Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 214829, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/214829
Research Article

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between Octopus 900 and Goldmann Kinetic Visual Fields

1Department of Health Services Research, Whelan Building, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
2Department of Ophthalmology, Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lovely Lane, Warrington WA5 1QG, UK

Received 10 April 2013; Accepted 9 November 2013; Published 23 January 2014

Academic Editor: Paolo Fogagnolo

Copyright © 2014 Fiona J. Rowe and Alison Rowlands. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [8 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Fiona J. Rowe, Christopher P. Cheyne, Marta García-Fiñana, Carmel P. Noonan, Claire Howard, Jayne Smith, and Joanne Adeoye, “Detection of Visual Field Loss in Pituitary Disease: Peripheral Kinetic Versus Central Static,” Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 116–124, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Michael P. Barry, Ava K. Bittner, Liancheng Yang, Rebecca Marcus, Mian Haris Iftikhar, and Gislin Dagnelie, “Variability and Errors of Manually Digitized Goldmann Visual Fields,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 720–730, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Julia-Sophia Bellingrath, Robert E. MacLaren, M. Dominik Fischer, G. Alex Ochakovski, Susanne Kohl, Simon Ramsden, Immanuel P. Seitz, Eberhart Zrenner, Nicola Hanig, Holger Prokisch, Bernhard H. Weber, and Susan M. Downes, “High symmetry of visual acuity and visual fields in RPGR-Linked retinitis pigmentosa,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 4457–4466, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Vera M. Mönter, David P. Crabb, and Paul H. Artes, “Reclaiming the periphery: Automated kinetic perimetry for measuring peripheral visual fields in patients with glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 868–875, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Claudia Bevers, Gauthier Blanckaert, Karel Van Keer, Jean-François Fils, Evelien Vandewalle, and Ingeborg Stalmans, “Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bronwen Walters, John Brookes, Anthony Moore, David Garway-Heath, Alki Liasis, David Crabb, Jugnoo S. Rahi, Phillippa M. Cumberland, Isabelle Russell-Eggitt, Chris Timms, Maria Papadopoulos, Ananth Viswanathan, Dipesh E Patel, Phillippa M Cumberland, Bronwen C Walters, Mario Cortina-Borja, Dipesh E. Patel, and Peng Tee Khaw, “Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Evaluation of kinetic approaches in childhood neuro-ophthalmic disease,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mays Talib, Gislin Dagnelie, and Camiel J. F. Boon, “Recording and analysis of goldmann kinetic visual fields,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1715, pp. 327–338, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Joanna M. Jefferis, Naz Raoof, Thomas Carroll, and Sachin M. Salvi, “Optic nerve sheath fenestration in patients with visual failure associated with vestibular schwannoma,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, pp. 1–7, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar