Research Article

Structural Comparison, Substrate Specificity, and Inhibitor Binding of AGPase Small Subunit from Monocot and Dicot: Present Insight and Future Potential

Table 3

Secondary structure statistics of AGPase SS predicted by CONCORD and domain position.

AGPaseHelix (%)Strand (%)Coil (%)Domain position

Template (Solanum tuberosum)70 (13.44)116 (22.26)335 (64.30)93–351, 389–515
MONOCOT
Oryza sativa ssp. japonica 67 (13.03)117 (22.76)330 (64.20)86–344, 382–507
Hordeum vulgare 68 (13.25)113 (22.02)332 (64.71)85–343, 381–506
Triticum aestivum 66 (13.95)112 (23.67)295 (62.36)45–303, 341–466
DICOT
Arabidopsis thaliana 69 (13.26)115 (22.11)336 (64.61)101–350, 388–514
Solanum lycopersicum 71 (13.62)117 (22.45)333 (63.91)93–351, 389–515
Beta vulgaris 66 (13.49)106 (21.67)317 (64.82)73–331, 369–483
Vicia faba171 (13.97)118 (23.22)319 (62.79)80–338, 376–502
Vicia faba268 (13.28)115 (22.46)329 (64.25)84–342, 380–506
Cicer arietinum170 (13.56)116 (22.48)330 (63.95)88–346, 384–510
Cicer arietinum267 (13.26)117 (23.16)321 (63.56)77–335, 373–499
Brassica napus 71 (13.65)114 (21.92)335 (64.42)92–350, 388–514