Review Article

Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis: Reexamining the Paradigm

Table 2

Summary of studies evaluating colloids.

AuthorYearStudy designSample sizeStudy fluidPrimary endpointComments

Schierhout and Roberts [55]1998Meta-analysis1315All colloidsMortalityIncreased mortality

Laxenaire et al. [56]1994Multicentre prospective19593All colloidsAdverse effectsGelatins and dextrans-independent risk for anaphylactoid reactions

Myburgh et al. [61]2012RCTa7000HESb versus 0.9% saline90-day mortalityHESb associated with increased incidence of RRT

Perner et al. [62]2012RCTa804HESb versus Ringer’s acetateDeath/dialysis dependence at 90 daysDeath and dialysis dependence more in HES

Zarychanski et al. [63]2013Meta-analysis10,290HESbMortality and AKIcSignificant increase in risk of mortality and AKIc

Guidet et al. [64]2012RCTa196HESb versus 0.9% salineHemodynamic efficacy and safetyHESb better hemodynamic efficacy and no difference in AKIc

Finfer et al. [67]2004RCTa6997Albumin versus 0.9% saline28-day mortalityNo difference

Myburgh et al. [72]2007Post hoc analysis of SAFE trial460Albumin versus 0.9% salineSafety in TBIdAlbumin unsafe for TBId

Delaney et al. [68]2011Meta-analysis1977AlbuminSafety for resuscitationAlbumin associated with lower mortality

Annane et al. [69]2013RCTa2857Colloids versus crystalloids 28-day mortalityNo difference

Table summarizing studies evaluating colloids. aRandomized Controlled Trial, bHydroxyethyl starch, cAcute Kidney Injury, dTraumatic Brain Injury.