Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 517125, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/517125
Clinical Study

New Tools for Embryo Selection: Comprehensive Chromosome Screening by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

1IVIOMICS SPAIN, Parc Cientific Universitat de València, Calle Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, 46980 Valencia, Spain
2Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI), Instituto Universitario IVI/INCLIVA, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain
3IVIOMICS USA, 1200 NW 78th Avenue, Suite 103, Miami, FL 33126, USA
4IVIOMICS INDIA, 13 Olof Palme Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi 11057, India
5Fundación IVI, 46980 Valencia, Spain
6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Received 12 January 2014; Accepted 24 February 2014; Published 29 April 2014

Academic Editor: Irma Virant-Klun

Copyright © 2014 Lorena Rodrigo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Harper, E. Coonen, A. H. Handyside, R. M. L. Winston, A. H. N. Hopman, and J. D. A. Delhanty, “Mosaicism of autosomes and sex chromosomes in morphologically normal, monospermic preimplantation human embryos,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Munné and J. Cohen, “Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 842–855, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. I. Nagaoka, T. J. Hassold, and P. A. Hunt, “Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 493–504, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. T. Hassold, N. Chen, and J. Funkhouser, “A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 151–178, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. E. Lamb, S. B. Freeman, A. Savage-Austin et al., “Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non- disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II,” Nature Genetics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 400–405, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Boué, J. Boué, and A. Gropp, “Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage,” Advances in Human Genetics, vol. 14, pp. 1–57, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, Y. Ozaki, K. Katano et al., “Abnormal embryonic karyotype is the most frequent cause of recurrent miscarriage,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2297–2303, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. J. Margalioth, A. Ben-Chetrit, M. Gal, and T. Eldar-Geva, “Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3036–3043, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Rodrigo, V. Peinado, E. Mateu et al., “Impact of different patterns of sperm chromosomal abnormalities on the chromosomal constitution of preimplantation embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1380–1386, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Rubio, M. Gil-Salom, C. Simón et al., “Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2084–2092, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. W. Kim, W. S. Lee, T. K. Yoon et al., “Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion after assisted reproductive treatment,” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 11, no. 1, article 153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, F. van der Veen, and S. Repping, “Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs,” Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 4, Article ID dmr003, pp. 454–466, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Cohen and J. A. Grifo, “Multicentre trial of preimplantation genetic screening reported in the New England Journal of Medicine: an in-depth look at the findings,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 365–366, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. C. J. M. Fauser, “Preimplantation genetic screening: the end of an affair?” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2622–2625, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. A. Fritz, “Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now?” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2617–2621, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. R. Hernández, “What next for preimplantation genetic screening? beyond aneuploidy,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1538–1541, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Mastenbroek, P. Scriven, M. Twisk, S. Viville, F. Van Der Veen, and S. Repping, “What next for preimplantation genetic screening? More randomized controlled trials needed?” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2626–2628, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. L. Simpson, “What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient,” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2179–2181, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Rubio, C. Giménez, E. Fernández et al., “The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2045–2047, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Rubio, J. Bellver, L. Rodrigo et al., “Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1400–1407, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Wilton, L. Voullaire, P. Sargeant, R. Williamson, and J. McBain, “Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 860–868, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Fragouli, D. Wells, K. M. Whalley, J. A. Mills, M. J. W. Faed, and J. D. A. Delhanty, “Increased susceptibility to maternal aneuploidy demonstrated by comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human MII oocytes and first polar bodies,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. B. Schoolcraft, E. Fragouli, J. Stevens, S. Munne, M. G. Katz-Jaffe, and D. Wells, “Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1700–1706, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Hellani, K. Abu-Amero, J. Azouri, and S. El-Akoum, “Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 841–847, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. S. Johnson, G. Gemelos, J. Baner et al., “Preclinical validation of a microarray Method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol,” Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1066–1075, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. R. Treff, B. Levy, J. Su, L. E. Northrop, X. Tao, and R. T. Scott Jr., “SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 583–589, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. J. Forman, X. Tao, K. M. Ferry, D. Taylor, N. R. Treff, and R. T. Scott, “Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening Results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1217–1222, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Hodes-Wertz, J. Grifo, S. Ghadir et al., “Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 675–680, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. Z. Yang, J. Liu, G. S. Collins et al., “Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study,” Molecular Cytogenetics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. P. Mir, L. Rodrigo, E. Mateu et al., “Accuracy rates in biopsies performed on day-3 and day-5 embryos using CGHarray technology for PGS,” in 11th International Conference on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Bregenz, Austria, 2012.
  31. A. Capalbo, S. Bono, L. Spizzichino et al., “Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 509–518, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  32. D. Christopikou, E. Tsorva, K. Economou et al., “Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1426–1434, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. R. Scott RT, K. M. Upham, E. J. Forman et al., “Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 697–703, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  34. J. L. Simpson, “Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve pregnancy outcomes in subfertility,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 805–815, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. H. Handyside, “24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 595–602, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  36. P. Mir, L. Rodrigo, A. Mercader et al., “False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical aplication on day-3,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 143–149, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  37. C. Gutiérrez-Mateo, P. Colls, J. Sánchez-García et al., “Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 953–958, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Rubio, A. Mercader, P. Alamá et al., “Prospective cohort study in high responder oocyte donors using two hormonal stimulation protocols: impact on embryo aneuploidy and development,” Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2290–2297, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Mercader, D. Valbuena, and C. Simón, “Human embryo culture,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 420, pp. 3–18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Kuwayama, G. Vajta, S. Ieda, and O. Kato, “Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 608–614, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Cobo, J. Bellver, J. Domingo et al., “New options in assisted reproduction technology: the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 68–72, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, I. Pérez-Cano et al., “FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 497–506, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Rubio, P. Buendía, L. Rodrigo et al., “Prognostic factors for preimplantation genetic screening in repeated pregnancy loss,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 687–693, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Milán, A. C. Cobo, L. Rodrigo et al., “Redefining advanced maternal age as an indication for preimplantation genetic screening,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 649–657, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Cobo, N. Garrido, J. Crespo, R. José, and A. Pellicer, “Accumulation of oocytes: a new strategy for managing low-responder patients,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 424–432, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Cobo and C. Diaz, “Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 277–285, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. L. Rienzi, A. Cobo, A. Paffoni et al., “Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1606–1612, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  48. E. J. Forman, X. Li, K. M. Ferry et al., “Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 644–649, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  49. A. Cobo, M. J. de Los Santos, D. Castellò et al., “Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1138–1146, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  50. B. Ata, B. Kaplan, H. Danzer et al., “Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 614–620, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. F. Dominguez, D. Castellò, and J. Remohí, “Effect of vitrification on human oocytes: a metabolic profiling study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 565–572, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  52. M. D. Keltz, M. Vega, I. Sirota et al., “Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) with Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1333–1339, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  53. G. L. Harton, S. Munné, M. Surrey et al., “Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1695–1703, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  54. J. M. Franasiak, E. J. Forman, K. H. Hong et al., “The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening,” Fertility and Sterility, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  55. C. Blockeel, V. Schutyser, A. De Vos et al., “Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 848–854, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. de Souza, J. Halliday, A. Chan, C. Bower, and J. K. Morris, “Recurrence risks for trisomies 13, 18, and 21,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 2716–2722, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Munné, M. Sandalinas, C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, J. Cohen, and D. Warburton, “Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 638–643, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. N. Al-Asmar, V. Peinado, M. Vera et al., “Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos from couples with a previous aneuploid miscarriage,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 145–150, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, A. P. Ferraretti, S. Gordts, V. Fredericks, and A. Crippa, “Paternal contribution to aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 536–542, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus