Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 856543, 9 pages
Research Article

Are There Differences in the Health Outcomes of Mothers in Europe and East-Asia? A Cross-Cultural Health Survey

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Graz and Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 14, 8036 Graz, Austria
2Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8524, Japan

Received 7 October 2014; Accepted 13 November 2014; Published 27 November 2014

Academic Editor: Kyousuke Takeuchi

Copyright © 2014 Eva Mautner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Cox and J. Holden, Perinatal Mental Health. A Guide to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Postnatal Depression: An Overview, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK, 2003.
  2. R. Thara and V. Patel, “Women's mental health: a public health concern,” Regional Health Forum: WHO South East Asia Region, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Goto, N. Quang Vinh, N. Thi Tu van et al., “Maternal confidence in child rearing: comparing data from short-term prospective surveys among Japanese and Vietnamese mothers,” Maternal and Child Health Journal, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 613–619, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Patel, A. Rahman, K. S. Jacob, and M. Hughes, “Effect of maternal mental health on infant growth in low income countries: new evidence from South Asia,” British Medical Journal, vol. 328, no. 7443, pp. 820–823, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. The WHOQOL Group, “The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 41, pp. 1403–1409, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. M. Skevington, M. Lotfy, and K. A. O'Connell, “The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial a Report from the WHOQOL Group,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 299–310, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Plantin and B.-W. M. Sweden, “Literature review for the EU framework 5 funded study,” in Gender, Parenthood and the Changing European Workplace, L. den Dulk, B. Pepper, and K. van Doorne-Huskes, Eds., Department of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK, 2004, View at Google Scholar
  8. World Health Organization, Fatherhood and Health Outcomes in Europe, 2007,
  9. OECD, Gender Brief, Prepared by the OECD Social Policy Division, 2010,
  10. Management and Coordination Agency, Report of International Survey on Youth and Their Families, Ministry of Finance Printing Brueau, Tokyo, Japan, 1996.
  11. M. Harada, “Changes in child rearing illustrated in Hyogo Report,” Hokenshi Journal, vol. 60, pp. 600–605, 2005 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  12. E. Mautner, E. Greimel, G. Trutnovsky, J. W. Egger, and U. Lang, “Pre-und postpartale Risikofaktoren für die Lebensqualität,” Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, vol. 70, pp. 298–303, 2010 (German). View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Mautner, C. Stern, M. Deutsch et al., “The impact of resilience on psychological outcomes in women after preeclampsia: an observational cohort study,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 11, no. 1, article 194, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Stern, E. M. Trapp, E. Mautner, M. Deutsch, U. Lang, and M. Cervar-Zivkovic, “The impact of severe preeclampsia on maternal quality of life,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1019–1026, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. D. Zimet, N. W. Dahlem, S. G. Yimet, and G. K. Farlez, “The multidimensional scale of perceived social support,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 52, pp. 30–41, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Antanovsky, Unravelling the Mystery of Health, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1987.
  17. J. F. Pallant and L. Lae, “Sense of coherence, well-being, coping and personality factors: further evaluation of the sense of coherence scale,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Eriksson and B. Lindström, “Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and its relation with quality of life: a systematic review,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 938–944, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Freidl, V. Rosolen, T. Albreht, L. Wegher, and F. Barbone, “A comparative cross-cultural health survey in the Alpe-Adria region of Central Europe,” International Journal of Public Health, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Ashida, Study on nurturance of mothers and young women before motherhood: focusing on objects and subjects of nurtrance [Ph.D. dissertation], Hiroshima University, 2011.
  21. D. Klepp, “Lebenssituation und subjektive Lebensqualität von Frauen mit Kindern im Alter von 0 bis 6 Jahren: Eine empirische psychologische Studie zur Mutterschaft,” in Schriftenreihe des ÖIF 12, B. Cizek, Ed., Familienforschung in Österreich: Markierungen—Ergebnisse—Perspektiven des Österreichischen Instituts für Familienforschung, Vienna, Austria, 2004, View at Google Scholar
  22. M. C. Angermeyer, R. Kilian, and H. Matschinger, WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-BREF. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Version der WHO Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany, 2000.
  23. The WHOQOL-Group, “The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument: the WHOQOL,” in Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives, J. Orlex and W. Kuyken, Eds., pp. 41–57, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Inagaki, T. Ohtsuki, N. Yonemoto et al., “Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and PHQ-2 in general internal medicine primary care at a Japanese rural hospital: a cross-sectional study,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 592–597, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Löwe, K. Kroenke, and K. Gräfe, “Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2),” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 163–171, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Roth, “Sex roles and decisions,” in Family Decision-Making: A Developmental Sex Role Model, J. H. Scanzoni and M. E. Szinovacz, Eds., pp. 15–44, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  27. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Population statistics of Japan, 2012,
  28. Statistics Austria, “Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung ab 15 Jahren 2011 nach Altersgruppen und Geschlecht,” Statistik Austria Bildungsstandregister, 2011, View at Google Scholar