BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 460251 |

Muskaan Belani, Nupur Purohit, Prakash Pillai, Sharad Gupta, Sarita Gupta, "Modulation of Steroidogenic Pathway in Rat Granulosa Cells with Subclinical Cd Exposure and Insulin Resistance: An Impact on Female Fertility", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 460251, 13 pages, 2014.

Modulation of Steroidogenic Pathway in Rat Granulosa Cells with Subclinical Cd Exposure and Insulin Resistance: An Impact on Female Fertility

Academic Editor: Leon Spicer
Received22 Feb 2014
Revised11 Jul 2014
Accepted28 Jul 2014
Published19 Aug 2014


Changes in lifestyle lead to insulin resistance (IR) in females ultimately predisposing them towards infertility. In addition, cadmium (Cd), an environmental endocrine disruptor, is reported for detrimental effects on granulosa cells, thus leading to ovarian dysfunction. A combination of these factors, lifestyle and environment, seems to play a role in etiology of idiopathic infertility that accounts for 50% amongst the total infertility cases. To address this issue, we made an attempt to investigate the extent of Cd impact on insulin-resistant (IR) granulosa cells. We exposed adult female Charles Foster rats to dexamethasone and confirmed IR condition by fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI). On treatment of IR rats with Cd, the preliminary studies demonstrated prolonged estrous cyclicity, decrease in serum estradiol concentrations, abnormal histology of ovary, and increased granulosa cell death. Further gene and protein expression studies of steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD), and cytochrome P450 aromatase (CYP19A1) were performed. Protein expression studies demonstrated significant decrease in treated groups when compared with control. Study revealed that, in spite of the molecular parameters being affected at varied level, overall ovarian physiology is maximally affected in IR and Cd coexposed group, thus mimicking the condition similar to those prevailing in infertile females.

1. Introduction

Development and function of female reproductive tract depend on coordinated biological processes. Follicular development and ovulation are dependent on proliferation and differentiation of both granulosa and theca cells that undergo steroidogenesis upon stimulation with gonadotropins and intraovarian cytokines. Granulosa cells of the ovary are very important components that are involved in the production of sex steroid hormones and a milieu of growth factors involved in interaction with oocyte development. Cellular growth in ovary is controlled by apoptosis of granulosa cells, a phenomenon responsible for follicular atresia. Interference with any of these processes can predispose women to reproductive dysfunctions ultimately leading to infertility [1]. It has been estimated that approximately 15% of the population in industrially developed countries are infertile [2]. Among the various proposed etiological factors for infertility, genetic, immunologic, endocrinology, and environmental disorders account for 50% of the patients; however, in the remaining 50%, the cause remains unknown (idiopathic infertility) [3, 4]. It is now thought that the idiopathic infertility might be due to lifestyle-environment interaction.

Changes in lifestyle with high carbohydrate diet intake or sedentary habits lead to insulin resistant (IR) condition. It has been reported that approximately 50–75% of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) have some degree of IR. Furthermore, it has been found that women with IR are more likely to have PCOS [5]. Besides the classical target organs for insulin action such as liver, adipose tissue, and muscle, the presence of insulin receptors in both stromal and follicular compartments and findings for insulin’s ability to stimulate steroidogenesis in ovarian cells in vitro have eventually established ovary as an important target organ for insulin action [6]. Hyperinsulinemia in IR alters the genes, enzymes, and proteins that are crucial for the steroidogenic machinery ultimately affecting follicle development and ovulation [7].

Amongst many environmental pollutants, cadmium (Cd) is an endocrine disruptor which is relatively dispersed in the environment mainly because of pollution from a variety of sources, including mining, smelting, fossil fuel combustion, batteries, paints, plastics, and tobacco smoke [8]. Because of high rate of soil-to-plant transfer, Cd is a contaminant found in most human foodstuffs, which renders diet a primary source of exposure among nonsmoking, nonoccupationally exposed populations [9]. Due to its unknown biological function, low rate of excretion from the body, and long biological half-life, it accumulates over time in blood, kidney, liver, and the reproductive organs such as placenta, testis, and ovaries [10]. Using the benchmark dose- (BMD-) derived urinary Cd threshold, the tolerable weekly intake for Cd was 2.5 μg/Kg body weight, which corresponds to 25 μg/day for a person who weighs 70 kg [11]. The stimulatory or inhibitory effects of Cd on key ovarian steroidogenic enzymes at a subclinical dose of 0.05 mg/kg body wt. are very well established in ovary and granulosa cells in our lab [1215]. In recent times, our lab has also demonstrated decrease in expression of StAR in granulosa cells of F1 generation rats that were exposed to Cd during their developmental age [16]. Decrease in gene expression of CYP19A1 due to Cd exposure has been established in carp ovarian follicles [17]. Apart from reproductive disorder, results of both human and animal studies suggest an association between Cd exposure, elevated blood glucose levels, and the development of diabetes [18].

To date, studies have mainly focused on investigating the effect of Cd and IR individually on granulosa cells ultimately affecting fertility. It has been observed that Cd and IR are prevalent in today’s lifestyle. In light of this, we aim to investigate the effect of Cd on dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid, induced IR granulosa cells, which could be mimicking present environment condition and sedentary life on the reproductive physiology at both cellular and molecular levels. There is ample evidence, in numerous species, that glucocorticoids result in increased serum insulin and glucose, decreased insulin-mediated glucose uptake, and insulin resistance [5, 19, 20]. We further evaluated certain physiological parameters along with mRNA and protein expression of StAR for cholesterol transport and CYP19A1 and 17β-HSD responsible for steroid synthesis in granulosa cells of IR animals exposed to Cd.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hormones and Reagents

Pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin hormone (PMSG) and trypan blue were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (USA). All the other chemicals used were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sisco Research Laboratories Ltd. (Mumbai, India). Glucose estimation kit glucose oxidase-peroxidase (GOD-POD) was from Reckon Diagnostics. Rat Insulin ELISA kit and serum estradiol kit were procured from Mercodia and Abbott, respectively.

2.2. Antibodies

Rabbit polyclonal antibody against CYP19A1 and β-actin was purchased from cell signaling. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against 17β-HSD and StAR protein were generous gift from Dr. Vann Luu-The (CHUL Research Center and Laval University, Canada) and Dr. Douglas M. Stocco (Department of Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA), respectively.

2.3. Animals and Experimental Design

All rats used in these studies were of the Charles Foster strain and were bred in our own animal facility. Animals were maintained under standard laboratory conditions (temperature: 24 ± 2°C; light: 12-h light/12-h dark) and were given standard pellet diet and water ad libitum throughout the experimental period. Adult virgin female Charles Foster rats weighing 180–220 g were used for this study and were monitored regularly for each stage of estrous cycle. Animals were divided into four groups with 6 animals in each group and the doses were given as shown in Figure 1. The dosage was selected on the basis of previous reports [12, 19]. After 28 days of dexamethasone treatment, animals showing IR were chosen for the study and sacrificed at proestrus stage after superovulation induction with PMSG-10 IU and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG-100 IU) hormones. The experimental study was approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of the Department of Biochemistry, the M.S. University of Baroda, and was in accordance with the CPCSEA norms.

2.4. Selection of IR Animals and Confirmation of IR

Standard oral glucose tolerance test was performed after 28 days of dexamethasone injection. After 12-hour fasting, 300 μL of blood was collected from retro-orbital sinus for glucose and immunoreactive insulin measurement followed by oral administration of 2 gm/kg body weight glucose and 100 μL blood collection at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min for OGTT. The blood was subjected to 4000 rpm for 10 min and serum was separated. Glucose was estimated from serum using GOD-POD kit as per the manufacturers instructions. Fasting serum was then proceeded for determining insulin levels using Rat Insulin ELISA kit according to manufacturers protocol (Mercodia, Germany). The fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI), a measure of the insulin sensitivity, was calculated according to the following formula:FIRI = fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) × fasting serum glucose (mmol/L)/25.

FIRI has been shown to have a better correlation with insulin sensitivity values than the fasting glucose/insulin ratio giving a reference index value as shown in Table 1 [21].

Index valueIndication

Less than 2.67Normal
Between 2.93 and 3.12Typically found in persons who are obese and may indicate insulin resistance
Above 3.22Indicates prediabetes or type-II diabetes

2.5. Estrous Cyclicity

Estrous cyclicity was monitored throughout the dosage schedule. Vaginal lavages from female rats were obtained and viewed under a microscope daily (between 0900 and 1000 h) for at least three consecutive cycles. A normal estrous cycle was defined as exhibiting vaginal cytology that was leukocytic (diestrus) for 2 days followed by nucleated cells (proestrus) for 1 day, cornified cells (estrus) for 1 day, and mixed cells (metestrus) for 1 day.

2.6. Serum Estradiol

Estradiol concentrations were measured from rat serum by commercially available kit (Architect Estradiol, Abbott, Ireland) using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay technology. The resulting chemiluminescent reaction was measured as relative light units (RLUs) that were detected by the ARCHITECT optical system.

2.7. Histological Analysis

One ovary from each group was removed and stored in 10% formaldehyde and then proceeded for sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Histological observations were made microscopically. The slides were observed for mature follicle, fibrosis, and other morphological changes.

2.8. Granulosa Cell Isolation

Granulosa cells were isolated at proestrus stage from the rat ovary as explained earlier [22]. Briefly, ovaries were removed from animals and kept in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) and centrifuged at 1000 rpm and 4°C to remove all the fat. The ovaries were then incubated in EGTA-BSA solution for 15 min at 37°C followed by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min. Samples were then incubated in hypertonic sucrose solution for 5 min at 4°C and then centrifuged at 1500 rpm. The granulosa cells were expressed from ovary in HBSS by blunt spatula and then washed three times with HBSS-EGTA by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 min. The viability of cells was analysed at final stage by trypan blue exclusion dye method.

2.9. Total RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from granulosa cells by using TRIzol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Purity of RNA was confirmed by 260/280 ratio and checked for integrity. 2 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into first strand cDNA and subjected to PCR amplification for various genes as mentioned in Table 2 [23]. Gradient PCR was performed with a range of annealing temperature from 51 to 60°C. cDNA was amplified for 35 cycles using Fermentas 2x master mix (1.5 unit Taq polymerase, 2 mM dNTP, 10x Tris, glycerol reaction buffer, 25 mM MgCl2) with 20 pM forward and reverse primer. β-Actin served as internal control and negative RT was performed with untranscribed RNA. PCR products were separated on 15% polyacrylamide gels (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and visualized and images were captured with Alpha Imager software (UVP Image Analysis Software Systems, USA) for densitometric analysis.

Gene nameGenBank accession numberSequence of the primer
Fw primer
Rv primer
Annealing temperature (°C)Product size (bp)


2.10. Western Blot Analysis

Granulosa cells were suspended in 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 6 M urea, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.00125% (w/v) bromophenol blue, and freshly added 5% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol and subjected to sonication on ice. Total protein content was quantified using Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Bradford Solution, USA). 20 μg protein was loaded on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions, along with prestained molecular weight markers. The separated proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) by a wet method (Bio-Rad, USA). The transfer was performed at a constant voltage (100 V) for 90 min in a buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol. The membrane was then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (TBS-containing 5% skimmed milk and 0.1% Tween-20). Then, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with appropriate antibody at a dilution of 1 : 1000 in TBS-containing 5% skimmed milk and 0.1% Tween-20. They were washed in PBS-0.1% Tween-20 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (final dilution 1 : 5000; Bangalore Genei) in TBS-containing 5% skimmed milk and 0.1% Tween-20. The signal was detected by ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence, Millipore Inc., USA).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The results are presented as mean ± standard error mean. The data were statistically analyzed by employing one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism; Graph Pad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). The minimum level of significance () was considered.

3. Results

3.1. Induction of IR Is Solely because of Dexamethasone

The groups treated with dexamethasone alone and in combination with Cd showed significant glucose intolerance as shown in OGTT curve compared to control, whereas Cd alone did not show any change as compared with control (Figure 2). Fasting serum insulin levels and FIRI values were observed to be significantly high () in groups treated with dexamethasone alone and in combination with Cd with respect to control, whereas Cd alone did not show any change (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Further, to confirm the status of IR at granulosa cell level, western blot for insulin receptor was performed. We observed significant downregulation of insulin receptor in granulosa cells of dexamethasone alone and coexposed group as compared to control (Figure 3(c)).

3.2. Effect of Cd and IR on Serum Estradiol Concentrations

Estradiol concentration was observed to be significantly decreased in Cd (), IR (), and IR + Cd () group as compared to control group. When compared between the groups, both IR and IR + Cd demonstrated significant decrease compared to Cd () treated group (Figure 4).

3.3. Effect of Cd and IR on Estrous Cyclicity

Daily inspection of vaginal cytology in the groups treated with dexamethasone and its coexposure with Cd revealed absence of normal estrous cyclicity, with a prolonged period of persistent mixed cells (metestrus), which last for few days, followed by a period of persistent leucocytes (diestrus) as compared with control group. However, Cd group alone did not show any change in estrous cyclicity (Figure 5).

3.4. Histological Analysis Revealed Alterations in Ovary

Histological examination of ovaries showed absence of mature follicles in all the three groups as compared to control group. Increased amount of fibrosis in the stroma was also observed in all the three groups as compared to control. Thickening of capillary wall was found to be evident in IR and IR + Cd treated group as compared to control group (Figure 6).

3.5. Granulosa Cell Viability Assay

Further investigation of granulosa cell viability by trypan blue exclusion dye demonstrated deleterious effect of Cd and IR either alone or in combination. Percentage cell viability was significantly affected in all the groups as compared to control groups. The Cd treated group in combination with IR exhibited maximum decrease () whereas Cd and IR groups exhibited significant decrease () in granulosa cell viability as compared to control group. Within the groups, the combined group showed significant decrease () as compared to Cd alone and IR group and no change was observed between IR and Cd alone group (Figure 7).

3.6. StAR, CYP19 A1, and 17β-HSD Expression in Rat Granulosa Cells

To assess the effects of Cd, IR, and their coexposure on the granulosa cell steroidogenic transcriptional machinery, mRNA and protein expression of StAR, CYP19A1, and 17β-HSD were analyzed by RT-PCR and western blot employing β-actin as the internal control. As expected mRNA and protein expression of StAR showed significant decrease ( and ), respectively, in Cd treated group as compared to control (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). There was slight but significant decrease () in protein expression of StAR in IR + Cd group whereas animals exposed to IR alone demonstrated an intermediate pattern of inhibition () as compared with control (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). As shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b), significant decrease ( and ) was observed in mRNA expression of CYP19A1 in Cd alone when compared to control and IR + Cd group, respectively. Similarly IR group showed significant decrease () in mRNA expression of CYP19A1 as compared to control and IR + Cd animals. IR + Cd group showed nonsignificant decrease in CYP19A1 mRNA as compared to control group. CYP19 A1 protein revealed significant decrease () in Cd alone and IR groups, respectively, as compared to control. CYP19A1 protein showed nonsignificant decrease in IR + Cd group as compared to control (Figures 9(c) and 9(d)). Further, mRNA expression of 17β-HSD did not reveal any significant difference in any of the groups (Figures 10(a) and 10(b)). But protein expression of 17β-HSD revealed significant decrease () in Cd group and maximum decrease () in IR and IR + Cd group as compared to control (Figures 10(c) and 10(d)), whereas IR and IR + Cd revealed significant decrease () as compared to Cd group with no change between themselves.

4. Discussion

Evidences state that, because of the change in lifestyle, there are increasing number of women with some degree of IR [5]. Moreover, due to environmental issues, women are also exposed to toxicants such as Cd in their reproductive age [9, 24]. As evident in present scenario, females are eventually exposed to both Cd and IR condition which may lead to altered reproductive performance and fertility-related problems. In this regard, the present study analyzed the extent of the effect of Cd on the ovary of dexamethasone induced IR rat model.

To prove this, at a very first step, we developed an IR female rat model by using dexamethasone. Dexamethasone has been previously reported to exacerbate IR in monovular animal model, such as cow, in isolated and cultured 3T3 adipocytes and in ovarian theca cells from porcine follicles [5, 20]. Further, studies on Cd exposure on animal models have shown Cd as a diabetogenic agent when injected at 2.0 mg/kg daily for 14 days [18]. The results of the present investigation demonstrated glucose intolerance and IR in the groups treated with dexamethasone alone and in combination with Cd. In our experimental observations, we found that Cd treated group did not show any glucose intolerance and insulin resistance indicating that the subclinical dose of 0.05 mg/kg b.w for 15 days used in the present study might not be sufficient to exacerbate type II diabetes. These findings thus indicate that development of IR in coexposed group is because of dexamethasone. Further, examination of IR status with western blot analysis in granulosa cell revealed downregulation of insulin receptor in groups treated with dexamethasone and dexamethasone with Cd as compared to control and Cd alone treated animals. In earlier reports, insulin receptor has been demonstrated in cultured porcine granulosa and theca cells by monitoring protein expression of downstream targets such as IRS-1, GLUT-4, and PPAR-γ [20, 25]. We instead demonstrated downregulation of insulin receptor itself in dexamethasone treated granulosa cells confirming the establishment of frank IR condition in rodent model at the cellular level itself.

Fertile rats show normal estrous cyclicity of 4 days and a normal ovarian morphology with growing follicles and a well-defined stroma [26]. Prolonged metestrus and diestrus stages were observed in IR and IR + Cd group which correlated with less number of mature follicles indicating direct or indirect actions of IR on the follicles. Recently glucocorticoid induced insulin resistance has been shown to suppress circulating estradiol concentration in serum [5]. Our present result of Cd treated group is similar to earlier reports from our lab which demonstrated reduced serum estradiol and normal estrous cyclicity with subclinical Cd exposure [16]. However, insulin resistance condition in IR and IR + Cd group can be correlated with abnormal cyclicity, decreased serum estradiol concentration, and very less number of mature follicles which is responsible for anovulation and reduced reproductive capacity and ultimately leading to reproductive failure. These results are substantiated with earlier reports where IR as such has been shown to have an effect on oocyte development, ovulation, fertilization, and implantation thus leading to infertility [5, 27]. These effects of the coexposure of Cd and IR further inquisited us to investigate their effect at cellular and molecular levels.

Folliculogenesis and ovulation being the ultimate functions of the ovary are intimately linked to multidirectional communication between oocyte, granulosa cells, and theca cells [28]. Granulosa cells are the first somatic cell type known to interact with germ cells [29] and are involved in apoptosis and steroidogenesis [30]. Previous reports have demonstrated decrease in granulosa cell number and change in its morphology with in vitro cadmium exposure [14, 31, 32]. Actions of insulin on granulosa cells have also been implicated in PCOS, where granulosa cell numbers were found to be decreased relative to follicle size [33]. Our data for reduced cell viability along with the altered histological findings imply that Cd exposure along with IR alters folliculogenesis and granulosa cell viability more deleteriously in coexposed group.

The rate-limiting step in ovarian steroid hormone synthesis requires StAR protein in order to transport cholesterol to the intramitochondrial membrane [34]. Cd alone demonstrated decreased expression of StAR at both mRNA and protein level when compared to control group supporting the fact that StAR might be a potent target for Cd to bind and thus alter steroidogenesis [10, 16, 35, 36]. IR alone failed to demonstrate any effect on expression of StAR mRNA but showed a significant decrease in its protein expression [37]. Similarly little but significant decrease in protein expression of StAR in IR + Cd group in the present study indicated reduced gonadal steroidogenesis leading to accumulation of cholesterol in lipid droplets supported by earlier reports [38].

In follicular steroidogenesis, the synthesis of estrogen is dependent on CYP19A1 and 17β HSD whose expressions are highly dependent on the type of granulosa cells [39]. In our study, we demonstrated significant decrease in protein expression of 17β HSD and a nonsignificant decrease in protein expression of CYP19A1 in the IR + Cd group as compared with control group. These changes along with attenuation of estradiol hormone synthesis disrupt the normal developmental program thereby arresting estrus cyclicity in metestrus and diestrus stage. The signaling pathway in granulosa cells from IR ovaries gets altered forcing the cell to luteinize at a premature stage as compared to granulosa cells from control ovaries. This leads to terminal differentiation in these cells because of which they lose their proliferative capacity and thus fail to express CYP19A1 and 17β HSD [5, 6]. Also presence of proteinaceous substances such as TGF-β, IGF-1, EGF, TNF-α, abnormally high levels of 5 alpha-androstane-3, 17-dione in the follicular fluid of insulin resistant patients act as endogenous inhibitors of estrogen production by inhibiting CYP19A1 activity explaining the potential for decrease in estradiol synthesis independent of CYP19A1 protein expression in IR + Cd group. Studies in the literature have also demonstrated strong inhibition of CYP19A1 expression and activity by Cd and other endocrine disruptors in many different species such as Teleost Fish and human embryonic 293 cells thus leading to decreased estradiol synthesis and disturbing reproductive cycle [17, 37, 40, 41].

Summarizing the results as per the insults, Cd alone directly interacts with StAR ultimately leading to a decrease in availability of cholesterol. It also decreases 17β HSD and CYP19A1 protein expression thus leading to relative decrease in estradiol production along with fibrosis. IR alone decreases expression of StAR, 17β HSD, and CYP19A1 protein leading to decrease in estradiol levels along with fibrosis and thickening of capillaries; the effects seem to be more adverse as compared to Cd alone. In IR + Cd, along with decrease in protein expression of StAR, 17β HSD, and CYP19A1, there is significant decrease in granulosa cell viability as compared to Cd alone and IR groups, ultimately decreasing estradiol levels (Table 3). This shows that although individual parameters were variedly affected at molecular level in different groups, overall effect is more deleterious in coexposed group providing support for their involvement in etiology of reproductive dysfunction as shown in schematic Figure 11.


IR status↓↓↓↓↓↓
Serum estradiol↓↓↓↓
HistologyFibrosisFibrosis and thickeningFibrosis and thickening
Granulosa cell viability↓↓
CYP19 A1-mRNA↓↓↓↓↓ (ns)
CYP19 A1-protein↓↓↓↓↓ (ns)
17- HSD-mRNA
17- HSD-protein↓↓↓↓

(— represents no change, down arrow represents downregulation, and ns represents nonsignificant).

5. Conclusion

This pilot study demonstrates that ovarian morphology and normal steroidogenic program in IR + Cd group is altered, causing destruction of the normal developmental programing in ovary. This research seeks attention towards understanding the insulin resistance along with endocrine disruptors. Thus the presence of various environmental pollutants with change in life style is alarming signals for increased incidence of female infertility which might have imprinting effect on the next generation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to thank CSIR for the contingency received under CSIR-SRF Award no. 09/114(0168)/2010-EMR-I to Muskaan Belani. The authors wish to thank Dr. Douglas Stocco, Texas Tech University, for the kind gift of a rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody to StAR protein. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Vann Luu-The (CHUL Research Center and Laval University, Canada) for the generous gift of rabbit polyclonal antibody to 17β-HSD enzyme.


  1. E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, J. Bourguignon, L. C. Giudice et al., “Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 293–342, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. F. Homan, M. Davies, and R. Norman, “The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–223, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. B. Ford and D. J. Schust, “Recurrent pregnancy loss: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy,” Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2, pp. 76–83, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  4. V. Vettriselvi, “A study on genetic polymorphisms associated with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss in south indian population,” 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. S. Hackbart, P. M. Cunha, R. K. Meye, and M. C. Wiltbank, “Effect of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance on follicle development and ovulation,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 88, no. 6, article 153, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Mukherjee and A. Maitra, “Molecular & genetic factors contributing to insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 743–760, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  7. E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, G. Argyrakopoulou, F. Economou, E. Kandaraki, and M. Koutsilieris, “Defects in insulin signaling pathways in ovarian steroidogenesis and other tissues in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS),” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 109, no. 3–5, pp. 242–246, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Yang, L. Julan, F. Rubio, A. Sharma, and H. Guan, “Cadmium reduces 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 activity and expression in human placental trophoblast cells,” The American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. E135–E142, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Satarug, S. H. Garrett, M. A. Sens, and D. A. Sens, “Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 182–190, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Zhang and H. Jia, “Effect and mechanism of cadmium on the progesterone synthesis of ovaries,” Toxicology, vol. 239, no. 3, pp. 204–212, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Alexander, “Cadmium in food-scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain,” EFSA Journal, vol. 980, pp. 1–139, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. Pillai, P. N. Laxmi Priya, and S. Gupta, “Effects of combined exposure to lead and cadmium on pituitary membrane of female rats,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 671–675, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. N. L. Priya, A. Pillai, and S. Gupta, “Effect of simultaneous exposure to lead and cadmium on gonadotropin binding and steroidogenesis on granulosa cells: an in vitro study,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. P. Nampoothiri and S. Gupta, “Simultaneous effect of lead and cadmium on granulosa cells: a cellular model for ovarian toxicity,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179–185, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Gupta, S. Bhosale, and K. Pandya, “Effect of simultaneous low level exposure of Pb and Cd on δ-ALAD and acetylcholinesterase activity in rats,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 819–821, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  16. P. Pillai, C. Pandya, and S. Gupta, “Biochemical and molecular effects of gestational and lactational coexposure to lead and cadmium on ovarian steroidogenesis are associated with oxidative stress in f1 generation rats,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 384–394, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Das and D. Mukherjee, “Effect of cadmium chloride on secretion of 17β-estradiol by the ovarian follicles of common carp, Cyprinus carpio,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. R. Edwards and W. C. Prozialeck, “Cadmium, diabetes and chronic kidney disease,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 289–293, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Gao, B. Li, H. Jiang, F. Liu, D. Xu, and Z. Liu, “Dioscorea opposita reverses dexamethasone induced insulin resistance,” Fitoterapia, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Qu, Y. Wang, X. Wu, L. Gao, L. Hou, and R. Erkkola, “Insulin resistance directly contributes to androgenic potential within ovarian theca cells,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1990–1997, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. H. Duncan, B. M. Singh, P. H. Wise, G. Carter, and J. Alaghband-Zadeh, “A simple measure of insulin resistance,” The Lancet, vol. 346, no. 8967, pp. 120–121, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. L. Campbell, “Ovarian granulosa cells isolated with EGTA and hypertonic sucrose: Cellular integrity and function,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 773–786, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. A. Myllymäki, T. E. Haavisto, L. J. S. Brokken, M. Viluksela, J. Toppari, and J. Paranko, “In utero and lactational exposure to TCDD; steroidogenic outcomes differ in male and female rat pups,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 534–544, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Caserta, L. Maranghi, A. Mantovani, R. Marci, F. Maranghi, and M. Moscarini, “Impact of endocrine disruptor chemicals in gynaecology,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Yan, J. Wang, X. Wu, L. Hou, H. Kuang, and Y. Wang, “Induction of insulin resistance by phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitor in porcine granulosa cells,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2119–2121, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. F. K. Marcondes, F. J. Bianchi, and A. P. Tanno, “Determination of the estrous cycle phases of rats: some helpful considerations,” Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 62, no. 4A, pp. 609–614, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. H. Akamine, A. C. Marçal, J. P. Camporez et al., “Obesity induced by high-fat diet promotes insulin resistance in the ovary,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Uzumcu and R. Zachow, “Developmental exposure to environmental endocrine disruptors: consequences within the ovary and on female reproductive function,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 337–352, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. E. Pepling and A. C. Spradling, “Mouse ovarian germ cell cysts undergo programmed breakdown to form primordial follicles,” Developmental Biology, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 339–351, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. J. Hsueh, E. Y. Adashi, P. B. Jones, and T. H. Welsh Jr., “Hormonal regulation of the differentiation of cultured ovarian granulosa cells,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 76–127, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. D. Smida, X. P. Valderrama, M. C. Agostini, M. A. Furlan, and J. Chedrese, “Cadmium stimulates transcription of the cytochrome p450 side chain cleavage gene in genetically modified stable porcine granulosa cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Paksy, K. Rajczy, Z. Forgacs et al., “Effect of cadmium on morphology and steroidogenesis of cultured human ovarian granulosa cells,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 321–327, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  33. L. Poretsky, N. A. Cataldo, Z. Rosenwaks, and L. C. Giudice, “The insulin-related ovarian regulatory system in health and disease,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 535–582, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. J. Clark and D. M. Stocco, “Expression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory (star) protein: a novel LH-induced mitochondrial protein required for the acute regulation of steroidogenesis in mouse Leydig tumor cells,” Endocrine Research, vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 243–257, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. Paksy, B. Varga, and P. Lázár, “Zinc protection against cadmium-induced infertility in female rats. Effect of zinc and cadmium on the progesterone production of cultured granulosa cells,” BioMetals, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Paksy, B. Varga, and P. Lázár, “Cadmium interferes with steroid biosynthesis in rat granulosa and luteal cells in vitro,” BioMetals, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 245–250, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. J. Jakimiuk, S. R. Weitsman, A. Navab, and D. A. Magoffin, “Luteinizing hormone receptor, steroidogenesis acute regulatory protein, and steroidogenic enzyme messenger ribonucleic acids are overexpressed in thecal and granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1318–1323, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. D. Petrescu, A. M. Gallegos, Y. Okamura, J. F. Strauss III, and F. Schroeder, “teroidogenic acute regulatory protein binds cholesterol and modulates mitochondrial membrane sterol domain dynamics,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 40, pp. 36970–36982, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. F. Miro, C. D. Smyth, P. F. Whitelaw, M. Milne, and S. G. Hillier, “Regulation of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase Δ5/Δ4-isomerase and cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 by activin in rat granulosa cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 3247–3252, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  40. K. Cheshenko, F. Pakdel, H. Segner, O. Kah, and R. I. L. Eggen, “Interference of endocrine disrupting chemicals with aromatase CYP19 expression or activity, and consequences for reproduction of teleost fish,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 31–62, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. Benachour, S. Moslemi, H. Sipahutar, and G. Seralini, “Cytotoxic effects and aromatase inhibition by xenobiotic endocrine disrupters alone and in combination,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 129–140, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Muskaan Belani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.