survival [10].

2. E-Cadherin Dysregulation in Head and Neck Cancers

Epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin or cadherin 1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as cell adhesion molecule (CAM). The gene encoding E-cadherin (CDH1) located at chromosome 16q22.1, a common hotspot of genetic abbreviations such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and mutations. Structurally, the E-cadherin protein contains five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region, and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. It is a calcium-dependent molecule involved in cell-cell adhesion, cell dissociation, and cell motility. The transmembrane glycoprotein establishes homophilic interactions with adjacent E-cadherin molecules forming the epithelial junctional complexes, which mediate the cell-cell adhesion in the epithelial tissues [11]. On the other hand, the cytoplasmic tail forms a link with the actin cytoskeleton of the cells [12].

E-cadherin expression is ubiquitous in normal stratified squamous epithelium of the oral cavity and oropharynx. E-cadherin suppressed head and neck epithelial cancer cells escape from contact-dependent growth and develop migratory phenotype with low differentiation stage, suggesting that E-cadherin has the potential to contribute to the transformation steps. It has been hypothesized that the E-cadherin negative cells are dissociated at the invasive fronts at the late progressive stages of oral tongue cancer development resulting in the metastasis to the regional lymph nodes [13]. In the in vitro model, cell lines expressing E-cadherin will appear as cuboidal morphology in well-differentiated cell lines and formed cobblestone colonies. In poorly differentiated cell lines, the cells will be shown as spindle-shaped with weak or no E-cadherin expression [14].

E-cadherin expression level is associated with the behavior of the cancers cells in the animal models and usually accompanied with high invasion ability. Cell lines losing E-cadherin expression displayed an increase in the invasive capacity. The oral tongue cancer cell line treated with human monoclonal antibodies will form highly invasive clones [13]. Similar to the cell line models, E-cadherin expression in the primary oral tongue cancer tissue is correlated with the cancer grading and is an indicator of poor prognosis for oral tongue cancer patients [15]. Further, low E-cadherin expression is an indicator of late cervical lymph node metastasis and is a poor prognostic factor for the overall survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients [16, 17]. Accumulating data on clinical specimens provided mounting evidence for the use of E-cadherin as an independent risk factor for oral tongue cancer patients [17]. The loss of homophilic cell-cell adhesive property in the E-cadherin suppressed cells will lead to the development of invasive phenotype. If the loss is a consequence of epigenetic aberration, the acquired invasive phenotype could possibly be reversed with the use of epigenetic drugs [18].

3. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and E-Cadherin

Epithelial head and neck cancer cells could acquire the ability to migrate and invade the surrounding tissues. As the cells move into the lymphatic system, they could be detected in the regional lymph nodes via route of peripheral lymphovascular channels. This process is generally regarded as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) accompanied by the conversion of highly aggregated epithelial cells to migratory and invasive cells. In the EMT conversion, E-cadherin is suggested to be an important player due to its functions in homophilic interaction with the adjacent cells and the observation that its expression is frequently lost in epithelial cancers with the migratory phenotype [19]. Epithelial cells are anchorage-dependent cells in which the growth and survival are dependent on extracellular matrix adhesion. When the normal epithelial cell loses cellular contact with the ligands in the extracellular matrix, it will undergo a specific type of programmed cell death (i.e., anoikis) triggered by multiple protein kinases/phosphatase including phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) [20]. Epithelial cancer cell undergoing EMT will acquire a fibroblast-like morphology with a high motile phenotype [21]. Apart from physical alterations, E-cadherin could induce EMT by induction of transcription factor such as Twist [21]. Twist is usually associated with the advanced cancers and linked with the positive lymph node, lung metastasis, and poor survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients [22].

4. Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression

Epigenetic regulation refers to control of gene expression without the reliance on DNA sequence [23]. The most common form of epigenetic regulation includes changes in the CpG island methylation patterns in the promoter region via addition of an aberrant methyl group to the cytosine residue, remodeling of the chromatin structure via modifying the histone protein core, and control of the expression level with the negative transcription regulator, microRNA. In terms of the epigenetic control of E-cadherin expression in the head and neck cancers, the most frequently reported mechanism includes promoter DNA hypermethylation and overexpression of the target microRNA.

5. Epigenetic Control of E-Cadherin Expression by DNA Methylation

Germline and somatic mutation of E-cadherin gene has been found in diffuse-type gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lobular and invasive ductal breast cancer, endometrial ovarian cancer, and prostate cancers [12]. Although loss of E-cadherin expression is also common in head and neck cancer, especially in the metastatic tumors, genetic abbreviation in head and neck cancers is relatively rare. In contrast, the most common form of E-cadherin alterations in head and neck cancer is DNA methylation.

DNA methylation refers to the covalent addition of a methyl group to the cytosine residue in the CpG dinucleotide [24]. Methyl CpG dinucleotide in fact is distributed throughout the normal genome. In cancer, however, methyl CpG cluster (CpG islands) embedded in the regulatory regions of the tumor-related genes becomes methylated by the de novo DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). The dense methylation incidence in the CpG islands is referred to as DNA hypermethylation which will lead to transcriptional silencing of the associated genes [25, 26]. Methylated DNA sequence will allow the preferential binding of methylated DNA binding proteins (e.g., MeCP2 and MBD2) and histone deacetylases leading to the nucleosome remodeling and histone modification and thereby hindering the accessibility of the transcription machinery [23].

6. Promoter Hypermethylation of E-Cadherin

Promoter hypermethylation is a potential epigenetic mechanism to the E-cadherin gene due to the dense CpG dinucleotide density in the transcription regulatory region (Figure 1). In cancer cell lines which grew as monolayer, treatment of the E-cadherin methylated cell lines with demethylating agent such as 5-azacytidine can restore the transcription and reverse the invasive phenotype [18]. However, the reversion with demethylation is not effective in all cases suggesting that other mechanisms exist in silencing E-cadherin at transcription level in the head and neck cancer cells [27]. Methylation of 5′ promoter region of the E-cadherin is found to be an early event in oral cancer lesions [28]. The presence of E-cadherin methylation is independent of the invasive and metastatic potential of the cancer cells [29]. At first, methylated DNA is thought as a specific cancer marker as the de novo methylated sequence is found largely in the cancerous tissue. In addition, the methylated E-cadherin DNA is present in the peripheral blood and oral rinse of head and neck cancer patients leading to the suggestion of using it as an noninvasive diagnostic marker in head and neck cancer detection. This potential use has also been explored in the oral rinse collected from oral squamous cell carcinoma patients [30]. However, before moving to the clinical use, it should be considered that methylated E-cadherin could possibly be deposited in the noncancerous epithelia in the head and neck region. Using pyrosequencing, the existence of methylated E-cadherin DNA is demonstrated in both oral squamous cell carcinoma and normal tissues obtained from the resection margin of the same patients with no statistical difference [31].

7. E-Cadherin Hypermethylation Induced by Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

De novo methylation of E-cadherin DNA could be induced by external factors such as virus infection. HPV infection is particularly common in oropharyngeal carcinoma and is considered as an independent risk factor [32, 33]. HPV positive tumor demonstrated characteristic features in epidemiology, clinical behavior, and molecular presentation and is regarded as a distinctive entity in head and neck cancer management [34, 35]. In the context of DNA methylation patterns, head and neck cancer infected with HPV has distinctive methylation imprints in comparison with the HPV negative counterparts [36]. The corresponding methylation pattern mediated by HPV infection is sometime referred to as methylation signature or methylator phenotype of head and neck cancers, in which high frequency of E-cadherin DNA methylation is observed and supports the idea that HPV facilitates E-cadherin suppression via altering the methylated CpG imprinting [36].

8. Epigenetic Controls of Gene Expression with MicroRNA

MicroRNA is a group of highly conserved noncoding RNA molecules with size that usually ranged from 20 to 22 b.p. long [37]. It was first identified in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and is now recognized as a kind of epigenetic regulator in cell growth, proliferation, morphogenesis, tissue remodeling, and development. Precursor microRNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase II and modified by the RNase III-type nuclease, Dorsha, in the nucleus to form the primary microRNA. Primary microRNA will later be transported into the cytoplasm by Exportin-5 (a Ras-GTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein) and cleaved by Dicer (RNase complex) and TRBP [TAR (transactivation-responsive RNA of HIV-1) RNA-binding protein] to generate the mature microRNA. Mature microRNA functions as translation inhibitor by hindering the translation machinery or promoting the recruitment of Argonaute-containing RNA-induced silencing (RISC) complex after binding to the target mRNA via a partial/incomplete complementary binding. The matching between the seed sequence (2–7 b.p.) of the microRNA with the target mRNA sequence would suffice to initiate the regulation cascade by microRNA [38]. MicroRNA expression patterns are tissue-specific. Increasing evidence suggested that head and neck cancers have a distinctive microRNA expression pattern which account for the characteristic clinical features of head and neck cancers [39]. Theoretically, the microRNA profile is highly correlated with the gene expression patterns displayed by the head and neck cancer cells as microRNA could directly control the translation of their target mRNA transcripts leading to the reduction in protein expression [39].

9. Potential Linkage between E-Cadherin and MicroRNA Networks

In comparison with DNA methylation which modify the E-cadherin gene sequence directly, microRNAs regulated the expression of E-cadherin by targeting different transcription or transcription-associated factors linking with the transcriptional processes including NF-κB1, ZEB1, ZEB2, EP300, and PTTG1 (Figure 2).

9.1. MicroRNA-9

MicroRNA-9 expression is activated by the MYC/MYCN signaling cascade and triggers EMT by targeting E-cadherin mRNA [40]. In c-myc-induced mouse mammary tumors, a significant increase in microRNA-9 is observed [40]. MicroRNA-9 is classified as tumor suppressing microRNA, as reduction in microRNA-9 expression by DNA methylation is found in the oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinoma [41, 42]. Overexpressing microRNA-9 in the aggressive oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines suppresses the invasion ability [42]. The microRNA-9 contains the seed sequence targeting the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of NF-κB1 and therefore suppressed the function of E-cadherin repressor, Snail1 [43].

9.2. MicroRNA-10b

Distinct from other head and neck cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is consistently associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. EBV is found nearly in all the World Health Organization (WHO) type II and type III nasopharyngeal carcinomas. E-cadherin expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is controlled by Twist (a highly conserved transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix protein) via the Wnt signaling cascade [44]. Twist is involved in the invasion and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and is closely correlated with the regional lymph node status of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients [45]. The increase in Twist expression is induced by one of the viral oncoprotein, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in the cancer cells. Recently, it was noticed that Twist also controls E-cadherin by inducing microRNA-10b expression [46]. NPC cells overexpressing microRNA-10b demonstrated lower E-cadherin expression with higher mobility [47]. The migration inducing effects is demonstrated in the mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with microRNA-10b [48]. In addition, the viral protein LMP1 could also be a modulator of microRNA-10b in the nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells [49].

9.3. MicroRNA-31

Compared with the normal oral mucosa, high microRNA-31 expression is found in the oral potential malignant disorder (OPMAD) tissues suggesting that microRNA-31 is a candidate oncogenic microRNA involved in the early development of oral tongue cancers [50]. Ectopic expression of microRNA-31 could promote the growth and immortalization of the nontumorigenic oral keratinocytes [50]. In a three-dimensional organoid culture derived from colon carcinoma, increase in microRNA-31 expression is observed during EMT induced by transforming growth factor β, a proinvasion/metastasis inducer [51]. Treatment of the cancer cells with transforming growth factor β could induce E-cadherin redistribution from the cell surface to cytoplasm without affecting the expression level [51]. In oral mucosa, E-cadherin redistribution from membrane to the cytoplasm is observed during EMT [52].

9.4. MicroRNA-192

MicroRNA-192 is overexpressed in the supraglottic laryngeal cancer patients with cervical lymph node metastasis [53]. Overexpression of miR-192 in the proximal tubular cells could suppress the expression of both the 2 major E-cadherin suppressors: ZEB1 (TCF8/deltaEF1) and ZEB2 (SMAD-interacting protein 1 [SIP1]/ZFXH1B) [54]. They are E-box binding transcription factors associated with the EMT initiation in epithelial cells by repressing epithelial differentiation and cell-cell adhesion [55, 56]. The inverse correlation of ZEB1 with E-cadherin leads to the loss of intercellular adhesion. Further, it is suggested that ZEB1 is linked with the cancer cell dedifferentiation and cell polarity [55].

9.5. MicroRNA-200 Family

The microRNA-200 family consists of 5 members: microRNA-141, microRNA-200a, microRNA-200b, microRNA-200c, and microRNA-429. MicroRNA-200 family is associated with the invasive phenotype of multiple human cancers [57]. In oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma, expression of the microRNA-200 family members is controlled by DNA methylation. Activation of microRNA-200a, microRNA-200b, microRNA-429, and microRNA-200c is closely correlated with the global CpG methylation reduction. It is suggested that miR-200 family controls E-cadherin at transcription level by targeting the E-cadherin E-box repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2 [58, 59]. In the mouse model, microRNA-200c is a positive regulator of E-cadherin. MicroRNA-200c can induce E-cadherin expression [60]. Reversely, deletion of microRNA-200c results in E-cadherin downregulation [60]. Apart from the ZEB, microRNA-200 could also regulate E-cadherin expression by targeting the transcription coactivator of E-cadherin, EP300 [61, 62]. The E1A-associated cellular p300 is a positive E-cadherin regulator protein and functions by binding to the two p300 binding sites located within the E-cadherin regulatory sequence [63]. Of the 5 miR-200 family members, microRNA-200b and microRNA-200c are suggested to be the regulators of E-cadherin through targeting p300 transcripts in the cancer cells [61].

9.6. MicroRNA-205

MicroRNA-205 is expressed at a high level in normal tissue containing squamous epithelium [64]. In head and neck squamous carcinoma, high microRNA-205 is also observed, especially in case when positive lymph node is detected [64]. In contrast, in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, microRNA-205 is significantly downregulated in the primary cancer tissues and cell line [65]. MicroRNA-205 could target ZEB2 mRNA and hence repress E-cadherin expression in the cancer cells [66].

9.7. MicroRNA-655

Apart from microRNA-200 family, the E-cadherin suppressor ZEB1 is controlled by another EMT-related microRNA, microRNA-655. Reduction of microRNA-655 expression has recently been reported in the oral squamous cell carcinoma [67]. Overexpressing microRNA-655 could suppress the invasion and migration of the cancer cell lines together with the induction of E-cadherin expression [67]. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, microRNA-655 could inhibit tumor cells migration via targeting pituitary tumor-transforming gene-1 (PTTG1), an invasion and migration promoter. In breast cancer cells, PTGG1-overexpressing cells have spindle shape with reduction in E-cadherin expression [68]. In addition, expression levels of EMT markers (including N-cadherin and vimentin) were induced in the PTGG1-expressing cells.

Intratumoral hypoxia is a result from the poor vasculature formed in the rapid proliferating cancer leading to the development of a microenvironment with low oxygen environment. The abnormality in the tumor microvasculature will increase the diffusion distances leading to the disturbance of gas exchange. Consequently, the oxygen transport capacity of the blood in the tumor bulk will be reduced as the tumor grows [69]. With the deteriorating gas exchange condition, normal tissues will be subjected to cellular quiescence, differentiation, and apoptosis leading to the impairment of growth and development [70]. In order to survive, cancer cells must tolerate the oxygen-deprived environment by switching their gene expression patterns to adapt the anaerobic condition [71]. Tumor cells with the ability to survive and adapt under the adverse condition are selected through clonal expansion with aggravate aggressiveness and genomic changes [69, 70].

Under hypoxic condition, one hallmark feature of head and neck cancer is the increase in invasiveness with enhancement of EMT ability with altering E-cadherin expression patterns [72]. It is suggested that HIF-1 could regulate E-cadherin indirectly by controlling the expression of E-cadherin regulators [72, 73]. With our understanding of the microRNA regulatory mechanism, it is now recognized that this is achieved by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which modulates the microRNA production machinery subsequently in the cancer cells in response to the low-oxygen microenvironment. In view of the emerging role of microRNA in gene regulation, several groups suggested that the hypoxic condition or HIF-1 itself could function as a microRNA regulator in controlling specific microRNA expression under the adverse condition. For example, microRNA-210, a tumor suppressing microRNA in head and neck cancers, is suggested to be a responsive element to the hypoxic stress and the expression is controlled by HIF-1 [74]. As E-cadherin expression is also controlled by HIF-1 under hypoxic condition, it remains to be explored whether HIF-1 could also control E-cadherin by inducing specific microRNA expression. Recent data suggested that microRNA could be the upstream regulator of HIF-1. MicroRNA-31, for instance, can regulate HIF-1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by controlling its regulator factor-inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor (FIH) under normoxic condition [75]. Another example is the E1A-associated cellular p300 transcriptional coactivator (EP300). As mentioned above, the transcription coactivator EP300 (regulated by the miR-200 family) is an inducer of E-cadherin expression on the one hand. On the other hand, it is also a transcription activator of HIF-1A (hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha). This has led to the suggestion that the HIF-1A and microRNA-210 family are intimately linked and cooperated in controlling E-cadherin expression under hypoxic condition.

11. Conclusions

E-cadherin expression in the head and neck epithelium is essential for the morphogenesis and homeostasis of epithelial tissues. Reduced E-cadherin expression has been observed in head and neck cell lines, animal xenograft model, and primary tumor of head and neck cancer. Decreased E-cadherin expression in the primary tumor is linked with the invasiveness of the cancers cells. Low E-cadherin expression is associated with poor prognostic factor of overall survival and late cervical metastasis in head and neck cancer patients. E-cadherin is suggested to be an important player in EMT, a process in which epithelial head and neck cancer cells acquire the ability to migrate and invade the surrounding tissues. The expression of E-cadherin was under epigenetic controls: promoter hypermethylation and microRNA. Environmental perturbation such as hypoxic condition and HPV infection could also regulate the expression of E-cadherin via affecting hypoxia-related microRNA or promoter methylation. Various microRNAs regulated the expression of E-cadherin by targeting genes involved in the transcription process including NF-κB1, ZEB1, ZEB2, EP300, and PTTG1. In light of the regulatory network between microRNAs and E-cadherin, it is feasible to reintroduce the expression of E-cadherin via microRNA-based therapy aiming at controlling the regional and distant metastasis of head and neck cancers. A more comprehensive understanding of the regulatory mechanisms is required for the clinical use of microRNAs to modulate E-cadherin expression in the clinical settings.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. R. J. Black, F. Bray, J. Ferlay, and D. M. Parkin, “Cancer incidence and mortality in the European Union: cancer registry data and estimates of national incidence for 1990,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1075–1107, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Jaber, S. R. Porter, M. S. Gilthorpe, R. Bedi, and C. Scully, “Risk factors for oral epithelial dysplasia—the role of smoking and alcohol,” Oral Oncology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Rodriguez, A. Altieri, L. Chatenoud et al., “Risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer in young adults,” Oral Oncology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. K. Chen, R. V. Katz, and D. J. Krutchkoff, “Intraoral squamous cell carcinoma. Epidemiologic patterns in Connecticut from 1935 to 1985,” Cancer, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1288–1296, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. S. Muir and R. Kirk, “Betel, tobacco, and cancer of the mouth,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 14, pp. 597–608, 1960. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Spira, J. Beane, V. Shah et al., “Effects of cigarette smoke on the human airway epithelial cell transcriptome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 27, pp. 10143–10148, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. P. Slaughter, H. W. Southwick, and W. Smejkal, “Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin,” Cancer, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 963–968, 1953. View at: Google Scholar
  8. YH. Joo, SH. Hwang, DI. Sun, KJ. Cho, JO. Park, and MS. Kim, “Relationships between tumor volume and lymphatic metastasis and prognosis in early oral tongue cancer,” Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 243, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. Fukano, H. Matsuura, Y. Hasegawa, and S. Nakamura, “Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma,” Head and Neck, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 205–210, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Yong-Hong, H. Qiao-Ying, P. Yong-Feng, T. Qiu, and F. Zhen-Fu, “Effect of the number and ratio of positive lymph nodes in hypopharyngeal cancer,” Head & Neck, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. Gumbiner, B. Stevenson, and A. Grimaldi, “The role of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1575–1587, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. M. Hajra and E. R. Fearon, “Cadherin and catenin alterations in human cancer,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Kudo, S. Kitajima, I. Ogawa et al., “Invasion and metastasis of oral cancer cells require methylation of E-cadherin and/or degradation of membranous β-catenin,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 5455–5463, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Hoteiya, E. Hayashi, K. Satomura, N. Kamata, and M. Nagayama, “Expression of E-cadherin in oral cancer cell lines and its relationship to invasiveness in SCID mice in vivo,” Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 107–111, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Diniz-Freitas, T. Garcφa-Caballero, J. Ant·nez-L≤pez, JM. Gßndara-Rey, and A. Garcφa-Garcφa, “Reduced E-cadherin expression is an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Oral Oncol, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 190–200, Feb 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  16. G. Pannone, A. Santoro, A. Feola et al., “The role of E-cadherin down-regulation in oral cancer: Cdh1 gene expression and epigenetic blockage,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 115, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Lim, S. Zhang, G. Ishii et al., “Predictive markers for late cervical metastasis in stage I and II invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 1, part 1, pp. 166–172, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Yoshiura, Y. Kanai, A. Ochiai, Y. Shimoyama, T. Sugimura, and S. Hirohashi, “Silencing of the E-cadherin invasion-suppressor gene by CpG methylation in human carcinomas,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 16, pp. 7416–7419, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Ching-Wen, K. Shih-Han, and Y. Pan-Chyr, “The MiRNAs and epithelial- mesenchymal transition in cancers,” Current Pharmaceutical Design. View at: Google Scholar
  20. P. J. Reddig and R. L. Juliano, “Clinging to life: cell to matrix adhesion and cell survival,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 425–439, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. T. Onder, P. B. Gupta, S. A. Mani, J. Yang, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Weinberg, “Loss of E-cadherin promotes metastasis via multiple downstream transcriptional pathways,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 3645–3654, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. D. da Silva, M. A. Alaoui-Jamali, F. A. Soares et al., “TWIST1 is a molecular marker for a poor prognosis in oral cancer and represents a potential therapeutic target,” Cancer, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 352–362, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. A. Jones and S. B. Baylin, “The epigenomics of cancer,” Cell, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 683–692, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. M. Suzuki and A. Bird, “DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 465–476, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Hoffmann and W. A. Schulz, “Causes and consequences of DNA hypomethylation in human cancer,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 296–321, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Esteller and J. G. Herman, “Cancer as an epigenetic disease: DNA methylation and chromatin alterations in human tumours,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Y. Zhang, L. Mao, L. Li et al., “Promoter methylation as a common mechanism for inactivating E-cadherin in human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Díez-Pérez, J. Campo-Trapero, J. Cano-Sánchez et al., “Methylation in oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions (review),” Oncology Reports, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1203–1209, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. V. de Moraes, D. T. Oliveira, G. Landman et al., “E-cadherin abnormalities resulting from CPG methylation promoter in metastatic and nonmetastatic oral cancer,” Head and Neck, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Nagata, T. Hamada, N. Yamada et al., “Aberrant DNA methylation of tumor-related genes in oral rinse: a noninvasive method for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 118, no. 17, pp. 4298–4308, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. J. Shaw, T. Liloglou, S. N. Rogers et al., “Promoter methylation of P16, RARβ, E-cadherin, cyclin A1 and cytoglobin in oral cancer: quantitative evaluation using pyrosequencing,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 561–568, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. D'Souza, A. R. Kreimer, R. Viscidi et al., “Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 19, pp. 1944–1956, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. W. M. Mendenhall and H. L. C. Logan, “Human papillomavirus and head and neck cancer,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 535–539, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. L. Gillison, “Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancer is a distinct epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular entity,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 744–754, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. C. Hafkamp, J. J. Manni, A. Haesevoets et al., “Marked differences in survival rate between smokers and nonsmokers with HPV 16-associated tonsillar carcinomas,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 2656–2664, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Lechner, T. Fenton, J. West et al., “Identification and functional validation of HPV-mediated hypermethylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Genome Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, article 15, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. Ambros, “The functions of animal microRNAs,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7006, pp. 350–355, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. W. Filipowicz, S. N. Bhattacharyya, and N. Sonenberg, “Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight?” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Dalmay and D. R. Edwards, “MicroRNAs and the hallmarks of cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 46, pp. 6170–6175, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Ma, J. Young, H. Prabhala et al., “MiR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 247–256, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Minor, X. Wang, F. Zhang et al., “Methylation of microRNA-9 is a specific and sensitive biomarker for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas,” Oral Oncology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Yu, K. Liu, Y. Wu et al., “MicroRNA-9 inhibits the proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by suppressing expression of CXCR4 via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway,” Oncogene, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  43. S. Liu, S. M. Kumar, H. Lu et al., “MicroRNA-9 up-regulates E-cadherin through inhibition of NF-κB1-Snail1 pathway in melanoma,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. R. Howe, O. Watanabe, J. Leonard, and A. M. C. Brown, “Twist is up-regulated in response to Wnt1 and inhibits mouse mammary cell differentiation,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1906–1913, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  45. T. Horikawa, J. Yang, S. Kondo et al., “Twist and epithelial-mesenchymal transition are induced by the EBV oncoprotein latent membrane protein 1 and are associated with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1970–1978, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X. Li, F. Xu, C. Chang et al., “Transcriptional regulation of miR-10a/b by TWIST-1 in myelodysplastic syndromes,” Haematologica, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 414–419, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. J. Sun, H. Liu, P. Zhang, X. D. Zhang, Z. W. Jiang, and C. C. Jiang, “miR-10b promotes migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 5535–5537, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  48. F. Zhang, S. Jing, T. Ren, and J. Lin, “MicroRNA-10b promotes the migration of mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and downregulates the expression of E-cadherin,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1084–1088, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. G. Li, Z. Wu, Y. Peng et al., “MicroRNA-10b induced by Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein-1 promotes the metastasis of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. S. Hung, H. F. Tu, S. Y. Kao et al., “miR-31 is upregulated in oral premalignant epithelium and contributes to the immortalization of normal oral keratinocytes,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1162–1171, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. L. Cottonham, S. Kaneko, and L. Xu, “miR-21 and miR-31 converge on TIAM1 to regulate migration and invasion of colon carcinoma cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 46, pp. 35293–35302, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. K. Das, A. Anura, M. Pal et al., “Epithelio-mesenchymal transitional attributes in oral sub-mucous fibrosis,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 259–269, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  53. J. Tai, X. Xiao, Z. G. Huang et al., “MicroRNAs regulate epithelial- mesenchymal transition of supraglottic laryngeal cancer,” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 499–503, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  54. A. Krupa, R. Jenkins, D. D. Luo, A. Lewis, A. Phillips, and D. Fraser, “Loss of microRNA-192 promotes fibrogenesis in diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 438–447, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. Aigner, B. Dampier, L. Descovich et al., “The transcription factor ZEB1 (δEF1) promotes tumour cell dedifferentiation by repressing master regulators of epithelial polarity,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 49, pp. 6979–6988, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Vandewalle, J. Comijn, B. de Craene et al., “SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 20, pp. 6566–6578, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Brabletz, K. Bajdak, S. Meidhof et al., “The ZEB1/miR-200 feedback loop controls Notch signalling in cancer cells,” EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 770–782, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. P. A. Gregory, A. G. Bert, E. L. Paterson et al., “The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 593–601, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Park, A. B. Gaur, E. Lengyel, and M. E. Peter, “The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2,” Genes and Development, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 894–907, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. Cao, A. Jheon, X. Li et al., “The Pitx2:miR-200c/141: noggin pathway regulates Bmp signaling and ameloblast differentiation,” Development, vol. 140, no. 16, pp. 3348–3359, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. T. Mees, W. A. Mardin, C. Wendel et al., “EP300—A miRNA-regulated metastasis suppressor gene in ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. Zhou, Y. Hu, M. Yang et al., “The miR-106b~25 cluster promotes bypass of doxorubicin-induced senescence and increase in motility and invasion by targeting the E-cadherin transcriptional activator EP300,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 462–474, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  63. Y. N. Liu, W. W. Lee, C. Y. Wang, T. H. Chao, Y. Chen, and J. H. Chen, “Regulatory mechanisms controlling human E-cadherin gene expression,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 56, pp. 8277–8290, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. M. Fletcher, A. C. Heaford, and D. K. Trask, “Detection of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using the relative expression of tissue-specific mir-205,” Translational Oncology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 202–208, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. Tian, J. Zhang, J. Ge et al., “MicroRNA-205 suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma,” Medical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 1, article 785, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  66. S. Liu, M. T. Tetzlaff, A. Liu, B. Liegl-Atzwanger, J. Guo, and X. Xu, “Loss of microRNA-205 expression is associated with melanoma progression,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1084–1096, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Harazono, T. Muramatsu, H. Endo et al., “miR-655 Is an EMT-suppressive microRNA targeting ZEB1 and TGFBR2,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e62757, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. Yoon, M. Kim, H. Lee et al., “PTTG1 oncogene promotes tumor malignancy via epithelial to mesenchymal transition and expansion of cancer stem cell population,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 23, pp. 19516–19527, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. Vaupel, D. K. Kelleher, and M. Höckel, “Oxygenation status of malignant tumors: pathogenesis of hypoxia and significance for tumor therapy,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, supplement 8, pp. 29–35, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Höckel and P. Vaupel, “Biological consequences of tumor hypoxia,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, supplement 8, pp. 36–41, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  71. W. Zeng, P. Liu, W. Pan, S. R. Singh, and Y. Wei, “Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factors in tumor metabolism,” Cancer Letters, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. Krishnamachary, D. Zagzag, H. Nagasawa et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent repression of E-cadherin in von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-null renal cell carcinoma mediated by TCF3, ZFHX1A, and ZFHX1B,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2725–2731, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. Zhang, Q. Cheng, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, and X. Chen, “Slug is a key mediator of hypoxia induced cadherin switch in HNSCC: correlations with poor prognosis,” Oral Oncology, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1043–1050, Nov 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  74. X. Huang, L. Ding, K. L. Bennewith et al., “Hypoxia-inducible mir-210 regulates normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 856–867, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. J. Liu, M. M. Tsai, P. S. Hung et al., “miR-31 ablates expression of the HIF regulatory factor FIH to activate the HIF pathway in head and neck carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1635–1644, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Thian-Sze Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1352 Views | 559 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.