Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 728516, 6 pages
Research Article

Presence of Leishmania and Brucella Species in the Golden Jackal Canis aureus in Serbia

1Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2Regional Laboratory of Public Health of Crete, Heraklion, 71110 Crete, Greece
3Laboratory for Medical Entomology, Department for Parasitology, Center of Excellence for Toxoplasmosis and Medical Entomology, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
4Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology, Parasitology, Zoonoses and Geographical Medicine, Medical School, University of Crete, P.O. BOX 1393, Heraklion, 71110 Crete, Greece

Received 20 February 2014; Accepted 9 May 2014; Published 22 May 2014

Academic Editor: Philippe Holzmuller

Copyright © 2014 Duško Ćirović et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The golden jackal Canis aureus occurs in south-eastern Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Caucasus, and Africa. In Serbia, jackals neared extinction; however, during the last 30 years, the species started to spread quickly and to increase in number. Few studies in the past have revealed their potential role as carriers of zoonotic diseases. Animal samples were collected over a three-year period (01/2010–02/2013) from 12 sites all over Serbia. Of the tissue samples collected, spleen was chosen as the tissue to proceed; all samples were tested for Leishmania species and Brucella species by real-time PCR. Of the 216 samples collected, 15 (6.9%) were positive for Leishmania species, while four (1.9%) were positive for B. canis. The potential epidemiologic role of the golden jackal in carrying and dispersing zoonotic diseases in Serbia should be taken under consideration when applying surveillance monitoring schemes.

1. Introduction

The golden jackal Canis aureus occurs in south-eastern Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Caucasus, and Africa [1, 2]. During 20th century European part of its distribution was dynamic. At the beginning of the century, the population of the golden jackal in Europe declined dramatically; however, it has recently achieved to recolonization of its former territories [2] establishing local populations with high densities [3]. Currently European populations are both still rapidly increasing and widening their ranges toward Central and Eastern Europe [2, 4] making it one of the most numerous carnivore species.

In Serbia, jackals neared extinction due to extensive poisonings organized after World War II, initially aimed at controlling the size of the wolf population and lessening the damage they caused to domestic animals. Only two relic populations survived in Srem and in eastern Serbia near Bulgarian borders [5, 6]. At the beginning of the 1980s, the species started to spread quickly along the rivers (Timok, Morava, Danube, and Sava) and to increase in number [7, 8], which resulted in the fusion of the two relic populations and the widening of their range [9]. This range now covers more than half of the Serbian territory [10] with local populations that have the highest density at the Balkan Peninsula [3].

The golden jackal is described as an opportunistic species, capable of using a wide range of food sources [11]. Studies conducted in the Balkan region shows the predominance of anthropogenic food sources during the winter period [1214]. This predominance leads to the positive relationship between jackals and human settlements. In Greece jackal groups were recorded at the average distance of only 2.61 km from the closest settlement [15, 16].

Increasing densities and widening of its European populations have not been accompanied by research of the presence of pathogens of interest both to animals and to humans. Only few studies have evaluated the potential of jackals as carriers of zoonotic diseases in Europe, while none has been conducted so far in the Serbian territory.

The scope of the current survey was to study the presence of two zoonotic agents, Brucella species and Leishmania species in the jackal population in Serbia and to evaluate its importance for animals and human health.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Sampling

Animal samples were collected over a three-year period (01/2010–02/2013) from 12 sites (Smederevo, Surčin, Veliko Gradište, Velika Plana, Svijalnac, Zaječar, Bela Palanka, Titel, Ćovdin, Smederevska Palanka, Kraljevo, and Negotin) all over the country (Figure 1), in cooperation with local hunting organizations.

Figure 1: The sites where golden jackals were collected from and the corresponding results after testing for Leishmania and Brucella species by PCR.

Sampling took place from dead animals brought at the Laboratory for animal ecology (Faculty of Biology, Belgrade-Serbia) by hunters. Data regarding location, sex, and date (of death) of each jackal were recorded. At necropsy, samples from different tissues were collected (spleen, liver, lung, heart, and kidneys) and stored at −80°C until further processing.

2.2. Sample Processing

Of the tissue samples collected, spleen was chosen as the tissue to proceed with the testing, based on the increased possibility, among the tissues collected, to detect the pathogens of interest. Tissue samples were processed by homogenizing frozen pieces of spleen using micropastles. A small portion of smashed tissue was then removed and processed using the Gene Jet Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific). All DNA extracts were stored at −20°C until PCR analysis.

2.3. Detection of Brucella and Leishmania Species by Real-Time PCR

Real-time PCR assays were carried at the Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology, Parasitology, Zoonoses and Geographical Medicine of the University of Crete (Greece), where part of the DNA extracts was brought and always stored at −20°C. DNA extracts were initially pooled, at pools of five, at a final volume of 20 μL. In case a positive PCR was detected, we went back to each pool and tested each corresponding DNA extract seperately.

For the detection of Brucella species, a multiplex real-time PCR protocol was used, targeting the bcsp31, alkB, and BMEI1162 genes of Brucella species, B. abortus, and B. melitensis, respectively, as previously described [17]. Where it was positive for Brucella species but negative for the other two, B. canis was tested using a PCR protocol targeting the omp2B gene as previously described [18].

For the detection of Leishmania species a real-time PCR protocol targeting the SSU rRNA gene was used, as previously described [19].

All real-time PCR assays were carried out on a C1000 Touch, CFX96 thermal cycler (Biorad). At a final volume of 20 μL, 10 μL of SsoFast Probes Supermix was used as a mastermix together with 0.6 μL (in the case of Brucella species) or 1.6 μL (in the case of Leishmania species) of each primer (10 μM), 0.4 μL (in the case of Brucella species) or 0.2 μL (in the case of Leishmania species) of each of the probes (10 μM), 2.7 μL (in the case of Brucella species) or 4.1 μL (in the case of Leishmania species) of sterile water, and 2.5 μL of the corresponding DNA. Brucella melitensis and Leishmania infantum isolated from human patients were used as positive controls for the corresponding assays. Two sets of negative controls (DNA from noninfected specimens and sterile water) were applied.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Chi-square (SPSS v. 19) was applied to compare results in-between gender and among sampling years. In all cases a P value < 0.05 was considered as significant.

3. Results

A total of 216 spleen samples, collected from 48 localities corresponding to 12 sites of Serbia (Figure 1), were tested. Most samples (196/90.7%) were collected during the hunting period (November–February). Of the samples tested, 108 animals were male and 108 were female (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of samples collected from jackals and prevalence of positivity, recorded by PCR means, based on month, year, region, and gender.

Of the 216 samples, 15 (6.9%) (collected from Smederevo, Surčin, Svilajnac, Velika Plana, and Veliko Gradište) were positive for Leishmania species, while four (1.9%) (collected from Svilajnac, Velika Plana and Veliko Gradište) were positive for B. canis. A single pool of those initially tested was also positive for Brucella species; however, when we went back to test each corresponding DNA extract separately we could not trace which was the positive one, perhaps due to very low initial DNA concentration. In that single case, we went back to the original tissues, collected multiple samples from each tissue, and performed individual PCR amplifications always, however, getting negative results. None of the samples which tested positive for Brucella species was positive for B. abortus or B. melitensis.

As expected, based on the distribution of the collected samples throughout the year, all positive samples were recorded during the winter (hunting period) both for Leishmania species and for B. canis. Although the number of samples did not fluctuate dramatically from 2011 to 2013, a remarkable increase in the number of positive samples recorded for Leishmania species (), but not for B. canis (), was recorded during 2013. As regards the distribution over the various regions, it was noted that the higher the number of samples collected from a certain region, the higher the possibility to retrieve a positive sample. Concerning gender, Leishmania species showed a preference to males over females (), contrary to the results for B. canis ().

All results are summarized in detail in Table 1.

4. Discussion

Wildlife is considered as playing a crucial role in the maintenance and dispersal of leishmanioses and reservoirs may include rodents, marsupials, edentates, monkeys, domestic dogs, and wild canids [20].

Jackals are known to be omnivores and scavengers and they usually prey on small mammals but on vegetables, fruit, and garbage as well. Their ability to adapt to novel habitats both on rural and urban areas allows them to come into contact with animals that live in close proximity to humans, such as dogs, hence their ability to host a number of zoonotic pathogens, such as canine viruses [21], Ehrlichia canis [22], Leishmania donovani [23, 24], and Echinococcus granulosus [25], as well as ectoparasites like ticks and fleas in areas where they occur at high densities, which may raise this species as a crucial key in the chain of zoonotic diseases maintenance and dispersal.

According to ECCMID, visceral leishmaniasis is endemic, amongst other countries, in Serbia as well [26]. In fact the disease had been characterized as endemic in southern Serbia even when Yugoslavia still existed. During the 90s, 39 cases of leishmaniasis were recorded in Serbia and Montenegro, with the incidence rate in the range of 0.01/100.000 [27]. Nevertheless, the animal reservoirs are still unknown.

In a study recently conducted in Hungary in sera collected from jackals, no evidence for the presence of leishmaniasis was noted [28]. To our knowledge no other study has been published in regards to the study of Leishmania species in jackals.

Away from the European territory, there have been reports that described the presence in jackals of these agents, such as visceral leishmaniasis [29] in Israel and of L. infantum in Algeria [30]. In fact, in Israel, the reappearance at the mid 90s of human infections of visceral leishmaniasis in areas where it normally did not exist, pointed towards the study of L. infantum in wildlife (wild canids, jackals, and red foxes), recording a seroprevalence of 7.6%, which, taking into account the presence of the pathogen in dogs from the same regions, led the public authorities to raise suspicions on the possible role of wildlife in spreading this disease [24]. In a later seroepidemiological study conducted in 2001 in Israel in samples collected from healthy adult free-ranging golden jackals, a prevalence raising up to 6.5% was recorded [31], while in a more recent study conducted in 2010 [32], a prevalence of 7.8% was recorded with L. tropica being added to the species of Leishmania that jackals can host; results of both studies resembled the ones we came up with (6.9%).

Getting further away from Europe, the presence of L. infantum has been reported in golden jackals in Iraq [33] and in Kazakhstan [34], while in Iran, where sporadic cases of visceral leishmaniasis are reported from time to time, the role of jackals in the dispersal of the pathogen has been documented, with prevalence rising up to 12.5% [3537].

As far as Brucellosis is concerned, Serbia is considered as a country with relatively low numbers of incidence rate (0.15/100.000) amongst the rest of Balkan countries and with a relatively low incidence rate within the European Union [38]. Nevertheless, more than 1500 cases of human Brucellosis have been recorded during the past 30 years, most of them occurring at the areas of Vojvodina and the southern part of central Serbia. Migration of animals among countries has been considered as the main reason of the spreading of old and the establishment of new foci of the pathogen [39].

In Europe, Brucella species have been identified in wild boar in France and Italy, in brown hare in Austria, France, the Czech Republic, and Switzerland, and in chamois and red deer in the Alps. Recently, its presence was also recorded in free-roaming domestic pigs, an indication that perhaps a wild reservoir may act as a source of the agent [40]. As regards the golden jackal, little, if any, work has been done on ability of this species to carry the pathogen. In fact only in Africa has the role of jackals been investigated superficially, on the dispersal of the pathogen. In a work done in Namibia studying the seroprevalence of Brucella in sheep and springbok [41] it was suggested that little evidence of abortions was recorded in farms that were recorded with high prevalence of Brucella, and this observation was attributed to the role of jackals and other carnivores in removing aborted fetuses and feeding on fetal membranes. During the late 60s, some evidence was recorded on the presence of Brucella species in jackals, in a study conducted in Tanzania [42]. The relatively low prevalence (1.9%) recorded in our study may suggest that perhaps jackals may not act as a primary reservoir of Brucella species; nevertheless, their tendency to scavenge carcasses and perhaps share areas of grazing with animals of veterinary importance may not exclude them as a potential source of dispersal of the pathogen.

An increase in jackal population has lately been observed in Serbia [7], while complaints about damages that jackals may cause to livestock mean that its wildlife cycle may well interfere with areas of natural human activity [43]. Their habitats are in proximity to densely populated areas while they are phylogenetically closely related to dogs. These facts, combined with the high prevalence of the jackals’ exposure to the major canine pathogens demonstrated in this study, suggest that they may serve as a reservoir for the transmission of certain diseases to domestic dogs. The tendency nowadays is to use modeling and predictive risk maps in an attempt to describe areas that based on factors such as animal population density, climate, land surface, altitude, and so forth may prove in the future of being at high risk due to spread of the agents of interest. In the case of leishmaniasis, such an attempt has already been made to describe incidence maps and prediction maps using published data of seroprevalence studies on canine leishmaniasis [44]. The model worked well when focusing on a single country; however, since that was the first attempt to approach epidemiology through a more holistic perspective, much can be improved in order to be able to achieve better results. Similar approaches have been tried with respect to the population of sandflies. Studies performed in Central Europe have shown that increase in temperature may lead to an expansion of the population of sandflies leading, as a consequence, to an increase of the occurrence of sandfly-borne diseases such as leishmaniasis [45]. This, together with the introduction of infected dogs from nearby countries, could result in the establishment of the pathogen in areas which were otherwise free, together with the appearance of autochthonous cases. Other groups which work in countries in close proximity to Serbia have performed studies on leishmaniasis on other chain links of the wildlife, such as wolves [46], red foxes [47], or vectors through entomological studies on areas of high incidence of the disease [48], in an attempt to reveal new reservoirs of the pathogen or new foci that could give burst to human cases.

In any case, further study is required to discern the potential epidemiologic role of the golden jackal in spreading and transmitting the above studied pathogens not only within Serbia but to neighbor countries as well; local awareness of residents, veterinarians, and health professionals would prove of great importance in order to efficiently monitor these and other zoonotic diseases.

5. Conclusion

The golden jackal is a carrier of a number of zoonotic diseases as has been recorded in the past. Herein we described the potential role of the golden jackal as a carrier of Leishmania and Brucella species in Serbia. Its growing population and its capacity to spread and interfere with regions of animals of veterinary importance and/or of humans should point out a hint on future surveillance schemes on these two pathogens.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work has been supported by a Grant from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological development of the Republic of Serbia (Project no. 173006). The work of Duško Ćirović, Snežana Tomanović, and Dimosthenis Chochlakis was done under the frame of EurNegvec Cost Action TD1303.


  1. A. Mitchell-Jones, W. Bogdanowicz, B. Krystufek et al., The Atlas of European Mammals, T & AD Poyser, London, UK, 1999.
  2. B. Kryštufek, D. Murariu, and C. Kurtonur, “Present distribution of the Golden Jackal Canis aureus in the Balkans and adjacent regions,” Mammal Review, vol. 27, pp. 109–114, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Šálek, J. Červinka, O. C. Banea et al., “Population densities and habitat use of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in farmlands across the Balkan Peninsula,” European Journal of Wildlife Research, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 193–200, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Arnold, A. Humer, M. Heltai, D. Murariu, N. Spassov, and K. Hackländer, “Current status and distribution of golden jackals Canis aureus in Europe,” Mammal Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Milenković, “Canis aureus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia, Canidae) in eastern Serbia,” in Proceedings of the Fauna of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia, 1983.
  6. M. Milenković, “Distribution of the jackal Canis aureus Linnaeus 1758 (Mammalia, Canidae) in Yugoslavia,” in Proceedings of the Fauna of SR Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia, 1987.
  7. M. Milenković and M. Paunovic, “Phenomenon of golden jackal (Canis aureus Linnaeus, 1758), expantion in Serbia,” in Proceedings of the Carpathian Workshop on Large Carnivores Conservation. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Brasov, Romania, 2003.
  8. I. R. Savić, M. Paunović, M. Milenković, and S. Stamenković, “Diversity of mammal (Mammalia) fauna of Yugoslavia, with an overview of species of international significance,” in Biodiversity of Yugoslavia, with an Overview of Species of International Importance, V. Stevanović and V. Vasić, Eds., pp. 517–554, Faculty of Biology and Ekolibri, Belgrade, Serbia, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  9. F. E. Zachos, D. Cirovic, J. Kirschning et al., “Genetic variability, differentiation, and founder effect in golden jackals (Canis aureus) from Serbia as revealed by mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite loci,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 241–250, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Ćirović, A. Penezić, M. Milenković, and M. Paunović, “Present distribution and factors of range spread of golden jackal (Canis aureus L., 1758) in Serbia,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on large carnivores, Žagubica, Serbia, 2008.
  11. D. W. Macdonald, “The flexible social system of the golden jackal, Canis aureus,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–38, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Bošković, M. Šperanda, T. Florijančić et al., “Dietary habits of the golden jackal (Canis aureus L.) in the Eastern Croatia,” Agriculturae Conspecutus Scientificus, vol. 78, pp. 245–248, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Ćirović, A. Penezić, M. Milenković, M. Paunović et al., “Winter diet composition of the golden jackal (Canis aureus L., 1758) in Serbia,” Mammalian Biology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Raichev, H. Tsunoda, C. Newman et al., “The Reliance of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) on anthropogenic foods in winter in Central Bulgaria,” Mammal Study, vol. 8, pp. 19–27, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Giannatos, Conservation Action Plan for the Golden Jackal Canis aureus L. in Greece, WWF, Athens, Greece, 2004.
  16. G. Giannatos, Y. Marinos, P. Maragou, and G. Catsadorakis, “The status of the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus L.) in Greece,” Belgian Journal of Zoology, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 145–149, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. S. Probert, K. N. Schrader, N. Y. Khuong, S. L. Bystrom, and M. H. Graves, “Real-time multiplex PCR assay for detection of Brucella spp., B. abortus, and B. melitensis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1290–1293, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Imaoka, M. Kimura, M. Suzuki, T. Kamiyama, and A. Yamada, “Simultaneous detection of the Genus Brucella by combinatorial PCR,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 60, no. 2-3, pp. 137–139, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Wortmann, C. Sweeney, H.-S. Houng et al., “Rapid diagnosis of Leishmaniasis by fluorogenic polymerase chain reaction,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 583–587, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. D. Ready, “Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe,” Euro surveillance, vol. 15, no. 10, Article ID 19505, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. A. Alexander, P. W. Kat, R. K. Wayne, and T. K. Fuller, “Serologic survey of selected canine pathogens among free-ranging jackals in Kenya,” Journal of wildlife diseases, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 486–491, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Waner, G. Baneth, C. Strenger, A. Keysary, R. King, and S. Harrus, “Antibodies reactive with Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia phagocytophila genogroup antigens and the spotted fever group rickettsial antigens, in free-ranging jackals (Canis aureus syriacus) from Israel,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. A. H. N. A. Khan, S. S. Khanm, J. Bashu et al., “Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in golden jackals of Bangladesh agricultural university campus, a threat for expanding future zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis,” Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, no. 1-2, pp. 101–109, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. G. Baneth, G. Dank, E. Keren-Kornblatt et al., “Emergence of visceral leishmaniasis in central Israel,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 722–725, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. N. L. Macpherson, L. Karstad, P. Stevenson, and J. H. Arundel, “Hydatid disease in the Turkana District of Kenya. III. The significance of wild animals in the transmission of Echinococcus granulosus, with particular reference to Turkana and Masailand in Kenya,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. P. Gangneux, “Visceral leishmaniasis—the European experience,” 2011,
  27. Z. D. Dakic, M. R. Pelemis, G. D. Stevanovic et al., “Epidemiology and diagnostics of visceral leishmaniasis in Serbia,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1173–1176, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Farkas, B. Tánczos, G. Bongiorno, M. Maroli, J. Dereure, and P. D. Ready, “First surveys to investigate the presence of canine Leishmaniasis and its phlebotomine vectors in Hungary,” Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 823–834, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Hervás, A. Méndez, L. Carrasco, J. C. Gómez-Villamandos et al., “Pathological study of visceral leishmaniasis in a jackal (Canis aureus),” The Veterinary Record, vol. 139, no. 12, pp. 293–295, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Bessad, K. Mouloua, I. Kherrachi et al., “Leishmania infantum MON-1 isolated from a golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Grande Kabylie (Algeria),” Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Shamir, B. Yakobson, G. Baneth et al., “Antibodies to Selected Canine Pathogens and Infestation with Intestinal Helminths in Golden Jackals (Canis aureus) in Israel,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Talmi-Frank, N. Kedem-Vaanunu, R. King et al., “Leishmania tropica infection in golden jackals and red foxes, Israel,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1973–1975, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Sukkar, “Epidemiology and control of visceral leishmaniasis in Iraq,” Bull Endem Dis (Baghdad), vol. 26, pp. 13–26, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  34. K. Musabekov, M. Novak, and O. Farisova, “The jackal as a potential source of leishmaniasis in southern and south-eastern Kazakhstan,” Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk-Seriya Biologicheskaya, vol. 4, pp. 86–87, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. Nadim, A. Navid-Hamidid, and E. Javadian, “Present status of kala-azar in Iran,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 27, no. 1 I, pp. 25–28, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Mohebali, Y. Hamzavi, G. H. Edrissian, and A. Forouzani, “Seroepidemiological study of visceral leishmaniasis among humans and animal reservoirs in Bushehr province, Islamic Republic of Iran,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 912–917, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. N. Hamidi, A. Nadim, G. H. Edrissian, G. Tahvildar-Bidruni, and E. Javadian, “Visceral leishmaniasis of jackals and dogs in northern Iran,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 756–757, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Čekanac, J. Mladenović, E. Ristanović et al., “Epidemiological characteristics of brucellosis in Serbia, 1980–2008,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 337–344, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Djuricic, “Brucellosis in the Republic of Serbia-the Epizootiological Situation,” Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 246–250, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. OIE, “Update on wildlife diseases,” 2013,
  41. O. Madzingira, Sero-Prevalence of Brucellosis in Sheep and Springbok (Antidorcas Marsupialis in the Karas Region of Namibia, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, 2013.
  42. R. Sachs, C. Staak, and C. M. Groocock, “Serological investigation of brucellosis in game animals in Tanania,” Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases of Africa, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 1968. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Heltai, D. Ćirović, S. László et al., “Golden jackal: opinions versus facts—experiences from serbia and hungary,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Hunting: Modern Aspects of Sustainable Management of Game Populations, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2013.
  44. A. O. Franco, C. R. Davies, A. Mylne et al., “Predicting the distribution of canine leishmaniasis in western Europe based on environmental variables,” Parasitology, vol. 138, no. 14, pp. 1878–1891.
  45. H. Aspöck, T. Gerersdorfer, H. Formayer, and J. Walochnik, “Sandflies and sandfly-borne infections of humans in Central Europe in the light of climate change,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 24–29, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. Sastre, O. Francino, O. Ramírez, C. Enseñat, A. Sánchez, and L. Altet, “Detection of Leishmania infantum in captive wolves from Southwestern Europe,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 158, no. 1-2, pp. 117–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. L. Dipineto, L. Manna, A. Baiano et al., “Presence of Leishmania infantum in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Southern Italy,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 518–520, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. Velo, S. Bino, G. Kuli-Lito, K. Pano, L. Gradoni, and M. Maroli, “Recrudescence of visceral leishmaniasis in Albania: retrospective analysis of cases during 1997 to 2001 and results of an entomological survey carried out during 2001 in some districts,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 288–290, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus