Review Article

Biomechanical Evaluation of Ascending Aortic Aneurysms

Table 1

Summary of test procedures.

AuthorsEnvironmental condition3PreconditioningStrain or loading rateStress measure1Strain measure2
cyclesRange

Uniaxial
 Okamoto et al., 2002 [3]Bath, RT100.1–0.49 N0.59 N/s E,
 Vorp et al., 2003 [5]Wetting, RT100–7% strain8.5%/min e,
 Iliopoulos et al., 2009 [6]Bath, 37°CY, *20%/min E, A
 Matsumoto et al., 2009 [12]Bath, RTNo0.2 mm/s E
 Duprey et al., 2010 [10]Wetting, RT20-1 N10 mm/min
 Khanafer et al., 2011 [11]Wetting, RT1010 mm/min
 Iliopoulos et al., 2011 [23]Bath, 37°CY, *20%/min , 2PK , E
 Sokolis et al., 2012 [21]Bath, 37°CY, *20%/min2PKE
 García-Herrera et al., 2012 [17]Bath, 37°C530% of max. load0.03 mm/s (18%/min)
 Pichamuthu et al., 2013 [7]Wetting, RT100–7% strain8.5%/min e,
Biaxial
 Okamoto et al., 2002 [3]Bath, RT1010% equi-stretch2–4%/s E
 Matsumoto et al., 2009 [12]Bath, RT/37°CN0.2 mm/s (1.7%/s) E,
 Choudhury et al., 2009 [8]Bath, RT105 mm disp.0.1 mm/ss, *e, *
 Pham et al., 2013 [13]Bath, 37°C40Equi-stress*1PK, 2PKE
 Azadani et al., 2013 [9] Bath1010% equi-stretchWaveform, 0.5 Hz E

s: engineering stress, : true or Cauchy stress, and 2PK: second Piola-Kirchoff stress; 2e: engineering strain, : true or logarithmic strain, E: Green strain, : stretch ratio, and A: Almansi strain; 3RT: room temperature; *: details not specified.