Recent Development in Production and Biotechnological Application of Microbial EnzymesView this Special Issue
A Noncellulosomal Mannanase26E Contains a CBM59 in Clostridium cellulovorans
A multicomponent enzyme-complex prevents efficient degradation of the plant cell wall for biorefinery. In this study, the method of identifying glycoside hydrolases (GHs) to degrade hemicelluloses was demonstrated. The competence of C. cellulovorans, which changes to be suitable for degradation of each carbon source, was used for the method. C. cellulovorans was cultivated into locust bean gum (LBG) that is composed of galactomannan. The proteins produced by C. cellulovorans were separated into either fractions binding to crystalline cellulose or not. Proteins obtained from each fraction were further separated by SDS-PAGE and were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and were detected for mannanase activity. The proteins having the enzymatic activity for LBG were cut out and were identified by mass spectrometry. As a result, four protein bands were classified into glycosyl hydrolase family 26 (GH26) mannanases. One of the identified mannanases, Man26E, contains a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) family 59, which binds to xylan, mannan, and Avicel. Although mannose and galactose are the same as a hexose, the expression patterns of the proteins from C. cellulovorans were quite different. More interestingly, zymogram for mannanase activity showed that Man26E was detected in only LBG medium.
The plant cell wall is composed of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. The formation of plant cell wall prevents a biomass saccharification for biorefinery . Since hemicellulose was composed of various sugar chains such as glucose, xylose, galactose, mannose, and arabinose, the degradation of plant cell wall needed various and different kinds of enzymes . β-mannanase mainly produces mannose to degrade galactomannan or glucomannan. Galactomannan, which is a main component in locust bean gum (LBG), is composed of β-(1-4)-D-mannopyranoside chain attached with α-D-galactose (Figure 1).
C. cellulovorans, which is an anaerobic mesophile , has an ability to degrade plant-biomass directly to produce a multienzyme complex called the “cellulosome” [4–8]. Genomic analysis revealed that this organism not only has 17 cellulosomal cellulases and 10 cellulosomal hemicellulases, but it also has 63 noncellulosomal enzymes related to polysaccharides degradation [9, 10]. In addition, members of cellulosomal subunits are changed to suitable and target substrates [11–14]. Thus, the method of functional protein evaluation is the best way to identify the enzymes for degrading each carbohydrate substrates. In this study, we identified several mannanases from C. cellulovorans for degrading LBG using functional protein evaluation and genomic data. In addition, we report that one of the identified mannanase 26E (Man26E) contains a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) family 59.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains and Media
The proteins used in proteomic and comparative analyses were produced by C. cellulovorans 743B. This organismwas grown under strictly anaerobic conditions at 37°C in medium containing 0.5% (w/v) glucose, mannose, galactose, or LBG as a carbon source .
2.2. Alignment of Amino Acid Sequences and Phylogenetic Trees
The databases used for sequencing data are as follows: NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), GenomeNet (http://www.genome.jp/), and CAZy (http://www.cazy.org/). The Clustal program  was used to carry out alignments of amino acid sequences.
2.3. Protein Production and Purification
The culture supernatants in C. cellulovorans were centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. The proteins in the supernatant were precipitated by dissolving ammonium sulfate and the precipitate was dissolved in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 6.0). The solution was dialyzed at 4°C for three hours. This solution was used as a total protein fraction. Crystalline cellulose (Avicel) was added to a 1-mL aliquot and incubated at 4°C for 1 hour. The mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was used as a nonbound fraction. The pellets binding to Avicel were washed twice by the same buffer at 4°C and were centrifuged. After the supernatant was removed, the pellets binding to Avicel were washed by distilled water at 25°C. The supernatant was used as a bound fraction. The concentration of proteins was determined with bovine serum albumin as a standard using protein assay kit (BIO-RAD).
The zymogram for mannanase activity was performed with 7.5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel containing 0.07% (w/v) LBG. After SDS-PAGE was performed, the gels were soaked into 25% isopropanol at room temperature for 6 h. The gels were washed for 20 min with 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 6.0) and were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour in the same buffer. Next, the gels were stained with 0.2% (w/v) Congo red solution for 20 min. The stained gels were destained by 1 M NaCl several times until white halos emerge.
2.5. Functional Protein Evaluation
The purified proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and were stained by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) and for mannanase activity. The selected 5 bands, which were observed by mannanase activity with zymogram, were cut out. The pieces of gels containing protein(s) were alkylated and digested by trypsin (Figure 2). The digested products by typsin were separated to 119 aliquots by nano-LC and the aliquots were analyzed by mass spectrums (MS). The proteins containing the aliquots were identified to compare amino acid sequences. The resulted analysis was performed with genomic data using Mascot software (MATRIX SCIENCE).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Comparison of Man26E and Other GH Family 26 Mannanases in C. cellulovorans
According to C. cellulovorans genomic data, schematic models of GH family 26 mannanases are shown in Figure 2. Four GH26 mannanases (Man26A, Man26C, Man26D, and ManB) were identified into cellulosomal enzymes that have a dockerin domain at the C-terminus. In contrast, Man26E and Man26F were classified into noncellulosomal enzymes. The alignment of the catalytic domains among GH26 mannanases is shown in Figure 3(a). Based on amino acid sequences of the catalytic domains among them, phylogenetic trees of GH26 mannanases in C. cellulovorans are shown in Figure 3(b). Man26A, Man26C and Man5B  have carbohydrate-binding module 6 (CBM6) that were reported for binding amorphous cellulose and β-1,4-xylan. On the other hand, Man26F has a CBM11 binding of β-1,4-glucan and β-1,3-1,4-mixed linked glucans and a part of CBM27 binding to mannan, respectively. Putative catalytic base [16, 17], which is Glu-166 in Man26E, was conserved in all GH26 mannanases in C. cellulovorans (Figure 3(a)). Interestingly, phylogenetic tree indicated that Man26A, Man5B, and Man26C were closely located, while Man26D, Man26E, or Man26F was far from each other (Figure 3(b)). These results suggested that three genes encoding: Man26A, Man5B, and Man26C were close to each other because there enzymes are cellulosomal enzymes. Moreover, it is possible that the genes encoding Man26D, Man26E, and Man26F might be obtained from other organisms except Clostridia.
3.2. Functional Protein Evaluation and Induced Expression of Man26E Caused by the Difference of Carbon Source
Table 1 shows the identified mannanases by functional protein evaluation. The protein bands that are represented to LBGB1 and LBGB3 contained Man26A and ManB , respectively (Figure 4), while LBGB4 and LBGN1 contained Man26E. On the other hand, LBGB1 contained Eng5B (accession number: YP_003842513.1.) which belongs to GH5. More interestingly, all these enzymes except Eng5B in the LBG media had a GH26 region.
C. cellulovorans can be grown on glucose, mannose, galactose, or LBG. The proteins from the culture supernatants were subjected to SDS-PAGE. There was no difference of bands in all fractions between glucose and mannose as a hexose (Figure 5(a)). On the other hand, several different bands appeared between galactose and LBG in comparison with glucose and mannose. In particular, only few bands having mannanase activity were detected with galactose (Figure 5(b)). More interestingly, although LBG is comprised of mannose and galactose, Man26E band appeared in only LBG in all fractions.
3.3. Man26E Contains a CBM59
Amino acid sequence analysis indicated Man26E has a CBM59 at its C-terminal region (Figure 6). The homologies between 163 amino acid sequence of CBM59 in Man26E and the other amino acid sequences were, for example, as follows: 53% with mannan endo-1,4-beta-mannosidase A and B from Paenibacillus mucilaginosus 3016; 52% with glycoside hydrolase families 5 and 6 from Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2; 51% with mannanase from Bacillus circulans; 48% with beta-mannanase precursor from Bacillus sp. N16-5; 48% with mannanase from Bacillus sp. JAMB-602; 41% with xylanase from uncultured bacterium. Phylogenetic tree showed that there were no Clostridia possessing a CBM59 except for C. cellulovorans (Figure 7). All of 15 organisms (containing uncharacterized organisms) having a CBM59 were bacteria and firmicutes outside of Herpetosiphon aurantiacus, which is classified into chloroflexi. Interestingly, CBM59 of C. cellulovorans was most close to H. aurantiacus CBM59 between the evolutionary relationships (Figure 7). The xylanase ManF-X10 from uncultured bacterium sharing 41% identity with the C-terminal region of Man26E was demonstrated to bind ivory nut mannan, oat spelt xylan and Avicel . However, it is suggested that the Avicel-bound activity of Man26E showed only nonbound fractions (Figures 4 and 5(b)). Furthermore, although Man26A, Man5B, and ManB were detected with an Avicel-bound fraction, Man26E was identified into a nonbound fraction (Figure 4 and Table 1). Putative aromatic residues of binding to the carbohydrate substrates were conserved in three-fourths of aromatic residues between ManF-X10 and Man26E (Figure 6). These results indicated that the affinity of CBM59 in Man26E to polysaccharides such as cellulose and hemicelluloses was weakened by deletion of aromatic amino acids.
Since CBM59 in Man26E binds to LBG and Avicel, Man26E could play a role on degradation of mannan attached to cellulose in the plant cell wall. These results in this study were strongly supported by previous studies that a high-synergistic effect was generated between the cellulosome and noncellulosomal enzymes . For example, it is known that the main scaffolding protein CbpA in the C. cellulovorans cellulosome binds to crystalline cellulose. Therefore, it is assumed that Man26E should be close to the cellulosome and could contribute to degrade the plant cell wall such as LBG with synergistic activity.
Man26E, which was one of the identified mannanases from the culture supernatant of C. cellulovorans by functional protein evaluation, was expressed only in LBG consisting of mannose and galactose, whereas it was not induced into glucose, mannose, or galactose. The alignment of CBM59 in Man26E revealed that aromatic amino acids were highly conserved and estimated to bind carbohydrate substrates. This is the first report that Man26E in C. cellulovorans contains a CBM59 which has never been found in Clostridia.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
This research was in part supported by Japan Society for Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Agrochemistry and the Sumitomo Foundation for Environmental Research.
L. R. Lynd, P. J. Weimer, W. H. van Zyl, and I. S. Pretorius, “Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 506–577, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Lynd, C. E. Wyman, and T. U. Gerngross, “Biocommodity engineering,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 777–793, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sleat, R. A. Mah, and R. Robinson, “Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium cellulovorans sp. nov,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 88–93, 1984.View at: Google Scholar
R. H. Doi, M. Goldstein, S. Hashida, J.-S. Park, and M. Takagi, “The Clostridium cellulovorans cellulosome,” Critical Reviews in Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
R. H. Doi and Y. Tamaru, “The Clostridium cellulovorans cellulosome: an enzyme complex with plant cell wall degrading activity,” Chemical Records, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Goldstein, M. Takagi, S. Hashida, O. Shoseyov, R. H. Doi, and I. H. Segel, “Characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose-binding protein A,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175, no. 18, pp. 5762–5768, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
O. Shoseyov, M. Takagi, M. A. Goldstein, and R. H. Doi, “Primary sequence analysis of Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose binding protein A,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 3483–3487, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
M. Takagi, S. Hashida, M. A. Goldstein, and R. H. Doi, “The hydrophobic repeated domain of the Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose-binding protein (CbpA) has specific interactions with endoglucanases,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175, no. 21, pp. 7119–7122, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Tamaru, H. Miyake, K. Kuroda et al., “Genome sequence of the cellulosome-producing mesophilic organism Clostridium cellulovorans 743B,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 901–902, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tamaru, H. Miyake, K. Kuroda et al., “Comparison of the mesophilic cellulosome-producing Clostridium cellulovorans genome with other cellulosome-related clostridial genomes,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. O. Han, H. Yukawa, M. Inui, and R. H. Doi, “Effect of carbon source on the cellulosomal subpopulations of Clostridium cellulovorans,” Microbiology, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 1491–1497, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. O. Han, H. Yukawa, M. Inui, and R. H. Doi, “Regulation of expression of cellulosomal cellulase and hemicellulase genes in Clostridium cellulovorans,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 185, no. 20, pp. 6067–6075, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Morisaka, K. Matsui, Y. Tatsukami et al., “Profile of native cellulosomal proteins of Clostridium cellulovorans adapted to various carbon sources,” AMB Express, vol. 2, article 37, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tamaru, S. Ui, K. Murashima et al., “Formation of protoplasts from cultured tobacco cells and Arabidopsis thaliana by the action of cellulosomes and pectate lyase from Clostridium cellulovorans,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2614–2618, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947–2948, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Bolam, N. Hughes, R. Virden et al., “Mannanase A from Pseudomonas fluorescens ssp. cellulosa is a retaining glycosyl hydrolase in which E212 and E320 are the putative catalytic residues,” Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 50, pp. 16195–16204, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Braithwaite, G. W. Black, G. P. Hazlewood, B. R. S. Ali, and H. J. Gilbert, “A non-modular endo-β-1,4-mannanase from Pseudomonas fluorescens subspecies cellulose,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 1005–1010, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
S. D. Jeon, K. O. Yu, S. W. Kim, and S. O. Han, “A celluloytic complex from Clostridium cellulovorans consisting of mannanase B and endoglucanase e has synergistic effects on galactomannan degradation,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 565–572, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, R. Kibblewhite, W. J. Orts, and C. C. Lee, “Molecular cloning and characterization of multidomain xylanase from manure library,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2071–2078, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kosugi, T. Arai, and R. H. Doi, “Degradation of cellulosome-produced cello-oligosaccharides by an extracellular non-cellulosomal β-glucan glucohydrolase, BglA, from Clostridium cellulovorans,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar