BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 497606 | 11 pages |

Phytochemical Evaluation, Antimicrobial Activity, and Determination of Bioactive Components from Leaves of Aegle marmelos

Academic Editor: Paul M. Tulkens
Received29 Jan 2014
Revised19 Apr 2014
Accepted23 Apr 2014
Published11 May 2014


The therapeutic value of Aegle marmelos Correa (Rutaceae), commonly known as ‘‘Bael,’’ has been recognized as a component of traditional medication for the treatment of various human ailments. The plant, though, being highly explored, still lacks sufficient evidences for the best variety possessing the highest degree of medicinal values. The present study is focused on phytochemical screening of aqueous and methanolic leaf extracts of 18 varieties/accessions of A. marmelos. The crude extracts of A. marmelos revealed the presence of several biologically active phytochemicals with the highest quantity of alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenols in Pant Aparna variety. The antibacterial efficacy was investigated against pathogenic bacterial strains and the highest inhibitory activity of aqueous extract was obtained against S. epidermidis, whereas methanolic extract was found to be most potent against S. aureus at 40 mg/mL concentration. However, in aqueous : ethanol, the best results were observed against E. aerogenes followed by K. pneumonia and S. epidermidis. The MIC of aqueous and methanol extract of Aegle marmelos ranged from 10 mg/mL to 40 mg/mL whereas in aqueous : ethanol it ranged between 40 mg/mL and 160 mg/mL. The GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of many bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, alcohols, aldehydes, aromatic compounds, fatty acid methyl esters, terpenoids, phenolics, and steroids that can be postulated for antibacterial activity.

1. Introduction

India is widely known as the botanical garden of the world since it is the largest producer of medicinal herbs [1]. Medicinal plants act as an indigenous source of new compounds possessing therapeutic value and can also be used in drug development. 80% of the population of developing countries depend on traditional medicines, mostly natural plant products, for their primary health care needs as estimated by WHO [2]. Because of the growing recognition of natural products the demand for medicinal plants has been increasing all over the world. They have minimal toxicity, are cost effective and pharmacologically active, and provide an easy remedy for many human ailments as compared to the synthetic drugs which are a subject of adulteration and side effects [3]. The alarming increase in the rate of infection by antibiotic-resistant microorganisms has urged scientists to search for compounds which have potential antimicrobial activity [4]. The ability to synthesize compounds by secondary metabolism possessing antimicrobial potential makes plants an invaluable source of pharmaceutical and therapeutic products [5]. The effectiveness of plant extracts on microorganism has been studied worldwide [69].

Bael (Aegle marmelos) has been known to be one of the most important medicinal plants of India since Charak (1500 B.C) [10]. More than 100 phytochemical compounds have been isolated from various parts of the plant, namely phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, cardiac glycosides, saponins, terpenoids, steroids, and tannins. These compounds are well known to possess biological and pharmacological activity against various chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders [1114]. Antioxidant, antiulcer, antidiabetic, anticancer, antihyperlipidaemic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antispermatogenic effects have also been reported on various animal models by the crude extracts of this plant [1422]. Every part of Aegle marmelos plant such as its fruits, stem, bark, and leaves possesses medicinal property and is used for treating various eye and skin infections [23]. Leaf is considered to be one of the highest accumulatory parts of the plant containing bioactive compounds which are synthesized as secondary metabolites [24]. The present study was, therefore, aimed at evaluating the phytochemical potential and antibacterial activity of Aegle marmelos aqueous and methanolic leaf extracts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Identification of Plant Material

The fresh leaves of Aegle marmelos from 18 varieties/accessions were collected from the orchard of Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad, India. The taxonomy of the plant was authenticated.

2.2. Extract Preparation

The leaves of the plant were properly washed in tap water and rinsed in distilled water. The rinsed leaves were hot air-dried for 3 days. The dried leaves of each plant were pulverized using pestle mortar to obtain a powdered form which was stored in airtight glass containers at 4°C until used. 10 g of powdered sample was soaked in distilled water and methanol (200 mL and 100 mL) separately for 12 hrs at room temperature. The extracts were then filtered and concentrated to a final volume of 50 mL and subjected to phytochemical analysis.

For antibacterial screening the leaf extracts were prepared from Pant Aparna variety by following the protocol of Harborne [25] in Soxhlet apparatus using 180 mL of distilled water and methanol. For aqueous: ethanol, 50 : 130 volume of distilled water and ethanol were taken. Every extraction was carried out for 24 hrs and the extract was then dried, weighed, and stored in refrigerator at 4°C.

2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

Qualitative phytochemical analyses of both the extracts were performed by following the protocol of Adetuyi and Popoola [26], Trease and Evans [27], and Sofowora [28].

Tannins. 200 mg of plant material was boiled in 10 mL distilled water and few drops of FeCl3 were added to the filtrate; a blue-black precipitate indicated the presence of Tannins.

Alkaloids. 200 mg plant material was boiled in 10 mL methanol and filtered. 1% HCl was added followed by 6 drops of Dragendorff reagent, and brownish-red precipitate was taken as evidence for the presence of alkaloids.

Saponins (Frothing test). 5 mL distilled water was added to 200 mg plant material. 0.5 mL filtrate was diluted to 5 mL with distilled water and shaken vigorously for 2 minutes. Formation of stable foam indicates the presence of saponins.

Cardiac Glycosides (Keller-Kiliani test). 2 mL filtrate was treated with 1 mL glacial acetic acid containing few drops of FeCl3.Conc. H2SO4 was added to the above mixture giving green-blue colour depicting the positive results for presence of cardiac glycosides.

Steroids (Liebermann-Burchard reaction). 200 mg plant material was added in 10 mL chloroform. Acetic anhydride was added in the ratio of 1 : 1 which resulted into the formation of blue-green ring pointing towards the presence of steroids.

Terpenoids (Salkowski test). To 200 mg plant material 2 mL of chloroform (CHCl3) and 3 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) were carefully added. A reddish brown colouration signified the presence of terpenoids.

Flavonoids. To the aqueous filtrate 5 mL of dilute ammonia solution was added, followed by concentrated H2SO4. A yellow colouration indicated the presence of flavonoids.

Phlobatannins. The deposition of a red precipitate denoted the presence of phlobatannins when 200 mg of plant material was dissolved in 10 mL of aqueous extract and few drops of 1% HCl were added in the boiling tube.

Anthraquinones. 500 mg of dried plant leaves were boiled in 10% HCl for 5 mins and filtrate was allowed to cool. Equal volume of CHCl3 with few drops of 10% NH3 was added to 2 mL filtrate. The formation of rose-pink colour implies the presence of Anthraquinones.

Reducing Sugars. To the 10 mL of aqueous extract a few drops of Fehling’s solution A and B were added; an orange red precipitate suggests the presence of reducing sugars.

2.4. Quantitative Estimation of Phytochemicals
2.4.1. Determination of Alkaloids

Alkaloids content was measured by following the protocol described by Harborne [29]. A suspension was prepared by dispersing 5 gm of the dried leaves in 10% acetic acid solution in ethanol and kept at 28°C for 4 hrs which was further filtered through Whatman Number 42. Thereafter alkaloid was precipitated by concentrating the filtrate to one quarter of its original volume and drops of conc. aqueous NH4OH were added. Finally the precipitate was washed with 1% ammonia solution and dried at 80°C in the oven. The content of alkaloid was calculated and expressed as mg/gm of sample.

2.4.2. Determination of Flavonoids

The flavonoids content was also determined by Harborne [29] method. Briefly, 5 gm of leaves was boiled in 2 M HCl for 30 mins under reflux and filtered after cooling. Equal volume of ethyl acetate was then added drop wise in filtrate. The weight of precipitated flavonoid was determined and reported as mg/g.

2.4.3. Determination of Tannins

The quantitative estimation of tannins was performed by the method of Swain [30] with minor modifications in our lab. Finely powdered leaves of Aegle marmelos were kept in a beaker containing 20 mL of 50% methanol covered with parafilm and then heated at 80°C in water bath for 1 hr with continuous stirring. The extract was quantitatively filtered using a double layered Whatman Number 1 filter paper and rinsed by 50% methanol. 1 mL of sample extract was treated with 20 mL distilled water, 2.5 mL Folin-Denis reagent, and 10 mL of 17% Na2CO3 for the development of a bluish-green colour and was allowed to stand for 20 minutes. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm and amount of tannin was calculated by comparing it with standard curve prepared in the range of 0–10 ppm.

2.4.4. Determination of Saponins

Saponin analysis was performed according to the method described by Brunner [31]. 100 mL Isobutyl alcohol was added to 1 g of finely powdered sample and stirred for 5 hrs. 20 mL of 40% saturated solution of Magnesium carbonate was added to the mixture and filtered. 2 mL of 5% FeCl3 solution and 50 mL volume of distilled water was added to 1 mL of colourless solution and kept for 30 min for colour (blood red) development. The absorbance of the samples along with the standard were read at 380 nm and calculated in mg/gm. Standard saponin solution was prepared in the reference range of 0–10 ppm.

2.4.5. Determination of Total Phenols

Five grams of the powdered leaves was boiled with 50 mL of ether for 15 mins and distributed in the ratio 1 : 2 (extract : distilled water). 2 mL of ammonium hydroxide followed with 5 mL of pentanol was added to it and incubated at the room temperature for 30 minutes. The absorbance was read at 505 nm as described by Obodoni and Ochuko [32].

2.5. Procuring of Bacterial Strain

Pure cultures of five test organisms, namely, S. aureus (NCIM 2079), S. epidermidis (NCIM 2493), B. cereus (NCIM 2156), E. aerogenes (NCIM 5139), and K. pneumoniae (NCIM 2957), were procured from National Chemical Laboratory, Pune. Stock cultures were maintained at 4°C on agar slants of nutrient media. Active cultures for experiment were prepared by transferring a loop full of microorganism from the stock cultures to 50 mL of sterile nutrient broth.

2.6. Antibacterial Activity

The extracts mentioned above were tested against five pathogenic bacterial strains, three gram-positive bacteria (B. cereus, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus), and two gram-negative bacteria (E. aerogens, K. pneumoniae). Antibacterial screening was done using agar well diffusion method [33]. For this 20 mL of sterile Mueller-Hinton Agar (Hi-media) was poured in sterile autoclaved petri plates. After solidification, the sterile cotton swab was dipped into the bacterial culture. The entire agar surface of each plate was evenly inoculated by swabbing. The seven uniform wells were prepared with the help of sterile 6 mm diameter cork-borer. Each well was filled with the various concentrations of both the aqueous and methanol extract (10, 20, 25, 30, and 40 mg/mL), respectively, whereas, in case of aqueous: ethanol, (40, 80, 100, and 120 mg/mL) concentrations were used and allowed for diffusion for 45 minutes. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. Triplicate plates were prepared for each treatment and the average zone of inhibition excluding well was recorded. 9% DMSO was used as negative control. Turbidity of bacterial culture was maintained up to 1 × 108 CFU/mL. The antibacterial potential of extracts was compared with standard antibiotic Ampicillin (10 μg/disc) with paper disc (Hi-media) method.

2.7. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Analysis

The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of methanolic extract of leaves of Aegle marmelos (var. Pant Aparna)was performed using a GC-MS (Model; QP 2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a VF-5 ms fused silica capillary column of 30 m length, 0.25 mm diameter, and 0.25 μm film thickness. The column oven temperature was programmed from 80°C to 310°C for 2°C min−1. Ionization of the sample components was performed in electron impact mode (EI, 70 eV). The temperature of the injector was fixed to 270°C and detector to 230°C. Helium (99.9995% purity) was the carrier gas fixed with a flow rate of 1.21 mL min−1. The mass range from 40–650 m/z was scanned at a rate of 3.0 scans/s. 2.0 μL of the methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos was injected with a Hamilton syringe to the GC-MS manually for total ion chromatographic analysis in split injection technique. Total running time of GC-MS was 56 min. The relative percentage of each extract constituent was expressed as percentage with peak area normalization.

The bioactive compounds of methanol extract were identified by comparing their retention indices and patterns of mass spectra with reference to Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data’s, New York (Wiley 8) and Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Library version 1.0 (FAME library) sources.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Profiling

The present study was carried on aqueous and methanolic extracts of Aegle marmelos to investigate the presence of medicinally important phytochemicals in the leaves of different varieties/accessions. Both the extracts revealed the presence of various phytochemicals such as tannins, saponins, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, carotenoids, cardiac glycosides, and reducing sugars in all the varieties and accessions while phlobatannins and anthocyanins were absent (Table 1). The presence of different phytochemicals and the antimicrobial activity of ethanolic, petroleum ether, chloroform, and methanolic extract of a single unidentified variety of Aegle marmelos have been previously reported [34, 35]; however, our study is first ever report to the best of our knowledge on qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis of various varieties/accessions available in India. The findings conclude that amongst 18 varieties and accessions, the variety Pant Aparna was found to be the best. The antibacterial activity of this variety using methanol, aqueous, and aqueous: ethanol as the solvent has been investigated. The activity was further confirmed by performing GC-MS which revealed the presence of different phytochemicals.

Diff. Bael variety/accessions aTA bPHL cSAP dTER eFLA fCAR gANTH hCAR iRED jALK

Pant Aparna++++++++

TA: tannins; bPHL: phlobatannins; cSAP: saponins; dTER: terpenoids; eFLA: flavonoids; fCAR: cardiac glycosides; gANTH: combined anthraquinones; hCAR: carotenoids; iRED: reducing sugar; jALK: alkanoids; +: present; −: absent.

The quantitative phytochemical estimation specifies that the leaves of all varieties contain a significant amount of alkaloid, flavonoids, phenolic, saponins, and tannin content. However the variety called Pant Aparna contains the highest amount of alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenol (Table 2). The alkaloids content was quantitatively estimated and was found in the range of  mg/gm in different varieties of Bael leaves but the maximum content was observed in Pant Aparna ( mg/gm). Similarly all the varieties exhibited good quantity of flavonoids and phenols starting from  mg/mL and  mg/mL, respectively, in variety NB-1, reaching up to  mg/mL and in Pant Aparna. Earlier report on quantitative yield also revealed that Aegle marmelos contained highest quantity of alkaloids, flavonoids, and tannins as compared to other medicinal plants [36]. The highest content of saponins was found in variety AM-7 () followed by Pant Aparna and AM-6. Among all the varieties analysed, Pant Aparna was found to be the most promising one, which prompted us to project Pant Aparna for further studies.

Different Bael

NB-178.62 ± 0.1026.2 ± 0.06522.8 ± 0.0047.65 ± 0.144.53 ± 0.15
Pant Aparna 11.98 ± 0.208.32 ± 0.40
NB-910.7 ± 0.1519.8 ± 0.05810.22 ± 0.0325.36 ± 0.153.78 ± 0.35
NB-59.56 ± 0.1023.2 ± 0.05512.6 ± 0.0056.57 ± 0.256.43 ± 0.05
AM-411.6 ± 0.1423.9 ± 0.05311.4 ± 0.0074.23 ± 0.444.97 ± 0.10
NB-76.56 ± 0.2518.5 ± 0.05110.0 ± 0.0054.65 ± 0.103.45 ± 0.25
AM-74.28 ± 0.3039.1 ± 0.04919.6 ± 0.045 5.76 ± 0.35
AM-314.34 ± 0.2028.9 ± 0.04817.78 ± 0.07912.76 ± 0.207.24 ± 0.15
NB-13.78 ± 0.1510.4 ± 0.0475.8 ± 0.0854.21 ± 0.453.20 ± 0.25
Kaghzi5.94 ± 0.1517.4 ± 0.04611.4 ± 0.0045.85 ± 0.355.31 ± 0.18
NB-410.57 ± 0.3012.4 ± 0.0439.6 ± 0.0047.50 ± 0.243.60 ± 0.42
NB-165.80 ± 0.2510.4 ± 0.0077.6 ± 0.0073.20 ± 0.154.35 ± 0.36
P.Sujana7.45 ± 0.4516.4 ± 0.07015.82 ± 0.0076.02 ± 0.306.62 ± 0.28
P.Sujata11.98 ± 0.2523.9 ± 0.08813.64 ± 0.0088.53 ± 0.256.43 ± 0.08
AM-112.79 ± 0.2023.5 ± 0.22515.22 ± 0.0827.89 ± 0.554.05 ± 0.24
AM-28.43 ± 0.3512.4 ± 0.0458.6 ± 0.0845.9 ± 0.345.32 ± 0.31
AM-615.03 ± 0.4026.9 ± 0.10820.22 ± 0.01010.94 ± 0.28
AM-813.36 ± 0.2526.6 ± 0.07818.38 ± 0.0789.25 ± 0.557.29 ± 0.18

**refers to significant values ( ).
3.2. Antibacterial Study

The pharmacological action of the plant cannot be ascertained by the result of phytochemical studies only. Thus the antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria was also evaluated. The present investigation shows the efficacy of all the extracts against the selected pathogenic bacteria (Tables 3, 4, and 5).

Aqueous extract

Conc. (mg/mL)101520253040StandardControl

Name of bacteriaZone of inhibition (mm)Ampicillin (10 mcg/disc)DMSO

K. pneumoniae 7.33 ± 0.038.33 ± 0.038.5 ± 0.026.5 ± 0.029.83 ± 0.0410.6 ± 0.0321.3 ± 0.0880
B. cereus 7.33 ± 0.038.33 ± ± 0.059.33 ± 0.05**10.3 ± 0.0880
E. aerogenes ±**11.3 ± 0.0880
S. aureus 8.66 ± 0.039.66 ± 0.0310.6 ± 0.0311.6 ± 0.0312.6 ± 0.0313.040.6 ± 0.1200
S. epidermidis 9.66 ± 0.0311. ± 0.0314.3 ± 0.06*20.6 ± 0.1450

Values are expressed as mean SEM and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dennett’s test; ; .

Methanol extract

Conc. (mg/mL)10 15 20 25 30 40StandardControl

Name of bacteriaZone of inhibition (mm)Ampicillin (10 mcg/disc)DMSO

K. pneumoniae 9.3 ± 0.039.6 ± 0.0310.6 ± 0.0311.3 ± 0.0311.0 ± 0.0511.0 ± 0.05*21.3 ± 0.0880
B. cereus 8.6 ± 0.0310.010.6 ± 0.0311.3 ± 0.0310.6 ± 0.0312.0 ± 0.05**10.3 ± 0.0880
E. aerogenes 11.3 ± 0.0880
S. aureus ± 0.0312.013.040.6 ± 0.1200
S. epidermidis 8.0 ± 0.059.3 ± 0.0610.010.3 ± 0.0311.012.0*20.6 ± 0.1450

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dennett’s test; ; .

Aqueous: ethanol

Conc. (mg/mL)40 80 120 160

Name of bacteriaZone of inhibition (mm)

K. pneumonia 9.0 ± 0.0511.0 ± 0.0512.3 ± 0.0314.6 ± 0.06*
B. cereus ± 0.03
E. aerogenes ± 0.03**
S. aureus 10.3 ± 0.0311.6 ± 0.0312.013.0
S. epidermidis 10.3 ± 0.0312.3 ± 0.0313.3 ± 0.0614.6 ± 0.03*

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dennett’s test; ; . The standard antibiotic and control are the same as that of aqueous and methanolic extract.

The aqueous extract showed highest antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis (14.3 mm) followed by S. aureus (13 mm) and K. pneumonia (10.6 mm). The maximum zone of inhibition was observed at the concentration of 40 mg/mL. Varying degree of antibacterial activity by leaf extracts of Aegle marmelos against various tested bacterial species has been reported [37]. The presence of the compounds Cuminaldehyde and Eugenol may be responsible for the antibacterial activity of leaf extracts against various bacterial strains [38]. The aqueous, acetone, and petroleum ether extracts of A. marmelos were found to be effective against B. coagulans, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus as reported earlier [39]. The dried fruit extract of Aegle marmelos showed potential antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, S. flexneri, E. coli, B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus [40].

On the other hand, the methanol extract exhibited a much better antibacterial activity as compared to aqueous extract against K. pneumoniae, B. cereus, and S. aureus. The methanol extract was most potent against S. aureus, showing the maximum zone of inhibition at the concentration of 40 mg/mL. The highest sensitivity of S. aureus may be due to its cell wall structure and outer membrane [41]. No activity was seen against E. aerogenes. A few reports have also mentioned significant in vitro antimicrobial activity by the methanol extracts of Aegle marmelos leaves and flowers [35, 42]. The MIC value of both aqueous and methanol extract was significant at 10 mg/mL; however, for aqueous: ethanol it was 40 mg/mL which is analogous to the MIC values reported using crude extracts of other medicinal plants. The antimicrobial activity of papaya seed extract with MIC value of 11.8 mg/mL was found to be effective against S. typhi by Yismaw et al. [43]. In Zizyphus sp. MIC values of 25 mg/mL [44] have been reported against S. aureus. Similarly, in case of F. religiosa, the final MIC values were 2–4-fold higher than initial MIC which ranged from 4.7 to 18.8 mg/mL and from 2.4 to 18.8 mg/mL for resistant and for sensitive isolates, respectively. MIC values (25 mg/mL) were reported by Valsaraj et al. [44] while higher concentration of 150 mg/mL was reported by Ahmad and Beg [45] against S. aureus. In yet another study, the antibacterial activity of whole plant of Borreria hispida (Linn) was evaluated against various organisms, where the MIC of methanolic extract of Borreria hispida was found to range from 250 μg/mL to 50 mg/mL. Moreover higher MIC values ranging from 0.125 to 32 mg/mL were also reported against at least one of the test microorganisms from nine ethnobotanically Indian medicinal plants [46].

The high antibacterial activity in the methanolic extract may be due to the presence of tannins, flavonoids, and terpenoids. These medicinally bioactive components exert antimicrobial action through different mechanism. Tannins cause inhibition in the cell wall synthesis by forming irreversible complexes with prolene rich protein [47]. The saponins have the ability to cause leakage of proteins and certain enzymes from the cell [48]. Terpenoids are responsible for dissolution of the cell wall of microorganism by weakening the membranous tissue [49]. Flavonoids which have been found to be effective antimicrobial substances against a wide array of microorganisms in vitro are known to be synthesized in response to microbial infection by plants. They have the ability to complex with extracellular and soluble proteins and to complex with bacterial cell walls [50]. Furthermore, steroids are known for their antibacterial activity specifically associated with membrane lipids and cause leakage from liposomes [51].

In the case of aqueous: ethanol, the maximum antibacterial activity was seen against E. aerogenes followed by S. epidermidis and K. pneumonia (Table 5). At the highest concentration of 160 mg/mL it showed 18.3 mm zone of inhibition. The antibiotic susceptibility showed that among all the bacterial strains S. aureus was found to be more susceptible to ampicillin followed by K. pneumonia.

3.3. GC-MS Analysis

In all, thirty-three compounds were identified from the GC-MS analysis of methanolic extract of Bael leaves exhibiting various phytochemical activities and were predominantly responsible for the antimicrobial activity found in the extract against the pathogenic bacteria. The retention time and percentage peak of various bioactive compounds are presented in Table 6. The major phytoconstituents present in the leaf extract were 1-Dodecanol (4.83), 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-(1.11), 2,3Dioxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-ene, 1-Methyl-4-(1-Methylethyl)-(Limonene dioxide 1) occupying two peak areas, that is, (0.53) and (0.40), Bicyclo[3.1.1] heptane-2,3-diol, 2,6,6-trimethyl (2,3-Pinanediol)(0.97), 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-(0.63, 0.41, 0.17), Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl-(BHT) (0.87), Tetradecanoic acid (Myristic acid) (2.00), 2(4H)-Benzofuranone 5,6,7,7A-Tetrahydro-6-hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl,1,3-cyclohexadiene,2-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-(1-Phellandrene), 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, methyl ester (Cinnamic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, methyl ester), 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol, commonly known as phytol; a diterpene has significant antimicrobial properties against many bacterial strains [52]. 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester (Linolenic acid, methyl ester) showing antibacterial and anticandidal activity, 2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl (Phytol isomer) (6.37), Octadecanoic acid (Stearic acid) (4.07), Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy-4-[[(4 methylphenyl) sulfonyl]methyl (10.76), fatty alcohols such as Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.) (campesterol), Stigmasta-5, 22-dien-3-ol, Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)- may be synergistically responsible for the antimicrobial activity.

S. no.R.TCompound nameMolecular formulaMWPeak area %Compound nature **Activity

17.1784H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-C6H8O4 1441.11Flavonoid fractionAntimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative
26.555 1-Butanol, 3-methyl-, acetateC7H14O21305.32Alcoholic compoundAntimicrobial
312.092,3 Dioxabicyclo 2.2.2 oct-5-ene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-(Limonene dioxide 1)C10H16O2 1680.53Terpeneantimicrobial
413.385Bicyclo 3.1.1 heptane-2,3-diol, 2,6,6-trimethyl
C10H18O2 1700.97Terpeneantimicrobial
413.7622-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-C10H16O2 1680.63antibacterial
515.2031-DodecanolC12H26O 1864.83long-chain fatty alcoholantibacterial
616.143Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl
C15H24O 2200.87Antimicrobial, antioxidant
716.457Benzoic acid, 4-ethoxy-, ethyl esterC11H14O31940.33Aromatic
acid ester
Antimicrobial Preservative
818.1012-Propanol, 1,1′- (1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis(oxy) bis-(Tripropylene glycol)C9H20O41920.87Antimicrobial
920.1891-Tetradecanol, acrylateC17H32O22681.46Fatty acid estersAnti-inflammatory,
1020.5231,3,4,5-Tetrahydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid
(Quinic acid)
C7H12O61920.39Aromatic acidantimicrobial
activity, anti-inflammatory
1121.839 Tetradecanoic acid
(Myristic acid)
C14H28O22282.00Fatty acidAntifungal, Antioxidant, cancer preventive,
nematicide, hypercholesterolemic,
1222.0702(4H)-Benzofuranone 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-6-hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethylC11H16O31960.26Triterpeneantimicrobial
C17H36O 2560.33Aliphatic alcoholAntimalarial, antifungal, Antioxidant
1422.409 1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-(1-Phellandrene)C10H16 1360.23MonoterpeneAntibacterial
1522.736 1,6-Octadiene, 7-methyl-3-methylene
C10H16 1360.13MonoterpeneAntibacterial
1623.404 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, methyl ester
(Cinnamic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, methyl ester )
C11H12O4 2080.66Aromatic methyl estersAntimicrobial,
antioxidant, antiviral
1723.819Pentadecanoic acidC15H30O2 2420.08Fatty acid Antibacterial
1824.897 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol
C20H40O 2960.32DiterpeneAntimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diuretic,
1924.986 hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester
(Palmitic acid methyl ester)
C17H34O22700.72Fatty acid methyl esterAntioxidant, hypocholesterolemic nematicide, pesticide, antiandrogenic flavor, hemolytic, 5-Alpha reductase inhibitor
2024.951Pentadecanoic acidC15H30O22427.99Saturated fatty acidAntimicrobial
2127.266 9-Octadecenoic acidC18H34O22820.31Unsaturated fatty acidantibacterial
2227.664 Heptadecanoic acidC17H34O22700.39Saturated fatty acidAntimicrobial
2328.2989,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester
(Linolenic acid, methyl ester)
C19H32O22921.07Fatty acid methyl esterAntibacterial and anticandidal
Antiinflammatory, hypocholesterolemic, cancer preventive,
hepatoprotective, nematicide, insectifuge antihistaminic,
antiarthritic, anticoronary, antieczemic antiacne, 5-Alpha
reductase inhibitor Antiandrogenic
2428.5542-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl
(Phytol isomer)
C20H40O 2966.37DiterpeneAntimicrobial
Anti-inflammatory Anticancer Diuretic
2529.227 Cis-9-HexadecenalC16H30O 23811.40AldehydeAntimicrobial
2629.573 Octadecanoic acid
(Stearic acid)
C18H36O22844.06Fatty acidAntimicrobial
2741.240 Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy-4- (4 methylphenyl)sulfonyl]methylC16H18O4S 30610.76Aromatic sulfur compound Antimicrobial
2844.155 Cholest-5-en-3-ol (3.beta.)-C27H46O 3860.24Steroidal Antibacterial
2945.238 Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)-C27H46O386 0.50SteroidalAntimicrobial,
3045.509Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-olC29H48O 4120.63SteroidalAntioxidant,
antibacterial activity, antiinflammatory, antiarthritic antiasthma, diuretic
3146.038 Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)-C29H50O 4143.08SteroidalAntimicrobial antioxidant antiinflammatory antiarthritic antiasthma diuretic
3247.033Vitamin EC29H50O24300.58Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activity
Hepatoprotective, Antispasmodic
3344.454 alpha.-TocopherolC29H50O24300.26Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, radical scavenging, antispasmodic

Source: Dr. Duke’s: Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases.

The different phyto compounds responsible for bioactivity have been identified and characterized in different medicinal plants. 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3, 5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-, a potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compound, possessed antibacterial activity in Barleria prionitis (Linn.) rhizome. A long-chain fatty alcohol, 1-Dodecanol, was reported with highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus [53]. Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl commonly known as Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), an antioxidant, has also demonstrated marked antimicrobial activity inhibiting or decreasing the growth of gram-positive bacteria at a higher degree than the gram-negative bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae [54]. Derivatives of cinnamic acid such as esters, amides, acids, and hydrazides have been reported to have antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral properties [55]. 2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl, a bioactive compound possessing the properties such as analgesic, antidiabetic, antibacterial, and antifungal, was identified from the methanolic fractions of the Azadirachta indica [56]. The extract contained (0.23%) of 1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl), commonly known as 1-phellandrene. Stigmasterol has been reported earlier as a strong antioxidant having antibacterial activity against multidrug resistant mycobacteria [57, 58].

Several bioactive compounds, namely, Marmin [59] and Marmelosin coumarin derivatives [60] and Aegeline, an alkaloid, have been previously reported from Aegle marmelos [61]. However the flavonoids and phenolics present in significant amount in this plant are still unexplored. The preferential quantity of these compounds in the methanolic extract of Pant Aparna as revealed by the present study directed to focus towards the purification and characterization of potential compound from this variety.

4. Conclusion

Medicines derived from plants have made immense contribution towards the betterment of human health and act as a source of inspiration for novel drug compounds. From the above research it can be concluded that this plant has immense potential to be used in the area of pharmacology and as a prospective source of valuable drugs. Due to the presence of various compounds that are essential for good health, it can also be used to improve the health status of society. The extracts showed a significantly high antibacterial activity against the microorganisms. The data clearly depicts the presence of compounds used for treating various bacterial diseases, indicating its use in the traditional system of medicine since ancient times. Further, the broad spectrum activity of aqueous, methanol, and aqueous: ethanol extracts proves to be encouraging in the development of novel antimicrobial formulation in the near future.

A spectrum of compounds showing strong antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities was revealed by the GC-MS analysis of the methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos.

Antimicrobials derived from plants possess vast curative properties since they have fewer side effects as compared to synthetic antimicrobials drugs. Aegle marmelos is of utmost importance for ethnobotanical purposes, and it has been placed in the priority list of thirty-two medicinal plants by The National Medicinal Plants Board of Govt. of India [62]. The present study contributes to the current knowledge of presence of various phytochemical active compounds in 18 varieties/accessions of Aegle marmelos possessing significant broad spectrum antibacterial efficacy. Further fractionation and purification will elucidate the potential compound, which is a pressing need because of the upcoming resistance of the currently available antibiotics.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge UGC, New Delhi, for its financial support in the form of Maulana Azad National Fellowship and Hon’ble Vice Chancellor of our Integral University.


  1. N. Shariff, M. S. Sudarshana, S. Umesha, and P. Hariprasad, “Antimicrobial activity of Rauvolfia tetraphylla and Physalis minima leaf and callus extracts,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 946–950, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. Vines, “Herbal harvests with a future: towards sustainable sources for medicinal plants,” 2004, Plant life International, View at: Google Scholar
  3. B. L. Saet, H. C. Kwang, N. K. Su et al., “The antimicrobial activity of essential oil from Dracocephalum foetidum against pathogenic microorganisms,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. H. Davis, Flora of Turkey and East Eagean Island, vol. 7, Edinburg University Press, Edinburg, Tex, USA, 1982.
  5. M. Lis-Balchin and S. G. Deans, “Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 759–762, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  6. D. A. Ates and O. T. Erdogrul, “Antimicrobial activities of various medicinal and commercial plant extract,” Turkish Journal of Biology, vol. 27, pp. 157–162, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. R. El-Seedi, T. Ohara, N. Sata, and S. Nishiyama, “Antimicrobial diterpenoids from Eupatorium glutinosum (Asteraceae),” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 293–296, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Rojas, B. Bustamante, J. Bauer, I. Fernández, J. Albán, and O. Lock, “Antimicrobial activity of selected Peruvian medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 88, no. 2-3, pp. 199–204, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Duraipandiyan, M. Ayyanar, and S. Ignacimuthu, “Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, article 35, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Chemexcil, Selected Medicinal Plants of India, Basic Chemicals, Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Export Promotion Council, Bombay, India, 1992.
  11. L. Badam, S. S. Bedekar, K. B. Sonawane, and S. P. Joshi, “In vitro antiviral activity of bael (Aegle marmelos Corr.) upon human coxsackieviruses B1-B6,” Journal of Communicable Diseases, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 88–99, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y. L. Chew, J. K. Goh, and Y. Y. Lim, “Assessment of in vitro antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic composition of selected medicinal herbs from Leguminosae family in Peninsular Malaysia,” Food Chemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. K. Gupta and N. Tandon, Reviews on Indian Medicinal Plants, vol. 1, Indian Council of Medicinal Research, New Delhi, India, 2004.
  14. N. Kamalakkannan and P. Stanely Mainzen Prince, “Antihyperlipidaemic effect of Aegle marmelos fruit extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 569–573, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. Arul, S. Miyazaki, and R. Dhananjayan, “Studies on the anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic properties of the leaves of Aegle marmelos Corr.,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 96, no. 1-2, pp. 159–163, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. C. Jagetia, P. Venkatesh, and M. S. Baliga, “Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa inhibits the proliferation of transplanted Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in mice,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Kamalakkannan and P. S. M. Prince, “Hypoglycaemic effect of water extracts of Aegle marmelos fruits in streptozotocin diabetic rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 87, no. 2-3, pp. 207–210, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Rajadurai, M. Padmanabhan, and P. S. M. Prince, “Effect of Aegle marmelos leaf extract and alpha-tocopherol on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats,” Cardiology, vol. 1, pp. 40–45, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. C. Sabu and R. Kuttan, “Antidiabetic activity of Aegle marmelos and its relationship with its antioxidant properties,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  20. K. Saradha Jyothi and B. Subba Rao, “Antibacterial activity of extracts from Aegle marmelos against standard pathogenic bacterial strains,” International Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1824–1826, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  21. T. K. Sur, S. Pandit, and T. Pramanik, “Antispermatogenic activity of leaves of Aegle marmelos corr. in albino rats: a preliminary report,” Biomedicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 199–202, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. C. Yen, P. D. Duh, and C. L. Tsai, “Relationship between antioxidant activity and maturity of peanut hulls,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 67–70, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Kingston, S. Jeeva, G. M. Jeeva, S. Kiruba, B. P. Mishra, and D. Kannan, “Indigenous knowledge of using medicinal plants in treating skin diseases in Kanyakumari District, Southern India,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 196–200, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. M. Cowan, “Plant products as antimicrobial agents,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 564–582, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  25. J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 11th edition, 1984.
  26. A. O. Adetuyi and A. V. Popoola, “Extraction and dyes ability potential studies of the colourant in zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides plant on cotton fabric,” Journal of Science Engineering Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 3291–3299, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  27. G. E. Trease and W. C. Evans, Pharmacognosy, Brailliar Tiridal Can Macmillian Publishers, 11th edition, 1989.
  28. A. Sofowora, Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in West Africa, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  29. J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis, Chapman & Hall Ltd., London, UK, 1973.
  30. T. Swain, “Tannins and lignins,” in Herbivores: Their Interactions with Plant Metabolites, G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen, Eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. H. Brunner, “Direct spectrophotometric determination of saponins,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 34, pp. 1314–1326, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  32. B. O. Obodoni and P. O. Ochuko, “Phytochemical studies and comparative efficacy of the crude extracts of some Homostatic plants in Edo and Delta States of Nigeria,” Global Journal of Pure Applied Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203–208, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  33. P. O. Olutiola, O. Famurewa, and H. G. Sonntag, An Introduction to General Microbiology—A Practical Approach, 2nd edition, 1991.
  34. D. Venkatesan, C. M. Karrunakarn, S. Selva Kumar, and P. T. Palani Swamy, “Identification of phytochemical constituents of Aegle marmelos responsible for antimicrobial activity against selected pathogenic organisms,” Ethnobotanical Leaflets, vol. 13, pp. 1362–1372, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. Kothari, V. Mishra, S. Bharat, and S. D. Tonpay, “Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical screening of serial extracts from leaves of Aegle marmelos (Linn.),” Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 687–692, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  36. R. Dhandapani and B. Sabna, “Phytochemical constituents of some Indian medicinal plants,” Ancient Science of Life, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  37. R. P. Rastogi and B. N. Mehrotra, “Ancient-modern concordance in Ayurvedic plants,” in Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, R. P. Rastogi, Ed., vol. 3, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India; Information Directorate, New Delhi, India, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  38. J. A. Duke, Handbook of Biologically Active Phytochemicals and Their Activities, CRC Press, 1992.
  39. V. Mohan, A. G. Molly, and A. N. Eldo, “Aegle marmelos extract as a potent bactericide,” Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 639–644, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  40. D. Supriya, S. Ashish, S. Ankit, G. Nirmala, and R. C. Agrawal, “Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial potential of ripe fruits of Aegle marmelos,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 179–181, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  41. L. L. Zaika, “Spices and herbs: their antimicrobial activity and its determination,” Journal of Food Safety, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 97–118, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Suresh, P. K. Senthilkumar, and B. Karthikeyan, “Antimicrobial activity of Aegle marmelos against clinical pathogens,” Journal of Phytology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 323–327, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  43. G. Yismaw, B. Tessema, A. Mulu, and M. Tiruneh, “The in vitro assessment of antibacterial effect of papaya seed extract against bacterial pathogens isolated from urine, wound and stool,” Ethiopian Medical Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  44. R. Valsaraj, P. Pushpangadan, U. W. Smitt, A. Adsersen, and U. Nyman, “Antimicrobial screening of selected medicinal plants from India,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. I. Ahmad and A. Z. Beg, “Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian medicinal plants against multi-drug resistant human pathogens,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 113–123, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Maji, P. Dandapat, D. Ojha et al., “In vitro antimicrobial potentialities of different solvent extracts of ethnomedicinal plants against clinically isolated human pathogens,” Journal of Phytology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 57–64, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  47. B. Mamtha, K. Kavitha, K. K. Srinivasan, and P. G. Shivananda, “An in vitro study of the effect of Centella asiatica [Indian pennywort] on enteric pathogens,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 41, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  48. R. M. Zablotowicz, R. E. Hoagland, and S. C. Wagner, “Effect of saponins on the growth and activity of rhizosphere bacteria,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 405, pp. 83–95, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  49. N. E. Hemandez, M. L. Tereschuk, and L. R. Abdala, “Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids in medicinal plants from Tafí del Valle (Tucumán, Argentina),” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 317–322, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Marjorie, “Plant products as antimicrobial agents,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 564–582, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  51. R. F. Epand, P. B. Savage, and R. M. Epand, “Bacterial lipid composition and the antimicrobial efficacy of cationic steroid compounds (Ceragenins),” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Biomembranes, vol. 1768, no. 10, pp. 2500–2509, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. V. Bharathy, B. Maria Sumathy, and F. Uthayakumari, “Determination of phytocomponents by GC-MS in leaves of Jatropha gossypifolia L.,” Science Research Reporter, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 286–290, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  53. N. Togashi, A. Shiraishi, M. Nishizaka et al., “Antibacterial activity of long-chain fatty alcohols against Staphylococcus aureus,” Molecules, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. Turcotte and S. A. Saheb, “Antimicrobial activity of phenolic antioxidants,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1306–1320, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  55. M. Sova, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cinnamic acid derivatives,” Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 749–767, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. V. Moorthy and M. Boominathan, “The antimicrobial activities of crude extracts and fraction of Psidium guajava and Azadirachta indica against Staphylococcus aureus in chronic disease affected patients,” International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Life Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 2249–6793, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  57. D. Hamdan, M. Z. El-Readi, A. Tahrani et al., “Secondary metabolites of ponderosa lemon (Citrus pyriformis) and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic activities,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C, vol. 66, no. 7-8, pp. 385–393, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  58. V. M. Navarro-García, J. Luna-Herrera, M. G. Rojas-Bribiesca, P. Álvarez-Fitz, and M. Y. Ríos, “Antibacterial activity of aristolochia brevipes against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 7357–7364, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. E. Nugroho, S. Riyanto, M. A. Sukari, and K. Maeyama, “Anti-allergic effects of Marmin, a coumarine isolated from Aegle marmelos Correa: in vitro study,” International Journal of Phytomedicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–97, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  60. P. P. Ram, G. Varun, S. Balram, C. Deepak, R. Veerma, and B. Anil, “Extraction and isolation of marmelosin from Aegle marmelos, synthesis and evaluation of their derivative as antidiabetic agent,” Der Pharmacia Lettre, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1085–1092, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  61. A. E. Nugroho, S. Riyanto, M. A. Sukari, and K. Maeyama, “Effects of aegeline, a main alkaloid of Aegle marmelos Correa leaves, on the histamine release from mast cells,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 359–367, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  62. C. P. Kala, “Ethnobotany and ethnoconservation of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 537–540, 2006. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Farina Mujeeb et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

14056 Views | 4931 Downloads | 46 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.