BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 691742 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/691742

Wajdi Ayadi, Nesrine Allaya, Hanèn Frikha, Emna Trigui, Abdelmajid Khabir, Abdelmonem Ghorbel, Jamel Daoud, Mounir Frikha, Ali Gargouri, Raja Mokdad-Gargouri, "Identification of a Novel Methylated Gene in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: TTC40", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 691742, 7 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/691742

Identification of a Novel Methylated Gene in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: TTC40

Academic Editor: Claus-Peter Richter
Received27 Feb 2014
Accepted10 Jun 2014
Published30 Jun 2014

Abstract

To further explore the epigenetic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed PCR was performed on NPC biopsies and nontumor nasopharyngeal samples. We have shown mainly two DNA fragments that appeared to be differentially methylated in NPCs versus nontumors. The first, defined as hypermethylated, corresponds to a CpG island at the 5′-end of the tetratricopeptide repeat domain 40 (TTC40) gene, whereas the second, defined as hypo-methylated, is located on repetitive sequences at chromosomes 16p11.1 and 13.1. Thereafter, the epigenetic alteration on the 5′-TTC40 gene was confirmed by methylation-specific PCR, showing a significant aberrant methylation in NPCs, compared to nontumors. In addition, the bisulfite sequencing analysis has shown a very high density of methylated cytosines in C15, C17, and X666 NPC xenografts. To assess whether TTC40 gene is silenced by aberrant methylation, we examined the gene expression by reverse transcription-PCR. Our analysis showed that the mRNA expression was significantly lower in tumors than in nontumors, which is associated with 5′-TTC40 gene hypermethylation. In conclusion, we found that the 5′-TTC40 gene is frequently methylated and is associated with the loss of mRNA expression in NPCs. Hypermethylation of 5′-TTC40 gene might play a role in NPC development; nevertheless, other studies are needed.

1. Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy with a remarkable racial and geographic distribution [1, 2]. In Tunisia, it represents the most frequent head and neck cancer, with an annual incidence of about 4 cases per 100,000 persons. There are several clinical and biological characteristics which are specific to North African patients, especially the two peaks of frequency according to age, the first around 50 and the second below 25 (20–25% of cases) [3].

The etiology of NPC is multifactorial and includes genetic susceptibility, exposure to various carcinogens, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent infection [4, 5]. Epigenetic changes also play a crucial role in nasopharyngeal carcinogenesis. Such epigenetic alterations of malignant tumors, compared with their analogous normal tissues, include both decreases in global DNA methylation (hypomethylation) commonly assessed in DNA repeat regions and concomitant increases (hypermethylation) in specific regions with the ability to affect gene expression [6]. Promoter hypermethylation has been proposed as a common mechanism for the transcriptional inactivation of several tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in human carcinomas. For NPC, silencing by promoter methylation has been reported for variety of TSGs, including Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1), retinoic acid receptor β2 (RAR β2), death-associated protein kinase (DAP-kinase), and deleted in lung and esophageal cancer 1 (DLEC1) [79]. It has been demonstrated that the gene alterations are involved in NPC pathogenesis by disrupting the normal regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle control [1013].

To identify the changes of the CpG methylation profile in cancer development, many methods have been described including those that explore the ability of exclusive digestion of nonmethylated CpG dinucleotides, such as restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) [14], methylated CpG island amplification, followed by representational difference analysis (MCA/RDA) [15], and methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed PCR (MS/AP-PCR) [16]. In the present study, we used MS/AP-PCR method to explore the CpG methylation profiles in NPC patients and then to identify the DNA fragments that may be differentially methylated in tumors versus nontumor samples. We report, mainly, a frequently methylated CpG island at 10q26.3 locus that is correlated with transcriptional silencing of a previously unknown gene, namely, the tetratricopeptide repeat domain 40 (TTC40).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Tissue Samples

Primary NPC biopsies were collected with informed consent from 68 patients, prior to any treatment, at Sfax University Hospital, Tunisia. Fifteen cases were of the juvenile form (patients aged less than 30 years). The clinical stage of the disease was determined according to the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC, 1997) [17, 18]. The histological type of NPC was determined on tissue sections according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2005) [19]. In addition, twelve biopsies of nontumor nasopharyngeal mucosa were used as controls. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, and subsequently stored at −80°C until use. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were examined by pathologists and shown to contain at least 70% of tumor cells.

2.2. MS/AP-PCR Conditions

Genomic DNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and conserved at −20°C until use. Methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed PCR (MS/AP-PCR) was conducted according to Gonzalgo et al. [16], with some modifications. Briefly, 1 μg of DNA in 40 μL was digested with either 10 units of methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme HpaII (Fermentas) or 10 units of methylation-insensitive isoschizomer MspI (Fermentas) at 37°C for 16 h. Aliquot of restriction-digested DNA (4 μL) was amplified in a final volume of 50 μL containing 1x PCR buffer, 50 pmol of a single primer MLG2 (5′-AACCCTCACCCTAACCCCGG-3′), 200 μM of each dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, and 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas). The reactions were carried out in a thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems 2720) for five cycles under low stringency (94°C for 30 s, 40°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 90 s) followed by 30 cycles under high stringency (95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 60 s). The PCR products were resolved on 8% polyacrylamide gel and staining was made using silver nitrate, as previously described by Benbouza et al. [20].

2.3. Isolation and Sequencing of AP-PCR Fragments

Candidate differentially methylated bands were cut out from dried polyacrylamide gels and incubated in 50 μL of sterile water at 80°C for 10 min. Five microliters of the eluate was reamplified using the same primer MLG2, under the same conditions as described above. The amplified products were resolved on 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and cloned in a pGEM-T vector(Promega). Individual colonies were subjected to automated sequencing with an ABI 377 DNA autosequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence identities were obtained using the BLAST program of the National Cancer Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/).

2.4. Bisulfite Sequencing

DNA samples from the three NPC xenografts (C15, C17, and X666) and the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line were subjected to bisulfite sequencing analysis. One μg of genomic DNA was modified by bisulfite treatment for 12 hours using EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This treatment deaminates unmethylated cytosines into uracil but does not affect 5-methylcytosines. After bisulfite treatment, PCR amplification was performed on 100 ng of modified DNA in a final reaction mixture of 100 μL containing 1x PCR buffer, 1 μM of each primer (Table 1), 200 μM of each dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas). The amplified fragments were purified using the Wizard SV gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) and cloned into a pGEM-T vector (Promega). Three clones of each sample were subjected to automated sequencing.


Primer sequences (5′-3′)Annealing temperatures
(°C)
Product sizes
(bp)
PCR cycles

MSP “TTC40”
Stage-1 PCR
F-GAAGGTGGAGGGTGAGTT 5243925
R-AACCTAAAATCACCTTACTAACTCT
Stage-2 PCR
MF-ATTTTCGCGGAGTTGGCG6118935
MR-CTCCGAAATCCGCGATACG
UF-GTTTTATTTTTGTGGAGTTGGTG5919835
UR-CTCTCTCCAAAATCCACAATACA

Bisulfite sequencing “TTC40”
F-GTTGTTTTGGTGTTTTATTTT5029435
R-AACCTAAAATCACCTTACTAACTCT

RT-PCR
“TTC40”
F-CCAGCCTTTCCCAAATCATA6118740
R-ATCTGCCGGTATTTCTGTGG
β-Actin”
F-GTCTCCCAAGTCCACACA5712530
R-GCACGAAGGCTCATCATT

2.5. MSP Conditions

The methylation status of the 5′-region of TTC-40 gene in the NPC xenografts and biopsies was also examined by two-stage nested methylation-specific PCR (MSP). The primers of the stage-1 PCR recognize the bisulfite-modified template but do not discriminate between methylated and unmethylated sequences. Aliquot of 50 ng of modified DNA was amplified in a final reaction mixture of 25 μL containing 1x PCR buffer, 0.4 μM of each primers, 200 μM of each dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, and 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas). Then, the PCR products were diluted 100-fold and 2 μL was subjected to a stage-2 PCR with two different mix reactions containing primers specific to methylated and unmethylated templates, respectively. Finally, the PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel, visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The primer sequences, annealing temperatures, and PCR product sizes are listed in Table 1.

2.6. Reverse Transcription- (RT-) PCR

RT-PCR was performed to examine the expression of TTC40 and endogenous control β-actin. Total RNA was isolated from frozen tissues using TRIzol [21]. First strand cDNA synthesis was performed on 1 μg of total RNA, previously treated with DNase (Amersham Biosciences), in a final volume of 20 μL containing 1× reaction buffer (Invitrogen), 0.1 pmole of random hexamer primers, 10 nmole of each dNTP, and 100 units of MMLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followed by 70°C for 10 min. The cDNA (1 μL) was used as a template in PCR using specific primers for TTC40 (exons 5-6, under Accession number NM_001200049.2) and β-actin. The primer sequences, product sizes, and annealing temperatures are shown in Table 1.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by Fisher’s test. A value ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Differentially Methylated DNA Fragments

We used MS/AP-PCR to isolate and identify novel DNA fragments that are aberrantly methylated in NPC tumors () versus nontumor nasopharyngeal tissues (). Our data showed mainly 2 bands that appeared to be differentially methylated between tumor and nontumor samples. One band of about 370 bp was visualized in 8 out of 18 tumor samples and was considered as a hypermethylated DNA fragment in NPC. The second band of about 430 bp detected in only nontumor samples () was regarded as hypomethylated DNA fragment (Figure 1).

To identify the differential amplification products, corresponding bands were excised, reamplified, cloned, and subject to DNA sequencing. In fact, our analysis of the hypermethylated fragment revealed two different DNA sequences (Table 2). Among them, we identified a region of 334 bp on chromosome 10q26.3, within a potentially CpG island and exactly at 379 bp upstream, the first exon of TTC40 gene. The CpG island was identified in 5′-flanking of TTC40 gene covering the region −803 to +463, relative to the transcription start site (Figure 2). Regarding the hypomethylated DNA fragment, we found similar DNA sequences of 400 or 406 bp in size. They are located on repetitive genomic region at chromosomes 16p11.1 and 13.1, respectively (Table 2). For the remainder of this study, we focused on the TTC40 gene analysis: status of methylation and expression in NPC samples.


Fragment Size (bp)CpG dinucleotideCpG islandaUnique/repetitive Chromosome map

Hypermethylated
Sequence-133425YesUnique10q26.3
Sequence-23363NoUnique1p13.3

Hypomethylated
Sequence-14007No Repetitive (6x)16p11.1
Sequence-2b4068NoRepetitive (6x)16p13.1

The presence of CpG island was determined based on the following criteria: minimum length, 200 bp; CG content, >50%; Obs/Exp, >0.6.
bThat is different from sequence-1 by the insertion of 6 bp.
3.2. TTC40 Methylation Status

To verify the MS/AP-PCR results, we performed the bisulfite genomic sequencing and MSP on NPC samples. The schematic position of the analyzed DNA sequences on the 5′-CpG island of TTC-40 gene is shown in Figure 2. Bisulfite DNA sequencing was conducted to determine the methylation pattern of a 294 bp region containing 37 CpG sites in three NPC xenografts (C15, C17, and X666). This region has no significant similarity with mouse genome by blast program and therefore the expected results should reflect the methylation status in only human origin cells. In fact, our analysis was focused on three clones and based on these data, each CpG site was classified as methylated, partially methylated, or unmethylated. As shown in Figure 3(a), the 5′CpG island of TTC40 gene had a very high density of methylated cytosines in all NPC xenografts. In contrast, most of these CpG sites were partially methylated in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Next, we applied a MSP method to assess the frequency of the aberrant methylation of the 5′-CpG island of TTC40 gene in 45 primary NPC biopsies and 11 nontumor nasopharyngeal tissues. Among the NPC biopsies, none was fully methylated, 32 were partially methylated (71.12%), and 13 were unmethylated. For the nontumor tissues, only 2 were partially methylated (18.19%) and the remaining were unmethylated (Figure 3(b)). The high frequency of TTC40 gene methylation in NPC cases compared to nontumor cases was statistically significant (). We note that the fully methylated form was shown in only NPC xenografts, which is in agreement with bisulfite genomic sequencing data.

To determine whether the aberrant methylation of TTC40 gene is correlated with clinicopathological parameters of patients with NPC, the frequency rates of the methylated status was calculated according to the bimodal-age distribution, histology type, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis. The statistical results have not shown any significant association (data not shown).

3.3. TTC40 Aberrant Methylation Was Correlated with Transcriptional Silencing

To assess whether the transcriptional repression of TTC40 gene is associated with the aberrant CpG methylation, we examined its corresponding mRNA expression in tumors and nontumor tissues. Our RT-PCR results showed that the TTC40 gene was silenced in all three NPC xenografts and in more than fifty percent of primary NPC cases (31/55; 56.37%). However, the TTC40 expression was commonly detected in nontumor nasopharyngeal tissues (6 out of 7 cases; 85.72%) (Figure 4). The low frequency of TTC40 expression in NPC cases compared to nontumor cases was statistically significant (). Among all the specimens assessed by RT-PCR for TTC-40 expression, only 41 available cases were tested for methylation status: three NPC xenografts, 32 primary tumors, and 6 nontumors (Table 3). In these cases, a significant correlation was found between aberrant CpG methylation and transcriptional silencing of TTC-40 gene () (Table 4).


MSP onlyMSP and RT-PCRRT-PCR onlyTotal

Primary NPC biopsies13322368

Nontumor samples56112

Total 183824


Methylation statusP value
M (n = 3a)M/U (n = 24b)U (n = 14c)

mRNA expression+ (n = 23d)011120.004
− (n = 18e)3132

M: full methylation, M/U: partial methylation, and U: unmethylation.
a: 3 NPC xenografts, b: 23 tumor biopsies + 1 nontumor, c: 9 tumor biopsies + 5 nontumors; d: 18 tumor biopsies + 5 nontumors; e: 3 NPC xenografts + 14 tumor biopsies + 1 nontumor. P value based on Fisher’s test.

4. Discussion

Genome-wide analysis for identification of hypermethylated regions in several tumor tissues has been reported and it leads to the isolation of novel or known cancer-related genes. Here, we identified 2 novel DNA fragments differentially methylated in NPC tumors compared to normal nasopharyngeal tissues. To our knowledge, this is the first study that focuses on MS/AP-PCR analysis to explore the CpG methylation profiles in NPC patients. Nevertheless, MS/AP-PCR method has previously been used for the identification of differentially methylated DNA in a variety of cancer such as colon, breast, prostate, and esophagus [16, 2225]. In fact, novel cancer-related genes that are epigenetically silenced have been described and, thereafter, defined as important molecular actors in the development of malignant diseases, especially the T-box transcription factor 5 (TBX5) gene in colon cancer [25] and the pituitary tumor apoptosis gene (PTAG) in pituitary adenomas [26].

Our finding shows that the isolated hypermethylated fragment by MS/AP-PCR corresponds to a CpG island located at the 5′-end of a previously unknown gene, TTC40. The recommended name, TTC40, has been attributed recently to the detection of its full transcript of 8293 nucleotides, under Accession number NM_001200049. The corresponding protein was not experimentally provided and it remains as hypothetical product. It was predicted to be 2715 aa showing 13 tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) patterns (Link Q8IYW2, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot). The TPR pattern was originally identified in yeast as a module of protein-protein interaction involved in the regulation of the cell cycle [27]. Here, our result on TTC40 gene would mention a possible relationship of its aberrant methylation resulting in its transcriptional silencing in NPC tumors. The methylation status of the 5′-TTC40 gene was also conducted by the bisulfite sequencing of 37 CpG sites, showing a very high density of methylated cytosines in three NPC xenografts C15, C17, and X666. In addition, the MSP result shows a high frequency of aberrant methylation in 32 out of 45 primary NPC tumors (71.12%). It was significantly more common compared to normal nasopharyngeal tissues () which is in line with the data on MS/AP-PCR. Overall, our data could suggest the methylation of 5′-TTC40 gene as a putative NPC biomarker since this epigenetic change is significantly more frequent in tumor than in normal nasopharyngeal mucosa. On the other hand, we consider that the TTC40 methylation frequency was similar to those previously found for the most defined genes as epigenetically silenced in NPC patients such as RASSF1A, RAR β2, DAP-kinase, and DLEC1 [710]. Consequently, we should support the inclusion of this epigenetic alteration in the panel of molecular biomarkers for primary diagnosis and monitoring of patients with NPC. Based on the general assumption about the impact of CpG island methylation on gene silencing [6, 28], we expected that this epigenetic alteration might play important roles in transcriptional repression of TTC40 in NPC tumors. In this regard, we found that the aberrant methylation was strongly correlated with the loss of TTC40 expression in forty-one available cases that were tested by both MSP and RT-PCR (). The current data may suggest that this epigenetic event is responsible, at least in part, for the silencing of TTC40 in NPC malignancy. However, further studies are warranted on the transcriptional regulation of TTC40 gene in NPC by analyzing, for example, the effect of DNA-demethylating agent on the TTC40 gene expression.

The second identified fragment by MS/AP-PCR corresponds to hypomethylated DNA sequence in NPC tumors. It does not meet the CpG islands criteria, likely reflecting the general DNA hypomethylation that occurs at non-CpG-rich regions in tumor cells [29]. In addition, the DNA sequence is located in repetitive genomic regions at the short arm of chromosome 16 that is prone to a number of recurrent rearrangements due to the presence of flanking segmental duplications. Recently, it has been shown that the recurring imbalances are associated with abnormal phenotypes including autism, intellectual disabilities, behavioural disorders, congenital anomalies, and obesity [30, 31]. However, these genetic alterations are not previously reported in malignant diseases. Therefore, the possible effect of the epigenetic change of chromosomes 16p11.1 and 13.1 on cancer development should be verified in further researches.

5. Conclusion

In summary, our results support the search of novel DNA fragments exhibiting aberrant methylation in NPC. Indeed, we mainly identified the 5′-CpG island of TTC40 gene as a new frequent cancer-associated hypermethylation in patients with NPC. This epigenetic event is suggested as a molecular factor involved in the loss of TTC40 expression. These findings promote the starting of further molecular investigations to examine the potential role of the epigenetic inactivation of TTC40 gene in the tumorigenesis of NPC and other cancers.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research, Information and Communication Technologies.

References

  1. M. C. Yu and J. M. Yuan, “Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 421–429, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. Busson, C. Keryer, T. Ooka, and M. Corbex, “EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas: from epidemiology to virus-targeting strategies,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 356–360, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Ayadi, A. Khabir, B. Hadhri-Guiga et al., “North African and Southeast Asian nasopharyngeal carcinomas: between the resemblance and the dissemblance,” Bulletin du Cancer, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Raab-Traub, “Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 431–441, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. X. Bei, Y. Li, W. H. Jia et al., “A genome-wide association study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 599–603, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. A. Jones and S. B. Baylin, “The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 415–428, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. Kwong, K. Lo, K. To, P. M. L. Teo, P. J. Johnson, and D. Poon Huang, “Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. W. Ayadi, H. Karray-Hakim, A. Khabir et al., “Aberrant methylation of p16, DLEC1, BLU and E-cadherin gene promoters in nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies from Tunisian patients,” Anticancer Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2161–2167, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Fendri, A. Masmoudi, A. Khabir et al., “Inactivation of RASSF1A, RARβ2 and DAP-kinase by promoter methylation correlates with lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 444–451, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Kwong, L. S. Chow, A. Y. Wong et al., “Epigenetic inactivation of the deleted in lung and esophageal cancer 1 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. S. Chow, K. Lo, J. Kwong et al., “RASSF1A is a target tumor suppressor from 3p21.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 839–847, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Y. Seo, E. O. Kim, and K. L. Jang, “Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 suppresses the growth-inhibitory effect of retinoic acid by inhibiting retinoic acid receptor-β2 expression via DNA methylation,” Cancer Letters, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 66–76, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. Kong, S. Zhang, C. Guo et al., “Effect of methylation-associated silencing of the death-associated protein kinase gene on nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 251–259, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Kawai, S. Hirotsune, K. Hirose, S. Fushiki, S. Watanabe, and Y. Hayashizaki, “Methylation profiles of genomic DNA of mouse developmental brain detected by restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) method,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 5604–5608, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Toyota, C. Ho, N. Ahuja et al., “Identification of differentially methylated sequences in colorectal cancer by methylated CpG island amplification,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2307–2312, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. L. Gonzalgo, G. Liang, C. H. Spruck III, J. Zingg, W. M. Rideout III, and P. A. Jones, “Identification and characterization of differentially methylated regions of genomic DNA by methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed PCR1,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 594–599, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  17. I. D. Fleming, J. S. Cooper, D. E. Henson et al., Eds., Cancer Staging Manual, American Joint Committee on Cancer, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 1997.
  18. L. H. Sobin, C. H. Wittekind, and International Union Against Cancer, Eds., TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1997.
  19. J. K. C. Chan, B. Z. Pilch, T. T. Kuo, B. M. Wenig, and A. W. M. Lee, “Tumors of the nasopharynx: introduction,” in Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours), L. Barnes, J. W. Eveson, P. Reichart, and D. Sidransky, Eds., pp. 82–84, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  20. H. Benbouza, J. M. Jacquemin, J. P. Baudoin, and G. Mergeai, “Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrylamide gels,” Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 77–81, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  21. P. Chomczynski and N. Sacchi, “Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 156–159, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. F. Costa, V. A. Paixão, F. P. Cavalher et al., “SATR-1 hypomethylation is a common and early event in breast cancer,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. B. Kuznetsova, T. V. Kekeeva, S. S. Larin et al., “Methylation of the BIN1 gene promoter CpG island associated with breast and prostate cancer,” Journal of Carcinogenesis, vol. 6, article 9, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B.-J. Zhao, S.-N. Tan, Y. Cui, D.-G. Sun, and X. Ma, “Aberrant promoter methylation of the TPEF gene in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Diseases of the Esophagus, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 582–588, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Yu, X. Ma, K. F. Cheung et al., “Epigenetic inactivation of T-box transcription factor 5, a novel tumor suppressor gene, is associated with colon cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 49, pp. 6464–6474, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Bahar, D. J. Simpson, S. J. Cutty et al., “Isolation and characterization of a novel pituitary tumor apoptosis gene,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1827–1839, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. Zeytuni and R. Zarivach, “Structural and functional discussion of the tetra-trico-peptide repeat, a protein interaction module,” Structure, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 397–405, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. F. Costello, M. C. Fruhwald, and D. J. Smiraglia, “Aberrant CpG -island methylation has non random and tumour-types-pecific patterns,” Nature Genetics, vol. 24, pp. 132–138, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  29. R. Z. Chen, U. Pettersson, C. Beard, L. Jackson-Grusby, and R. Jaenisch, “DNA hypomethylation leads to elevated mutation rates,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6697, pp. 89–93, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Shinawi, P. Liu, S. L. Kang et al., “Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 332–341, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Bachmann-Gagescu, H. C. Mefford, C. Cowan et al., “Recurrent 200-kb deletions of 16p11.2 that include the SH2B1 gene are associated with developmental delay and obesity,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 641–647, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Wajdi Ayadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

982 Views | 411 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.