Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 690787, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/690787
Research Article

Final Gleason Score Prediction Using Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine Based on Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer at 3T

1Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Yeditepe University, İnönü Mah., Kayışdağı Cad, 26 Ağustos Yerleşimi, Ataşehir, 34755 Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Radiology, VKF American Hospital, 34365 Istanbul, Turkey
3Department of Urology, VKF American Hospital, 34365 Istanbul, Turkey
4School of Medicine, Koç University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey
5Biomedical Engineering Institute, Boğaziçi University, Rasathane Cad, Kandilli Campus, Kandilli Mah., 34684 Istanbul, Turkey

Received 5 June 2014; Revised 10 September 2014; Accepted 12 September 2014; Published 2 December 2014

Academic Editor: Barıs Turkbey

Copyright © 2014 Fusun Citak-Er et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Matsuda and A. Matsuda, “Time trends in prostate cancer mortality between 1950 and 2008 in Japan, the USA and Europe based on the who mortality database,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 41, no. 12, Article ID hyr177, p. 1389, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Penzkofer and C. M. Tempany-Afdhal, “Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities—a radiologist's perspective,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. N. Simmons, R. K. Berglund, and J. S. Jones, “A practical guide to prostate cancer diagnosis and management,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 321–331, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. B. Garnick, “Prostate cancer: screening, diagnosis, and management,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 804–818, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Turkbey and P. L. Choyke, “Multiparametric MRI and prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 310–315, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Zhou, R. R. Hallac, Q. Yuan et al., “Correlating multi-parametric MRI with Gleason score in human prostate,” in International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Itay, May 2014.
  7. S. Verma, B. Turkbey, N. Muradyan et al., “Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 6, pp. 1277–1288, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Panebianco, A. Sciarra, M. Ciccariello et al., “Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ([(1)H]MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in identifying prostate cancer foci in patients with negative biopsy and high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA),” Radiologia Medica, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 1314–1329, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. A. Reinsberg, G. S. Payne, S. F. Riches et al., “Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. F. Riches, G. S. Payne, V. A. Morgan et al., “MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 193, no. 6, pp. 1583–1591, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Roy, R. Pasquali, A. Matau, G. Bazille, and H. Lang, “The role of diffusion 3-Tesla MRI in detecting prostate cancer before needle biopsy: multiparametric study of 111 patients,” Journal de Radiologie, vol. 91, no. 11, part 1, pp. 1121–1128, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. F. Gleason, “Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective,” Human Pathology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Montironi, F. R. Path, and R. Mazzucchelli, “Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Contemporary approach.,” Pathologica., vol. 97, no. 4, p. 164, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Puech, N. Betrouni, N. Makni, A. S. Dewalle, A. Villers, and L. Lemaitre, “Computer-assisted diagnosis of prostate cancer using DCE-MRI data: design, implementation and preliminary results,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. S. Sung, H.-J. Kwon, B.-W. Park et al., “Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 197, no. 5, pp. 1122–1129, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Parfait, P. M. Walker, G. Créhange, X. Tizon, and J. Mitéran, “Classification of prostate magnetic resonance spectra using Support Vector Machine,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 499–508, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Poulakis, U. Witzsch, R. de Vries et al., “Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage,” Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 1306–1310, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Peng, Y. Jiang, C. Yang et al., “Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score: a computer-aided diagnosis development study,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 787–796, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Niaf, O. Rouvière, F. Mège-Lechevallier, F. Bratan, and C. Lartizien, “Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3833–3851, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements et al., “ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 746–757, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. D. Berg, M. A. Røder, K. Brasso, B. Vainer, and P. Iversen, “Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 168–176, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. F. Abdollah, M. Sun, J. Schmitges et al., “Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: estimations of the number needed to treat according to tumor and patient characteristics,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik, “Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines,” Machine Learning, vol. 46, no. 1–3, pp. 389–422, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. B. Cattell, “Citation classic—the Scree test for the number of factors,” Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, no. 5, p. 16, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Schölkopf, A. J. Smola, and K. R. Müller, “Kernel principal component analysis,” in Advances in Kernel Methods, pp. 327–352, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  26. T.-J. Chin and D. Suter, “Incremental kernel principal component analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1662–1674, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. Q. Wang, “Kernel principal component analysis and its applications in face recognition and active shape models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3538.
  28. E. Alpaydın, Introduction to Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  29. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. I. T. Jolliffe, Principal component analysis, Springer, 2nd edition, 2002. View at MathSciNet
  31. R. Nagarajan, Z. Iqbal, B. Burns et al., “Maximum entropy reconstructed echo planar based spectroscopic imaging and diffusion weighted imaging in prostate cancer,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  32. M. C. Maas, A. J. Wright, K. M. Selnæs et al., “Prostate cancer localization with a multiparametric MR approach (PCaMAP): separating PCa from Benign tissue in a multi-center study,” in International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  33. V. Morgan, C. C. Parker, S. Giles, and N. de Souza, “Monitoring low-risk prostate cancer with diffusion-weighted MRI: ADC and its relationship to growth rate,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  34. C. Xiaoxi, L. Wu, Y. Dai, and J. Xu, “Feasibility and preliminary experience of quantitative T2* mapping at 3.0 T for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  35. A. A. Tonyushkin, S. S. Hedgire, P. F. Hahn et al., “Quantitative DTI tractography of prostate gland in prostate cancer patients,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  36. S. Punwani, S. Benigno, B. Ganeshan, A. Groves, and M. Emberton, “Textural entropy may help identify significant tumour within the prostatic transition zone on mp-MRI,” in Proceedings of the Medicine Annual Conference, pp. 10–16, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  37. E. K. Vos, T. Kobus, G. Litjens et al., “Multiparametric MR imaging for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness at 3 Tesla,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, pp. 10–16, Milan, Italy, 2014.
  38. C. Wang, S. Cheng, J. Hu et al., “Comparative study of four widely used classifiers for prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI,” in International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  39. M. Moradi, S. E. Salcudean, S. D. Chang et al., “Multiparametric MRI maps for detection and grading of dominant prostate tumors,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1403–1413, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. O. Starobinets, J. Simko, K. Kuchinsky et al., “Multiparametric MRI to differentiate high-risk from low-risk prostate cancer,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  41. P. C. Vos, T. Hambrock, C. A. Hulsbergen - Van De Kaa, J. J. Fütterer, J. O. Barentsz, and H. J. Huisman, “Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 888–899, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. D. Nicholson, V. A. Master, T. E. Powell et al., “Multiparametric prostate MRI—correlation of imaging findings with MRI-guided biopsy results,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  43. G. J. Metzger, B. Fossen, P. J. Bolan et al., “Detection and grading of prostate cancer using model-based spectral fitting,” in Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  44. H. A. Ashab, P. Kozlowski, R. Rohling et al., “Handling missing DCE data in prostate cancer detection using multiparametric MRI,” in International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Conference, Milan, Italy, May 2014.
  45. P. C. Vos, T. Hambrock, J. O. Barenstz, and H. J. Huisman, “Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1719–1734, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus