Grasps Recognition and Evaluation of Stroke Patients for Supporting Rehabilitation Therapy

Table 6

Correlation between the grasp quality measure (GQ) and common arm motor recovery tests.

Test compared with GQ	Relax posture		Tripod grasp		Cylindrical grasp		Lateral grasp
	Pearson correlation	Sig.	Pearson correlation	Sig.	Pearson correlation	Sig.	Pearson correlation	Sig.
ARAT_total	−0.365	0.187	−0.387	0.172	−0.247	0.278	0.078	0.427
ARAT_A	−0.375	0.180	−0.443	0.136	−0.247	0.278	0.008	0.492
ARAT_B	−0.139	0.371	−0.214	0.305	−0.007	0.494	0.209	0.310
ARAT_C	−0.527	0.090	−0.502	0.102	−0.434	0.141	−0.055	0.448
ARAT_D	−0.077	0.429	−0.051	0.452	0.020	0.482	0.347	0.200
FM_total	−0.117	0.391	−0.133	0.376	−0.005	0.496	−0.037	0.465
FM_proximal	0.130	0.380	−0.083	0.422	−0.002	0.498	−0.071	0.434
FM_distal	−0.042	0.461	−0.086	0.419	0.044	0.459	0.023	0.479
FM_coordination	−0.638*	0.044	−0.660*	0.038	−0.574	0.069	−0.441	0.137

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
ARAT = arm scores of the action research arm test; FM = arm scores of the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment.