BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 162754 | 6 pages |

Association between Severe Upper Limb Spasticity and Brain Lesion Location in Stroke Patients

Academic Editor: Lucio Marinelli
Received10 Apr 2014
Revised12 May 2014
Accepted12 May 2014
Published25 May 2014


Association between the site of brain injury and poststroke spasticity is poorly understood. The present study investigated whether lesion analysis could document brain regions associated with the development of severe upper limb poststroke spasticity. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 39 chronic stroke patients. Spasticity was assessed at the affected upper limb with the modified Ashworth scale (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers). Brain lesions were traced from magnetic resonance imaging performed within the first 7 days after stroke and region of interest images were generated. The association between severe upper limb spasticity (modified Ashworth scale ≥2) and lesion location was determined with the voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping method implemented in MRIcro software. Colored maps representing the statistics were generated and overlaid onto the automated anatomical labeling and the Johns Hopkins University white matter templates provided with MRIcron. Thalamic nuclei were identified with the Talairach Daemon software. Injuries to the insula, the thalamus, the basal ganglia, and white matter tracts (internal capsule, corona radiata, external capsule, and superior longitudinal fasciculus) were significantly associated with severe upper limb poststroke spasticity. Further advances in our understanding of the neural correlates of spasticity may lead to early targeted rehabilitation when key regions are damaged.

1. Introduction

Spasticity is characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone with exaggerated tendon jerks, resulting from hyperexcitability of the stretch reflex [1]. It affects neuromotor function after a lesion in the corticospinal [2] and accompanying parapyramidal (corticoreticulospinal) pathways [2].

Poststroke spasticity (PSS) has a prevalence ranging from 4–27% in the early phase of illness (1–4 weeks after stroke) to 17–43% in the chronic one (>3 months) (no clear difference between the upper and lower limbs, but a frequently higher severity in the former) [2, 3]. Severe PSS [3] carries a heavy burden, as it is associated with pain, decreased quality of life, higher impairment, and disability [4].

Low Barthel Index (BI) score [5], marked paresis [36], poststroke pain [6], and sensory deficits [3] were reported to relate to the presence and severity of PSS [2], but the heterogeneous measures of spasticity and the variable findings from previous studies limit their strength as early predictors. Stroke location was consistently reported to play a role in upper limb motor recovery [7], but its association with upper limb PSS is unclear.

Elucidating this point could enhance our understanding of the neural circuitry involved in spasticity and help prioritizing prevention or early treatment in patients at high risk for developing PSS. Thus, the aim of the current investigation was to determine the association between stroke lesion location and severe upper limb PPS using brain voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) procedures [8].

2. Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, we recruited 116 adults, who consecutively were referred to the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona (January 2011–December 2012) for the evaluation of a recent stroke.

Inclusion criteria are as follows: first-ever unilateral ischemic stroke occurred 3–6 months earlier and high resolution 1.5 T anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed within the first 7 days after stroke with T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences available. Exclusion criteria are as follows: previous stroke, other neurological disorders or musculoskeletal conditions that might bias spasticity evaluation, and previous or current treatment with antispastic drugs or therapies (e.g., botulinum toxin, phenol block) that might influence spasticity. Patients were treated according to the current stroke rehabilitation guidelines [9].

All patients gave their written consent for participation in the study. The protocol was carried out according to the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences of Verona University.

2.1. Muscle Tone Assessment

Spasticity was assessed with the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) [3, 10], which is a 6-point scale grading the resistance of a relaxed limb to rapid passive stretch (0: no increase in muscle tone; 1: slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+: slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of motion; 2: more marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion; 3: considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficulty; and 4: affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). Spasticity evaluation at the affected arm included passive flexion and extension movements of several joints with the patient in a sitting position. We tested arm abductors/adductors, elbow flexors/extensors, wrist flexors/extensors, and finger flexors.

Patients were divided into those with (SP+) and those without (SP–) PSS, which was defined as MAS ≥ 2 for any of the tested movements [3].

2.2. Lesion Tracing

Lesions were visually identified as having altered FLAIR and DWI signal intensity compared to corresponding contralateral tissue. DWI sequences were used when MRI was performed within the first 48 h after stroke and FLAIR sequences when MRI was performed between 48 h and 7 days after stroke [11]. Lesion tracing was carried out using the ch2bet anatomical brain template provided with the MRIcro software ( and region of interest (ROI) images were generated [8]. Furthermore, ROI images of each patient were converted into volume of interest (VOI) images using MRIcron software ( All lesions were traced by a trained image analyst and confirmed by an experienced clinical neurologist, who was blind to all clinical data, except for the side of hemiparesis.

Since the proportion of right and left hemisphere lesions was not significantly different between the SP+ and SP− groups, and to improve the power of the lesion overlays analysis, ROI images were transformed to the right hemisphere [12]. We felt confident that this procedure would not affect our results because previous studies suggested that lesion laterality does not significantly influence PSS [3, 13, 14].

2.3. Lesion and Statistical Analysis

Association between severe upper limb PSS and VOI images was analyzed with the VLSM methods implemented in the nonparametric mapping (NPM) software included into the MRIcron software [8].

For statistical purposes, we considered severe PSS as a binary variable (absent/present) according to a binary images/binary behaviour design [8]. Voxels damaged in less than 2% of patients were ignored. The nonparametric Liebermeister statistical analysis for binary data was used [8]. The level of significance was and corrected for multiple comparisons with the false discovery rate (FDR) threshold (permutation thresholding was reported to be less sensitive than FDR and consequently was not performed) [15].

Colored VLSM maps representing the statistics were generated and overlaid onto the automated anatomical labeling (AAL) and the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) white matter templates provided with MRIcron software [8]. Since MRIcron software does not provide information on thalamic divisions, the Talairach Daemon software ( was used for the overlaid analysis of thalamic nuclei [16].

Pearson’s chi-squared test with Yates’ continuity correction was used for frequencies, Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables, and Spearman rho for correlations for the analysis of patients’ demographic clinical characteristics ().

3. Results

Thirty-nine patients (24 males, 15 females; mean age 72.7 years) were included (Figure 1). Among the demographic (age, sex) and clinical characteristics (mean time from stroke: 4.5 months; side of stroke: 21 left, 18 right; and location of stroke: cortical 8, subcortical 12, and mixed 19), only stroke severity was significantly greater in the SP+ group (European Stroke Scale: SP+: , SP−: , ; Table 1). Overlay of lesions for all patients is shown in Figure 2.

PatientAgeSexTime from stroke (mos) Stroke sideStroke locationESS scoreLesion voxels ( )

1, SP−65M3LSubcortical8390067
2, SP−75F4RSubcortical80898
3, SP−80F5LSubcortical941584
4, SP−75F6LSubcortical9211377
5, SP−67F3RMixed814264
6, SP−78M4RCortical888171
7, SP−83M5LMixed813561
8, SP−76F4LSubcortical974829
9, SP−67M6LSubcortical813558
10, SP−59M3RMixed882455
11, SP−63F4RMixed8044832
12, SP−83M5RCortical1004264
13, SP−68M6LMixed836299
14, SP−76M4RSubcortical842265
15, SP−73M3LSubcortical9644575
16, SP−80F4RMixed902544
17, SP−69M6LCortical701626
18, SP−75M6LMixed963985
19, SP−66M5LSubcortical854829
20, SP−64M5LCortical1008171
21, SP−77F6RMixed783561
22, SP−85F4RCortical100130059
23, SP−56M3RMixed1003177
24, SP−60F4LMixed100210
25, SP+78F3RCortical5313645
26, SP+66F6LMixed50290752
27, SP+72M4LSubcortical64110211
28, SP+75M4RCortical6273818
29, SP+69M3LMixed6160229
30, SP+67M3LMixed5833799
31, SP+73M4RMixed513050
32, SP+74M6RCortical613251
33, SP+78F5LMixed58145595
34, SP+79F5LMixed3089151
35, SP+66F6LSubcortical6460102
36, SP+84M6LSubcortical5326852
37, SP+76M3RMixed3417465
38, SP+80M4RMixed3010276
39, SP+78M5RMixed4518057

SP−: patient without severe spasticity; SP+: patient with severe spasticity; M: male; F: female; R: right; L: left; ESS: European Stroke Scale.

The number of MRI voxels involved by the stroke lesion was significantly larger in the SP+ (, median 33799) than in the SP− group (, median 4124.5, ; Table 1). The lesion overlay of SP+ patients and the VLSM revealed cerebral areas that were significantly associated with severe PSS (Figure 3, Table 2).

Region LB z max voxels

Anterior limb of internal capsule212203.64310
Posterior limb of internal capsule26−25173.827136
Retrolenticular part of internal capsule23−2543.467174
Anterior corona radiate2123−13.643149
Superior corona radiate29−6194.188226
Posterior corona radiate26−25193.827184
External capsule284133.827159
Superior longitudinal fasciculus30−5214.188133

For each region, the Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates of the centre of mass are provided along with the maximum Liebermeister (LB) z statistic in each cluster and the number ( ) of clustering voxels that survived the threshold of , false discovery rate corrected.

Grey matter areas included the insula, the basal ganglia (caudate, putamen, and pallidum), and the thalamus. White matter tracts included the anterior and the posterior limb, the retrolenticular part of the internal capsule, the anterior, superior, and posterior corona radiate, the external capsule, and the superior longitudinal fasciculus. The thalamic areas significantly correlated with severe PSS corresponded to the ventral posterior lateral nucleus in the Talairach atlas (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

The current study explored the anatomy underlying the development of spasticity after stroke and documented that damage to the insula, the thalamus, the basal ganglia, and many white matter tracts (internal capsule, corona radiata, external capsule, and superior longitudinal fasciculus) is associated with severe upper limb PSS.

We used a bottom-up lesion analysis, where patients were grouped according to the presence of severe upper limb PSS rather than lesion location. Our approach reduced the chance of overlooking structures outside arbitrarily predefined ROIs [7] and identified the critical areas with 1 mm resolution. It also overcame inaccuracies and uncertainties of previous anatomical studies, which defined lesion locations very broadly by categorizing them as cortical versus subcortical, or by computerized tomography scan instead of MRI [17].

Damage to corona radiata and internal capsule was previously found to predict motor recovery after stroke, while pure cortical lesions did not [7]. In keeping with previous data, we did not find a correlation between severe PSS and cortical strokes. Shared pathophysiological mechanisms between spasticity and paresis explain why marked paresis [36] is a good clinical predictor of severe PSS. Our findings however indicate that severe PSS behaves differently from paresis, in that the latter was found to correlate with the damage of the posterior limb of the internal capsule [7], while we found the former to be associated with lesions to different components of the internal capsule and corona radiata. We may speculate that the involvement of more primitive rubrospinal, reticulospinal, and vestibulospinal motor control systems [7] may have contributed to severe PSS in our patients.

This is the first report of a correlation between stroke in the basal ganglia as well as in the external capsule and severe PSS. The basal ganglia play a central role in motor control. In that, they have bidirectional connections with the primary motor cortex, premotor, and supplementary motor areas through basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits. Damage to the basal ganglia might contribute to the spastic dystonia component, which is common in patients with severe PSS. At variance, the role of the external capsule is difficult to explain on pathophysiological grounds, in that it contains fibres not belonging to the motor system. An explanation for our finding is that these subcortical structures (basal ganglia, external capsule) turned out to be significantly associated with severe PSS because they share the same vascular supply with the internal capsule through the lenticulostriate branches of the middle cerebral artery. Their role in the pathogenesis of severe PSS should be better explored in future studies.

The ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus and the insula turned out to be significantly associated with severe PSS. This is the first report of the role of the ventral posterior lateral nucleus and the insula in PSS, but our findings are in keeping with the association between PSS and sensory deficits [3] and poststroke pain [6], both of which are common after stroke involving these areas. They are also in accordance with the view that pain may worsen spasticity [2].

The superior longitudinal fasciculus is the major dorsally located fibre pathway linking parietal and frontal cortices [11]. This fasciculus has never been found to be associated with PSS, but its role in spasticity is suggested by diffusion tensor imaging evidence of its alteration in the spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay, a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder [18].

Taken together, our data show a positive correlation between severe PSS development and the degree of destruction or disorganization of the central sensorimotor system [2]. This finding is in keeping with the significantly larger number of lesioned voxels in the SP+ group and with previous reports showing that BI may predict PSS [5].

Limitations of our study are the small sample size, the absence of correlation between clinical and MRI data, and the use of a single subjective measure of spasticity. Furthermore, the study design might have resulted in the exclusion of patients with minor and less severe strokes (who usually are not referred for neurorehabilitation consultancy), those with most severe strokes (who die before 3–6 months after stroke), or older ones (in these patients computed tomography scan is usually performed instead of MRI). However, the patients’ population included in the present study (intermediate stroke severity) is the one where the prediction of PSS is clinically more difficult and has more rehabilitative implications. Finally, lesions were drawn on DWI for some subjects and FLAIR for others because of the different timing of MRI and the original brain scans were of lower resolution than the high resolution T1 scans used in studies in chronic stroke. However, the study was aimed at exploring whether MRI early after stroke may help to predict PSS and, in this phase, the extent of stroke cannot be reliably measured in T1 scans.

5. Conclusions

Our results have clinical implications, in the fact that they may help early identification of those patients who carry a higher risk of developing spasticity and may particularly benefit from preventive and therapeutic strategies. Future prospective larger studies including further clinical measures are needed to strengthen our data and better explore predictors of PSS that may lead to early targeted rehabilitation when key regions are damaged.

Conflict of Interests

The authors received no financial support for the research or authorship of this paper. No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this paper has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

Authors’ Contribution

Alessandro Picelli and Stefano Tamburin contributed equally to the paper.


The authors would like to thank Francesca Magrinelli for her helpful comments on the paper.


  1. J. W. Lance, “The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg lecture,” Neurology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1303–1313, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. Wissel, A. Manack, and M. Brainin, “Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity,” Neurology, vol. 80, no. 3, supplement 2, pp. S13–S19, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. P. Urban, T. Wolf, M. Uebele et al., “Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2016–2020, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Wissel, L. D. Schelosky, J. Scott, W. Christe, J. H. Faiss, and J. Mueller, “Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 257, no. 7, pp. 1067–1072, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. J. Leathley, J. M. Gregson, A. P. Moore, T. L. Smith, A. K. Sharma, and C. L. Watkins, “Predicting spasticity after stroke in those surviving to 12 months,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 438–443, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Lundström, A. Smits, A. Terént, and J. Borg, “Time-course and determinants of spasticity during the first six months following first-ever stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 296–301, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. N. Shelton and M. J. Reding, “Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke,” Stroke, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. Rorden, H.-O. Karnath, and L. Bonilha, “Improving lesion-symptom mapping,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1081–1088, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. W. Duncan, R. Zorowitz, B. Bates et al., “Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. e100–e143, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. W. Bohannon and M. B. Smith, “Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity,” Physical Therapy, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 206–207, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  11. H.-O. Karnath, J. Rennig, L. Johannsen, and C. Rorden, “The anatomy underlying acute versus chronic spatial neglect: a longitudinal study,” Brain, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 903–912, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. D. Alexander, S. E. Black, K. K. Patterson, F. Gao, C. J. Danells, and W. E. Mcllroy, “Association between gait asymmetry and brain lesion location in stroke patients,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 537–544, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. K. Sommerfeld, E. Eek, A.-K. Svensson, L. W. Holmqvist, and M. H. von Arbin, “Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 134–139, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Lundström, A. Terént, and J. Borg, “Prevalence of disabling spasticity 1 year after first-ever stroke,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 533–539, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Nichols and S. Hayasaka, “Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 419–446, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. L. Lancaster, M. G. Woldorff, L. M. Parsons et al., “Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 120–131, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. K. Y. Haaland, D. L. Harrington, and R. T. Knight, “Neural representations of skilled movement,” Brain, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 2306–2313, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. E. Prodi, M. Grisoli, M. Panzeri et al., “Supratentorial and pontine MRI abnormalities characterize recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay. A comprehensive study of an Italian series,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 138–146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Alessandro Picelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2446 Views | 917 Downloads | 23 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder