Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 624024, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/624024
Research Article

Performance Studies on Distributed Virtual Screening

1Center for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center, and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 12-14, 01069 Dresden, Germany
3Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr aße 5-13, 81377 München, Germany
4Center for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 539, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA

Received 6 March 2014; Revised 17 May 2014; Accepted 19 May 2014; Published 17 June 2014

Academic Editor: Ivan Merelli

Copyright © 2014 Jens Krüger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Ou-Yang, J. Lu, X. Kong, Z. Liang, C. Luo, and H. Jiang, “Computational drug discovery,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1131–1140, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. J. Irwin, T. Sterling, M. M. Mysinger, E. S. Bolstad, and R. G. Coleman, “ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1757–1768, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. Kohlbacher, “CADDSuite-a workflow-enabled suite of open-source tools for drug discovery,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 4, supplement 1, p. O2, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. O. Trott and A. J. Olson, “Software news and update AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 455–461, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. M. Morris, D. S. Goodsell, R. S. Halliday et al., “Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 1639–1662, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Rarey, B. Kramer, T. Lengauer, and G. Klebe, “A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 261, no. 3, pp. 470–489, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Neudert and G. Klebe, “DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein-ligand complexes,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2731–2745, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Krüger, R. Grunzke, S. Gesing et al., “The MoSGrid science gateway-a complete solution for molecular simulations,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Gesing, R. Grunzke, J. Krüger et al., “A single sign-on infrastructure for science gateways on a use case for structural bioinformatics,” Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 769–790, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Grunzke, G. Birkenheuer, D. Blunk et al., “A data driven science gateway for computational workflows,” in Proceedings of the 8th Uniform Interface to Computing Resources (UNICORE Summit '12), vol. 15, pp. 35–49, May 2012. View at Scopus
  11. P. Kacsuk, “P-GRADE portal family for grid infrastructures,” Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Barbera, G. La Rocca, R. Rotondo, A. Falzone, P. Maggi, and N. Venuti, “Conjugating science gateways and grid portals into e-collaboration environments: the Liferay and GENIUS/EnginFrame use case,” in Proceedings of the TeraGrid Conference (TG '10), August 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Alameda, M. Christie, G. Fox et al., “The open grid computing environments collaboration: portlets and services for science gateways,” Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 921–942, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Li, K. Bum-Erdene, P. H. Baenziger et al., “BioDrugScreen: a computational drug design resource for ranking molecules docked to the human proteome,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 1, Article ID gkp852, pp. D765–D773, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Goecks, A. Nekrutenko, J. Taylor et al., “Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences,” Genome Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, p. R86, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Russell, P. Dziubecki, P. Grabowski et al., “The Vine Toolkit: a Java framework for developing grid applications,” in Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, R. Wyrzykowski, J. Dongarra, K. Karczewski, and J. Wasniewski, Eds., vol. 4967, pp. 331–340, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. McLennan and R. Kennell, “HUBzero: a platform for dissemination and collaboration in computational science and engineering,” Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 48–45, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. A. Wassenaar, M. van Dijk, N. Loureiro-Ferreira et al., “WeNMR: structural biology on the grid,” Journal of Grid Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 743–767, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Hull, K. Wolstencroft, R. Stevens et al., TAverna: A Tool for Building and Running Workflows of Services Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK, 2006.
  20. B. Demuth, B. Schuller, S. Holl et al., “The UNICORE rich client: facilitating the automated execution of scientific workflows,” in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on e-Science (eScience '10), pp. 238–245, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. M. Mysinger, M. Carchia, J. J. Irwin, and B. K. Shoichet, “Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 6582–6594, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. 2014, http://dude.docking.org/targets/abl1.
  23. M. R. Bauer, T. M. Ibrahim, S. M. Vogel, and F. M. Boeckler, “Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0—a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1447–1462, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. 2014, http://dekois.com/.
  25. SCI-BUS, SCIentific gateway Based User Support, 2014, https://www.sci-bus.eu/.
  26. ER-flow, Building an European Research Community through Interoperable Workflows and Data, 2014, https://www.erflow.eu/.
  27. XSEDE, Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment, 2014, https://www.xsede.org/.
  28. R. Grunzke, S. Breuers, S. Gesing et al., “Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Grunzke, S. Gesing, R. Jäkel, and W. E. Nagel, “Towards generic metadata management in distributed science gateway infrastructures,” in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid '14), 2014.
  30. F. Hupfeld, T. Cortes, B. Kolbeck et al., “The XtreemFS architecture-a case for object-based file systems in grids,” Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 2049–2060, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Fuhrmann and V. Gülzow, “dCache, storage system for the future,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Euro-Par Conference on Parallel Processing (Euro-Par '06), W. E. Nagel, W. V. Walter, and W. Lehner, Eds., vol. 4128, pp. 1106–1113, Springer, Dresden, Germany, September 2006.
  32. A. Rajasekar, R. Moore, and C. Y. Hou, IRods Primer: Integrated Rule-Oriented Data System, Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, Calif, USA, 2010.
  33. A. Streit, P. Bala, A. Beck-Ratzka et al., “UNICORE 6-recent and future advancements,” Annales des Telecommunications, vol. 65, no. 11-12, pp. 757–762, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. PRACE, PRACE Research Infrastructure, 2014, http://www.prace-ri.eu/.
  35. EGI, European Grid Infrastructure, 2014, https://www.egi.eu/.
  36. HBP, The Human Brain Project, 2014, https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/.
  37. OASIS, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0, 2002, http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-2.0-os.zip.
  38. R. L. Morgan, S. Cantor, S. Carmody, W. Hoehn, and K. Klingenstein, “Federated security: the Shibboleth approach,” EDUCAUSE Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 12–17, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  39. SHIWA SHaring Interoperable Workflows for large-scale scientic simulations on Available DCIs, http://www.shiwa-workflow.eu/project.
  40. S. Herres-Pawlis, Á. Balaskó, G. Birkenheuer et al., “User-friendly workflows in quantum chemistry,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Scientific Gateways (IWSG '13), 2013.
  41. M. Valiev, E. J. Bylaska, N. Govind et al., “NWChem: a comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 9, pp. 1477–1489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., Gaussian 09, Revision A.02, Gaussian, Wallingford, Conn, USA, 2009.