Research Article
Identification and Analysis of Driver Missense Mutations Using Rotation Forest with Feature Selection
Table 3
Performance of predicting on three test datasets (TP53, EGFR, and Cosmic2plus).
| Method | Test set | Accuracy | Recall | Precision | F-measure | MCC |
| mRMR-RF | TP53 + neutral | 88.86 | 100 | 62.4 | 76.85 | 0.734 | EGFR + neutral | 86.68 | 100 | 15.88 | 27.41 | 0.3702 | Cosmic2plus + neutral | 85.3 | 81.04 | 59.26 | 68.46 | 0.6041 |
| DX-LibSVM | TP53 + neutral | 83.93 | 100 | 53.48 | 69.69 | 0.6553 | EGFR + neutral | 80.78 | 100 | 11.56 | 20.73 | 0.3047 | Cosmic2plus + neutral | 81.51 | 86.52 | 51.83 | 64.83 | 0.5655 |
| DX-SVMLight | TP53 + neutral | 88.31 | 100 | 61.25 | 75.97 | 0.7243 | EGFR + neutral | 86.02 | 100 | 15.23 | 26.44 | 0.3612 | Cosmic2plus + neutral | 85.42 | 84.46 | 59.08 | 69.53 | 0.6199 |
| DX-RF | TP53 + neutral | 89.28 | 100 | 63.28 | 77.51 | 0.7414 | EGFR + neutral | 87.18 | 100 | 16.39 | 28.16 | 0.3772 | Cosmic2plus + neutral | 85.53 | 80.14 | 59.91 | 68.56 | 0.6048 |
|
|