BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 318254 |

Nerea García, Inmaculada Moreno, Julio Alvarez, María Luisa de la Cruz, Alejandro Navarro, Marta Pérez-Sancho, Teresa García-Seco, Antonio Rodríguez-Bertos, María Luisa Conty, Alfredo Toraño, Antonio Prieto, Lucas Domínguez, Mercedes Domínguez, "Evidence of Leishmania infantum Infection in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in a Natural Area in Madrid, Spain", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 318254, 5 pages, 2014.

Evidence of Leishmania infantum Infection in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in a Natural Area in Madrid, Spain

Academic Editor: Douwe Bakker
Received17 Oct 2013
Revised22 Jan 2014
Accepted24 Jan 2014
Published03 Mar 2014


Leishmaniasis is one of the most important neglected zoonosis and remains endemic in at least 88 developing countries in the world. In addition, anthropogenic environmental changes in urban areas are leading to its emergency world wide. Zoonotic leishmaniasis control might only be achieved by an integrated approach targeting both the human host and the animal reservoirs, which in certain sylvatic cycles are yet to be identified. Recently, hares have been pointed out as competent reservoirs of Leishmania infantum in Spain, but the role of other lagomorphs has not been clarified. Here, 69 rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from a natural area in Madrid in which a high density was present were analyzed using indirect (immunofluorescence antibody test, IFAT) and direct (PCR, culture) techniques. Fifty-seven (82.6%) of the animals were positive to at least one technique, with IFAT yielding the highest proportion of positive samples. L. infantum was isolated in 13% animals demonstrating the occurrence of infection in this setting. Our results suggest that rabbits could play a role of competent reservoir of L. infantum and demonstrate that the prevalence of infection is high in the analyzed area.

1. Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a world-wide vector-borne disease caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania that affect humans and other mammal reservoir hosts [1]. Nowadays leishmaniasis is considered an emerging disease in Central and Northern European countries [2, 3]. In the Mediterranean area, where leishmaniasis is endemic, Leishmania infantum is the agent responsible of the disease [4], and sandflies of the genus Phlebotomus (mainly P. perniciosus) are the main vectors [58] while the dog is considered the major domestic reservoir [911]. Zoonotic leishmaniasis control might only be achieved by an integrated approach targeting both the human host and the animal reservoirs, which in certain sylvatic cycles are yet to be identified. Leishmania infection in wild carnivores (mongooses, red foxes, genets, lynxes, wolves, etc.) and rodents has also been described in different countries [1217] including Spain [1820] but the role of these species in the epidemiological cycle of L. infantum is unclear. A Leishmania-infected mammal species that carries live parasites can be considered a suspected parasite reservoir, but in order to consider it as a proven reservoir its active role in the perpetuation of the disease must be fully demonstrated, including the use of xenodiagnostic studies [16].

However, as a result of recent investigations carried out after the leishmaniasis outbreak occurred in the south-west area of the province of Madrid (Spain) from 2009 to 2012, in which at least 446 human cases have been reported, the Iberian hare (Lepus granatensis) has been described as a new competent reservoir of the disease [2123]. L. infantum infection in hares was evidenced using PCR analysis and indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) [24], and its ability to transmit the parasite to sandflies (P. perniciosus) was demonstrated by xenodiagnostic studies [23]. This laboratory evidence, combined with epidemiological data, confirmed that Iberian hares (and not dogs) were contributing to the outbreak [22]. Another study performed in 94 hares trapped in different geographic regions of Spain found a prevalence of L. infantum infection of 43.6% based on DNA detection in spleen samples from principally two hare species (L. granatensis and L. europaeus) [25], highlighting the potential importance of these species in the epidemiology of leishmaniasis in Spain. In one of the studies assessing the importance of possible alternative reservoirs in the outbreak area of Madrid a seroprevalence of 46% was also reported in rabbits [24], therefore suggesting that hares may not be the only reservoir maintaining the infection in this setting.

In order to evaluate the possible risk posed by rabbits as a potential source of L. infantum infection, another study was carried out in a natural area of Madrid where a very high density of this species has been noted, using indirect (serology) and direct (PCR-detection, culture) diagnostic techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 69 European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were captured for scientific purposes by convenience sampling by ferreting [26] during September 2013 in a public restricted natural area of approximately 80 hectares in Madrid (Central Spain) after receiving ethical clearance by the Health and Environment authorities of Madrid Council. Several favorable conditions for the vector reproductive cycle were present in the area of study, such as a high relative humidity, mean temperatures between 17 and 30°C and large accumulations of organic materials. In addition, the rabbit population in the area showed a substantial increase in the last years. Sample size was set to detect infection for a minimum expected prevalence of 5% with a level of confidence of 95% [27].

Rabbits were transported to the lab within the first five hours after their capture and were necropsied to observe macroscopic lesions compatible with subclinical infections. In addition information on the sex (determined by observing the external genitalia) and age (established based on the presence of cartilage conjunction in the ulna of the forelegs [28]) was available in 44 of the 69 animals (16 male and 28 female, 18 young, and 26 adult rabbits).

Serum, spleen, and skin (from the external ear) samples were collected from all animals for laboratory determinations. Sera were analyzed using IFAT; a portion of the spleen was used immediately for in vitro culture, while the rest of the spleen sample and the skin were stored at −20°C for subsequent PCR analyses.

2.1. IFAT Analysis

Rabbit serum titer against L. infantum was carried out as previously described [24]. Briefly, 24-well glass slides coated with L. infantum (MCAN/ES/97/10,445) zymodeme MON-1 grown for 5 in vitro passages were used. Serum samples (10 μL) were analyzed by serial doubling dilution (1/25 to 1/800) in PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Slides were washed three times (10 min each) in PBS, and 10 μL of fluorescein-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (4050-02; Southern Biotech, AL, USA) diluted in PBS supplemented with Evans blue (diluted 1/104) were added to wells and incubated (37°C, 30 min). After incubation, slides were washed three times in PBS, mounted, and examined in a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop 40; 40x magnification). To detect anti-Leishmania antibodies, a threshold value was established at 1/25 dilution (at this dilution, background antitrypanosomatid reactivity due to natural antibodies was negligible) using sera from Leishmania-seronegative naïve NZW rabbits as described before [24]. As a species-specific target antigen, we used L. infantum promastigotes derived from various culture passages. For genus-specific antigen controls, low-passage L. amazonensis promastigotes were used in parallel.

2.2. PCR Analysis
2.2.1. DNA Extraction

A portion of approximately 10 mg of spleen and 25 mg of skin was placed in 300 μL of NET-10 buffer. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. DNA was resuspended in 150 μL of elution buffer and frozen at −80°C until use.

2.2.2. PCR

A specific Leishmania nested PCR reaction aimed at the SSU-rRNA region [29] was performed in all the skin and spleen samples. Negative (sterile water) and positive controls [DNA obtained from L. infantum (MCAN/ES/97/10,445) zymodeme MON-1 promastigotes] were used in each assay. The reactions were carried out in I-Cycler thermocycler (Bio-Rad) equipment. PCR products were visualized into a 3% agarose (Ultrapure Agarose, Invitrogen) gel using DNA SYBR Safe gel stain (Invitrogen) and 1 ul of loading marker (Promega, WIS, USA; 100 kb ladder) was used. Positive samples yielded a PCR product of 358 pb.

2.3. Limiting Dilution Analysis

Spleens were excised aseptically, weighted, and a piece of ~10 mg was taken to determine parasite DNA by PCR analysis. The remaining spleen tissue was homogenized with a tissue grinder in Schneider’s drosophila medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum (Hy Clone, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (50 mg/mL), (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) 20 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 1% sterile urine, and the homogenate was adjusted to 10 mg of tissue/mL of medium. Eight aliquots of 0.15 mL were seeded in the first column of a 96-well culture plate, and then a series of six serial dilutions (from 1 to 1/1024) were made. The plate was incubated at 27°C for 15 days. Plates were visualized for promastigote growth with an inverted microscope at 200x magnification. Parasite burden was calculated from the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which promastigotes were observed [30].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Proportions of positive samples to each technique and individual characteristics, when available (age, sex) were compared using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Agreement between tests was measured using the Kappa statistic. All calculations were carried out using the SPSS software V.20 (IBM Inc., Chicago, Il, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Different diagnosis techniques were used to confirm Leishmania infection as none of them could be considered as a “gold standard” tool [31]. Overall 52 (75.4%) out of the 69 rabbits were considered positive in the IFAT (Table 1), with titers ranging from 1/25 to 1/800 (81.2% of the seropositive samples had titers of 1/100 or higher). Reactivity to conserved Leishmania spp. epitopes was, on average, two titer steps lower than to that L. infantum, showing a preferential antibody response to epitopes of the infecting species. Our results are in contrast with a previous study performed in wild rabbits in southeastern Spain, in which a seroprevalence of 0% was estimated analyzing 36 plasma samples with a modified commercial ELISA, although one animal was positive using direct PCR on tissues [32]. The seroprevalence in rabbits found in this population was also higher than that recently described in the outbreak area (45.7%) with the same serological test used here [24]. The proportion of seropositive animals was similar in adult (76.9%) and young rabbits, as well as in males (81.2%) and females (75.0%) and therefore no statistically significant association between these variables and the test result was observed (), in agreement with previous results in wild carnivores in Spain [20].

TestSamplePositive samples% of positive samples
(95% Confidence intervalI)

IFATSera5275.4 (64.0–84.0)
Direct PCRSpleen22.9 (0.8–10.0)
Skin1217.4 (10.2–2.8)
IsolationSpleen913.0 (7.0–23.0)

No macroscopic lesions in liver or spleen were observed in all animals after postmortem examination, suggesting a limited clinical impact of the infection in the hosts as described before for wild hosts other than domestic host [33].

PCR analysis of skin samples detected 12 (17.4%) positive samples, while Leishmania DNA was only found in two (2.9%) spleen samples (inconclusive results were found in another animal) (Table 1). One animal was positive simultaneously in both spleen and tissue samples, while another spleen-positive rabbit had a negative PCR-result in the skin. Seven (58.3%) and 45 (78.9%) of the 12 and 57 skin-PCR positive and negative animals, respectively, were also positive in the IFAT, suggesting a lack of association between the results in these tests (Fisher’s exact test, ) (Table 2). Again, no significant association was found between the results of the molecular analysis and the age/sex of the animals.

IFAT PCR on skin sampleIsolationTotal


L. infantum was isolated from the spleen of 9 (13%) of the 69 rabbits (Table 1). The parasitic load ranged from 506 to more than 10,217 parasites per organ (spleen), a load approximately 10 times lower than that observed in experimental infections in mice [30]. No significant association between the culture results and those from the IFAT/PCR was observed (Fisher’s exact test, ).

Agreement between the three techniques performed here (IFAT, direct PCR, and isolation of the parasite) on different samples (serum, spleen, and skin) was very low (Kappa < 0.2 in all cases) (Table 2). The highest proportion of positive samples was observed using IFAT. False positive results in serological tests such as IFAT may occur due to the imperfect specificity of the tests and the presence of cross-reacting antigens, although the IFAT is considered a highly specific test for diagnosis of Leishmania infection [34, 35]. Comparison of the results obtained using antigens from L. infantum and L. amazonensis confirms the specificity of the reactions detected in animals considered as positive here. In addition, the isolation of L. infantum in 13% of the analyzed spleen samples, the first isolation of this parasite in the rabbit to the authors’ knowledge, confirms the presence of a true infection of the rabbits in the area under study. Differences in the results of PCRs performed on spleen and skin samples have been reported before and may be related with the uneven distribution of Leishmania across tissues and the analysis of individuals in different stages of infection [36]. The higher proportion of culture positive spleen samples compared to PCR (performed on spleen) could be explained at least in part by the higher amount of tissue used for the former technique coupled with the low parasitic load found (other techniques as spleen imprints are considered negative if the parasite burden is below 105) [30].

If the four diagnostic tests are interpreted in parallel (i.e., considering an animal as infected if a positive result was found in any test) 57 (82.6%) out of the 69 analyzed individuals would be considered infected. This percentage is higher than those described using different techniques for other potential L. infantum reservoirs such as fox (14.1%) and wolf (20.5%) in peninsular Spain [20], and genet (10%), feral cat (26%), and pine marten (39%) in endemic areas of Mallorca Island [19]. However, differences may be also attributed at least in part to the use of different diagnostic techniques (IFAT, direct PCR on spleen and skin samples and culture applied in parallel compared with direct PCR on spleen or blood samples and Western blotting-based serology). A number of epidemiological studies have determined anti-L. infantum seroprevalence in the cat using in-house developed IFAT techniques, although sensitivity and specificity parameters were not determined [3740]. There is thus a clear need to evaluate and optimize IFAT as an analytical method for epidemiological use in noncanine species.

Our results are comparable to those determined in hares in a recent leishmaniosis outbreak in Madrid (considered as a local important reservoir of disease) by direct PCR (43.5%) and IFAT (74.1%) [24]. This could be due to the confluence of certain epidemiological factors favoring leishmaniosis transmission such as an increased density in the host and vector populations coupled by the lack of predators or other competent hosts for the parasite, similar to what was described in the outbreak area in Madrid [41].

4. Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that L. infantum infection is present in the rabbit population in Madrid as evidenced by the detection of specific antibodies against the parasite and Leishmania DNA and, especially, by the first isolation of this protozoon from rabbit. The lack of macroscopical lesions observed in spleen and liver of positive animals suggest that infection may remain asymptomatic and, given the high proportion of positive individuals found using all techniques, highlights the potential importance of this host species as an alternative reservoir of infection as already described for hares in Spain. Further studies are needed to determine the role of rabbits in the epidemiology of leishmaniasis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank Raúl López, Gabriela Luz Torre, Ines de Cárdenas, S. Crespo, and A. B. Martín for their help in the collection and processing of samples. J. Alvarez received a Sara Borrell postdoctoral contract (CD11/00261, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación). This work is a contribution to the EU FP7 ANTIGONE Project (278976) and was partially supported by the program I+D “Vigilancia Sanitaria” from the Autonomous Community of Madrid.


  1. A. L. Bañuls, M. Hide, and F. Prugnolle, “Leishmania and the leishmaniases: a parasite genetic update and advances in taxonomy, epidemiology and pathogenicity in humans,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 64, pp. 1–458, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Gramiccia and L. Gradoni, “The current status of zoonotic leishmaniases and approaches to disease control,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 35, no. 11-12, pp. 1169–1180, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. D. Ready, “Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 15, no. 10, Article ID 19505, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. Boelaert, B. Criel, J. Leeuwenburg, W. van Damme, D. le Ray, and P. van der Stuyft, “Visceral leishmaniasis control: a public health perspective,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 465–471, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. M. Aransay, P. D. Ready, and F. Morillas-Marquez, “Population differentiation of Phlebotomus perniciosus in Spain following postglacial dispersal,” Heredity, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 316–325, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Gálvez, M. A. Descalzo, I. Guerrero, G. Miró, and R. Molina, “Mapping the current distribution and predicted spread of the leishmaniosis sand fly vector in the Madrid Region (Spain) based on environmental variables and expected climate change,” Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 799–806, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. A. L. Franco, F. Morillas-Márquez, S. D. Barón et al., “Genetic structure of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) ariasi populations, the vector of Leishmania infantum in the western Mediterranean: epidemiological implications,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1335–1346, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Maroli, M. D. Feliciangeli, L. Bichaud, R. N. Charrel, and L. Gradoni, “Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 123–147, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. Gálvez, G. Miró, M. A. Descalzo et al., “Emerging trends in the seroprevalence of canine leishmaniosis in the Madrid region (central Spain),” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 169, no. 3-4, pp. 327–334, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Gálvez, M. A. Descalzo, G. Miró et al., “Seasonal trends and spatial relations between environmental/meteorological factors and leishmaniosis sand fly vector abundances in Central Spain,” Acta Tropica, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 95–102, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Gállego, “Emerging parasitic zoonoses: leishmaniosis,” Revue Scientifique et Technique, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 661–676, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  12. P. Abranches, F. M. C. Silva, M. M. S. Rlbeiro, F. J. Lopes, and L. T. Gomes, “Kala-azar in portugal-IV. The wild reservoir: the isolation of a Leishmania from a fox,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 420–421, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  13. D. A. Elnaiem, M. M. Hassan, R. Maingon et al., “The egyptian mongoose, Herpestes ichneumon, is a possible reservoir host of visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Sudan,” Parasitology, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 531–536, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Helhazar, J. Leitao, A. Duarte, L. Tavares, and I. P. da Fonseca, “Natural infection of synathropic rodent species Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus by Leishmania infantum in Sesimbra and Sintra, Portugal,” Parasits and Vectors, vol. 6, article 88, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Mohebali, H. Hajjaran, Y. Hamzavi et al., “Epidemiological aspects of canine visceral leishmaniosis in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 129, no. 3-4, pp. 243–251, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. J. Quinnell and O. Courtenay, “Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis,” Parasitology, vol. 136, no. 14, pp. 1915–1934, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Mirzaei, S. Rouhani, H. Taherkhani et al., “Molecular detection and conventional identification of leishmania species in reservoir hosts of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in fars province,” Iran Journal of Parasitology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 280–288, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. Criado-Fornelio, L. Gutierrez-Garcia, F. Rodriguez-Caabeiro, E. Reus-Garcia, M. A. Roldan-Soriano, and M. A. Diaz-Sanchez, “A parasitological survey of wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from the province of Guadalajara, Spain,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 245–251, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Millán, S. Zanet, M. Gomis, A. Trisciuoglio, N. Negre, and E. Ferroglio, “An investigation into alternative reservoirs of canine leishmaniasis on the endemic Island of Mallorca (Spain),” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 352–357, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Sobrino, E. Ferroglio, A. Oleaga et al., “Characterization of widespread canine leishmaniasis among wild carnivores from Spain,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 155, no. 3-4, pp. 198–203, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. “Brote comunitario de leishmaniasis en la zona suroeste de la Comunidad de Madrid. A-o 2011,” Report Community Outbreak of Leishmaniasis in the Southwest Area of the Community of Madrid, Year 2011, Boletin Epidemiologico de la Comunidad de Madrid, vol. 17, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Arce, A. Estirado, M. Ordobas et al., “Re-emergence of leishmaniasis in Spain: community outbreak in Madrid, Spain, 2009 to 2012,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 18, no. 30, Article ID 20546, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Molina, M. I. Jimenez, I. Cruz et al., “The hare (Lepus granatensis) as potential sylvatic reservoir of Leishmania infantum in Spain,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 190, no. 1-2, pp. 268–271, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  24. I. Moreno, J. Alvarez, N. Garcia et al., “Detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in sylvatic lagomorphs from an epidemic area of Madrid using the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 199, no. 3-4, pp. 264–267, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Ruiz-Fons, E. Ferroglio, and C. Gortazar, “Leishmania infantum in free-ranging hares, Spain, 2004–2010,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 18, no. 30, Article ID 205241, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. P. Cowan, “The use of ferrets (Mustela furo) in the study and management of the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus),” Journal of Zoology, vol. 24, pp. 570–574, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Thrusfield, “Surveys,” in Veterinary Epidemiology, chapter 13, Blackwell Sciences, Oxford, UK, 3rd edition, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  28. F. Ballesteros, Las especies de caza en España. Biología, ecología y conservación, Estudio y Gestión del Medio, Colección Técnica, Oviedo, Spain, 1998.
  29. I. Cruz, C. Cañavate, J. M. Rubio et al., “A nested polymerase chain reaction (Ln-PCR) for diagnosing and monitoring Leishmania infantum infection in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 96, supplement 1, pp. S185–S189, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  30. P. A. Buffet, A. Sulahian, Y. J. F. Garin, N. Nassar, and F. Derouin, “Culture microtitration: a sensitive method for quantifying Leishmania infantum in tissues of infected mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2167–2168, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. Marfurt, A. Nasereddin, I. Niederwieser, C. L. Jaffe, H.-P. Beck, and I. Felger, “Identification and differentiation of Leishmania species in clinical samples by PCR amplification of the miniexon sequence and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 3147–3153, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Chitimia, C. I. Muñoz-García, D. Sánchez-Velasco et al., “Cryptic Leishmaniosis by Leishmania infantum, a feature of canines only? A study of natural infection in wild rabbits, humans and dogs in southeastern Spain,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. O. Courtenay, R. J. Quinell, and C. Dye, “The role of foxes (Carnivora: Canidae) in the maintenance and transmission of Leishmania infantum: implications for peridomestic control,” in Proceedings of Round Table on Canine Leishmaniasis, World Leishmaniasis Conference II, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  34. L. Gradoni and M. Gramiccia, “Leishmaniosis,” in OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (Mammal, Birds and Bees), chapter 2. 1. 8, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. Mettler, F. Grimm, G. Capelli, H. Camp, and P. Deplazes, “Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, an immunofluorescent- antibody test, and two rapid tests (immunochromatographic-dipstick and gel tests) for serological diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic Leishmania infections in dogs,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5515–5519, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Maia and L. Campino, “Methods for diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis and immune response to infection,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 274–287, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Poli, F. Abramo, P. Barsotti et al., “Feline leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum in Italy,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 181–191, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Martín-Sánchez, C. Acedo, M. Muñoz-Pérez, B. Pesson, O. Marchal, and F. Morillas-Márquez, “Infection by Leishmania infantum in cats: epidemiological study in Spain,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 145, no. 3-4, pp. 267–273, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Ayllon, M. A. Tesouro, I. Amusategui, A. Villaescusa, F. Rodriguez-Franco, and Á. Sainz, “Serologic and molecular evaluation of Leishmania infantum in cats from central Spain,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1149, pp. 361–364, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Maia, J. Gomes, J. Cristóvão et al., “Feline Leishmania infection in a canine leishmaniasis endemic region, Portugal,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 174, no. 3-4, pp. 336–340, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. (SNEDO) Sistema de Notificación de Enfermedades de Declaración Obligatoria, Institut of Public Heatlh, Community of Madrid, “Diseases transmitted by vectors: leishmaniasis and paludism,” 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Nerea García et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.