Review Article

Maternal Obesity and Occurrence of Fetal Macrosomia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Quality assessment of included studies.

StudyRepresentativeness of the exposed cohortSource of nonexposed cohortAscertainment of exposure (obesity)Comparability of cohortsAdequacy of follow-upOverall rating

Hoff et al., 2009 [42]Moderate 
Outcome of second pregnancy in women who were overweight in their first pregnancy
High 
Same population as exposed cohort
Low 
No information
Low 
Comparable for parity and race
Not comparable for age and socioeconomic status
No information on diabetes or hypertension
High 
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low 

Salihu et al., 2009 [43]High
State-wide registry used to validate US national datasets
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Moderate
Self-reported prepregnancy weight, measured height
Low
No comparable variables
Not comparable for age, parity, diabetes, hypertension, or race
No information on socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Crane et al., 2009 [44]High
Provincial perinatal database
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Comparable for age
Not comparable for parity, diabetes, hypertension
No information on socioeconomic status or race
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Leung et al., 2008 [45]Low
Not enough information to determine
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
BMI obtained from weight and height at antenatal booking—unclear whether self-report or measured
Low
Comparable for age and race
Not comparable for parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension
No information on socioeconomic status
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Nohr et al., 
2008 [46, 47]
High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Denmark
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Not comparable for age, parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status
No information on race
Low
~30% of women were excluded because they did not participate in the second interview, no description given
Moderate

Khashan and Kenny 2009 [48]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Manchester
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (around 16 weeks)
Moderate
Comparable for age and socioeconomic status
Not comparable for parity or race
No information on presence of diabetes or hypertension
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
High

Bhattacharya et al., 2007 [24]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Aberdeen and district
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (around 10 weeks)
Low
Comparable for parity
Not comparable for maternal age, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status
No information for race
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
High

Getahun et al., 2007 [49]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Missouri
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Not comparable for age, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension or race
No information for parity or socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Sukalich et al., 2006 [50]Low
Selected group of users—<19 years old only
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Comparable for presence of preexisting diabetes
Not comparable for maternal age, parity, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
No information on multiple gestation
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Jensen et al., 2003 [51]Low
Selected group of users—women with a normal 75 g OGTT
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
No description of how prepregnancy BMI was obtained
Low
Comparable for presence of diabetes
Not comparable for age, parity, presence of hypertension, or race
No information for socioeconomic status or multiple gestation
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Stepan et al., 2006 [52]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Leipzig
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
No description of how prepregnancy BMI was obtained
Low
Comparable for maternal age
No information for parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Athukorala et al., 2010 [53]Low
Selected group of users—women enrolled in the Australian Collaborative Trial of Supplements with antioxidants vitamin C and vitamin E
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit
Moderate
Comparable for age, parity, and race
Not comparable for presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or socioeconomic status
Information not availableHigh

Narchi and Skinner 2010 [54]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in the UK site
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (8–12 weeks)
Low
Comparable for age
Not comparable for parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or race
No information on socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
High

Baeten et al., 2001 [23]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in the state of Washington
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Comparable for parity
Not comparable for age, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Clausen et al., 2005 [55]Low
Selected group of users (participants in a larger cohort study)
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
No description of how obesity was ascertained
Low
No information given on age, parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
Low
Loss to follow-up 244/2294, 10.6%
Low

Driul et al., 2008 [56]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in the state of Washington
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
No information given on age, parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Roman et al., 2007 [57]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman on Reunion Island (consecutive cases)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
No description of how obesity was ascertained
Moderate
Comparable for age and parity
Not comparable for presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or race
No information on socioeconomic status
High
Retrospectively derived cases and controls
Moderate

Sahu et al., 2007 [58]Moderate
Somewhat representative of the average obese woman in Northern India (had to deliver on site)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
No description of how obesity was ascertained
Moderate
Comparable for age and parity
Not comparable for presence of diabetes or presence of hypertension
No information on socioeconomic status or race
High
Retrospectively derived cohort
Low

van Wootten and Turner 2002 [59]Low
Selected group—patients with gestational diabetes
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (8-9 weeks)
Low
Comparable for presence of diabetes
No information for age, parity, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic status, or race
Low
14 women were missing height and weight information
Moderate

Rode et al., 
2005 [33, 60]
High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Copenhagen
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Not comparable for presence of diabetes or presence of hypertension
No information on age, parity, socioeconomic status, or race
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Magann et al., 2011 [61]Moderate
Somewhat representative of the average obese woman in Jackson or Portsmouth (two hospitals only, one naval)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (all first trimester)
Low
Not comparable for age, parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or race
No information for socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Lumme et al., 1995 [62]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Northern Finland
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (all first visit)
Low
Not comparable for age, parity, presence of diabetes, or presence of hypertension
No information for socioeconomic status or race
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
High

Langer et al., 2005 [63]Low
Selected group of users (women with GDM)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
No description of how prepregnancy BMI was derived
Low
Not comparable for age or parity
No information for hypertension, socioeconomic status, race, or multiple gestation
High
Prospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

Jensen et al., 1999 [64]Moderate
Somewhat representative of the average pregnant woman in Herning (several exclusion criteria)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
No description of how obesity was ascertained
Low
Comparable for presence of diabetes and presence of hypertension
No information on age, parity, socioeconomic status, or race
High
Retrospective cohort 100% “follow-up”
Low

Mantakas and Farrell 2010 [65]Low
Selected group of users (nulliparous women, one hospital site)
High
Controls derived from the same population as cases
Low
No description of how obesity was ascertained
Low
Not comparable for age or race
Comparable for parity
No information for presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Low

El-Gilany and Hammad 2010 [66]Low
Selected group of users—volunteers
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit
Low
Comparable for socioeconomic status
Not comparable for age, parity, presence of diabetes, or presence of hypertension
No information on race
Moderate
Subjects lost to follow-up unlikely to introduce bias (<5% and description given)
Moderate

Bodnar et al., 2010 [67]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Pittsburgh, PA
High
Same population as exposed cohort
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Not comparable for age, parity, or race
No information on presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension, or socioeconomic status
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
Moderate

Le Thai et al., 1992 [68]Moderate
Case definition adequate but not independently validated, consecutive cases
High
Controls from same population as cases
Low
Self-reported prepregnancy weight and height
Low
Comparable for age
Not comparable for parity, presence of diabetes, presence of hypertension
No information for socioeconomic status or race
High
Retrospective case control study, no loss to follow-up
Moderate

Voigt et al., 2008 [69, 70]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant woman in Germany
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit
Low
Comparable for age
Not comparable for parity, presence of diabetes, or presence of hypertension
No information on socioeconomic status or race
High
Retrospective cohort, 100% “follow-up”
High

Brennand et al., 2005 [71]High
Truly representative of the average obese pregnant Cree woman in James Bay
High
Same population as exposed cohort
High
Measured height and first antenatal visit (<14 weeks)
Low
Comparable for race
Not comparable for age, presence of diabetes, or presence of hypertension
No information on socioeconomic status or parity
Low
314 women were excluded because they did not have a recorded first weight <14 weeks (no description given)
High