Metadherin, p50, and p65 Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Neoplasms: An Immunohistochemical Study

Giopanou, Ioanna; Bravou, Vasiliki; Papanastasopoulos, Panagiotis; Lilis, Ioannis; Aroukatos, Panagiotis; Papachristou, Dionysios; Kounelis, Sophia; Papadaki, Helen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/178410

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 178410 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/178410

Metadherin, p50, and p65 Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Neoplasms: An Immunohistochemical Study

Ioanna Giopanou,¹Vasiliki Bravou,¹Panagiotis Papanastasopoulos,²Ioannis Lilis,¹Panagiotis Aroukatos,³Dionysios Papachristou,¹Sophia Kounelis,⁴and Helen Papadaki¹

Academic Editor: Alfredo Conti

Received23 Feb 2014

Revised08 May 2014

Accepted10 May 2014

Published22 May 2014

Abstract

NF-κB signaling promotes cancer progression in a large number of malignancies. Metadherin, a coactivator of the NF-κB transcription complex, was recently identified to regulate different signaling pathways that are closely related to cancer. We assessed the immunohistochemical expression of p50, p65, and metadherin in 30 ovarian carcinomas, 15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 31 benign ovarian cystadenomas. Ovarian carcinomas exhibited significantly higher expression of all 3 markers compared to benign ovarian tumours. Borderline ovarian tumours demonstrated significantly higher expression for all 3 markers compared to benign cystadenomas. Ovarian carcinomas demonstrated significantly higher expression of p50 and metadherin compared to borderline ovarian tumours, whereas no significant difference was noted in p65 expression between ovarian carcinomas and borderline ovarian tumours. There was a strong correlation with the expression levels of p50, p65, and metadherin, whereas no correlation was observed with either grade or stage. Strong p50, p65, and metadherin expression was associated with a high probability to distinguish ovarian carcinomas over borderline and benign ovarian tumours, as well as borderline ovarian tumours over benign ovarian neoplasms. A gradual increase in the expression of these molecules is noted when moving across the spectrum of ovarian carcinogenesis, from borderline ovarian tumours to epithelial carcinomas.

1. Introduction

The estimated number of new ovarian cancer cases in Europe in 2012 was 65538 with 42704 deaths [1]. Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common type of cancer in women and the fourth most common cause of cancer death in women. The majority of cases of ovarian cancer are of epithelial origin (>90%). Invasive serous carcinomas are the most common histological type accounting for up to 80% of advanced ovarian cancers. Borderline tumours comprise about 10%–15% of ovarian tumours and do not fit into the category of benign or malignant.

The NF-κB family of transcription factors is expressed in many tissue types and has been studied extensively in lymphoid development and lymphoid malignancies. Constitutive NF-κB signaling also has been identified in tumors of epithelial origin including breast, colon, lung, and ovarian carcinomas [2]. The NF-κB transcription factor family consists of five subunits (p50, p52, p65, c-Rel, and RelB) that join into active dimers. Homo- or heterodimers form the active transcription factor complex, which is retained in the cytoplasm by Inhibitors of NF-κB (I-κBs). The transcription factors are released once I-κBs are phosphorylated by I-κB kinases (IKKs) upon activation by upstream stimuli. There has been previous evidence of NF-kB proteins overexpression in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian carcinomas, where a significant association of p50 with poor overall survival was found [3]. Similarly, Guo et al. demonstrated that the expression of NF-κB p65 in epithelial ovarian carcinomas is mainly nuclear and that the levels correlate with poor differentiation and late FIGO stage, whereas patients who were positive for NF-κB p65 subunit had inferior survival [4]. Finally, a recent study identified the network of genes controlled by the IKKβ-NF-κB pathway in one ovarian carcinoma line; using the highly specific IKKβ small-molecule inhibitor ML120b or IKKβ siRNA to decrease IKKβ expression, gene expression microarray results revealed that the IKKβ-NF-κB pathway controls genes were associated with ovarian carcinoma cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion, angiogenesis, and the creation of a proinflammatory microenvironment [5]. A comprehensive review on the role of NF-κB pathway on epithelial ovarian cancers can be found in reference [6].

AEG-1/MTDH (astrocyte elevated gene-1 or metadherin or lyric), originally identified as a neuropathology-associated gene in primary human fetal astrocytes [7], is now established as an oncogene in a variety of cancers, including lung [8], breast [9], diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [10], hepatocellular carcinoma [11], squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [12], renal cell carcinoma [13], neuroblastoma [14], prostate cancer [15], glioma [16], colorectal cancer [17], and gastric cancer [18]. Human AEG-1/MTDH gene is located in chromosome 8q22 having 12 exons/11 introns. AEG-1/MTDH is a single-pass transmembrane protein which regulates different signaling pathways that are closely related to cancer, such as nuclear factor-kappaB, Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, and AP-1 [19]. NF-κB signal pathway significantly contributes to AEG-1/MTDH-mediated oncogenic events and AEG-1/MTDH activates NF-κB by directly interacting with the p65 subunit of NF-κB, as previously shown [20, 21]. Although AEG-1/MTDH does not directly bind to DNA, it interacts with NF-κB as well as with the transcription coactivator- (CREB-) binding protein, and AEG-1/MTDH functions as a bridging factor between NF-κB and CBP bringing them together to the basal transcription machinery [21].

In this study we aim to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of p50 and p65 subunits of NF-κB, as well as the expression of AEG-1/MTDH in epithelial ovarian tumors: benign, borderline, and malignant, in order to further clarify their role in the pathophysiology of epithelial ovarian cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tissue Samples

Seventy-six ovarian neoplasms were included in our study; paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were retrieved from archival material from the Departments of Pathology of General Hospital “Agios Andreas,” Patras, Greece, and General Hospital “Elena Venizelou,” Athens, Greece. The neoplasms included 30 epithelial ovarian carcinomas, 15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 31 ovarian cystadenomas. Patients were all Caucasian and their age ranged from 12 to 81 years old, with a median age of 49. Amongst the 30 cases of carcinoma, 19 were histologically grade 3, 8 were grade 2, and 3 were grade 1. Seventeen presented with stage III disease, 6 with stage II, and 7 with stage I. All 15 borderline ovarian tumours were stage I as per FIGO, 2009 (Table 1).

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

Representative tumour tissue blocks were used for immunohistochemistry; 4 μm thick paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. For all the antibodies used, tissue sections were subjected to heat-induced epitope antigen retrieval in 0.1 M sodium citrate using an electric microwave οven. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with a 3% H₂O₂ solution. Protein blocking was performed with 2% bovine-serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-p50 (sc-114, 1/50, rabbit polyclonal IgG, SANTACRUZ BIOTECHNOLOGY), anti-p65 (sc-8008, 1/200, mouse monoclonal IgG, SANTACRUZ BIOTECHNOLOGY), and anti-AEG-1/MTDH (HPA015104, 1/70, rabbit polyclonal, ATLAS ANTIBODIES), overnight at 4°C. Detection of bound primary antibodies was performed using the Chem Mate TM Dako En Vision TM Detection system, Peroxidase/DAB, Rabbit Mouse (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, diaminobenzidine was used as a colour substrate and Harris’s hematoxylin as counterstain. Appropriate positive controls (lymph nodes for p50 and p65 and small bowel for AEG-1/MTDH) were used for each antibody. For negative controls, the primary antibody was omitted. Sections from adjacent to tumour normal ovarian tissue were also stained for AEG-1/MTDH, p50, and p65 for each case included.

Immunoreactivity was scored by two pathologists and one investigator blindly to each case. The intensity of immunostaining and the distribution in the cellular population were combined in the following scoring system: 0: <10% of cells positive, 1: weak intensity in 10%–35% of cells, 2: moderate intensity in 35%–70% of cells, and 3: strong intensity in >70% of cells. Pictures were taken using the Nikon Eclipse 80i photon microscope and the Nikon DXM 1200c camera with ACT-1C software (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The significance of differences in the expression of p50, p65, and AEG-1/MTDH (ordinal variables) between malignant, borderline, and benign epithelial ovarian neoplasms was tested using the nonparametric Mann Whitney U-test. Correlations between expression of proteins (immunoreactivity scores) were investigated using the Kendall Tau test. We used the binary logistic regression model to investigate the predictive value of p50, p65, and MTDH expression levels with regard to the malignant potential of epithelial ovarian tumours (dependent variable: malignant versus borderline, malignant versus benign, and borderline versus malignant). The significance level was defined as . Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS for Windows, release 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

3. Results

Forty-six out of our total 76 cases demonstrated high nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of AEG-1/MTDH, amongst which 30/30 carcinomas, 14/15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 1/31 benign tumours. There was no AEG-1/MTDH expression noted in normal ovarian tissue, 30/31 benign cystadenomas and 1 borderline ovarian tumour (Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), and 1(d)). Ovarian carcinomas expressed statistically significant higher levels of AEG-1/MTDH protein compared to benign tumours, and borderline ovarian tumours (Mann Whitney U-test, ). Borderline ovarian tumours demonstrated statistically significant higher expression of AEG-1/MTDH compared to the benign cystadenomas (Mann Whitney U-test, , Table 2). There was no statistically significant correlation of AEG-1/MTDH expression with clinicopathological parameters (stage and grade).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Forty-six out of our total 76 cases demonstrated high nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of p50, amongst which 30/30 carcinomas, 13/15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 3/31 benign cystadenomas. No p50 staining was observed in adjacent normal ovarian epithelium, 2/15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 28/31 benign cystadenomas (Figures 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)). Ovarian carcinomas expressed statistically significant higher levels of p50 protein compared to borderline tumours (Mann Whitney U-test, ), and benign cystadenomas (Mann Whitney U-test, ). Borderline ovarian tumours demonstrated statistically significant higher expression of p50 compared to the benign cystadenomas (Mann Whitney U-test, , Table 2). There was no statistically significant correlation of p50 expression with clinicopathological parameters of ovarian carcinomas (stage and grade).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Forty-seven out of our total 76 cases demonstrated high, nuclear, and cytoplasmic (primarily), expression of p65, amongst which 30/30 carcinomas, 14/15 borderline ovarian tumours, and 3/31 benign tumours. There was no p65 expression noted in normal ovarian tissue, 28/31 benign cystadenomas, and 1/15 borderline ovarian tumours (Figures 3(a), 3(b), 3(c), and 3(d)). Ovarian carcinomas expressed statistically significant higher levels of p65 protein compared to benign tumours (Mann Whitney U-test, ). Borderline ovarian tumours demonstrated statistically significant higher expression of p65 compared to the benign cystadenomas (Mann Whitney U-test, ). However, there was no difference in p65 expression level between ovarian carcinomas and borderline ovarian tumours (Mann Whitney U-test, , Table 2). There was no statistically significant correlation of p65 expression with clinicopathological parameters (stage and grade).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Furthermore, there was a strong statistically significant correlation between AEG-1/MTDH, p50, and p65 expression levels in the 76 cases studied (Kendall Tau test, ).

Finally, we used the binary logistic regression model to investigate the predictive value of p50, p65, and AEG-1/MTDH expression levels in the diagnosis of ovarian carcinomas. High AEG-1/MTDH expression was associated with a 98.4% probability of accurately distinguishing ovarian carcinomas from nonmalignant tumours. Similarly, strong expression of p50 and p65 was associated with a probability of accurate distinction of malignant epithelial ovarian tumours from nonmalignant tumours of 95.1% and 96.7%, respectively. Furthermore, high AEG-1/MTDH expression could distinguish borderline from benign ovarian tumours with an associated probability of 95.6%, whereas high p50 and p65 expression was associated with a probability of 89.1% and 91.3%, respectively. Finally, high AEG-1/MTDH expression was associated with a probability of 68.9% to accurately distinguish malignant from borderline ovarian tumours, whereas the respective probabilities for p50 and p65 were 71.1% and 68.9%.

4. Discussion

In this study we investigated the expression pattern of the subunits of NF-κB, p50 and p65, and AEG-1/MTDH, a transcription coactivator of NF-κB in ovarian carcinomas, borderline ovarian tumours, and benign cystadenomas. To our best knowledge, our study is the first report of the combined expression of AEG-1/MTDH, p50, and p65 in ovarian epithelial neoplasms indicating a potential synergistic role for the above transcription factors in epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis.

In line with our results in ovarian epithelial cancer, recently there has been emerging evidence from studies demonstrating a significant role for AEG-1/MTDH in the pathophysiology of several cancer types including breast cancer [9], large B-cell lymphoma [10], hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer [11, 18], and prostate adenocarcinoma [15]. Furthermore, MTDH overexpression, inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition, enhanced the migratory, and invasive properties of squamous head and neck cancer cells [12].

In our study, the overexpression of AEG-1/MTDH in ovarian carcinomas indicates an important role for AEG-1/MTDH in epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis and is consistent with the findings of a small number ofstudies of AEG-1/MTDH in ovarian cancer so far; AEG-1/MTDH was found to have a prognostic significance as a biomarker of distal metastasis [22], whereas high expression of AEG-1/MTDH was significantly associated with poorer overall survival and disease-free survival in another study in ovarian cancer patients [23]. Finally, Li et al. recently demonstrated that the presence of cisplatin-based chemoresistance was significantly associated with the expression level of AEG-1/MTDH in platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients [24]. In consistence with our findings, Song et al. demonstrated a gradual increase in the expression level of AEG-1/MTDH when moving from low grade benign colonic tumours (cytoplasmic expression primarily) through to frank colorectal adenocarcinoma (nuclear expression), whereas AEG-1/MTDH expression was again associated with shorter survival [17]. The cytoplasmic expression of AEG-1/MTDH observed in our study could be explained by recent evidence supporting an additional cytoplasmic role for AEG-1/MTDH in which AEG-1/MTDH serves as a binding molecule and regulator of RNA-binding proteins and components of the RNA-induced silencing complex. In the same study, depletion of cytoplasmic AEG-1/MTDH resulted in reduced cancer cell survival in response to chemotherapy [25].

In our study, p65 was primarily cytoplasmic while p50 demonstrated both cytoplasmic and nuclear localization. There have been previous studies in which high cytoplasmic p65 expression was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence in prostate adenocarcinoma and a predictor of poor survival in pancreatic cancer [26, 27]. We also acknowledge studies contradicting the significance of the cytoplasmic localization of NF-κB subunits, in which p50-RelA heterodimers were found in the cytoplasm in normal and low grade cervical lesions, and subsequently translocated into the nucleus in high-grade lesions and squamous cell carcinomas [28]. Upon activation of the NF-κB pathway, an upregulation of I-κBs has been described, which can potentially explain the cytoplasmic localization of NF-κB subunits, as I-κBs would prevent p50 and p65 translocation into the nucleus [29]. Another possible explanation for the cytoplasmic localization of NF-κB subunits is the previously identified overexpression of the nuclear membrane transporter chromosomal region maintenance/exportin1 protein (CRM1) in ovarian carcinomas [30], which has been found to facilitate the export of p65 from the nucleus into the cytoplasm.

The strong correlation in the expression levels of p50, p65, and AEG-1/MTDH further supports their significant role in epithelial ovarian cancer progression, whereas the moderate expression of the above transcription factors in borderline ovarian tumours and low expression in benign neoplasms indicate that the upregulation of NF-κB pathway and AEG-1/MTDH may consist of late events in the course of epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis and further support the premalignant nature of borderline ovarian tumours. The authors acknowledge the limitations of this study; the relatively small number of cases included, along with the absence of clinical follow up data, can potentially explain the lack of correlation between p50, p65, and AEG-1/MTDH expression and clinicopathological parameters, as observed in previously mentioned studies.

Furthermore, using the binary logistic regression model we identified that high AEG-1/MTDH expression was associated with a 98.4% probability of accurately distinguishing ovarian carcinomas from nonmalignant tumours, whereas high p50 and p65 expression levels were associated with a probability of accurate distinction of malignant epithelial ovarian tumours from nonmalignant of 95.1% and 96.7%, respectively. Similar results were observed when the expression of the above markers was used to distinguish borderline from benign ovarian tumours. Our results support the potential diagnostic significance of AEG-1/MTDH, p50, and p65 expression in the differential diagnosis of ovarian carcinomas over borderline and benign epithelial ovarian tumours. Further studies on a large number of cases is required to definitively clarify the potential role of p50, p65, and AEG-1/MTDH as independent prognostic factors of the malignant potential of epithelial ovarian tumours.

5. Conclusion

In summary, in this study the subunits of the transcription factor NF-κB, p50, and p65, and the coactivator of NF-κB transcription complex, AEG-1/MTDH, were found to be overexpressed in epithelial ovarian carcinomas with a moderate expression observed in borderline ovarian tumours. We conclude that AEG-1/MTDH and NF-κB signaling is active in epithelial ovarian cancer, where there appears to be a gradual increase in the expression of these molecules when moving across the spectrum of ovarian carcinogenesis, from borderline ovarian tumours to the frank malignant epithelial carcinomas. AEG-1/MTDH expression may also aid the differential diagnosis between borderline and ovarian carcinomas. Molecular techniques are required to further characterize metadherin upstream regulators and downstream mediators and investigate its potential for targeted molecular treatments.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

EUCAN Cancer Factsheets: Ovary, 2013, http://eu-cancer.iarc.fr/EUCAN/CancerOne.aspx?Cancer=27&Gender=2.
M. Karin, “Nuclear factor-κB in cancer development and progression,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7092, pp. 431–436, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Annunziata, H. T. Stavnes, L. Kleinberg et al., “Nuclear factor κB transcription factors are coexpressed and convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer,” Cancer, vol. 116, no. 13, pp. 3276–3284, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R.-X. Guo, Y.-H. Qiao, Y. Zhou, L.-X. Li, H.-R. Shi, and K.-S. Chen, “Increased staining for phosphorylated AKT and nuclear factor-κB p65 and their relationship with prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer,” Pathology International, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 749–756, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hernandez, S. C. Hsu, B. Davidson, M. J. Birrer, E. C. Kohn, and C. M. Annunziata, “Activation of NF-κB signaling by inhibitor of NF-κB kinase β increases aggressiveness of ovarian cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 4005–4014, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Alvero, “Recent insights into the role of NF-κB in ovarian carcinogenesis,” Genome Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, article 56, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-Z. Su, D.-C. Kang, Y. Chen et al., “Identification and cloning of human astrocyte genes displaying elevated expression after infection with HIV-1 or exposure to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein by rapid subtraction hybridization, RaSH,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 3592–3602, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Kim, E. A. Welsh, U. Oguz, B. Fang, Y. Bai, and F. Kinose, “Dissection of TBK1 signaling via phosphoproteomics in lung cancer cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 30, pp. 12414–12419, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Kong, M. S. Moran, Y. Zhao, and Q. Yang, “Inhibition of metadherin sensitizes breast cancer cells to AZD6244,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Ge, X. Lv, L. Feng et al., “Metadherin contributes to the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e39449, p. 6, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Ahn, J. Hyeon, and C. K. Park, “Metadherin is a prognostic predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy,” Gut and Liver, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 206–212, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Yu, Y. Liu, H. Tan, G. Li, Z. Su, and S. Ren, “Metadherin regulates metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck via AKT signalling pathway-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” Cancer Letters, vol. 343, no. 2, pp. 258–267, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Wu, B. Jin, L. Chen et al., “MiR-30d induces apoptosis and is regulated by the Akt/FOXO pathway in renal cell carcinoma,” Cell Signal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1212–1221, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S.-G. Lee, H.-Y. Jeon, Z.-Z. Su et al., “Astrocyte elevated gene-1 contributes to the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma,” Oncogene, vol. 28, no. 26, pp. 2476–2484, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kikuno, H. Shiina, S. Urakami et al., “Knockdown of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 inhibits prostate cancer progression through upregulation of FOXO3a activity,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 55, pp. 7647–7655, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liu, J. Wu, Z. Ying et al., “Astrocyte elevated gene-1 upregulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 and induces human glioma invasion,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 3750–3759, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Song, C. Li, R. Li, and J. Geng, “Prognostic significance of AEG-1 expression in colorectal carcinoma,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1201–1209, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-B. Xu, H. Wu, Y.-L. He et al., “Astrocyte-elevated gene-1 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 455–462, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Yoo, L. Emdad, S.-G. Lee et al., “Astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1): a multifunctional regulator of normal and abnormal physiology,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Emdad, D. Sarkar, Z.-Z. Su et al., “Activation of the nuclear factor κB pathway by astrocyte elevated gene-1: implications for tumor progression and metastasis,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1509–1516, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sarkar, S. P. Eun, L. Emdad, S.-G. Lee, Z.-Z. Su, and P. B. Fisher, “Molecular basis of nuclear factor-κB activation by astrocyte elevated gene-1,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1478–1484, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li, J. Liu, R. Lu et al., “AEG -1 overexpression: a novel indicator for peritoneal dissemination and lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancers,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 602–608, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Meng, C. Luo, L. Ma, Y. Hu, and G. Lou, “Clinical significance of astrocyte elevated gene-1 expression in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li, Y. Li, X. Wang et al., “Elevated expression of astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) is correlated with cisplatin-based chemoresistance and shortened outcome in patients with stages III-IV serous ovarian carcinoma,” Histopathology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 953–963, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Meng, D. Zhu, S. Yang et al., “Cytoplasmic Metadherin (MTDH) provides survival advantage under conditions of stress by acting as RNA-binding protein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 7, pp. 4485–4491, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Ross, B. V. S. Kallakury, C. E. Sheehan et al., “Expression of nuclear factor-kappa B and I kappa B alpha proteins in prostatic adenocarcinomas: correlation of nuclear factor-kappa B immunoreactivity with disease recurrence,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2466–2472, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Weichert, M. Boehm, V. Gekeler et al., “High expression of RelA/p65 is associated with activation of nuclear factor-κB-dependent signaling in pancreatic cancer and marks a patient population with poor prognosis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 523–530, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nair, M. Venkatraman, T. T. Maliekal, B. Nair, and D. Karunagaran, “NF-κB is constitutively activated in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinomas of the human uterine cervix,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Barkett and T. D. Gilmore, “Control of apoptosis by Rel/NF-κB transcription factors,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 49, pp. 6910–6924, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Darb-Esfahani, B. V. Sinn, W. Weichert et al., “Expression of classical NF-κB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma,” Histopathology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 727–739, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Ioanna Giopanou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1228

Downloads

1165

Citations