Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 307160, 14 pages
Review Article

The Evolution of Legislation in the Field of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Embryo Stem Cell Research in European Union Members

1Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy
2Neuromed, Istituto Mediterraneo Neurologico (IRCCS), Via Atinense 18, Pozzilli, 86077 Isernia, Italy

Received 18 March 2014; Revised 6 July 2014; Accepted 7 July 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Ursula Zollner

Copyright © 2014 Francesco Paolo Busardò et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a WHO meeting on “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction”,” WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2001,
  2. R. J. Cook, B. M. Dickens, and M. F. Fathalla, Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003.
  3. “Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz am 4 juni 1992,” Reproductive Medicine, 1992,
  4. C. Shalev and G. Werner-Felmayer, “Patterns of globalized reproduction: egg cells regulation in Israel and Austria,” Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. H. Case of and V. Others, “Case of S.H. and Others V. Austria,” Application 57813/00, European Court of Human Rights Judgment, Strasbourg, France, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Murphy and G. Ó. Cuinn, “Works in progress: new technologies and the European Court of Human Rights,” Human Rights Law Review, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID ngq038, pp. 601–638, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz geändert wird (Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz-Novelle 2004—FMedGNov 2004), Reproductive Medicine Act Amendment 2004—FmedGNov 2004,
  8. “Loi relative à la procréation médicalement assistée et à la destination des embryons surnuméraires et des gamètes,” (M.B. 17/07/2007),
  9. Loi relative à la procreation médicalementassistée et à la destination des embryonssurnuméraires et de gametes,
  10. White & Case LLP, “European laws governing in vitro fertilization,” New York, NY, USA, 2009,
  11. The Bulgarian Health Act, 2004,
  12. No. Order, “Order No. 28 of 20 June 2007 on assisted reproduction,” (Promulgated in the State Gazette, issue No. 55/6 July 2007),
  13. Law on Transplantation of Organs, Tissues and Cells, 2003,
  14. “Act on Medical Fertilization,” (OG 88/09, 110/09),
  15. Law on medically assisted reproduction, 2012,
  16. The National Bioethics Committee Of Cyprus, 2007,
  17. Czech legislation. Embryo research. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE),
  18. B. A. Faber, “Assisted reproduction, the law and public attitudes: a danish perspective,” European Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. S80–S84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Law on research on human embryonic stem cells and related activities (no. 227/2006),
  20. “Artificial Insemination and Embryo Protection Act,” 1997,
  21. Act on Assisted Fertility Treatments (1237/2006),
  22. Law on Bioethics, “LOI no. 2011-814 du 7 juillet 2011 relative à la bioéthique,”
  23. “Law on Bioethics, (no. 2004-800),” 2004,;
  24. “Law 654/1994 on the Donation and Use of Elements and Products of the Human Body, Medically Assisted Procreation, and Prenatal Diagnosis,”
  25. Act for the Protection of Embryos, 1990,
  26. “Act ensuring Protection of Embryos in connection with the importation and use of human embryonic stem cells,” Stammzellgesetz StZG—Stem Cell Act, 2008,
  27. “Law on medically assisted human reproduction,” (No. 3089/2002), 2002,
  28. Law on Medically assisted reproduction techniques, (No. 3305/2005), 2005,
  29. Act on Health, Chapter IX, 20/2007,
  30. Ministerial Decree 30/1998,
  31. Italian Law 40/2004,;
  32. Italian Constitutional Court (No.151/09),
  33. Italian Constitutional Court, 2014,
  34. “Sexual and Reproductive Health Law,” 2002,–-ed_protect/–-protrav/–-ilo_aids/documents/legaldocument/wcms_127921.pdf.
  35. “Law on Ethics of Biomedical Research,” (no. VIII-1679), 2000 (last amended on 15 November 2007—No. X-1325),
  36. Law on Donation and Transplantation of Human Tissues, Cells and Organs (no. I-1626), 1996,
  37. T. A. M. Te Braake, “The Dutch 2002 embryos act and the convention on human rights and biomedicine: some issues,” European Journal of Health Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. “Law no. 32/2006 on medically assisted procreation,”
  39. G. Puppinck and A. Popescu, “Memorandum Privind Proiectul de Lege Referitor la Reprodurecea Umana Asistata Cu Tert Donator in Romania,” European Centre for Law and Justice,
  40. National Regulations on Ethics and Research in Slovak Republic, 2003,
  41. National Regulations on Ethics and Research in Slovenia, 2003,
  42. “Law on Assisted Reproductive Technology, Law 22/2006,”
  43. The Law on Biomedical Research, 2007,
  44. “Genetic Integrity Act,” 2006,
  45. Health and Medical Services Act No. 763/1982,
  46. “Biobanks in medical care act,” 2002,
  47. “Human Fertilization and Embryology Act,” 2008,
  48. “Human Fertilization and Embryology Act,” 1990,
  49. “Surrogacy Arrangements Act,” 1985,
  50. The Guide to Professional Conduct & Ethics for Registered Medical Practitioners, 2009,
  51. “The Medical Profession Act,” 1996,
  52. D. J. Walsh, M. L. Ma, and E. S. Sills, “The evolution of health policy guidelines for assisted reproduction in the Republic of Ireland, 2004–2009,” Health Research Policy and Systems, vol. 9, article 28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. V. Fineschi, M. Neri, and E. Turillazzi, “The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40-2004),” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 536–539, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. Turillazzi and V. Fineschi, “Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 34, no. 10, p. e21, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Dembińska, “Bioethical dilemmas of assisted reproduction in the opinions of polish women in infertility treatment: a research report,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 731–734, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. “European Convention on Human Rights,”