Clinical Study

Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects with Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) or Enamel Matrix Derivatives (Emdogain): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Table 2

Clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months.

VariableBaseline (BS)6 months12 monthsDifference (after 6 m)P value* (Bs–6 m)Difference (after 12 m)P value* (Bs–12 m)P value* (6 m–12 m)

Bone level (mm, mean ± SD)
 NHA group 0.001 <0.0010.886
 EMD group <0.001 <0.0010.919
P value0.8670.8360.8670.9581.000
RAL (mm, mean ± SD)
 NHA group 0.004 0.0030.802
 EMD group <0.001 <0.0010.635
P value0.6400.7830.5280.4270.211
PPD (mm, mean ± SD)
 NHA group <0.001 <0.0010.706
 EMD group <0.001 <0.0010.936
P value0.8790.1910.1540.4250.312
RGR (mm, mean ± SD)
 NHA group 0.001 0.0010.891
 EMD group <0.001 0.0010.552
P value0.3520.5180.5960.9460.785

EMD: enamel matrix derivative; NHA: nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite; PPD: probing pocket depths; RAL: relative attachment level; RGR: relative gingival recession; *paired t-test; unpaired t-test. Mean differences are calculated as baseline 6–months, baseline–12 months, and 6–12 months.