Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 315494, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/315494
Review Article

Role of Nutrient-Sensing Signals in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Nephropathy

1Department of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa-Cho, Seta, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, Japan
2Division of Diabetology & Endocrinology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku-Gun, Ishikawa 920-0265, Japan

Received 25 March 2014; Accepted 13 May 2014; Published 14 July 2014

Academic Editor: Akito Maeshima

Copyright © 2014 Shinji Kume et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. The multipronged drug approach still fails to fully prevent the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Therefore, a new therapeutic target to improve the prognosis of diabetic nephropathy is urgently required. Nutrient-sensing signals and their related intracellular machinery have evolved to combat prolonged periods of starvation in mammals; and these systems are conserved in the kidney. Recent studies have suggested that the activity of three nutrient-sensing signals, mTORC1, AMPK, and Sirt1, is altered in the diabetic kidney. Furthermore, autophagy activity, which is regulated by the above-mentioned nutrient-sensing signals, is also altered in both podocytes and proximal tubular cells under diabetic conditions. Under diabetic conditions, an altered nutritional state owing to nutrient excess may disturb cellular homeostasis regulated by nutrient-responsible systems, leading to exacerbation of organelle dysfunction and diabetic nephropathy. In this review, we discuss new findings showing relationships between nutrient-sensing signals, autophagy, and diabetic nephropathy and suggest the therapeutic potential of nutrient-sensing signals in diabetic nephropathy.

1. Introduction

Nutrient-sensing pathways dependent on extracellular nutrient conditions are well conserved among eukaryotes from yeasts to mammals. Recently, the importance of three nutrient-sensing pathways in metabolism development has become clear as the study of diabetes and obesity advances (Figure 1). Generally, in excessive nutrient conditions, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is activated by increases in glucose, amino acid, and insulin levels [1, 2]. However, in nutrient-depleted conditions, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and oxidized NAD- (NAD+-) dependent histone deacetylase (Sirt1) are activated by increases in intracellular AMP and NAD+ levels, respectively [35]. These nutrient-sensing pathways use posttranslational phosphorylation and acetylation modification of proteins to regulate energy homeostasis in metabolic organs under both excess and restricted nutrient conditions [15]. Dysregulation of these pathways is associated with the development of diabetes [15].

315494.fig.001
Figure 1: Nutrient-sensing signal and diseases. The three nutrients-sensing pathways, mTOR, AMPK, and Sirt1, independently and coordinately regulate organ metabolism in multiple organs. Their alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of obesity-related and age-related diseases.

Interestingly, these pathways also exist in the kidney [69], and tissue concentrations of glucose, amino acid, AMP, and NAD+ are modified by particular nutrient states, such as diabetes, and diet therapies, such as protein or dietary restriction. These findings led us to consider whether these signaling pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases and whether they may be potential therapeutic targets for treating renal diseases associated with diabetes and obesity [9].

In the multiple organs involved in diabetes and obesity, cells experience stress with nutrient excesses, leading to organelle dysfunction, including mitochondrial stress [10], peroxisomal oxidative stress [11, 12], and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [2], which are thought to be pathological factors in diabetic nephropathy [1114]. We considered how it might be possible to protect organelles against stresses mediated by excessive nutrient conditions.

The study of “autophagy” in mammalian systems is advancing rapidly, and many researchers are entering this new and exciting field. Autophagy plays a critical role in removing damaged organelles for the maintenance of intracellular homeostasis [15]. Interestingly, this process is also regulated by the above-mentioned nutrient-sensing pathways [16, 17].

In this paper, we review the roles of nutrient-sensing pathways in renal diseases associated with diabetes and obesity and provide a perspective that may assist future research in this field.

2. mTOR in Diabetic Nephropathy

Of the three nutrient-sensing pathways, the pathological roles of mTOR and the therapeutic potential of rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR, in diabetic nephropathy are increasingly being examined in experimental animal models (Table 1).

tab1
Table 1: The roles of mTOR (mTORC1) in diabetic nephropathy.

mTOR is a nutrient-sensing signal which was first identified in yeast mutants resistant to the effects of rapamycin, an immunosuppressive agent. mTOR associates with the nonenzymatic regulatory-associated scaffold proteins of TOR in mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and the rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR in mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) [1]. Rapamycin can inhibit the function of predominantly mTORC1 but not mTORC2.

Activation of mTORC1 most prominently results in phosphorylation of two downstream targets, ribosomal S6 kinase and eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 4E-binding protein [1]. These proteins stimulate ribosome biogenesis and protein translation, leading to increases in cell mass [1]. However, current information on the exact role and regulatory mechanisms of mTORC2 is still limited. Thus, knowledge of the role of mTOR in diabetic nephropathy is largely limited to the role of mTORC1.

Over the past few years, the role of mTOR in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy has received increased attention. Studies using rapamycin were important in defining the role of the mTORC1 pathway. After being investigated primarily for its antiproliferative effects, it was increasingly clear that the mTOR pathway has broad implications in both normal and diseased physiologies, including regulating cell and organ size [1]. Additionally, the role of rapamycin has been studied in a wide spectrum of kidney diseases, including diabetic nephropathy [6, 27]. It has long been known that typical features of diabetic nephropathy include renal and glomerular hypertrophy, proteinuria, and advanced fibrosis and inflammation. In addition to inhibiting renal and glomerular hypertrophy present in the early stages of diabetic nephropathy [20], rapamycin seems to ameliorate mesangial expansion, glomerular basement membrane thickening, renal fibrosis and macrophage recruitment, and the development of proteinuria in diabetic rodent models [18, 19, 2125] (Table 1). These findings suggest that mTOR activation may contribute to the pathogenesis of typical lesions, such as glomerular sclerosis and renal hypertrophy, in diabetic nephropathy.

Two recent studies using heterozygous-raptor knockout mice revealed that hyperactivation of the mTORC1 signal is strongly associated with the progression of podocyte injury and proteinuria in diabetic animal models [27, 28]. In the podocyte of heterozygous-raptor knockout mice showed a resistance to diabetes-induced dysregulation of foot process formation and apoptosis leading to podocyte loss. Furthermore, we recently reported that obesity-mediated hyperactivation of the mTORC1 signal led to the suppression of autophagy activity in proximal tubules resulting in the development of cell vulnerability, which were ameliorated by calorie restriction and rapamycin [26]. These findings suggest that mTORC1 activation in all kinds of renal component cells may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.

mTOR is activated by both insulin and nutrients such as glucose and amino acids in renal cells in diabetic and obese states. Because hyperglycemia occurs along with hyperinsulinemia in obese type 2 diabetic patients, combined hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemia would be expected to activate the mTOR pathway in obese and type 2 diabetic patients. However, hyperglycemia, rather than growth factors such as insulin, may contribute more to mTOR activation in diabetes because mTOR is activated even in the kidneys of insulin-independent type 1 diabetic models [6].

In summary, mTOR induces the synthesis of matrix proteins associated with basement membrane thickening and mesangial matrix accumulation. Additionally, mTOR enhances fibrosis through fibroblast proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and the expression of profibrotic cytokines such as transforming growth factor-β1 and connective tissue growth factor. mTOR-dependent infiltration of macrophages and production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as MCP-1, might support inflammation during diabetic nephropathy [18, 19, 2125]. Additionally, hyperactivity of mTORC1 signal is strongly related to podocyte dysfunction characterized by dysregulation of nephrin protein and podocyte loss [27, 28]. Finally, more recent reports demonstrated that mTOR contributes to proximal tubular cell apoptosis and damage in diabetes [26, 29]. Thus, it is evident that mTOR plays a central role in the development of the major features of diabetic nephropathy, although additional mechanisms are likely to be involved.

Caution is necessary when interpreting the role of mTOR in diabetic nephropathy because many of the current insights regarding mTOR are derived from pharmacological inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin [30]. Additionally, as mentioned above, our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms and substrates of mTORC2 is very limited. Thus, kidney tissue-specific analysis of mTORC1- and mTORC2-dependent signaling in mice is required to further understand the functional role of mTOR in diabetic nephropathy.

3. AMPK in Kidney Diseases

AMPK is a ubiquitously expressed kinase that also acts as an energy sensor [3]. Kinase activity is strictly regulated by extracellular nutrient conditions, which are detected as rising concentrations of AMP, and increases in AMP/ATP ratios [3]. Additionally, AMPK activity is positively regulated by an adipokine, adiponectin [31]. During energy-depleted conditions, there is a marked increase in both intracellular concentrations of AMP and plasma adiponectin levels, leading to activation of AMPK. Activated AMPK acts to restore energy homeostasis by phosphorylating multiple substrates to enhance energy production and suppress energy consumption [3]. In metabolic organs such as skeletal muscle, brown adipose tissue, and the liver, AMPK enhances lipolysis through phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and mitochondrial biogenesis and suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis [3]. Thus, AMPK acts as a nutrient sensor to maintain cell and tissue homeostasis under energy-depleted conditions.

Several studies on whole renal cell lysates have demonstrated that AMPK expression and activity in the kidney are determined by phosphorylation at Thr172 [3236]. Immunoelectron microscopy analysis of its exact localization in glomeruli revealed that AMPK is expressed in podocytes, mesangial cells, and glomerular endothelial cells, although its expression pattern in different renal tubular epithelial cells remains uncertain.

Recently, our understanding of the pathophysiological role of AMPK in the kidney has increased [8]. The expression and activity of AMPK have been examined in several types of diabetic rodent models (Table 2). In streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced type 1 diabetic models, AMPK expression and activity decreased [3234]. The exact mechanism underlying the decrease in renal AMPK activity in this model is unknown; however, it is possible that decreases in plasma adiponectin, in addition to hyperglycemia, could contribute to this decrease [33]. Pharmacological activation of AMPK by 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR) and metformin ameliorated renal hypertrophy in STZ-induced diabetic rats [34]. In diet-induced obese mouse models and type 2 diabetic db/db mice, renal AMPK activity was suppressed and plasma adiponectin levels were reduced [35, 36]. Interestingly, adiponectin was able to stimulate AMPK activity in podocytes, mesangial cells, and glomerular endothelial cells [39], and adiponectin-deficient mice showed development of albuminuria together with decreased AMPK activity in podocytes [38]. These findings suggest that activation of the adiponectin-AMPK pathway may be a therapeutic target for diabetes- and obesity-related kidney diseases.

tab2
Table 2: The activity and pathophysiological roles of AMPK in kidney disease.

It is likely that AMPK activity decreases in the kidneys of diabetic and obese animals, which raises the question of how decreases in AMPK activity are involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases. A study has reported that, in the kidney of obese mice, intrarenal lipid metabolism was altered and was characterized by enhanced renal lipogenesis and suppressed lipolysis [36]. AMPK-mediated phosphorylation inactivates a lipogenic enzyme, ACC, which results in decreased lipogenesis and enhanced lipolysis [3]. Decreases in kidney AMPK activity in these mouse models may be involved in altered renal lipid metabolism and subsequent lipotoxicity-associated renal damage. Recent reports suggest that altered mitochondrial biogenesis and subsequent ROS production under excessive nutrient conditions contribute to the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity. Proximal tubular cells contain a large number of mitochondria because the energy demand in these cells is relatively higher than those of other cells. Thus, the altered mitochondrial biogenesis observed under diabetic conditions might be associated with ROS production and subsequent tubular damage [35]. Collectively, decreases in renal AMPK activity may cause the typical features of renal disease in obese and diabetic patients. Actually, pharmacological activation of AMPK by AICAR significantly improved renal injury including albuminuria in diabetic Akita mice [37].

4. Sirt1 in Kidney Disease

Calorie restriction slows aging and increases life span in different species. Even if calorie restriction is shown to increase life expectancy in humans, it is unlikely that such restrictions will be widely adopted because of the difficulty in maintaining long-term calorie restriction in modern society. Therefore, there has been increased interest in identifying molecules that act as “calorie restriction mimetics.” Interestingly, several recent studies have revealed that Sirt1, one of seven mammalian sirtuin/Sir2 genes in the NAD+-dependent deacetylase family, could be a common mediator that explains the health benefits under calorie restriction [4, 5]. Furthermore, several recent reports have shown that Sirt1 regulates several biological functions, including cell survival, mitochondrial biogenesis, insulin secretion, and glucose and lipid metabolism in various tissues [5].

Reduced forms of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) are metabolites of glucose and fatty acids. Thus, NAD+/NADH ratios decrease in cells under nutrient excess. Sirt1 senses intracellular NAD+ levels and acts as a deacetylase in a NAD+-dependent manner. Protein acetylation can be regulated in a metabolically responsive manner, and this process may also contribute to adaptation to metabolic stress. Collectively, these findings suggest that Sirt1’s deacetylase activity decreases in nutrient excess conditions, and its activation, which acts as a calorie restriction mimetic, may be a new therapy for renal disease in obese and diabetic patients. However, the relationship between Sirt1 and diabetic complications is not well known. We discuss here the role of Sirt1, and speculate on the possible involvement of Sirt1, in renal diseases in patients with diabetes and obesity.

The effects of nutrient conditions on Sirt1 expression levels in the kidney have been determined (Table 3). Dietary restriction in rats increases Sirt1 expression, which is associated with decreases in plasma growth factors such as insulin/IGF-1 [42]. In STZ-induced type 1 diabetic kidneys, Sirt1 expression decreases [40, 41], but Sirt1 expression does not change in kidneys of type 2 diabetic db/db mice [35]. Sirt1 activity is strictly regulated by intracellular NAD+ concentrations [50], which are likely to decrease in diabetic organs. Thus, to determine whether Sirt1 activity is altered in diabetic kidneys, it is necessary to assess the deacetylation of Sirt1 substrates such as NFκB (p65), p53, and forkhead proteins [4].

tab3
Table 3: The activity and pathophysiological roles of Sirt1 in kidney disease.

Many researchers are entering this exciting field, and interesting findings showing the renoprotective effects of Sirt1 have been reported (Table 3). Sirt1 expression and activity determined by deacetylase activity on the Foxo3a substrate were significantly altered in aging kidneys [16]. Furthermore, heterozygous Sirt1-deficient mice showed dietary restriction-resistant premature renal aging [16]. This evidence suggests that Sirt1 may be involved in renal aging and dietary restriction-mediated renoprotection.

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis is a common final pathway for end-stage renal diseases, including diabetic nephropathy. Several recent reports have shown the antifibrotic effects of Sirt1 in mouse experimental models [44, 46]. In those reports, mechanisms of Sirt1’s antifibrotic effects were explained by suppression of both cyclooxygenase 2 expression [44] and activation of TGFβ-induced Smad3 [46], both of which are recognized as classical pathogenic factors in diabetic nephropathy. Additionally, in vivo studies by Hasegawa et al. showed direct renoprotective effects of Sirt1 overexpression in proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTEC) [45]. Proximal tubular cells with specific Sirt1 overexpression were resistant to cisplatin-mediated PTEC damage because of overexpression of catalase and subsequent peroxisome protection [45]. Funk et al. showed that the specific Sirt1 activator, SRT1720, enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis through deacetylation of PGC1 and subsequently reduced ROS in cultured proximal tubular cells [49]. The role of Sirt1 in glomerular cells is still small. In cultured mesangial cells, Sirt1 showed antiapoptotic effects against ROS and TGFβ [47, 48].

Based on more recent reports, Sirt1 activity is likely to be suppressed in the kidney of diabetic animal models [43, 51]. Interestingly, Hasegawa et al. reported that Sirt1 activity in both proximal tubular cells and podocytes was associated with diabetic nephropathy [43]. Interestingly, proximal tubular cell-specific Sirt1 transgenic mice showed a resistance to diabetes-related progression of podocyte damage and subsequent proteinuria [43]. Collectively, these results strongly support Sirt1 activation being considered as a new therapy to improve the prognosis of diabetic nephropathy.

5. Organelle Dysfunction and Renal Disease in Diabetes and Obesity

In addition to the classical pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, organelle dysfunction, such as in mitochondria [35], peroxisomal oxidative stress [11], and ER stress [13], has been proposed as a theory to explain the emergence of pathological features in diabetic nephropathy (Figure 2). ROS are an inevitable by-product of mitochondrial and peroxisomal metabolism. And excess ROS is implicated with classical pathogenesis by initiating events in diabetic nephropathy [1114, 35]. In nutrient excess conditions, such as diabetes and obesity, high glucose levels enhance the generation of mitochondrial ROS, and high plasma levels of free fatty acids can also cause ROS overproduction from mitochondria and peroxisomes. Therefore, maintaining healthy populations of functional mitochondria and peroxisomes in different renal cells under nutrient excess conditions is essential for the well-being of cells. This maintenance may prevent the development of renal disease in cases of diabetes and obesity.

315494.fig.002
Figure 2: Organelles, such as mitochondria, peroxisome, and ER, dysfunction causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ER stress in diabetic kidney. Dietary restriction enhances autophagy-lysosomal degradation system, leading to cell or tissue homeostasis. Nutrient-sensing signal and organella maintenance in diabetic nephropathy (DN).

ER contains quality-control mechanisms to handle misfolded proteins, and thus ER stress refers to physiological or pathological states that result in the accumulation of misfolded proteins. ER stress in renal pathophysiology is a relatively new area of research in proteinuric kidney diseases, including diabetic nephropathy. Hyperglycemia and high levels of free fatty acids cause ER stress in podocytes [52], which undergo apoptosis and the subsequent initiation of proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. Additionally, in proteinuric kidney diseases, including overt stages of diabetic nephropathy, proteinuria filtered from glomeruli enhances ER stress responses in proximal tubules, leading to progression of tubulointerstitial lesions [53]. Thus, maintaining the ER’s capacity for handling misfolded proteins in podocytes and tubular cells could be considered a new therapeutic target for protecting kidneys from proteinuria-related pathologies.

If this is the case, it remains to be determined how to protect organelles from stresses derived from nutrient excesses. Autophagy is an intracellular process for the degradation of proteins and organelles via lysosomes for the control of cell homeostasis [15]. This degradation system maintains cell homeostasis under nutrient-depleted conditions and has been generally well conserved among all types of eukaryotes. Nutrient excesses inactivate autophagy, but once nutrients are depleted, autophagy is activated to provide energy resources for cells. Interestingly, autophagy is closely regulated by nutrient-sensing pathways and by cellular stresses [16, 17, 54, 55]. Inhibition of mTOR and activation of AMPK and Sirt1 activate nonselective autophagy in response to nutrient depletion [16, 17]. Furthermore, oxidative stress derived from mitochondria and peroxisomes or ER stress can cause autophagy to degrade the damaged organelle itself (organelle-selective autophagy: mitophagy, pexophagy, and ERphagy) [2, 54, 56].

Recent reports have shown that autophagy deficiencies under nutrient excess conditions are related to the pathogenesis of obesity- or aging-associated diseases [15]. Currently, nephrologists are also entering this field of study. Although direct evidence showing the relationship between autophagy and diabetic nephropathy is unfortunately still weak, several interesting findings regarding autophagy have been recently demonstrated in the field of nephrology. Age-associated declines in autophagy in podocytes and proximal tubular cells are part of the development of key features in renal aging, albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and ROS production as a result of the accumulation of damaged mitochondria in proximal tubular cells [16, 57, 58]. Interestingly, Sirt1-mediated activation of autophagy under hypoxic conditions in proximal tubular cells is essential for dietary restriction-mediated antirenal aging [16]. Additionally, autophagy was activated in a renoprotective manner in ischemic-reperfusion and cisplatin-induced kidney injury mouse models [5861]. Thus, autophagy is required for maintaining homeostasis in podocytes and proximal tubular cells and is activated under stress conditions to protect renal cells.

If autophagy is inactivated by mTOR activation and AMPK and Sirt1 inactivation in obesity and diabetic renal diseases, autophagy deficiency could enhance organelle dysfunction mediated by nutrient excess, hypoxia, and proteinuria. Organelle degradation systems regulated by nutrient conditions may be involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases associated with obesity and diabetes. We previously found that autophagy activity was suppressed in an mTORC1-dependent manner in proximal tubular cells of obese mice, leading to more severe proteinuria-induced tubular interstitial lesions [26].

Autophagy could be a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, although solid evidence of the involvement of autophagy in the pathogenesis of podocyte injury is lacking.

6. Diet Therapy in Renal Diseases in Diabetes and Obesity

Diet or calorie restriction is essential for strict glycemic control in diabetic patients without advanced nephropathy. Based on results from a large number of experimental studies on diabetes and obesity, ameliorating the above-mentioned nutrient pathways could be a mechanism underlying dietary restriction-mediated improvement of obesity and diabetes. Additionally, recent human clinical studies have shown that the quality of diet affects the development of insulin resistance and new onset of diabetes. A high fructose intake rather than glucose [62], and ingestion of high concentrations of plasma branched-chain amino acids [63], and saturated fatty acids rather than polyunsaturated fatty acids [64] are independent risk factors for developing insulin resistance and diabetes.

In patients with diabetic nephropathy, diet therapies, such as protein restriction, have been used. However, the efficacy of protein restriction is now controversial. If altered nutrient-sensing pathways, lipotoxicity, and organelle dysfunction in kidneys under excess nutrient stresses are involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases, a high energy intake along with a low-protein diet may cause an insufficiency of protein restriction in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. It may, therefore, be time to reconsider whether energy excess along with protein restriction is really beneficial. Also, we need to identify what types of carbohydrates, amino acids, and fatty acids in different diet regimens lead to a better prognosis in renal diseases associated with diabetes and obesity. Amelioration of nutrient-sensing pathways altered in the kidney of diabetic and obese animals may be a possible experimental target to examine the beneficial effects of diet therapy.

7. Concluding Comments

Currently, the incidence of obesity and diabetes associated with nutrient excess is increasing worldwide. Accordingly, diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, despite the application of various intensive therapy programs, such as hypoglycemic and antihypertensive therapy. The identification of additional new therapeutic targets for the prevention of renal diseases associated with diabetes and obesity is urgently needed.

This paper has provided a perspective on whether nutrient-sensing pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and whether they are acceptable new therapeutic targets. In the next few years, additional studies in conditional knockout mice, transgenic mice, and new disease models will elucidate this possibility. These studies will ultimately provide a clearer perspective on whether nutrient-sensing pathways and organelle maintenance by autophagy should be considered novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of renal diseases in diabetes and obesity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (no. 25713033 to Shinji Kume and no. 25670414 to Daisuke Koya); Uehara Memorial Foundation (Shinji Kume); Takeda Science Foundation (Shinji Kume); and Banyu Life Science Foundation International (Shinji Kume).

References

  1. R. Zoncu, A. Efeyan, and D. M. Sabatini, “MTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. E. Wellen and C. B. Thompson, “Cellular metabolic stress: considering how cells respond to nutrient excess,” Molecular Cell, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 323–332, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. R. Steinberg and B. E. Kemp, “AMPK in health and disease,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1025–1078, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Imai and L. Guarente, “Ten years of NAD-dependent SIR2 family deacetylases: implications for metabolic diseases,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 212–220, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Guarente, “Sirtuins, aging, and medicine,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 23, pp. 2235–2244, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. B. Huber, G. Walz, and E. W. Kuehn, “MTOR and rapamycin in the kidney: signaling and therapeutic implications beyond immunosuppression,” Kidney International, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 502–511, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Hao and V. H. Haase, “Sirtuins and their relevance to the kidney,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1620–1627, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. R. Hallows, P. F. Mount, N. M. Pastor-Soler, and D. A. Power, “Role of the energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase in renal physiology and disease,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. F1067–F1077, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Kume, M. C. Thomas, and D. Koya, “Nutrient sensing, autophagy, and diabetic nephropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Baltzer, S. K. Tiefenböck, and C. Frei, “Mitochondria in response to nutrients and nutrient-sensitive pathways,” Mitochondrion, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 589–597, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Tanaka, S. Kume, S. Araki et al., “Fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, has renoprotective effects in mice by enhancing renal lipolysis,” Kidney International, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 871–882, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Hwang, J. Lee, J. Y. Huh et al., “Catalase deficiency accelerates diabetic renal injury through peroxisomal dysfunction,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 728–738, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. T. Lindenmeyer, M. P. Rastaldi, M. Ikehata et al., “Proteinuria and hyperglycemia induce endoplasmic reticulum stress,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2225–2236, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. M. Forbes, M. T. Coughlan, and M. E. Cooper, “Oxidative stress as a major culprit in kidney disease in diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1446–1454, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Mizushima and M. Komatsu, “Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues,” Cell, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 728–741, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Kume, T. Uzu, K. Horiike et al., “Calorie restriction enhances cell adaptation to hypoxia through Sirt1-dependent mitochondrial autophagy in mouse aged kidney,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 1043–1055, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Kim, M. Kundu, B. Viollet, and K. Guan, “AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 132–141, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. K. Chen, G. Thomas, S. C. Kozma, and R. C. Harris, “S6 kinase 1 knockout inhibits uninephrectomy- or diabetes-induced renal hypertrophy,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 297, no. 3, pp. F585–F593, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Sataranatarajan, M. M. Mariappan, J. L. Myung et al., “Regulation of elongation phase of mRNA translation in diabetic nephropathy: amelioration by rapamycin,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 1733–1742, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Sakaguchi, M. Isono, K. Isshiki, T. Sugimoto, D. Koya, and A. Kashiwagi, “Inhibition of mTOR signaling with rapamycin attenuates renal hypertrophy in the early diabetic mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 340, no. 1, pp. 296–301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Wittmann, C. Daniel, A. Stief, R. Vogelbacher, K. Amann, and C. Hugo, “Long-term treatment of sirolimus but not cyclosporine ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in the rat,” Transplantation, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 1290–1299, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Mori, K. Inoki, K. Masutani et al., “The mTOR pathway is highly activated in diabetic nephropathy and rapamycin has a strong therapeutic potential,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 384, no. 4, pp. 471–475, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Yang, J. Wang, L. Qin et al., “Rapamycin prevents early steps of the development of diabetic nephropathy in rats,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 495–502, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Lloberas, J. M. Cruzado, M. Franquesa et al., “Mammalian target of rapamycin pathway blockade slows progression of diabetic kidney disease in rats,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1395–1404, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Nagai, T. Matsubara, A. Mima et al., “Gas6 induces Akt/mTOR-mediated mesangial hypertrophy in diabetic nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 552–561, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Yamahara, S. Kume, D. Koya et al., “Obesity-mediated autophagy insufficiency exacerbates proteinuria-induced tubulointerstitial lesions,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1769–1781, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Inoki, H. Mori, J. Wang et al., “mTORC1 activation in podocytes is a critical step in the development of diabetic nephropathy in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 2181–2196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Godel, B. Hartleben, N. Herbach et al., “Role of mTOR in podocyte function and diabetic nephropathy in humans and mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 2197–2209, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Velagapudi, B. S. Bhandari, S. Abboud-Werner, S. Simone, H. E. Abboud, and S. L. Habib, “The tuberin/mTOR pathway promotes apoptosis of tubular epithelial cells in diabetes,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 262–273, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Cravedi, P. Ruggenenti, and G. Remuzzi, “Sirolimus for calcineurin inhibitors in organ transplantation: contra,” Kidney International, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1068–1074, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Yamauchi, J. Kamon, Y. Minokoshi et al., “Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1288–1295, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. G. Cammisotto, I. Londono, D. Gingras, and M. Bendayan, “Control of glycogen synthase through ADIPOR1-AMPK pathway in renal distal tubules of normal and diabetic rats,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 294, no. 4, pp. F881–F889, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Guo and Z. Zhao, “Effect of N-acetylcysteine on plasma adiponectin and renal adiponectin receptors in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 558, no. 1–3, pp. 208–213, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Lee, D. Feliers, M. M. Mariappan et al., “A role for AMP-activated protein kinase in diabetes-induced renal hypertrophy,” American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. F617–F627, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Kitada, S. Kume, N. Imaizumi, and D. Koya, “Resveratrol improves oxidative stress and protects against diabetic nephropathy through normalization of Mn-SOD dysfunction in AMPK/SIRT1- independent pathway,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 634–643, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Kume, T. Uzu, S. Araki et al., “Role of altered renal lipid metabolism in the development of renal injury induced by a high-fat diet,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2715–2723, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. L. Dugan, Y. H. You, S. S. Ali et al., “AMPK dysregulation promotes diabetes-related reduction of superoxide and mitochondrial function,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 4888–4899, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. K. Sharma, S. RamachandraRao, G. Qiu et al., “Adiponectin regulates albuminuria and podocyte function in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1645–1656, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. G. Cammisotto and M. Bendayan, “Adiponectin stimulates phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase α in renal glomeruli,” Journal of Molecular Histology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 579–584, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Tikoo, K. Singh, D. Kabra, V. Sharma, and A. Gaikwad, “Change in histone H3 phosphorylation, MAP kinase p38, SIR 2 and p53 expression by resveratrol in preventing streptozotocin induced type I diabetic nephropathy,” Free Radical Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 397–404, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Li, F. Cai, Y. Yang et al., “Tetrahydroxystilbene glucoside ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in rats: involvement of SIRT1 and TGF-β1 pathway,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 649, no. 1–3, pp. 382–389, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. Y. Cohen, C. Miller, K. J. Bitterman et al., “Calorie restriction promotes mammalian cell survival by inducing the SIRT1 deacetylase,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5682, pp. 390–392, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Hasegawa, S. Wakino, P. Simic et al., “Renal tubular Sirt1 attenuates diabetic albuminuria by epigenetically suppressing Claudin-1 overexpression in podocytes,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1496–1504, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. W. He, Y. Wang, M. Zhang et al., “Sirt1 activation protects the mouse renal medulla from oxidative injury,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 1056–1068, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Hasegawa, S. Wakino, K. Yoshioka et al., “Kidney-specific overexpression of Sirt1 protects against acute kidney injury by retaining peroxisome function,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 17, pp. 13045–13056, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Li, X. Qu, S. D. Ricardo, J. F. Bertram, and D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, “Resveratrol inhibits renal fibrosis in the obstructed kidney: potential role in deacetylation of Smad3,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 1065–1071, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Kume, M. Haneda, K. Kanasaki et al., “Silent information regulator 2 (SIRT1) attenuates oxidative stress-induced mesangial cell apoptosis via p53 deacetylation,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2175–2182, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Kume, M. Haneda, K. Kanasaki et al., “SIRT1 inhibits transforming growth factor β-induced apoptosis in glomerular mesangial cells via Smad7 deacetylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. A. Funk, S. Odejinmi, and R. G. Schnellmann, “SRT1720 induces mitochondrial biogenesis and rescues mitochondrial function after oxidant injury in renal proximal tubule cells,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 333, no. 2, pp. 593–601, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S.-J. Lin, P.-A. Defossez, and L. Guarente, “Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5487, pp. 2126–2128, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Kitada, A. Takeda, T. Nagai, H. Ito, K. Kanasaki, and D. Koya, “Dietary restriction ameliorates diabetic nephropathy through anti-inflammatory effects and regulation of the autophagy via restoration of sirt1 in diabetic wistar fatty (fa/fa) rats: a model of type 2 diabetes,” Experimental Diabetes Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 908185, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. Sieber, M. T. Lindenmeyer, K. Kampe et al., “Regulation of podocyte survival and endoplasmic reticulum stress by fatty acids,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 299, no. 4, pp. F821–F829, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. V. Cybulsky, “Endoplasmic reticulum stressin proteinuric kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. Kroemer, G. Mariño, and B. Levine, “Autophagy and the integrated stress response,” Molecular Cell, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 280–293, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. I. H. Lee, L. Cao, R. Mostoslavsky et al., “A role for the NAD-dependent deacetylase Sirt1 in the regulation of autophagy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 3374–3379, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. Farré, R. Manjithaya, R. D. Mathewson, and S. Subramani, “PpAtg30 tags peroxisomes for turnover by selective autophagy,” Developmental cell, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 365–376, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. Hartleben, M. Gödel, C. Meyer-Schwesinger et al., “Autophagy influences glomerular disease susceptibility and maintains podocyte homeostasis in aging mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 1084–1096, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Kimura, Y. Takabatake, A. Takahashi et al., “Autophagy protects the proximal tubule from degeneration and acute ischemic injury,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 902–913, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Jiang, K. Liu, J. Luo, and Z. Dong, “Autophagy is a renoprotective mechanism during in vitro hypoxia and in vivo ischemia-reperfusion injury,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 1181–1192, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. Periyasamy-Thandavan, M. Jiang, Q. Wei, R. Smith, X. Yin, and Z. Dong, “Autophagy is cytoprotective during cisplatin injury of renal proximal tubular cells,” Kidney International, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 631–640, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Takahashi, T. Kimura, Y. Takabatake et al., “Autophagy guards against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 517–525, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. L. Stanhope, J. M. Schwarz, N. L. Keim et al., “Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1322–1334, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. J. Wang, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan et al., “Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 448–453, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  64. E. P. Rhee, S. Cheng, M. G. Larson et al., “Lipid profiling identifies a triacylglycerol signature of insulin resistance and improves diabetes prediction in humans,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 1402–1411, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus