BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Anticancer Properties of Natural Products

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 890904 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/890904

Antiproliferative Activity of Hamigerone and Radicinol Isolated from Bipolaris papendorfii

Academic Editor: Zeki Topcu
Received27 May 2014
Accepted16 Jul 2014
Published12 Aug 2014

Abstract

Secondary metabolites from fungi organisms have extensive past and present use in the treatment of many diseases and serve as compounds of interest both in their natural form and as templates for synthetic modification. Through high throughput screening (HTS) and bioassay-guided isolation, we isolated two bioactive compounds hamigerone (1) and radicinol (2). These compounds were isolated from fungus Bipolaris papendorfii, isolated from the rice fields of Dera, Himachal Pradesh, India. The structures of the compounds were established on the basis of spectroscopic data, namely, NMR (1H, 13C, mass, and UV). Both compounds were found to be antiproliferative against different cancer cells. Furthermore we have also noted that both compounds showed increase in apoptosis by favorably modulating both tumor suppressor protein (p53) and antiapoptic protein (BCL-2), and in turn increase caspase-3 expression in cancer cells. This is the first report of these compounds from fungus Bipolaris papendorfii and their anticancer activity.

1. Introduction

Microfungi are a rich source of chemical diversity [13], and its metabolites are used by the pharmaceutical industry either in the native form or as derivatives [46]. As only a small part of the Mycota is known and most fungi produce several unknown metabolites, fungi are still one of the most promising sources for new lead compounds. Hence fungi are the objective in numerous high throughput screening (HTS) programs targeting new pharmaceutics and other bioactive components [710].

In our ongoing pharmacological screening program on biodiversity of fungi present in Indian landscape using high throughput screening (HTS), we have identified a notable antiproliferative activity against cancer cells in extracts/fractions of a fungus Bipolaris papendorfii, coded as PM0853873 isolated from the rice fields of Dera, Himachal Pradesh, India. Hamigerone was originally reported as the major secondary metabolite of Hamigera avellanea but no pharmacological activity was reported [11]; similarly radicinol was isolated from Cochliobolus lunata but no pharmacological activity was reported [12]. Apoptosis is essential in the homeostasis of normal tissues of the body. The two important genes involved in this process are the BCL-2 gene and p53 gene. BCL-2 is a gene of antiapoptosis and is crucial in preventing apoptosis whereas p53 gene is known as tumor suppressor gene. Cellular stresses, particularly DNA damage, are sensed by proteins such as ATM and DNA-PK, which phosphorylate and stabilize p53 which in turn cause apoptosis to the cancer cells [13]. The apoptotic pathway is related to induction of p53 and this pathway is held in check by the antiapoptotic gene BCL-2 [14]. The protooncogene BAX forms a heterodimer with BCL-2 and accelerates the process of apoptosis. We describe here the identification and bioactivity of the lead compounds hamigerone and radicinol from this culture. In this study, we also demonstrate for the first time the novel in vitro antiproliferative properties of hamigerone and radicinol in cancer cells. Both the compounds are inducing apoptosis in Panc-1 cancer cells by favorably modulating p53, BCL-2, and caspase 3 expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

HPLC was performed in Lichrosphere RP-18, 125 × 4 mm column using Shimadzu LC-2010 CHT Liquid Chromatography. Water preparative HPLC was used for final purification. Solvents used were of HPLC grade and normal column chromatography (CC) was performed with distilled commercial-grade solvents. Silica gel (SiO2, 200–300 mesh) was used for CC and GF254 (30–40 mm). TLCs were procured from Merck. NMR spectra in CDCl3 were recorded on Bruker 300 MHz spectrometer with TMS as the internal standard with chemical shift δ values in ppm and coupling constant J in Hz. ESI LC-MS was from Bruker Daltonics. Flash chromatography was performed on CombiFlash Sq 16X Teledyne Technologies Company ISCO attached with UV/VIS detector, (RediSep Flash Column silica 12 g, CHCl3 / MeOH gradient system). Final purification was achieved by preparative HPLC using RP-18 column (10X25 mm, 10 μ) and acetonitrile/water as a solvent system.

2.2. Cell Culture Reagents

All the cell lines were obtained from ATTC, USA. McCoy’s 5a medium, MEM, RPMI-1640, FBS, BSA, isopropanol, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), formaldehyde, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, Triton X-100, and PBS were obtained from Sigma, USA. Hoechst 3342 and Dylight 549 were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA. All the antibodies, namely, BCL-2 (SC-738), p53 (SC-126), and cleaved caspase 3 (SC-22171), were procured from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., USA.

2.3. Isolation and Identification of Fungus

The strain PM0853873 was isolated from the soil samples collected from Dera rice field during October 2007. The culture was isolated using soil plate method [15] using potato carrot agar (Hi Media) supplemented with 50 mg/L of chloramphenicol and maintained on potato dextrose agar (Hi Media) supplemented with 50 mg/L of chloramphenicol for identification and fermentation. The strain was identified as Bipolaris papendorfii by partial sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) using ITS1 and ITS4 primers [16]. A nucleotide to nucleotide BLAST [17] query of the gene bank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) recovered KC592365 Bipolaris papendorfii (92%) as the closest match to the ITS rDNA of PM0853873 (100.0%). Evolutionary analyses (Figure 1) were performed using MEGA6 [18].

2.4. Large-Scale Production of the Fungus

A loop full of the well grown culture from slant maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) was transferred to a 500 mL conical flask with 100 mL liquid medium containing soluble starch 1.5 g; soya bean meal 1.5 g; yeast extract 0.2 g; corn steep liquor 0.1 g; glucose 0.5 g; CaCO3 0.2 g; NaCl 0.5 g; glycerol 1.0 g in demineralized water at pH 5.5. This was grown on rotary shaker at 220 rpm for 72 h at 28°C and was used as seed medium. Potato dextrose broth medium (Hi Media) was used for production. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.5 prior to sterilization. Twenty-five, 1000 mL flasks containing 200 mL of the above medium were inoculated with 1% of the seed culture and incubated on rotary shaker at 220 rpm for 72 h at 28°C.

2.5. Purification of Compounds

5 L fermentation broth was filtered through Whatman number 1 filter paper to separate biomass. Methanol was added to the biomass, stirred for 40 min, and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated on rotary evaporator to remove methanol and aqueous residue was partitioned with ethyl acetate; the organic layer was concentrated on rotary evaporator to remove solvent, which yielded 500 mg crude extract. The crude extract was subjected to flash chromatography 16X on ISCO Combiflash system using RediSep silica column (SiO2, 200–300 mesh, 12 g; petroleum ether/ethyl acetate gradient). Semipure compounds 1 and 2 were obtained from the fractions eluted with 10% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. Final purification of compound 1 and 2 was performed on preparative HPLC (Waters PrepLC 4000 system, RP-18 column 8 × 250 mm (Lichrosphere), 10 μ; 2–100% acetonitrile in 30 min gradient against water, 5 mL/min flow). The peak at RT 28.2 was collected and evaporated the solvent to get 8 mg pure compound 1. In a similar preparative HPLC experiment semipure compound 2 appeared at 16 min to give 12 mg pure compound. The purity of the compounds were determined by Analytical HPLC.

2.6. Identification of the Substances

These compounds were characterized by spectroscopic data (UV, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and LC-MS). Compounds 1 and 2 were identified as hamigerone and radicinol respectively. LC MS data indicated the molecular weight of compound 1 as 412 and compound 2 as 238.

3. Screening for Anticancer Activity

3.1. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell growth was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method [19]. Cells were seeded at the appropriate concentrations to prevent confluence throughout the experiment. After 24 h of incubation, cells were treated with serial concentrations of the compounds. Control cells were treated with equal concentration of DMSO (never exceeding 0.1%). At 72 h after treatment, aliquots of 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL) were added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The supernatant was removed and 100 μL of isopropanol was added. The color intensity of reduced MTT was measured using Tecan Sapphire multifluorescence microplate reader (Tecan, Germany, GmbH) at 595 nm. DMSO-treated cells were considered untreated control and assigned a value of 100%.

3.2. In Vitro Protein Expression (by High Content Screening)

Panc-1 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. 24 h after seeding, medium was replaced with fresh medium. Panc-1 cells were treated with 1.9 μM of hamigerone and 10.50 μM of radicinol for 12 h. At the end of every time point, to determine the protein expression, the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 minutes at room temperature, followed by permeabilization with 0.15% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes. After permeabilization, the cells were blocked with 5% BSA for 2 h. After blocking step specific primary antibody was added for 1 h. Following primary antibody incubation, the nucleus was stained with Hoechst 3342 (blue) and primary antibodies of different protein (BCL-2, p53, and caspase 3) were localized by secondary antibody labeled with Dylight 549 (red). Immunofluorescence of BCL-2, p53, and cleaved caspase 3 was determined by scanning the plates on Cellomics Array Scan VTI HCS Reader with 20X magnification (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA).

All the data points were analyzed using the target activation and molecular translocation bioalgorithm of Cellomics and the quantitative data was expressed as percentage (%) activation in comparison to the DMSO control cells. 1000 cells were counted for each replicate well and the results were presented as an average ± SE. Bioapplication enables identification of the cell and cytoplasmic areas; the blue traces define the cell boundaries, while the orange traces cells rejected from the analysis. The scoring outputs used were total cellular/nuclear intensity and redistribution of fluorescence intensity from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (entropy intensity change) [20, 21].

3.3. Statistical Analysis

The data shown are the mean values of at least three replicate experiments and expressed as means ± SD. Differences between groups were analyzed using two sided -test and ANOVA with considered statistically significant. In cases in which averages were normalized to controls, the SDs of each nominator and denominator were taken into account in calculating the final SD. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism software 3.03 package (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Isolation and Structural Elucidation

The bioactivity guided purification of the crude extract obtained from the fermented whole broth yielded pure bioactive compounds 1 (hamigerone) and 2 (radicinol) (Figure 2). These compounds were characterized by spectroscopic data (UV, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and LC-MS). All the values were in complete accord with that of the reported values [11, 12, 22].

Hamigerone was previously isolated from the fungus Hamigera avellanea and exhibits in vitro growth inhibitory activity against phytopathogenic fungi [11].

Radicinol, the phytotoxic compound, was produced on carrot disks by Cochliobolus lunata IFO 6288 [12]. It was also produced by Bipolaris coicis, Alternaria radicina, and A. chrysanthemi [2224].

4.2. Antiproliferative Effect and In Vitro Protein Expression of Hamigerone and Radicinol

Hamigerone induced cytotoxicity in various cancer cell lines with an IC50 ranging from 1.9 μM to 4.3 μM. Similarly radicinol showed lesser efficacy as a poor inducer of cytotoxicity towards the cancer cell lines with an IC50 in the range of 10.50 μM–25 μM (Table 1). Both the compounds were not toxic to normal breast epithelial cell line (MCF10A), as there was no growth inhibition up to a concentration of 30 μM. These findings suggest that these compounds are specific towards the abnormally proliferating cells [25] wherein hamigerone showed better toxicity to cancer cells as compared to radicinol. Based on the potent antiproliferation activity of both hamigerone and radicinol in Panc-1 cells, these compounds were further profiled for p53, BCL-2, and caspase 3 activity using high content screening tool Cellomics VTI Array Scan.


Cell lineIC50 in M (±SD)
Hamigerone Radicinol Gemcitabine Flavopiridol

Panc-1 (pancreatic)1.9 ± 0.9210.50 ± 1.40.38 ± 0.04 0.62 ± 0.05
ACHN (renal)4.3 ± 0.7814.28 ± 1.80.78 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.11
Calu1 (lung)2.91 ± 1.112.60 ± 0.870.98 ± 0.11 0.79 ± 0.19
H460 (non-small cell lung)2.42 ± 0.6321.6 ± 3.21.23 ± 0.23 0.82 ± 0.09
HCT116 (colon)2.91 ± 0.8725 ± 2.91.15 ± 0.21 0.73 ± 0.08
MCF10A (normal breast epithelium)>30>30>10>10

IC50 values of hamigerone and radicinol in different cancer cells at 48 h. The cells were exposed to different concentrations at end of 48 h; cytotoxicity was measured using live cell dehydrogenase assay.

The p53 protein is known as a cellular gate-keeper. In general, in more than 70% of the tumors p53 status is either mutated or deleted. Activating p53 in cancer cells aids in driving the cancer cells into apoptosis. We have analyzed p53 protein expression in Panc-1 cells after 12 h of treatment with hamigerone and radicinol. The results showed 3.5-fold and 2.4- fold increased expression of p53 in Panc-1 cells (Figure 3), respectively. The quantitative expression level of this protein is represented as bar diagram.

It was also observed that hamigerone showed more significant induction of p53 (red color Ch2) when compared with radicinol. The significance of p53 in cell cycle arrest was also noted with Selaginella tamariscina extract in human ovarian cancer cell line A-2780 [26].

BCL-2 is an antiapoptotic protein. On treatment with hamigerone we noted 2.5-fold decreased expression of BCL-2 as compared with untreated control cells (Figure 4), while radicinol showed marginal reduction (1-fold). This data reveals that hamigerone was more potent than radicinol in reducing BCL-2 expression in Panc-1 cells. The bar diagram indicates the quantitative expression of BCL-2 protein levels. In another study resveratrol, a phytoalexin present in grapes and other food products, induces apoptosis in cancer cells by decreasing BCL-2 expression in HL-60 cells and gives rise to proteolytic cleavage of caspase substrate PARP [27] thereby causing apoptosis to the cancer cells.

Furthermore we evaluated the cleaved caspase 3 activity in the cells treated with these compounds. In Panc-1 cells cleaved caspase 3 levels were higher (3.9-fold and 2.1-fold) in cells treated with hamigerone and radicinol as compared to untreated cells, respectively (Figure 5). These findings suggest the cytotoxicity effect of hamigerone and radicinol in cancer cells could be via induction of caspase 3 activation. The quantitative expression level of this protein against untreated controls is represented as bar diagram.

Of all the proteins involved in the activation and execution of apoptosis, the caspase 3 stands out as being crucial for this process [28].

In this study we have identified that hamigerone and radicinol interact with multiple cancer targets whose implication in cancer drug discovery is well described previously. Based on our findings, these molecules can become a potential start-up point for developing new scaffold which can modulate potential cancer targets.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

We are thankful to the analytical discovery group at Piramal Enterprises Limited for recording spectral data.

References

  1. D. J. Newman and G. M. Cragg, “Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 461–477, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. C. Frisvad, U. Thrane, and O. Filtenborg, “Role and use of metabolites in fungal taxonomy,” in Chemical Fungal Taxonomy, J. C. Frisvad, P. D. Bridge, and D. K. Arora, Eds., pp. 289–319, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. A. L. Gunatilaka, “Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 509–526, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. G. Bernier, D. D. Lazarus, E. Clark et al., “A methionine aminopeptidase-2 inhibitor, PPI-2458, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10768–10773, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Wang, T. Wiltshire, Y. Wang et al., “ATM-dependent CHK2 activation induced by anticancer agent, irofulven,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 38, pp. 39584–39592, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. W. Chin, M. J. Balunas, H. B. Chai, and A. D. Kinghorn, “Drug discovery from natural sources,” AAPS Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. E239–E253, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. L. Harvey, “Natural products in drug discovery,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 13, no. 19-20, pp. 894–901, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. R. Eldridge, H. C. Vervoort, C. M. Lee et al., “High-throughput method for the production and analysis of large natural product libraries for drug discovery,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74, no. 16, pp. 3963–3971, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. K. Deshmukh, P. D. Mishra, A. Kulkarni-Almeida et al., “Anti-inflammatory and anticancer activity of ergoflavin isolated from an endophytic fungus,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 784–789, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. Giridharan, S. A. Verekar, A. Khanna, P. D. Mishra, and S. K. Deshmukh, “Anticancer activity of sclerotiorin, isolated from an endophytic fungus Cephalotheca faveolata Yaguchi, Nishim. & Udagawa,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 464–468, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Breinholt, A. Kjœr, C. E. Olsen, B. R. Rassing, and C. N. Rosendahl, “Hamigerone and dihydrohamigerone: two acetate-derived, antifungal metabolites from Hamigera avellanea,” Acta Chemica Scandinavica, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1241–1244, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Manabu and M. Shingo, “Radicinol, a new metabolite of Cochliobolus lunata, and absolute stereochemistry of radicinin,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 18, no. 37, pp. 3271–3272, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. J. Bold, P. M. Termuhlen, and D. J. McConkey, “Apoptosis, cancer and cancer therapy,” Surgical Oncology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 133–142, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. C. Shore and J. Viallet, “Modulating the bcl-2 family of apoptosis suppressors for potential therapeutic benefit in cancer,” The American Society of Hematology, vol. 1, pp. 226–230, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. H. Warcup, “The soil-plate method for isolation of fungi from soil,” Nature, vol. 166, no. 4211, pp. 117–118, 1950. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor, “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, Eds., pp. 315–322, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, pp. 2725–2729, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Low, L. Stancato, J. Lee, and J. J. Sutherland, “Prioritizing hits from phenotypic high-content screens,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  21. G. J. F. Ding, P. A. Fischer, R. C. Boltz et al., “Characterization and quantitation of NF-κB nuclear translocation induced by interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 44, pp. 28897–28905, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Nakajima, T. Ishida, Y. Otsuka, T. Hamasaki, and M. Ichinoe, “Phytotoxins and related metabolites produced by Bipolaris coicis, the pathogen of job's tears,” Phytochemistry, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Solfrizzo, C. Vitti, A. de Girolamo, A. Visconti, A. Logrieco, and F. P. Fanizzi, “Radicinols and radicinin phytotoxins produced by Alternaria radicina on carrots,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3655–3660, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Sheridan and A. Canning, “Novel radicinol derivatives from long-term cultures of Alternaria chrysanthemi,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1568–1569, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Yang, H. Hanwell, J. Zhang, R. Tsao, and K. A. Meckling, “Antiproliferative activity of pomiferin in normal (MCF-10A) and transformed (MCF-7) breast epithelial cells,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 24, pp. 13328–13336, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. I. Lee, A. Nishikawa, F. Furukawa, K. Kasahara, and S. Kim, “Effects of Selaginella tamariscina on in vitro tumor cell growth, p53 expression, G1 arrest and in vivo gastric cell proliferation,” Cancer Letters, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. J. Surh, Y. J. Hurh, J. Y. Kang, E. Lee, G. Kong, and S. J. Lee, “Resveratrol, an antioxidant present in red wine, induces apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. W. Nicholson and N. A. Thornberry, “Caspases: killer proteases,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 299–306, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Periyasamy Giridharan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1148 Views | 506 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.