Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 416205, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/416205
Research Article

Speech Understanding with a New Implant Technology: A Comparative Study with a New Nonskin Penetrating Baha System

1Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
2Cochlear Bone Anchored Hearing Solutions, Mölnlycke, Sweden

Received 6 March 2014; Accepted 16 May 2014; Published 23 July 2014

Academic Editor: Nozomu Matsumoto

Copyright © 2014 Anja Kurz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Hakansson, A. Tjellstrom, U. Rosenhall, and P. Carlsson, “The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 100, no. 3-4, pp. 229–239, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. T. Faber, C. A. J. Dun, R. C. Nelissen, E. A. M. Mylanus, C. W. R. J. Cremers, and M. K. S. Hol, “Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 104–110, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Pfiffner, M. D. Caversaccio, and M. Kompis, “Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 728–735, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Kurz, M. Caversaccio, and M. Kompis, “Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 604–610, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Mudry and A. Tjellström, “Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 71, pp. 1–9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Håkansson, G. Lidén, A. Tjellström et al., “Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, Supplement, vol. 151, pp. 1–16, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. McDermott and P. Sheehan, “Paediatric baha,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 71, pp. 56–62, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Wazen, J. B. Spitzer, S. N. Ghossaini et al., “Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J. Wazen, B. Wycherly, and J. Daugherty, “Complications of bone-anchored hearing devices,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 71, pp. 63–72, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. T. Faber, M. J. F. De Wolf, J. W. J. de Rooy, M. K. S. Hol, C. W. R. J. Cremers, and E. A. M. Mylanus, “Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions,” Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 742–747, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Negri, O. Bernath, and R. Häusler, “Bone conduction implants: xomed audiant bone conductor(TM) vs. BAHA,” Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 394–396, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Siegert and J. Kanderske, “A new semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device: Clinical, surgical, and audiologic outcomes in patients with congenital ear canal atresia,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 927–934, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Siegert, “Partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without a percutaneous abutment (otomag): technique and preliminary clinical results,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 71, pp. 41–46, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. K. S. Hol, R. C. Nelissen, M. J. H. Agterberg, C. W. R. J. Cremers, and A. F. M. Snik, “Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1071–1075, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Barbara, M. Perotti, B. Gioia, L. Volpini, and S. Monini, “Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 133, no. 10, pp. 1058–1064, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Kompis, M. Krebs, and R. Häusler, “Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 829–835, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. J. Zarowski, N. Verstraeten, T. Somers, D. Riff, and E. F. Offeciers, “Headbands, testbands and softbands in preoperative testing and application of bone-anchored devices in adults and children,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 71, pp. 124–131, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. C. Flynn and M. Hillbratt, “Improving the accuracy of Baha fittings through measures of direct bone conduction,” Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 5, supplement 1, pp. S43–S47, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Wagener, T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier, “Entwicklung und evaluation eines satztestes für die deutsche sprache teil III: evaluation des oldenburger satztestes,” Audiologic Acoustic, vol. 38, pp. 86–95, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Pfiffner, M. Kompis, and C. Stieger, “Bone-anchored hearing aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 884–890, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Verstraeten, A. J. Zarowski, T. Somers, D. Riff, and E. F. Offeciers, “Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the “snap” abutment,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus