BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 739494 | 19 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/739494

Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Does Not Control Proliferation in Primary Cultures of Human Metastatic Renal Cellular Carcinoma

Academic Editor: Dimitra Gkika
Received11 Feb 2014
Revised29 Apr 2014
Accepted19 May 2014
Published09 Jul 2014

Abstract

Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) is activated following depletion of the inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3)-sensitive Ca2+ pool to regulate proliferation in immortalized cell lines established from either primary or metastatic lesions. The molecular nature of SOCE may involve both Stim1, which senses Ca2+ levels within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ reservoir, and a number of a Ca2+-permeable channels on the plasma membrane, including Orai1, Orai3, and members of the canonical transient receptor (TRPC1–7) family of ion channels. The present study was undertaken to assess whether SOCE is expressed and controls proliferation in primary cultures isolated from secondary lesions of heavily pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. SOCE was induced following pharmacological depletion of the ER Ca2+ store, but not by InsP3-dependent Ca2+ release. Metastatic RCC cells express Stim1-2, Orai1–3, and TRPC1–7 transcripts and proteins. In these cells, SOCE was insensitive to BTP-2, 10 µM Gd3+ and Pyr6, while it was inhibited by 100 µM Gd3+, 2-APB, and carboxyamidotriazole (CAI). Neither Gd3+ nor 2-APB or CAI impaired mRCC cell proliferation. Consistently, no detectable Ca2+ signal was elicited by growth factor stimulation. Therefore, a functional SOCE is expressed but does not control proliferation of mRCC cells isolated from patients resistant to multikinase inhibitors.

1. Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common kidney cancer, accounting for 2%-3% of all adult malignancies and representing the 7th most common cancer in men and the 9th most common cancer in women [1]. The only treatment for patients with localized RCC is radical surgical resection of the tumour; however, 20–30% of patients present with synchronous metastases at diagnosis, and up to 30–35% of more patients, initially radically resected, will eventually develop metastases over time [2]. Targeting the intricate vascular network which develops around the primary tumour and is the gateway for metastasis dissemination has emerged as the most active treatment strategy to fight metastatic RCC (mRCC) [37]. In the past 7-8 years, the development and registration of molecularly targeted agents, inhibiting either the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF(Rs) pathway or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), have dramatically improved the prognosis of mRCC patients [6, 7]. However, despite this abundance of active reagents, progression-free survival (PSF) for the majority of these patients rarely exceeds eleven months [6]. This is due to the ultimate development of drug resistance in the majority of patients initially responsive to treatment (3-4) and to the presence of so-called primary refractory patients (i.e., those who do not respond from the very beginning) [8]. There is, therefore, an unmet demand for discovering alternative molecular targets to achieve the complete regression of spreading metastases in both resistant and refractory mRCC patients, as well as in those experiencing treatment-related adverse events.

Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) is a ubiquitous mechanism which plays a key role in several key steps to malignant transformation, such as cell proliferation, migration, and metastatization [914]. A variety of molecular mechanisms have been proposed to sustain SOCE [4, 15]. Both G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and tyrosine kinase receptors (TKRs) engage distinct isoforms of phospholipase C (PLC), that is, PLC and PLC respectively, to cleave phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, into inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). InsP3 induces a massive Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the most abundant intracellular Ca2+ reservoir, by activating the so-called InsP3 receptors (InsP3Rs). The consequent fall in intraluminal Ca2+ levels is detected by the ER Ca2+ sensor, Stim1 [4, 16]. Once activated, Stim1 proteins aggregate and migrate towards subplasmalemmal puncta, where they tether to and gate the Ca2+-selective channel Orai1 [4, 13]. Stim1 and Orai1-mediated SOCE control cell cycle progression and metastatization in several human malignancies, including those of glia [17], liver [18, 19], breast, and uterine cervix [20]. Conversely, no functional role has so far been established for Stim1 and Orai1 paralogues, that is, Stim2 and Orai2, in carcinogenesis, while Orai3 is recruited by Stim1 to activate SOCE and cell proliferation in some oestrogen receptor-negative human breast cancer lines [21]. Alternatively, Stim1 might trigger SOCE by conveying the ER Ca2+ load to nonselective Ca2+-permeable pathways, such as those belonging to the canonical transient receptor (TRPC1-7) family of ion channels [15]. Stim1 may bind to and activate TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5; in addition, Stim1 causes TRPC3 and TRPC6 to mediate SOCE by mediating the heteromultimerization of TRPC3 with TRPC1 and of TRPC6 with TRPC5 [15]. TRPC1 and TRPC6 have convincingly linked to SOCE in a growing number of human tumours, including breast carcinoma [22], glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [23, 24], and hepatoma [18, 19]. These results put forward SOCE as an alternative target to devise novel antimetastatic treatments [10, 12, 14, 25]. With some notable exceptions [17], however, the physiological function of SOCE has been characterized in immortalized cell lines established from either primary or metastatic lesions that do not accurately recapitulate the heterogeneity and complexity of human neoplasms. This issue is particularly relevant when seeking alternative strategies to fully eradicate metastases by inhibiting SOCE. Accordingly, earlier work showed that oncogenesis reduces the need for Ca2+ entry to initiate DNA synthesis and cell replication, a phenomenon known as “habituation” to extracellular Ca2+ [26, 27].

We have recently demonstrated that Stim1, Orai1, and TRPC1 mediate SOCE and control proliferation in circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) isolated from untreated mRCC patients [10]. The present study aimed to assess whether a functional store-dependent Ca2+ inflow is present and drives cell growth in a different cellular setting related to this neoplasm, that is, primary cultures of mRCC cells isolated from subjects resistant to multikinase inhibitors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tumour Samples

Tumour samples were collected from 4 patients affected by metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) who have undergone surgical intervention or biopsy to remove metastasis (Table 1), in accordance with a protocol approved by the local Ethics Committee and after signing informed consent. We reasoned that it would be of particular interest to investigate also cells derived from primary tumour to define whether metastatic cells presented peculiar features; however, during all the observation time, we never had the availability of patients undergoing simultaneous resection of both primary tumour and metastases. So, we decided to focus this first study only on the characterization of metastatic cells. Surgical materials not required for histopathologic diagnosis were placed in sterile tubes containing RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 200 U/mL penicillin, and 200 μg/mL streptomycin (all from Life Technologies Inc., Paisley, UK).


PatientSexDay of birthYear of diagnosisHistologyStage1 at diagnosisSurgery for localized diseaseSystemic treatments received

LAM14/11/19441995Clear cell RCCpT2, Nx, M0Yes, radical nephrectomyIL-2
Sorafenib
Sunitinib
Everolimus
Experimental vaccine

DPVM21/05/19532010Bellini’s duct RCCpT2, N2, M1Yes. Radical nephrectomyTemsirolimus
Sorafenib
Sunitinib
Cytotoxic chemotherapy
Experimental vaccine

LGF25/12/19482005Clear cell RCCpT2, N0, M0Yes. Partial nephrectomyCytotoxic chemotherapy
Sunitinib
Everolimus
Sorafenib
Interferon-
Experimental vaccine

GGM20/10/19592009Papillary type I RCCpT3b, N0, M1Yes, radical nephrectomySunitinib
Sorafenib
Everolimus
Cytotoxic chemotherapy
Experimental vaccine

Stage is indicated according to the 2002 TNM staging system.
2.2. Establishment of Primary Cell Cultures from Surgical Samples

Tumour samples were treated with 0.1% collagenase for half an hour and then processed with the gentle MACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Tumour cells were filtered (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) to remove clusters and then collected by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes, checked for viability with trypan blue die exclusion, resuspended at a concentration of 0.5–1 × 106 cells/mL of CellGro SCGM (Cell Genix, Freiburg, Germany), supplemented with 20% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (complete medium) (all from Life Technologies Inc.), and cultured in 25 cm2 tissue flasks (Corning, Stone Staffordshire, England) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Viable tumour cells attached to the flask within 12–24 hours. At the first medium change, rather than discarding medium containing unattached cells that may grow and provide a backup culture, we put these into a fresh flask. Cultures at 75% to 100% confluence were selected for subculture by trypsinization with 0.25% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA (Life Technologies Inc.) in a calcium/magnesium-free balanced solution. The culture medium was changed twice a week and cellular homogeneity evaluated microscopically every 24–48 hours.

To confirm the neoplastic origin of cultured cells, at least three cytospins were performed using 105 cultured cells/cytospin obtained after 3–5 passages, for morphological and immunocytochemical analysis. Cells were fixed in alcohol 95°; one slide was stained with haematoxylin-eosin to identify malignant cells on the basis of cytomorphology. To distinguish tumour from hyperplastic mesothelial cells, the other slides were tested with monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin CAM 5.2 (Dako, Glostruo, Denmark) and calretinin (Invitrogen), using indirect immunoenzymatic staining according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Tumour cells were assessed by a semiquantative method as recently illustrated in [28]. In addition, since the great majority of metatastatic clear cell RCC (by far the commonest hystotype of kidney cancer) express CD10, cultured cells were also evaluated by cytofluorimetric analysis for the expression of this antigen. CD10 is usually not present on normal cells [29]. Evaluation of CD10 expression was performed by direct immunofluorescence, using phycoerythrin (PE)-anti CD10 specific monoclonal antibody (BD Pharmingen, Bioscience, Mountain View, CA), according to previously reported methods [30]. For functional experiments, tumour cells were thawed and plated at the concentration of 10–20 × 105/mL and evaluated after 3-4 days when they reached the optimal confluency. In the proliferation assays, results are expressed as average number of cells (±SE) under each condition; the cells were obtained from all four patients. Differences were assessed by Student’s -test for unpaired values. All statistical tests were carried out with GraphPad Prism 4.

2.3. Isolation and Culturing of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Since a number of drugs and agonists failed to affect intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in mRCC cells, we sought to verify their efficacy in another cellular setting, such as circulating EPCs isolated from healthy donors. We have recently shown that Ca2+ signaling is a key to EPC activation [911, 31, 32], so that they are suitable to serve as positive control for many substances commonly utilized to study subcellular Ca2+ movements [3, 25]. Blood samples (40 mL) were obtained from healthy human volunteers aged from 22 to 28 years old. The Institutional Review Board at “Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San Matteo Foundation” in Pavia approved all protocols and specifically approved this study. Informed written consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki. We focused on the so-called endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) [33], a subgroup of EPCs which are found in the CD34+ CD45 fraction of circulating mononuclear cells and exhibit robust proliferative potential and form capillary-like structures in vitro [4, 33]. To isolate ECFCs, mononuclear cells (MNCs) were separated from peripheral blood (PB) by density gradient centrifugation on lymphocyte separation medium for 30 min at 400 g and washed twice in EBM-2 with 2% FCS. A median of 36 × 106 MNCs (range 18–66) was plated on collagen-coated culture dishes (BD Biosciences) in the presence of the endothelial cell growth medium EGM-2 MV Bullet Kit (Lonza) containing endothelial basal medium (EBM-2), 5% foetal bovine serum, recombinant human (rh) EGF, rhVEGF, rhFGF-B, rhIGF-1, ascorbic acid, and heparin and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 and humidified atmosphere. Discard of nonadherent cells was performed after 2 days; thereafter, medium was changed three times a week. The outgrowth of endothelial cells from adherent MNCs was characterized by the formation of a cluster of cobblestone-appearing cells [11]. That ECFC-derived colonies belonged to endothelial lineage was confirmed as described in [10, 11].

2.4. Solutions

Physiological salt solution (PSS) had the following composition (in mM): 150 NaCl, 6 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 Glucose, and 10 Hepes. In Ca2+-free solution (0Ca2+), Ca2+ was substituted with 2 mM NaCl, and 0.5 mM EGTA was added. Solutions were titrated to pH 7.4 with NaOH. The solution was then titrated to pH 7.4 with KOH. The osmolality of the extracellular solution was 338 mmol/kg, as measured with an osmometer (Wescor 5500, Logan, UT).

2.5. [Ca2+]i Measurements and Statistics of Ca2+ Signals

mRCC cells were loaded with 4 μM fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (fura-2/AM; 1 mM stock in dimethyl sulfoxide) in PSS for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing in PSS, the coverslip was fixed to the bottom of a Petri dish and the cells were observed by an upright epifluorescence Axiolab microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), usually equipped with a Zeiss ×40 Achroplan objective (water-immersion, 2.0 mm working distance, 0.9 numerical aperture). The cells were excited alternately at 340 and 380 nm, and the emitted light was detected at 510 nm. A first neutral density filter (1 or 0.3 optical density) reduced the overall intensity of the excitation light and a second neutral density filter (optical density = 0.3) was coupled to the 380 nm filter to approach the intensity of the 340 nm light. A round diaphragm was used to increase the contrast. The excitation filters were mounted on a filter wheel (Lambda 10, Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA). Custom software, working in the LINUX environment, was used to drive the camera (Extended-ISIS Camera, Photonic Science, Millham, UK) and the filter wheel and to measure and plot on-line the fluorescence from 10 up to 100 rectangular “regions of interest” (ROI). Each ROI was identified by a number. Since cell borders were not clearly identifiable, a ROI may not include the whole cell or may include part of an adjacent cell. Adjacent ROIs never superimposed. [Ca2+]i was monitored by measuring, for each ROI, the ratio of the mean fluorescence emitted at 510 nm when exciting alternatively at 340 and 380 nm (shortly termed “ratio”). An increase in [Ca2+]i causes an increase in the ratio [34]. Ratio measurements were performed and plotted on-line every 3 s. The experiments were performed at room temperature (22°C). All the data have been collected from mRCC cells isolated from all four patients and from EPCs harvested from three different healthy donors. The amplitude of the peak Ca2+ response was measured as the difference between the ratio at the peak (either of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in 0Ca2+ or of Ca2+ entry occurring upon Ca2+ restoration to the bath) and the mean ratio of 1 min baseline before the peak. Pooled data are given as mean ± SE and statistical significance () was evaluated by Student’s -test for unpaired observations.

2.6. RNA Isolation and Real Time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from mRCC cells derived from all the four established cultures by using the QIAzol Lysis Reagent (QIAGEN, Italy). Single cDNA was synthesized from RNA (1 μg) using random hexamers and M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen S.R.L., Italy). Reverse transcription was always performed in the presence or absence (negative control) of the reverse transcriptase enzyme. qRT-PCR was performed in triplicate using 1 μg cDNA and specific primers (intron-spanning primers) for Stim1-2, Orai1-3, TRPC1-7, and InsP3Rs1-3, as previously described [10, 11] (Tables 2, 3, and 4). Briefly, GoTaq qPCR Mastermix (Promega, Italy) was used according to the manufacturer instruction and qRT-PCR was performed using Rotor Gene 6000 (Corbett, Concorde, NSW, Australia). The conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec; annealing at 58°C for 30 sec, and elongation at 72°C for 40 sec. The qRT-PCR reactions were normalized using -actin as housekeeping gene. Melting curves were generated to detect the melting temperatures of specific products immediately after the PCR run. The triplicate threshold cycles (Ct) values for each sample were averaged resulting in mean Ct values for both the gene of interest and the housekeeping gene -actin. The gene Ct values were then normalized to the housekeeping gene by taking the difference: ΔCt = Ct[gene] − Ct[-actin], with high ΔCt values reflecting low mRNA expression levels. The sequences of the bands were checked by using the Big dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystem, PE, USA). PCR products were also separated with agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and acquired with the Image Master VDS (Amersham Biosciences Europe, Italy). The molecular weight of the PCR products was compared to the DNA molecular weight marker VIII (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Italy).


GenePrimer sequencesSize (bp)Accession number

Orai1Forward5′-AGTTACTCCGAGGTGATGAG-3′257NM_032790.3
Reverse5′-ATGCAGGTGCTGATCATGAG-3′
Orai2Forward5′-CCATAAGGGCATGGATTACC-3′334NM_001126340.1 variant 1
Reverse5′-CAGGTTGTGGATGTTGCTCA-3′NM_032831.2 variant 2
Orai3Forward5′-CCAAGCTCAAAGCTTCCAGCC-3′159NM_152288.2
Reverse5′-CAAAGAGGTGCACAGCCACCA-3′
Stim1Forward 5′-CCTCAGTATGAGGAGACCTT-3′347NM_003156.3
Reverse5′-TCCTGAAGGTCATGCAGACT-3′
Stim2Forward5′-AAACACAGCCATCTGCACAG-3′186NM_020860.2
Reverse5′-GGGAAGTGTCGTTCCTTTGA-3′
-actin Hs_ACTB_1_SG, QuantiTect Primer Assay QT00095431, Qiagen 146NM_001101


GenePrimer sequencesSize (bp)Accession number

TRPC1Forward5′-ATCCTACACTGGTGGCAGAA-3′307NM_003304.4
Reverse5′-AACAAAGCAAAGCAGGTGCC-3′
TRPC3Forward5′-GGAGATCTGGAATCAGCAGA-3′336NM_001130698.1 variant 1
Reverse5′-AAGCAGACCCAGGAAGATGA-3′NM_003305.2 variant 2
TRPC4Forward5′-ACCTGGGACCTCTGCAAATA-3′300NM_016179.2 variant alpha
Reverse5′-ACATGGTGGCACCAACAAAC-3′NM_001135955.1 variant beta
NM_001135956.1 variant gamma
NM_001135957.1 variant delta
NM_003306.1 variant epsilon
NM_001135958.1 variant zeta
TRPC5Forward5′-GAGATGACCACAGTGAAGAG-3′221NM_012471.2
Reverse5′-AGACAGCATGGGAAACAGGA-3′
TRPC6Forward5′-AGCTGTTCCAGGGCCATAAA-3′341NM_004621.5
Reverse5′-AAGGAGTTCATAGCGGAGAC-3′
TRPC7Forward5′-CACTTGTGGAACCTGCTAGA-3′387NM_020389.1
Reverse5′-CATCCCAATCATGAAGGCCA-3′


GenePrimer sequencesSize (bp)Accession number

InsP3R1Forward5′-TCAACAAACTGCACCACGCT-3′180ENSG00000150995
Reverse5′-CTCTCATGGCATTCTTCTCC-3′
InsP3R2Forward5′-ACCTTGGG GTTAGTGGATGA-3′158ENSG00000123104
Reverse5′-CCTTGTTTGGCTTGCTTTGC-3′
InsP3R3Forward5′-TGGCTTCATCAGCACTTTGG-3′173ENSG00000096433
Reverse5′-TGTCCTGCTTAGTCTGCTTG-3′
-actin Hs_ACTB_1_SG, QuantiTect Primer Assay QT00095431, Qiagen146NM_001101

2.7. Sample Preparation and Immunoblotting

mRCC were homogenized by using a Dounce homogenizer in a solution containing: 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0.1 mg/mL PMSF, 100 mM -mercaptoethanol, and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (P8340, Sigma, USA). The homogenates were solubilized in Laemmli buffer [32] and 30 μg proteins were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to the Hybond-P PVDF Membrane (GE Healthcare, Italy) by electroelution. After 1 h blocking with Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 3% BSA and 0.1% Tween (blocking solution), the membranes were incubated for 3 h at room temperature with the following affinity purified antibodies diluted 1 : 200 in the TBS and 0.1% Tween: anti-Stim1 (sc-166840), anti-Orai1 (sc-68895), anti-TRPC1 (sc-133076), anti-TRPC3/6/7 (sc-15056), and anti-IP3R-I/II/III (sc-377518) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, anti-Orai3 (HPA015022) and anti-Stim2 (PRS4123) from Sigma-Aldrich (Italy), and anti -actin rabbit antibody as control (Rockland Immunochemicals for Research, USA; code, 600-401-886). The membranes were washed and incubated for 1 h with peroxidase-conjugated mouse, rabbit, or goat IgG (1 : 120000 in blocking solution), from Dakocytomation (P0260), Chemicon (AP132P), and Santa Cruz (sc-2354), respectively. The bands were detected with the ECL Select western blotting detection system (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Italy). Prestained molecular weight markers (SDS7B2, Sigma, Italy) were used to estimate the molecular weight of the bands. Control experiments were performed by using the antibody preadsorbed with a 20-fold molar excess of the immunizing peptide or by incubating the blots with nonimmune serum.

2.8. Protein Content

Protein contents of all the samples were determined by the Bradford’s method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard [35].

2.9. Chemicals

EBM and EGM-2 were purchased from Clonetics (Cell System, St. Katharinen, Germany). Fura-2/AM was obtained from Molecular Probes (Molecular Probes Europe BV, Leiden, the Netherlands). N-(4-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazo​  l-1-yl]phenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazol​e-5-carboxamide(BTP-2) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA, USA). CAI was a gift from the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch, National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD). Pyr6 has been synthesized as described in [36]. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Is Functionally Expressed in mRCC Cells

Primary cell cultures of mRCC were performed as described in Materials and Methods section and their morphology after staining with hematoxylin and eosin is illustrated in Figure 1(a). Immunofluorescence revealed that >95% of cells were positive for CD10 staining, thereby confirming that they belonged to the neoplastic phenotype (Figure 1(b)). Store-operated Ca2+ entry in primary cultures of mRCC cells was, thus, evaluated by exploiting the “Ca2+ add-back” protocol [10]. Fura-2-loaded cells were challenged with cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) and thapsigargin, two well-known inhibitors of the Sarco-Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA). These drugs prevent the pump from counterbalancing the passive Ca2+ leak from the stores to the cytosol, thereby leading to a massive drop in the ER Ca2+ content which signals the gating of store-operated Ca2+ channels on the plasma membrane [10]. As depicted in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), both CPA (10 μM) and thapsigargin (2 μM) elicited a robust SOCE in mRCC cells. Similarly, SOCE was activated by ionomycin (5 μM) (Figure 2(c)), a Ca2+-ionophore that mobilizes the entire amount of luminally stored Ca2+ by forming Ca2+-conducting pores on ER membrane. Hence, a functional SOCE is present in primary cultures of mRCC cells.

3.2. The Molecular Candidates to Mediate SOCE Are Expressed in mRCC Cells

The putative molecular underpinnings of SOCE in mRCC cells were scrutinized by performing a qRT-PCR analysis of their total mRNA content. We focused on Stim1-2, Orai1–3, TRPC1, and TRPC3–7. TRPC2 is a pseudogene in humans and has not been investigated. All the transcripts investigated were readily detectable (Figures 2(d)2(f)). Single bands of the expected size of cDNA fragments were amplified, as previously shown in [11]. Negative controls were performed by omitting the reverse transcriptase (not shown). The comparison of ΔCt values of the mRNAs obtained by qRT-PCR showed that Stim1 and Stim2 were equally expressed (Figure 2(d)); conversely, Orai3 expression is about fourfold less than Orai1 and Orai2 isoforms (Figure 2(e)), while TRPC3, 4, 6 levels are about threefold less than TRPC1 (Figure 2(f)). Similarly, TRPC5 is about 300 fold less expressed than TRPC1, while TRPC7 is nearly absent (Figure 2(f)). In order to confirm transcript expression at protein level, we carried out a number of western blot experiments by utilizing affinity-purified antibodies selectively targeting Stim1, Stim2, Orai1, Orai3, TRPC1, and TRPC3/6/7 [10, 31, 32]. Since TRPC7 transcript is barely expressed, the latter signal is likely to be generated by TRPC3 and TRPC6. As depicted in Figure 3, immunoblots showed a major band of about 33 kDa for Orai1 and Orai3 (Figure 3(b)), whereas Stim1 and Stim2 displayed a doublet of about 77 and 100 kDa (Figure 3(a)), and TRPC1 and TRPC3/6/7 exhibited major bands of about 110 kDa (Figure 3(c)). The band sizes were in agreement with those previously observed by using the same antibodies in circulating EPCs [10, 31, 32]. Therefore, mRCC cells are endowed with all the molecular candidates to mediate the store-dependent Ca2+ influx induced by CPA, thapsigargin, and ionomycin.

3.3. Pharmacological Profile of SOCE in mRCCs

SOCE in naïve cells may be inhibited by the pyrazole derivative BTP-2 (20 μM), low concentrations of lanthanides (e.g., 1–10 μM Gd3+), and the membrane permeable synthetic drug 2-aminoethyldiphenyl borate (2-APB) [4, 25, 31, 34]. Unexpectedly, BTP-2 (20 μM; 20 min) did not affect either Ca2+ release or SOCE occurring in response to CPA (10 μM) in mRCC cells (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Similarly, BTP-2 (20 μM; 20 min) did not reduce the amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ release and extracellular Ca2+ inflow induced by either thapsigargin (2 μM; Figures 4(c) and 4(d)) or ionomycin (5 μM; Figures 4(e) and 4(f)). These results strongly suggest that neither Orai1 nor TRPC1, which are dramatically sensitive to this drug, contribute subunits to the conducting pore of store-dependent channels in mRCC cells [3, 4]. Then, we probed the effects of 10 μM Gd3+, which selectively abrogates Ca2+ entry through Orai1 and TRPC1 [3]. Our preliminary experiments demonstrated that preincubating the cells for 30 min with 10 μM Gd3+ did not produce any significant reduction in both CPA- and thapsigargin-induced SOCE ( and , resp.; data not shown). Likewise, Pyr 6 (10 μM, 5 min), a recently synthesized specific Orai1 blocker did not affect the biphasic Ca2+ response to CPA (; Figures 4(g)-4(h)). Therefore, we turn on to 100 μM Gd3+, which exerts an unspecific inhibition on TRPC-gated Ca2+ inflow. At this dose, Gd3+ suppressed SOCE in response to either CPA (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)) or thapsigargin (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)), without affecting intracellular Ca2+ release (Figures 4(a)4(d)). Then, we ascertained the inhibitory action of 2-APB, a largely utilized inhibitor of both Orai- and TRPC-gated Ca2+ entry [3]. We found that 2-APB (50 μM) selectively reduced CPA-induced SOCE (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Finally, we focused on CAI, a synthetic small molecule inhibitor of non-voltage-gated Ca2+ channels which was already tested on mRCC patients within a phase II clinical trial, but eventually failed [3]. Twenty min pretreatment with 20 μM significantly reduced CPA-evoked intracellular Ca2+ release and SOCE (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). Overall, these data show that the pharmacology of SOCE in mRCC cells is rather unusual, such pathway being insensitive to BTP-2, low concentrations of lanthanides, and Pyr6, while it was blocked by 100 μM Gd3+, 2-APB, and CAI. As discussed in more detail below, this profile is consistent with a Ca2+-conducting pore constituted by the heteromeric interaction of multiple TRPC and, perhaps, Orai subunits.

3.4. Weak InsP3-Dependent Ca2+ Signalling in mRCCs

Then, we sought to assess whether InsP3 signalling is coupled to SOCE activation in mRCC cells. The thiol-reactive agent thimerosal, which serves as InsP3R agonist in a variety of cell types, has widely been employed to stimulate InsP3-dependent Ca2+ release [37]. However, 25 μM thimerosal was ineffective in the large majority of cells tested (Figures 7(a) and 7(c)), while it induced a brief burst of Ca2+ spikes only in a modest fraction of cells when its concentration was raised up to 50 μM (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)). In order to assess whether the drug was indeed capable of stimulating InsP3-dependent Ca2+ release, we probed its effects on EPCs isolated from healthy donors, which served as positive control. Twenty-five μM thimerosal evoked repetitive oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in ~70% of cells (Figures 7(b) and 7(c)), which testify for the efficacy of the drug batch we employed. This issue was further investigated by challenging mRCC cells with the InsP3-synthesizing transmitter, ATP, which binds to purinergic P2Y receptors to engage PLC-β and activate SOCE [10, 11]. As shown in Figure 7(d) (grey tracing) and Figure 7(e), 100 μM ATP was never able to induce Ca2+ mobilization from ER in mRCC cells, albeit in parallel experiments it induced InsP3-dependent Ca2+ discharge and SOCE in most EPCs (black tracing in Figures 7(d) and 7(e)). These results could be explained by the lack of InsP3Rs in mRCC cells. However, qRT-PCR analysis unveiled that these cells are present with the transcripts encoding for all the three known isoforms of InsP3Rs (i.e., InsP3R1–3; Figure 7(f)) [37], the relative pattern of expression being InsP3R3 InsP3R2 InsP3R1. InsP3R expression was further probed by immunoblotting, which revealed a large band, deriving from the sum of 313/260/250 kDa bands, for InsP3R1/2/3. These data were confirmed by administrating SDF-1α (10 ng/mL), the most important chemoattractant cytokine involved in cancer dissemination, which induces SOCE upon InsP3-dependent mobilization of intraluminally stored Ca2+ [38]. SDF-1α (10 ng/mL) elicited a transient elevation in [Ca2+]i in a minor proportion of mRCC cells (Figures 8(a) and 8(c)). This pattern of Ca2+ signalling is consistent with a modest intracellular Ca2+ release, but not with a sizeable Ca2+ influx [16]. Conversely, SDF-1α (10 ng/mL) elicited a rapid Ca2+ peak which rapidly decayed to a plateau phase of intermediate amplitude, which is the typical hallmark of SOCE [16], in EPCs (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). Accordingly, the “Ca2+ add-back” protocol revealed that SDF-1α-induced SOCE was present in these cells, but not in mRCC cells (Figure 8(c)). Taken together, these data demonstrate that InsP3 signalling is rather weak and might be not tightly coupled to SOCE in mRCC cells.

3.5. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Does Not Control Proliferation in mRCC Cells

The metastatic RCC cells utilized in the present study have been isolated from malignant lesions and have, thus, already been exposed to the chemotactic clues that drive them to the target organ from the primary tumour. In the search for an alternative target to eradicate disseminated metastases from the patients, we reasoned it was more appropriate to focus on SOCE involvement in mRCC proliferation. Consequently, we probed the effect of 100 μM Gd3+, 50 μM 2-APB, 20 μM CAI, and 10 μM, as negative control, on mRCC proliferation. Figure 8(d) clearly shows that none of these compounds inhibited cell growth after 7 days in culture; therefore, SOCE is not required in the replication process in these cells. Among the signalling pathways utilized by growth factors to promote cell cycle progression, store-dependent Ca2+ inflow stands out as a prominent mechanism [4, 13, 14, 25, 39]. In agreement with the lack effect of SOCE inhibition on mRCC cell proliferation, 20% FBS did not generate any detectable increase in [Ca2+]i (, data not shown). Moreover, 10 ng/mL VEGF elicited a modest Ca2+ transient in a small fraction of cells (Figures 8(e) and 8(g)), while it induced robust intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in EPCs (Figures 8(f) and 8(g)) due to the concerted interaction of InsP3-dependent Ca2+ release and SOCE [9]. The fraction of responding mRCC cells augmented when VEGF concentration was raised up to 100 ng/mL (Figure 8(g)), but the Ca2+ signal still lacked a plateau phase (not shown). Similarly, 20% FBS activated a biphasic Ca2+ signal in EPCs (grey tracing in Figure 8(h); ), but not in mRCC cells (black tracing in Figure 8(h); ). Finally, EGF did not ignite any detectable Ca2+ activity when administrated at 10 ng/mL (, respectively; data not shown), which has been shown to trigger a sustained Ca2+ inflow in other cell types [40]. Overall, these data argue against the requirement for SOCE to drive proliferation in mRCC cells. We finally sought to ascertain whether extracellular Ca2+ inflow is involved in mRCC cell growth. The cells were plated in complete culture medium and, after three days, external Ca2+ was chelated by the addition of 5 mM EGTA. As depicted in Figure 9, this treatment dramatically prevented mRCC from replicating. Therefore, albeit SOCE does not control this process, mRCC proliferation requires extracellular Ca2+ entry.

4. Discussion

Store-operated Ca2+ entry is among the most widespread mechanisms of Ca2+ entry in cancer cells, thereby contributing to regulate a growing number of processes involved in malignant transformation, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and metastatization [4, 1214, 25, 27, 39, 4143]. It is, therefore, not surprising that SOCE has been put forward as a promising target to develop alternative therapies of metastatic tumours. We have recently found that the pharmacological blockage of SOCE suppresses cell proliferation in circulating EPCs isolated from naïve mRCC patients [10]. Therefore, we hypothesized that SOCE inhibition could provide an alternative strategy to promote eradicate metastases in subjects resistant to multikinase inhibitors [3]. To reinforce this concept, we undertook the present investigation to assess whether SOCE drives proliferation in primary cultures of mRCC cells isolated from these patients.

The “Ca2+ add-back” manoeuvre revealed that a functional SOCE is present in mRCC cells and is activated upon pharmacological emptying of ER Ca2+ content [10, 11]. Growing body of evidence indicates that SOCE in cancer cells is mediated by Stim1, which relays the information relative to the drop in ER Ca2+ levels to cell periphery, where it binds to and activates Orai1, a highly Ca2+-selective pore-forming unit [10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 42, 44]. Alternatively, SOCE might require the involvement of a less Ca2+-selective membrane pathway, such as that provided by TRPC channels. In more detail, all TRPC channels may participate in SOCE either through direct binding to Stim1 (i.e., TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5) or upon multimerization with Stim1-gated isoforms (i.e., TRPC3 and TRPC6). In particular, TRPC1 and TRPC6 have been involved in SOCE-mediated proliferation and cytokinesis in a number of cancer types [18, 2224, 42, 45]. The scenario becomes even more complicated when considering that Orai3 is activated by Stim1 upon intracellular store depletion in some oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer lines [21], and that Orai1 may assemble into a supramolecular ternary complex with Stim1 and TRPC1 [46]. In the present investigation, we utilized qRT-PCR analysis to demonstrate that mRCC cells possess all the molecular candidates to mediate SOCE, that is, Stim1-2, Orai1–3, TRPC1, TRPC4, TRPC5, and TRPC6. However, Orai3 is far less expressed than Orai1 and Orai2, whereas TRPC1 is more abundant than TRPC3, TRPC4, TRPC5, and TRPC6. Immunoblotting has confirmed that mRCC cells present with Stim1-2, Orai1, Orai3, TRPC1, and TRPC6 proteins. It is worth noting that mRCC cells present with TRPC3 and TRPC5, which are absent in normal renal epithelium and in RCC cell lines [47]. This feature supports the notion that established long term cell cultures may not truly represent the biological complexity of a real metastatic phenotype. These expression data hint at the participation of Stim1-2, Orai1-2, and TRPC1 to SOCE activation in mRCC cells. However, the pharmacological profile displayed by SOCs in these cells is not entirely consistent with this hypothesis. First, BTP-2 does not affect the magnitude of store-dependent Ca2+ influx induced by pharmacological depletion of ER in mRCC cells. This result was somehow surprising: we had previously shown that 20 μM BTP-2 fully blocks CPA- and ATP-induced SOCE in different types of EPCs [10], whereas 10–30 μM BTP-2 inhibits store-dependent Ca2+ inflow in several other cell types [3]. As discussed elsewhere [3], BTP-2 may interfere with SOCs containing either Orai1 or TRPC1 alone or is formed by Orai1 in conjunction with TRPC1. As a consequence, these mechanisms are unlikely to be the main actors of SOCE in mRCC cells. This hypothesis is further supported by the lack of effect of 10 μM Gd3+: at this concentration, lanthanides fully block SOCE either when it is driven by an Orai1-lined channel pore [3] or when both Orai1 and TRPC1 are part of the Ca2+-conducting pathway [10, 11]. Therefore, we do believe that neither Orai1 nor an Orai1-TRPC1 complex is involved in SOCE in mRCC cells. Consistently, Pyr6, a specific Orai1 inhibitor, failed to inhibit CPA-induced Ca2+ inflow. Conversely, SOCE is suppressed by high micromolar concentrations of Gd3+ and/or to 2-APB, which affect other members of the TRPC subfamily, such as TRPC3–6 [3, 4]. The wealth of information on the pharmacology of naive SOCs contributed by naïve TRPC channels is rather scarce. Both TRPC3 and TRPC6 are blocked by 2-APB [3, 48]. Nevertheless, Ca2+ entry through ectopically expressed TRPC3 is abrogated by lanthanides already at 10 μM, while TRPC6 inhibition requires doses higher than 50 μM [48]. This feature rules out TRPC3 from the candidates to mediate SOCE in mRCC cells. TRPC4 and TRPC5 are potentiated, rather than impaired, by 100 μM La3+ and Gd3+ and are unaffected by 2-APB [49]. Overall, these observations are consistent with a role of TRPC6 in SOCE in mRCC cells. This hypothesis is corroborated by two pieces of evidence. First, endogenous TRPC6 mediates SOCE and sustains proliferation in Hep G2 and Huh-7 human hepatoma cells [18, 19], in human and rat glioma cell lines [50] and in human gastric cancer cells [51]. Second, TRPC6 expression is enhanced in a variety of primary neoplasms as compared to normal paratumour tissues [5052], including RCC [53]. Third, TRPC6 is sensitive to CAI in Hep G2 and Huh-7 human hepatoma cells [19], albeit this drug may also prevent intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in mRCC cells. The effect exerted by CAI both on Ca2+ release and on store-dependent Ca2+ influx is a consequent to the inhibition of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, as shown in HEK293 cells [54]. Despite the pharmacological and molecular evidence of TRPC6 involvement in SOCE, we cannot rule out the contribution of Orai proteins or other TRPC channels, as part of TRPC6-containing complexes [15, 46]. For instance, TRPC4 would be indispensable to confer store sensitivity to TRPC6 [15], which is otherwise gated by diacylglycerol [48]. Moreover, over-expressed Orai1 proteins may assemble with endogenous TRPC channels in a Stim1-dependent manner to form a SOCE pathway which is insensitive to low micromolar Gd3+ [55]. Therefore, further studies are required to untangle the molecular architecture of SOCE in mRCC cells.

Store-operated Ca2+ entry is normally activated upon InsP3-dependent depletion of the intracellular Ca2+ stores [4]. A peculiar feature of SOCE in mRCC cells was its weak coupling to InsP3 signalling. These cells are endowed with all the three known InsP3R isoforms, their pattern of mRNA expression being InsP3R3 InsP3R2 InsP3R1, which is similar to that found in GMB [56] and breast carcinoma [57]. Our results revealed that InsP3-dependent Ca2+ release is loosely coupled to SOCE. Thimerosal oxidizes thiols to form a thiomercurylethyl complex, thereby sensitizing InsP3 to basal InsP3 levels [37]. In our hands, up to 50 μM thimerosal was almost ineffective at mobilizing intracellular Ca2+ in mRCC cells, while it induced repetitive Ca2+ oscillations in EPCs. These observations suggest that the resting concentration of InsP3, which is attributable to constitutive PLC activity, is low. When we sought to physiologically increase intracellular InsP3 levels, we found that both ATP and SDF-1α fail to reproducibly mobilize intracellularly stored Ca2+ in mRCC cells; the same results were obtained when PLCγ was recruited to the plasma membrane by stimulating TKRs with either VEGF, EGF, or FBS (as discussed below). ATP, FBS, and EGF were actually unable to induce Ca2+ release from ER in the totality of the cells probed. It appears that mRCC cells are reluctant to generate InsP3-dependent Ca2+ signals and to activate SOCE. Indeed, both VEGF and SDF-1α trigger transient elevations in [Ca2+]i which lack the plateau phase caused by persistent SOCE activation. InsP3 metabolism may be dramatically deranged in cancer cells. It has recently been demonstrated that the activity of the InsP3 producing enzymes, phosphatidylinositol (PI) 4-kinase, PI 4-phosphate-5-kinase, and PLC, is enhanced in neoplastic tissues, while the catabolic enzymes, PIP2 5-phosphatase and PIP 4-phosphatase, are downregulated; this is likely to lead to an amplification of InsP3-related pathways [58]. It could be hypothesized that the opposite occurs in mRCC cells and is responsible for the weak InsP3 signalling we observed. An alternative, but not mutually exclusive, explanation includes the downregulation of the membrane receptors we have tried to exploit or their lower sensitivity to ligand binding in these cells (see below).

The present study aimed to assess whether the pharmacological blockade of SOCE leads to the inhibition of primary cultures established from metastatic lesions of patients resistant to the most recent anti-angiogenic therapies. Nevertheless, the inhibition of SOCE with Gd3+, 2-APB, and CAI did not impair mRCC cell proliferation. The lack of effect of CAI deserves a careful evaluation. This is a synthetic small molecule compound that inhibits a Ca2+-mediated cellular responses by exerting a nonspecific block on Ca2+ entry and release pathways in both malignant cells and tumour vessels [4, 25]. CAI is currently under investigation as an orally administered tumouristatic and antiangiogenic agent in clinical phase I–III trials of several solid cancers [25], including RCC [4, 25]. As reviewed in [25], this agent was supposed to possess antitumour activity against mRCC based on the observation, coming from phase I trials, of cases of disease stabilization and minor responses. Unfortunately, a randomized discontinuation trial of CAI in mRCC patients was not successful, the compound being inactive and not well tolerated. The present investigation permits understanding the failure of CAI administration at cellular level as this drug did not affect mRCC cell proliferation in our hands. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that CAI does not hamper cell cycle progression in tumour cells [41]. SOCE is the ubiquitous mechanism whereby Ca2+ inflow drives cell cycle progression and DNA synthesis in both normal and cancer cells. The “habituation” of mRCC cells to reduced SOCE is, therefore, the most remarkable finding of the present study. This feature renders RCC cells, which are freshly isolated from metastatic effusions and maintained in culture for less than 3-4 passages, different from the commercially available immortal tumour cell lines, which heavily rely on SOCE to proliferate [1823, 44, 45, 50, 51]. Curiously, a recent investigation conducted on primary cultures established from GBM disclosed that Stim1/Orai1 account for ~20% of cell growth [17], thereby confirming that freshly isolated tumour cells may become independent on SOCE to proliferate. It is reasonable to speculate that the sharp fall in SOCE requirement to proliferate may be considered a novel mechanism of tumour resistance to pharmacological treatments that could be identified only in patients-derived cells. Consistent with these results, recent work has convincingly demonstrated that external Ca2+ entry through either store-operated or arachidonate-activated channels does not support proliferation in three different tumoural cell lines, such as HEK293, HeLa, and Huh-7 cells [59], and in EPCs harvested from patients affected by primary myelofibrosis [32]. In order to explain our result, it is mandatory to recall that mRCC cells have been cultured from metastatic lesions of patients who progressed after being exposed to at least two VEGF/VEGF(Rs) inhibitors and one mTOR inhibitor. These drugs are administrated to disrupt the vascular network which sustains the exceeding tumour growth and paves the ways for the dissemination of malignant deposits throughout the organism [3]. The physiological stimulus that activates SOCE to control cell proliferation is the InsP3-dependent drop in ER Ca2+ levels which is consequent to TKR stimulation by extracellular growth factors [9, 23, 45, 50]. The prolonged exposure to multikinase inhibitors, which target the intracellular pathways downstream VEGF, PDGF, and EGF receptors, might “silence” the ability of metastatic cells to respond to endogenous growth factors [60], albeit the treatment was designed to impair endothelial signalling. As a consequence, either the reduced sensitivity to ligand binding or the inhibition of TKR activation would fail to mobilize a sufficient amount of Ca2+ from the InsP3-sensitive store. Future work is required to assess whether store-dependent Ca2+ inflow governs cell proliferation in mRCC cells isolated from naïve patients, that is, who are yet to undergo any pharmacological treatment. Accordingly, EPCs isolated from these subjects cannot expand in the presence of SOCE inhibitors [10]. Two pieces of observations should, however, be borne in mind in regard to the role of Ca2+ signalling in mRCC cell growth. First, although the influx of Ca2+ is not important to drive proliferation in HEK293, HeLa, and Huh-7 cells, the same investigation unveiled that the genetic suppression of Orai1 and Orai3 impeded mitosis progression in these settings [59]. Therefore, these protein channels fulfill cellular functions other than conducting signalling ions across the plasma membrane that are relevant to cell proliferation [59, 61]. Second, whereas the pharmacological blockade of SOCE did not cause any significant decrease in mRCC cell number after 5 days of incubation, buffering external Ca2+ with EGTA blocked cell proliferation. As a consequence, this process is controlled by a different Ca2+ entry pathway(s) and these cells do not habituate to extracellular Ca2+ deprivation [26]. A variety of additional Ca2+-permeable may control cell growth in nonexcitable cells, such as receptor-operated channels (ROCs), second messengers-operated channels (SMOCs), voltage operated-channels (VOCs), and ionotropic receptors [16]. One or more of these conductances are likely to regulate mRCC cell proliferation and should be identified in future experiments.

5. Conclusions

This investigation demonstrated for the first time that a functional SOCE is present in primary cultures of mRCC cells isolated from patients treated with multikinase inhibitors. The pharmacological characterization and the molecular screening of Stim, Orai, and TRPC transcripts are consistent with the involvement of TRPC6. A role for Stim, Orai, and other TRPC isoforms cannot, however, be ruled out: in fact, these proteins tend to assemble in supramolecular heteromeric complexes which display different pharmacological, ion selectivity, and gating properties as those observed when ectopically expressed as single units. SOCE is loosely coupled to InsP3-dependent signalling and cannot be activated by ATP, SDF-1α, VEGF, FBS, and EGF. Consistent with this observation, the pharmacological blockade of SOCE does not affect mRCC proliferation. These results suggest that SOCs are unlikely to provide a suitable molecular target to design alternative treatments for subjects resistant to multikinase inhibitors. Caution is, therefore, warranted when SOCE inhibition is put forward as a novel option for cancer therapy exclusively on the basis of results obtained from immortal tumour cell lines.

Disclosure

Daniela Montagna and Francesco Moccia share senior authorship of the paper.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Silvia Dragoni and Ilaria Turin equally contributed to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by Grants from Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Finalizzata RF-20102316319) to Daniela Montagna and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Ricerca Corrente to Daniela Montagna.

References

  1. B. Escudier, T. Eisen, C. Porta et al., “Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 23, no. 7, Article ID mds227, pp. vii65–vii71, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. C. Flanigan, S. C. Campbell, J. I. Clark, and M. M. Picken, “Metastatic renal cell carcinoma.,” Current Treatment Options in Oncology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 385–390, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Moccia, S. Dragoni, V. Poletto et al., “Orai1 and transient receptor potential channels as novel molecular targets to impair tumor neovascularisation in renal cell carcinoma and other malignancies,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 296–312, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  4. F. Moccia, S. Dragoni, F. Lodola et al., “Store-dependent Ca2+ entry in endothelial progenitor cells as a perspective tool to enhance cell-based therapy and adverse tumour vascularization,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 34, pp. 5802–5818, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Moccia, S. Dragoni, M. Cinelli et al., “How to utilize Ca2+ signals to rejuvenate the repairative phenotype of senescent endothelial progenitor cells in elderly patients affected by cardiovascular diseases: a useful therapeutic support of surgical approach?” BMC Surgery, vol. 13, supplement 2, p. S46, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. J. Vogelzang, “Treatment options in metastatic renal carcinoma: an embarrassment of riches,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Escudier, C. Szczylik, C. Porta, and M. Gore, “Treatment selection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: expert consensus,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 327–337, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Porta, R. Sabbatini, G. Procopio, C. Paglino, E. Galligioni, and C. Ortega, “Primary resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: state-of-the-science,” Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1571–1577, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Dragoni, U. Laforenza, E. Bonetti et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates endothelial colony forming cells proliferation and tubulogenesis by inducing oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ concentration,” Stem Cells, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1898–1907, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Lodola, U. Laforenza, E. Bonetti et al., “tore-operated Ca2+ entry is remodelled and controls in vitro angiogenesis in endothelial progenitor cells isolated from tumoral patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e42541, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Sánchez-Hernández, U. Laforenza, E. Bonetti et al., “Store-operated Ca2+ entry is expressed in human endothelial progenitor cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1967–1981, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Prevarskaya, R. Skryma, and Y. Shuba, “Calcium in tumour metastasis: new roles for known actors,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 609–618, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Roberts-Thomson, A. A. Peters, D. M. Grice, and G. R. Monteith, “ORAI-mediated calcium entry: mechanism and roles, diseases and pharmacology,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. F. Chen, Y. T. Chen, Y. T. Chiu, and M. R. Shen, “Remodeling of calcium signaling in tumor progression,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 20, no. 1, article 23, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. F. Worley, W. Zeng, G. N. Huang et al., “TRPC channels as STIM1-regulated store-operated channels,” Cell Calcium, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 205–211, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Moccia, R. Berra-Romani, and F. Tanzi, “Update on vascular endothelial Ca2+ signalling: a tale of ion channels, pumps and transporters,” World Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 127–158, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. K. Motiani, M. C. Hyzinski-García, X. Zhang et al., “STIM1 and Orai1 mediate CRAC channel activity and are essential for human glioblastoma invasion,” Pflugers Archiv-European Journal of Physiology, vol. 465, no. 9, pp. 1249–1260, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. El Boustany, G. Bidaux, A. Enfissi, P. Delcourt, N. Prevarskaya, and T. Capiod, “Capacitative calcium entry and transient receptor potential canonical 6 expression control human hepatoma cell proliferation,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2068–2077, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Enfissi, S. Prigent, P. Colosetti, and T. Capiod, “The blocking of capacitative calcium entry by 2-aminoethyl diphenylborate (2-APB) and carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) inhibits proliferation in Hep G2 and Huh-7 human hepatoma cells,” Cell Calcium, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 459–467, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y.-F. Chen, W.-T. Chiu, Y.-T. Chen et al., “Calcium store sensor stromal-interaction molecule 1-dependent signaling plays an important role in cervical cancer growth, migration, and angiogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 37, pp. 15225–15230, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. K. Motiani, I. F. Abdullaev, and M. Trebak, “A novel native store-operated calcium channel encoded by Orai3: Selective requirement of Orai3 versus Orai1 in estrogen receptor-positive versus estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 25, pp. 19173–19183, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. M. Davis, A. A. Peters, D. M. Grice et al., “Non-stimulated, agonist-stimulated and store-operated Ca2+ influx in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells and the effect of EGF-induced EMT on calcium entry,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e36923, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. V. C. Bomben, K. L. Turner, T. C. Barclay, and H. Sontheimer, “Transient receptor potential canonical channels are essential for chemotactic migration of human malignant gliomas,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 226, no. 7, pp. 1879–1888, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Chigurupati, R. Venkataraman, D. Barrera et al., “Receptor channel TRPC6 is a key mediator of Notch-driven glioblastoma growth and invasiveness,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 418–427, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. Moccia, F. Lodola, S. Dragoni et al., “Ca2+ signalling in endothelial progenitor cells: a novel means to improve cell-based therapy and impair tumour vascularisation,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 87–105, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. F. Jaffe, “A calcium-based theory of carcinogenesis,” Advances in Cancer Research, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 231–263, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Capiod, “Cell proliferation, calcium influx and calcium channels,” Biochimie, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 2075–2079, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. I. Turin, R. Schiavo, M. Maestri et al., “In vitro efficient expansion of tumor cells deriving from different types of different tumor samples,” Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70–81, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. R. Sangoi, J. Karamchandani, J. Kim, R. K. Pai, and J. K. McKenney, “The use of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a review of PAX-8, PAX-2, hKIM-1, RCCma, and CD10,” Advances in Anatomic Pathology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 377–393, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Montagna, I. Turin, R. Schiavo et al., “Feasibility and safety of adoptive immunotherapy with ex vivo-generated autologous, cytotoxic T lymphocytes in patients with solid tumor,” Cytotherapy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Dragoni, U. Laforenza, E. Bonetti et al., “Canonical transient receptor potential 3 channel triggers vascular endothelial growth factor-induced intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in endothelial progenitor cells isolated from umbilical cord blood,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 2561–2580, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Dragoni, U. Laforenza, and E. Bonetti, “Enhanced expression of stim, orai, and TRPC transcripts and proteins in endothelial progenitor cells isolated from patients with primary myelofibrosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e91099, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. A. Ingram, L. E. Mead, H. Tanaka et al., “Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood,” Blood, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 2752–2760, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. A. di Buduo, F. Moccia, M. Battiston et al., “The importance of calcium in the regulation of megakaryocyte function,” Haematologica, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 769–778, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Schleifer, B. Doleschal, M. Lichtenegger et al., “Novel pyrazole compounds for pharmacological discrimination between receptor-operated and store-operated Ca2+ entry pathways,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 167, no. 8, pp. 1712–1722, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. K. Foskett, C. White, K. Cheung, and D. D. Mak, “Inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 593–658, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Moccia, E. Bonetti, S. Dragoni et al., “Hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells circulate by surfing on intracellular Ca2+ waves: a novel target for cell-based therapy and anti-cancer treatment?” Current Signal Transduction Therapy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161–176, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. R. Monteith, F. M. Davis, and S. J. Roberts-Thomson, “Calcium channels and pumps in cancer: changes and consequences,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 38, pp. 31666–31673, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. Moccia, R. Berra-Romani, S. Tritto, S. Signorelli, V. Taglietti, and F. Tanzi, “Epidermal growth factor induces intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in microvascular endothelial cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Pla, D. Avanzato, L. Munaron, and I. S. Ambudkar, “Ion channels and transporters in cancer. 6. vascularizing the tumor: TRP channels as molecular targets,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. C9–C15, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Fiorio Pla and D. Gkika, “Emerging role of TRP channels in cell migration: from tumor vascularization to metastasis,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, article 311, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  43. T. Capiod, “The need for calcium channels in cell proliferation,” Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Yang, J. J. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Orai1 and STIM1 are critical for breast tumor cell migration and metastasis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 124–134, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. Tajeddine and P. Gailly, “TRPC1 protein channel is major regulator of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 20, pp. 16146–16157, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Birnbaumer, “The TRPC class of ion channels: a critical review of their roles in slow, sustained increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 49, pp. 395–426, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Veliceasa, M. Ivanovic, F. T. Hoepfner, P. Thumbikat, O. V. Volpert, and N. D. Smith, “Transient potential receptor channel 4 controls thrombospondin-1 secretion and angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma,” FEBS Journal, vol. 274, no. 24, pp. 6365–6377, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. Harteneck and M. Gollasch, “Pharmacological modulation of diacylglycerol-sensitive TRPC3/6/7 channels,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. D. Plant and M. Schaefer, “Receptor-operated cation channels formed by TRPC4 and TRPC5,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 371, no. 4, pp. 266–276, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. X. Ding, Z. He, K. Zhou et al., “Essential role of trpc6 channels in G2/M phase transition and development of human glioma,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, no. 14, pp. 1052–1068, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Cai, X. Ding, K. Zhou et al., “Blockade of TRPC6 channels induced G2/M phase arrest and suppressed growth in human gastric cancer cells,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 2281–2287, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Ouadid-Ahidouch, I. Dhennin-Duthille, M. Gautier, H. Sevestre, and A. Ahidouch, “TRP channels: diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for breast cancer?” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Song, Y. Wang, X. Li et al., “Critical role of TRPC6 channels in the development of human renal cell carcinoma,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 5115–5122, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. O. Mignen, C. Brink, A. Enfissi et al., “Carboxyamidotriazole-induced inhibition of mitochondrial calcium import blocks capacitative calcium entry and cell proliferation in HEK-293 cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 23, pp. 5615–5623, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. Liao, N. W. Plummer, M. D. George, J. Abramowitz, M. X. Zhu, and L. Birnbaumer, “A role for Orai in TRPC-mediated Ca2+ entry suggests that a TRPC:Orai complex may mediate store and receptor operated Ca2+ entry,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 3202–3206, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. S. Kang, K. Han, B. M. Ku et al., “Caffeine-mediated inhibition of calcium release channel inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor subtype 3 blocks glioblastoma invasion and extends survival,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1173–1183, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. Szatkowski, J. B. Parys, H. Ouadid-Ahidouch, and F. Matifat, “Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ signalling is involved in estradiol-induced breast cancer epithelial cell growth,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 156, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. G. Weber, “Down-regulation of increased signal transduction capacity in human cancer cells,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 45, pp. 37–51, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. S. Borowiec, G. Bidaux, R. Tacine et al., “Are Orai1 and Orai3 channels more important than calcium influx for cell proliferation?” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1843, no. 2, pp. 464–472, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  60. H. L. Goel and A. M. Mercurio, “VEGF targets the tumor cell,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 871–882, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  61. A. S. Borowiec, G. Bidaux, N. Pigat, V. Goffin, S. Bernichtein, and T. Capiod, “Calcium channels, external calcium concentration and cell proliferation,” European Journal of Pharmacology, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Silvia Dragoni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1155 Views | 1228 Downloads | 35 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.