Review Article

Prospect of Stem Cell Conditioned Medium in Regenerative Medicine

Table 3

Growth factor level from various cell sources, culture duration, cell number and processing of conditioned medium.

Reference numberCell sourceCulture/duration Cell number/processingGrowth factor level

[7]Hu-ESC-ECMonolayer —5 daysNA Angiogenic cytokine: VEGF, SDF-1, PlGF, leptin, EGF, bFGF, and HGF:
CM DM-PAC < CM cPAC
Angiogenic cytokine: VEGF, PDGF, ICAM-1, EGF, and bFGF: CM ESC-EC > CM c-PAC = CM D-PAC

[13](i) Hu-ESC-CD133/KDR-EPC
(ii) Hu-UCB-EPC
Monolayer—48 hours80% in 150 mm culture dish/Conc. 50xEGFESC-EPC versus CB-EPC versus EGM-2
12584 versus 12654 versus 9 pg/mL
FGF-2383 versus 652 versus 61
Fractalkine1605 versus 150 versus 133
GM-CSF755 versus 323 versus 313
IL-6 4332 versus 1961 versus 2463
IL-8 239030 versus 13629 versus 7
IL-9 345 versus 42 versus 9
IP-10 458 versus 513 versus 511
MCP-1 63 versus 3201 versus 1902
PDGF-AA6667 versus 5568 versus 41
PDGF-AB/BB17 versus 1884 versus 75
VEGF4265 versus 538 versus 42

[9]Hu-AF SC—Ckit (+)Monolayer—16 hours15 × 104—70%/from 5 × 105 cells Conc. 12.5xVEGF, IL-8, SDF-11 ng/170.000 cell (1 g DNA)
IL-6, MCP-10.5 ng/170.000 cell
TGF-b0.2 ng/170.000 cell
IFNg
IP-10 /CXCL10
IL-1a

[20](i) Hu-AF-MSC
(ii) Hu-AF-MSC-HPL
Monolayer—24 hours1.5 × 106
80%/
Conc. 25x
Proteome analysis
Hu-AF-MSC-HPL-CM:
Anti-inflammatory cytokine: IL-10, IL-27, IL-17E, IL-13, IL-12p70, and IL-1ra
Liver protection: MCP- 1, IL-1b
Hu-AF-MSC-HPL-CM, AF-MSC-CM:
Anti-inflammatory cytokine: TGFβ1
Tissue repair: serpin E1, SDF-1
Angiogenesis: VEGF, PDEGF, and endostatin/collagen XVIII
Liver regeneration: UPA, thrombospondin 1 and 2, HEGF, FGF-7, EGF, and HGF
Anti-apoptotic markers: TIMP-1, IGFBP

[8](i) Hu-PB-MNC-
EPC
(ii) HUVEC
Monolayer—72 hoursNAIL-8/CXCL8
Hypox versus norm
29090.7 ± 12279.4 pg/mL
versus 2282.1 ± 406.3 pg/mL
SDF-1/CXCL126059.9 ± 654.6 pg/mL
versus 3179.9 ± 488.0 pg/mL
HGF539.5 ± 141.7 pg/mL
versus 343.4 ± 74.8 pg/mL
Angiogenin144.6 ± 68.2 pg/mL
versus 72.5 ± 15.8 pg/mL
PDGF-BB111.6 ± 27.02 pg/mL
versus 19.9 ± 2.2 pg/mL
VEGF-A25.5 ± 4.8 pg/mL
versus 11.4 ± 5.2 pg/mL

[10]Hu-UCB SC (endothelial + MSC)Monolayer—48 hours80%/Conc. 50xEGF3,286 ± 419 pg/mL
VEGF2,463 ± 151 pg/mL
G-CSF3,615 ± 173 pg/mL
GM-CSF3,623 ± 345 pg/mL
TGF-β1, PDGF,
bFGF, and KGF
=HUVEC
HUVEC Monolayer—48 hours80%/Conc. 50xEGFUCB-SC-4.8X
VEGFUCB-SC-42x
G-CSFUCB-SC-3.7x
GM-CSFUCB-SC-2.4x

[22] Hu-BM-MSCMonolayer—24 hours2 × 106/Conc. 25x 69 from 174 prot. tested (+)
(concentration NA)

[27]Hu-BM-MSCMonolayer—24 hours4 × 106/Conc. 25xVEGF

HGF
Normoxia: 230 pg/mL
Hypoxia: 450 pg/mL
Normoxia: 600 pg/mL
Hypoxia: 750 pg/mL

[17]Hu-BM-MNC-stro-3-MPCNA1 × 106/Conc.IL-6 = 2x C118.04 ± 0.27 pg/mL
MCP-1 = 2x C521.89 ± 1.48 pg/mL
VEGF = 2x C33.95 ± 2.98 pg/mL

[25](i) Hu-BM-MSC
(ii) Hu-BM-CD133
(iii) Hu-BM-p75
Monolayer—48 hours1 × 106
90%/
Conc. 40x
Secretion/cell P75 versus CD133 versus BMMSC
IL6—norm3.8 versus 0.8 versus 0.6 fg
IL6—hypox0.25 = 0.25 versus 0.1 fg
PlGF—norm0.045 versus 0.01 versus 0 fg
PlGF—hypox0.043 versus 0.025 versus 0.15 fg
ADM—norm0.1 versus 0.05 versus 0.2 fg
ADM—hypox5.8 versus 5.4 versus 11.5 fg
VEGF—norm1.5 versus 1.0 versus 1.35 fg
VEGF—hypox0.7 versus 0.9 versus 0.95 fg
SDF-1—norm1.35 versus 0.75 versus 0.15 fg
SDF-1—hypox0.4 versus 0.7 versus 1.0 fg
HGF—norm0.84 versus 0.7 versus 0.25 fg
HGF—hypox0.01 versus 0.25 versus 0.01 fg
DKK-I—norm4 versus 4 versus 4.5 fg
DKK-1—hypox6.8 versus 6.5 versus 10.5 fg

[28]Rat-BM-MSCMonolayer—48 hours90%
T75/Conc. 40x
23 from 90 prot. tested (+)
NGF356 ± 117 pg/mL
BDNF208 ± 57 pg/mL
IL-6427± 168 pg/mL

[24]Hu-AD-MSCSpheroid—2 days4.2 × 107/Centr. CM versus αMEM:hTGF-b114.33 ± 6.71 versus 2.49 ± 2.39 pg/mL
hVEGF1,015.17 ± 170.97 pg/mL versus ND
hPDGF-AABoth ND

[6]Hu-AD-SC
In MEM—FBS
Spheroid—2 days105/Centr. VEGF14.4 ± 0.4 ng/mL
FGF213.2 ± 2.2 ng/mL
HGF13.3 ± 2.3 ng/mL
CXCL1216.6 ± 2.9 ng/mL
In CRM-hu alloNo diff >< MEM-FBS
In CRM-serum (−)GF <
In αMEM—FBS Monolayer—2 days 105/Centr. GF<<<
In CRM-hu allo GF<<<

[5]Hu-AD-SCMonolayer—
72 hours
4 × 105/Conc. Spot density array hypox versus nomoxia
GCSF14.07 ± 3.84 versus 10.13 ± 4.21
GM-CSF13.53 ± 1.26 versus 10.21 ± 1.44
IGFBP-19.48 ± 0.44 versus 5.56 ± 0.44
IGFBP-28.91 ± 0.02 versus 6.73 ± 0.31
IGF-II10.62 ± 0.85 versus 4.61 ± 0.93
M-CSF14.06 ± 0.13 versus 7.46 ± 1.69
M-CSF R9.09 ± 0.20 versus 3.31 ± 1.75
PDGF Rβ17.67 ± 1.32 versus 11.47 ± 1.40
PDGF-AA16.63 ± 1.33 versus 12.14 ± 2.12
VEGF13.47 ± 1.26 versus 5.59 ± 1.22
EGF11.06 ± 2.45 versus 34.14 ± 6.75

[36](i) AD-SC
(ii) Hu dermal fibroblast
NANAAD-SC
VEGF810.65 ± 56.92 pg/g DNA
IGF-I328.33 ± 22.7 pg/g DNA
Hu dermal fibroblast
VEGF28.4 ± 2.25 pg/g DNA
IGFIUndetectable

[33]Hu-MSC (Lonza)Monolayer—48 hours70%/(—)IGF-11515.6 ± 211.8 pg/mL
VEGF465.8 ± 108.8 pg/mL
TGF-b1339.8 ± 14.4 pg/mL
HGF20.3 ± 7.9 pg/mL,
FGF-2, PDGFBB, BMP-2, and SDF-1 (—)

CRM: clinically relevant med, hu allo: human allogenic serum, MP: microparticle, ND: not detected, SDF-1: stromal derived factor-1, PlGF: placental GF, bFGF: basic FGF, HGF: hepatocyte GF, PAC: peripheral blood angiogenic cells (from PB MN cells-floating), cPAC: healthy control PAC, ESC-EC: ESC derived endothelial cell, MCP-1: monocyte chemotactic protein-1, PDEGF: platelet derived endothelial cell GF, UPA: urokinase plasminogen activator, HEGF: heparin binding epidermal GF, TIMP-1: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, IGFBP: insulin-like GF binding protein, IP-10: interferon inducible protein-1, ADM: adrenomedullin, DKK-1: Dickkopf-1, norm: normoxic, hypox = hypoxic, fg = fentogram.